Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Nails on July 26, 2011, 05:18:17 PM

Title: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: Nails on July 26, 2011, 05:18:17 PM
(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/Mr_Olympia/2005/Mr.O_2005_387.jpg)
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: The_Iron_Disciple on July 26, 2011, 05:25:52 PM
I'm sorry ... hahahahahahahah ... it's just ..... hahahahahah ... one of the gayest pics I've ever seen ! I'm laughin' and feelin' uncomfortable at the same time. :/ :D


Between this pic and Ronnie givin' Jay a piggyback ride ... man, I just don't know anymore ... WTF, Ronnie ?????
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: supernick on July 26, 2011, 06:17:11 PM
nothing on jay is small..... or at least from what i can see
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: Iceman1981 on July 26, 2011, 06:22:09 PM
Next to Ronnie anyone would look small even though Jay is huge.
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: jude2 on July 26, 2011, 06:32:19 PM
Did you see the size of his legs in that 2009 most muscular shot that destroyed everyone that year.
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: Hulkotron on July 26, 2011, 06:35:37 PM
He has upped the dosage since then.
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: 20inch calves on July 26, 2011, 09:20:27 PM
bad angle. ronnie is also a freak. but jays legs have never been small
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: Nirvana on July 26, 2011, 09:26:59 PM
it's Ronnie's fault
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: BIG ACH on July 26, 2011, 10:03:34 PM

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-7bWbCxX-3IY/TZl9UyKInMI/AAAAAAAAAJs/12v8W4x005E/s1600/Jay+Cutler+Mr+Olympia+2009+-+www.musclebase.blogspot.com.JPG)
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: jude2 on July 26, 2011, 10:07:59 PM
Thats the shot I was talking about.
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: TRIX on July 26, 2011, 10:15:15 PM
ronnies legs were just bigger, that video of coleman in korea a few weeks after the olympia at 305 lbs measured his quads (middle) at 33 inches (shredded) probably 35 inches if they measured up closer to the glutes
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: Figo on July 27, 2011, 04:17:48 AM
thats flipin huge, 33-35 inches

how did/do branch, platz, mustafa, de mayo stack up against that? anyone know what they measured
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: The Grim Lifter on July 27, 2011, 04:26:14 AM
Quote from: Nails on July 26, 2011, 05:18:17 PM
(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/Mr_Olympia/2005/Mr.O_2005_387.jpg)

Maybe Ronnie's trying to give him a hard on so all the blood rushes out of his legs
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: Big Worm on July 27, 2011, 08:32:44 AM
Quote from: supernick on July 26, 2011, 06:17:11 PM
nothing on jay is small..... or at least from what i can see
Settle down,Homo..
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: MORTALCOIL on July 27, 2011, 08:38:58 AM
Quote from: Nails on July 26, 2011, 05:18:17 PM
(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/Mr_Olympia/2005/Mr.O_2005_387.jpg)

Pregnancy really doesn't look good on men.
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: Griffith on July 27, 2011, 12:03:34 PM
The shape of his quads is mainly down to genetics, especially the outer sweep.
Title: Re: Are Jay Cutlers Legs really that small? or is a bad Angle ?
Post by: Dreadlifter on July 27, 2011, 02:37:32 PM
Jay has one small leg, and one big leg.

That is all.