Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Deicide on August 13, 2011, 06:23:15 PM
-
-
Fuck these jerk offs. Nothing is going to ruin my day today. I heading out for a few beers with like minded RP freaks. Night.
-
Unreal that at the end some picked Rick Perry when asked who won last night. WTF...the guy wasn't even there. Ron Paul will never get a fair shake. If he had even 70% backing by the media he would be president. I am starting to believe Fox news doesn't want Obama to lose so they can go on and keep their fan base of Obama/Lib haters. You watch if Ron Paul doesn't win the Primary we are stuck with Obama again. It sucks that Fox was all over Ron Pauls dick when it fit their agenda but now he is touted as "Crazy" Ron... ::)
-
Because he says things that's off the wall plus he's a crazy CTer.
-
Because he says things that's off the wall plus he's a crazy CTer.
Uh..no. He says things that other people are scared to say for fear of political suicide. As for the CT thing, I don't recall him being one. What has he claimed?
-
Because he says things that's off the wall plus he's a crazy CTer.
He backs no conspiracy theories that I'm aware of.
Could you list some of the off the wall things he says please?
-
I hate fox news, but love Andrea Tantaros.
-
I hate fox news, but love Andrea Tantaros.
She's very pretty.
-
She's very pretty.
I'm a perv and did a search on her :D
-
Ske is an ass kicker. I like that other skinny greek broad as well they have for financial stuff.
-
Unreal that at the end some picked Rick Perry when asked who won last night. WTF...the guy wasn't even there. Ron Paul will never get a fair shake. If he had even 70% backing by the media he would be president. I am starting to believe Fox news doesn't want Obama to lose so they can go on and keep their fan base of Obama/Lib haters. You watch if Ron Paul doesn't win the Primary we are stuck with Obama again. It sucks that Fox was all over Ron Pauls dick when it fit their agenda but now he is touted as "Crazy" Ron... ::)
That is because FOX news is really controlled by the same zionist interests.
When are Americans going to wake up? Are you really all that stupid?
-
I'm a perv and did a search on her :D
lol :)
-
lol
Poltico changes title story. Original headline reads, Michele Bachmann wins Ames Straw Paul, Tim Pawlenty gets third.
original headline
No mention of RP.
New title just reads Michele Bachmann wins Ames Straw Paul.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/61317.html
"We are in the business of kicking candidates out of the race."
"He is unelectable."
"The MEDIA believes that Ron Paul has a hoot in hells chance of winning...so we are going to IGNORE him."
"Rick Santorum broke the golden rule of the Republican debate and that is pretending that Ron Paul is invisable."
-
What a douche.
-
Fuck these jerk offs. Nothing is going to ruin my day today. I heading out for a few beers with like minded RP freaks. Night.
Have fun and be sure to take some Pics for the XXX board.
-
Shouldn`t Fox News and all of those Websites have the right to permanently ban Ron Paul or limit him as they see fit given that they are part of the Free Market? ???
Why do you want to force these news outlets to perform outside of the Free Market? ???
-
Shouldn`t Free Market News Outlets have the right to not include Ron Paul if they don`t feel like it?
Why would they have to bend their Free Market stance?
-
Shouldn`t Fox News and all of those Websites have the right to permanently ban Ron Paul or limit him as they see fit given that they are part of the Free Market? ???
Why do you want to force these news outlets to perform outside of the Free Market? ???
Should a news agency that characterises itself as being factual just pull some shit outta their ass and not get called on it?
-
What your suggesting is something as stupid as saying , shouldnt a company that sells lawnmowers be allowed to sell them without a blade in the free market?
I guess they could but then it wouldnt be much of a lawnmower would it?
-
RP is a kook
but he sort of seems more sane than Bachmann, Perry, etc...
he is still a nut
-
Should a news agency that characterises itself as factual just pull some shit outta their ass and not get called on it?
That happens to Fox News all the time and it does not seem to hurt their viewership any.
They don`t owe Ron Paul anything and can silence him any day they choose, same as all of the other networks. Why bitch about it when its just the Free Market at work, nothing else.
If Fox News or any of the rest makes more revenue directly or indirectly by not including Ron Paul, why should that be stopped? You surely don`t want to limit a private corporation from making more money do you?
-
What your suggesting is something as stupid as saying , shouldnt a company that sells lawnmowers be allowed to sell them without a blade in the free market?
I guess they could but then it wouldnt be much of a lawnmower would it?
Sure it would, blades are only about 15 dollars and you get to choose which kind you want, mulching or for short clipping or for weeds, each has a different blade for a different purpose. You don`t have to buy a lawn mower with the blade at all if you plan on changing it or installing a specific type.
I don`t understand the analogy at all.
-
They don`t owe Ron Paul anything and can silence him any day they choose, same as all of the other networks? Why bitch about it when its just the Free Market at work, nothing else.
What a ridiculous comment.
I always said, if they want to ignore him they can and they do, but that doesnt mean I have to be quiet about it.
Are you saying I dont have a right to bring to light their tactics?
-
What your suggesting is something as stupid as saying , shouldnt a company that sells lawnmowers be allowed to sell them without a blade in the free market?
I guess they could but then it wouldnt be much of a lawnmower would it?
If you owned a News Corporation and one of your sponsors, a large one, threatened to pull out because they don`t like Ron Paul`s message, why would you continue to pay it any lip service? Or if your viewership complained about Ron Paul or if you knew that the base viewership was not favorable to Ron Paul over other candidates to the point of losing ratings, why would you continue to include him if all you are doing is losing revenue?
Certainly you are not against censoring Ron Paul, disobeying Free Market principles. Why would you want to take away their right to control their profits?
-
What a ridiculous comment.
I always said, if they want to ignore him they can and they do, but that doesnt mean I have to be quiet about it.
Are you saying I dont have a right to bring to light their tactics?
Yell all you want, but don`t be a crybaby when they boot him off the air for whatever reason they feel like doing so. They can not include him in any polls and give him zero air time if they choose. Why cry about it? They want to maximize profits, electing Ron Paul is not their goal.
-
I don`t see anyone mad that they are ignoring Thaddeus McCotter. You do know he is running for President on the Republican side as well.
-
If you owned a News Corporation and one of your sponsors, a large one, threatened to pull out because they don`t like Ron Paul`s message, why would you continue to pay it any lip service? Or if your viewership complained about Ron Paul or if you knew that the base viewership was not favorable to Ron Paul over other candidates to the point of losing ratings, why would you continue to include him if all you are doing is losing revenue?
Certainly you are not against censoring Ron Paul, disobeying Free Market principles. Why would you want to take away their right to control their profits?
Then I wouldnt be much of a news agency would I? At least not one that is supposed to do what a real news agency does, which is report facts.
-
Then I wouldnt be much of a news agency would I? At least not one that is supposed to do what a real news agency does, which is report facts.
Do you think Fox News cares about the Facts first and foremost? Their goal are high ratings, and high ratings they do get. Why would they change their business model since it seems to work so well?
They are the highest rated news station and intend to stay that way and don`t need any nonsense from Ron Paul. If I were them I would embrace the Free Market and kick him off and take out a restraining order against him and give my audience what they want. 24 hours of Palin, Bachmann and Perry mixed Sean Hannity`s political insight. Their audience loves them. Hopefully they get rid of Ron Paul soon as he is a bane to Fox News as far as the Free Market is concerned.
-
Yell all you want, but don`t be a crybaby when they boot him off the air for whatever reason they feel like doing so. They can not include him in any polls and give him zero air time if they choose. Why cry about it? They want to maximize profits, electing Ron Paul is not their goal.
Why expose whats happening? Gee Adam, I don't know why anyone would expose something they know is not right? Why wouldn't people just accept total bullshit as fact?
If you wanna play games could you at least try a little harder? ::)
-
Why expose whats happening? Gee Adam, I don't know why anyone would expose something they know is not right? Why wouldn't people just accept total bullshit as fact?
If you wanna play games could you at least try a little harder? ::)
Who is stopping you from "exposing" anything? Nobody. Why do you think it is not right? Fox News and the other Corporations number one goal is to make money via The Free Market. How is it not right then for them to ignore Ron Paul if they are just following what they are intended (make the most money they can and attain and retain the highest viewership) to do in the Free Market?
Surely you don`t want to deny them their right to control their profits any way they see fit, even if that means never mentioning Ron Paul even if he did win an online poll or two. Its their poll, they don`t have to use it if they don`t like the results.
-
Do you think Fox News cares about the Facts first and foremost? Their goal are high ratings, and high ratings they do get. Why would they change their business model since it seems to work so well?
They are the highest rated news station and intend to stay that way and don`t need any nonsense from Ron Paul. If I were them I would embrace the Free Market and kick him off and take out a restraining order against him and give my audience what they want. 24 hours of Palin, Bachmann and Perry mixed Sean Hannity`s political insight. Their audience loves them. Hopefully they get rid of Ron Paul soon as he is a bane to Fox News as far as the Free Market is concerned.
Im not out on a campaign to make them change their tactics. Im just spreading information on what they are doing. However, if they are going to claim to be a news agency then they should report the news and do it factually, that woman on CNN didn't do that.
Only a moron would understand what I said as an attack on the free market.
-
Im not out on a campaign to make them change their tactics, Im just spreading information on what they are doing. If they are going to claim to be a news agency then they should report the news and do it factually, that woman on CNN didn't do that.
Only a moron would understand what I said as an attack on the free market.
They can report anything they want even if its factually incorrect. If its not hurting their revenue why should they care? Fox News probably should begin closing up shop on Ron Paul if its going to hurt their profits in any way and so should the other networks. The Free Market will weed him out if he is creating any type of loss for them, be it sponsors, viewership or if they just don`t feel like hearing his voice any longer.
I just don`t get why this would make any supporter of the Free Market angry. Profit comes first you know.
-
They can report anything they want even if its factually incorrect. If its not hurting their revenue why should they care? Fox News probably should begin closing up shop on Ron Paul if its going to hurt their profits in any way and so should the other networks. The Free Market will weed him out if he is creating any type of loss for them, be it sponsors, viewership or if they just don`t feel like hearing his voice any longer.
I just don`t get why this would make any supporter of the Free Market angry. Profit comes first you know.
Only a moron would understand what I said as an attack on the free market.
-
Only a moron would understand what I said as an attack on the free market.
So you and Deicide and the rest of the Free Market Paultards stop whining and accept the cold hand of the Free Market when it decides to slam the door on Ron Paul.
So what if they marginalize him or ignore him. They are just doing what is in their own best and self interest. Don`t come whining on here about it if you don`t like it.
-
So you and Deicide and the rest of the Free Market Paultards stop whining and accept the cold hand of the Free Market when it decides to slam the door on Ron Paul.
So what if they marginalize him or ignore him. They are just doing what is in their own best and self interest. Don`t come whining on here about it if you don`t like it.
Lol, are you high?
-
Lol, are you high?
Don`t worry, the Free Market Fox News and others will put an end to Paul and work itself out as it always does.
-
Don`t worry, the Free Market Fox News and others will put an end to Paul and work itself out as it always does.
Yup, I'm guessing meth.
-
Yup, I'm guessing meth.
Ron Paul is on meth? ???