Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Deicide on August 16, 2011, 06:22:06 AM
-
Paul
-
Why can`t the Free Market censor and kick out Ron Paul if he is a detriment to their profits? Hell, they are a private business entity they don`t even need a reason to ban him permanently. Why do you want to change this? ???
Leave the Free Market alone! I hope they get rid of him today.
-
ARE YOU GUYS STILL GOING TO DENY HE IS BEING IGNORED ON PURPOSE!!???
It couldnt be any more obvious.
Skip? Beach?
-
ARE YOU GUYS STILL GOING TO DENY HE IS BEING IGNORED ON PURPOSE!!???
It couldnt be any more obvious.
Skip? Beach?
Who cares. The Free Market News stations don`t need a reason to ignore him. If he is bad for business and profit or if they just don`t like his suits, it doesn`t matter. Why do you Paultards keep bringing this up? Who cares if the Free Market is weeding him out?
-
Paul
The main issue with Ron Paul is that he disagrees with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As a result, the media is going to shun him and GOP doesn't want to have anything to do with him.
-
LOL @ Anyone who denies there is a concerted effort to ignore him!
-
ROFLMAO I love it.
Free Market Media at its finest. I have no idea why this would anger any Ron Paul supporters, they don`t owe him anything. Why should they lose revenue and profits because of Poop Paul?
-
No I want Bernie Sanders for President or Dennis Kucinich actually or Mike Gravel. I hope this helps.
Dennis Kucinich on Ron Paul
This is old news you know. Personally I think Ron Paul is the best of the Republican Party. Too bad there are zero others in his party like him. All of your favorites, Bachmann, Palin and such are the complete opposites.
How do you process that in your brain and reconcile that? Ron Paul and Palin/Bachmann are polar opposites. You can`t be for Paul and then be for Bachmann or Palin or anyone else in the Republican Party. It just doesn`t work and it means you really have no firm principles.
-
Dennis Kucinich on Ron Paul
This is old news you know. Personally I think Ron Paul is the best of the Republican Party. Too bad there are zero others in his party like him. All of your favorites, Bachmann, Palin and such are the complete opposites.
How do you process that in your brain and reconcile that? Ron Paul and Palin/Bachmann are polar opposites. You can`t be for Paul and then be for Bachmann or Palin or anyone else in the Republican Party. It just doesn`t work and it means you really have no firm principles.
Prepare for the Wrath of the Free Market Media. Its time Ron Paul stopped driving profits down.
-
Did Ron Paul's presidential bid just get a big boost from Jon Stewart?
Libertarian Ron Paul narrowly lost the Iowa straw poll to Michele Bachmann, yet has been cut out of media postmortems on the GOP's top tier. Does he deserve more coverage? Jon Stewart thinks so.
When did Ron Paul become the GOP presidential candidate-who-must-not-be-named?
"Daily Show" host Jon Stewart asked that question on his show Monday night and in doing so he sparked a discussion among the media hordes that has produced more than a few mea culpas and could perhaps – perhaps – lead to more coverage of the libertarian Texas congressmen in the future.
In particular, Mr. Stewart took aim at the fact that Mr. Paul narrowly lost the Ames, Iowa, straw poll to Michele Bachmann yet was almost entirely left out of the journalistic political postmortem.
cont... http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Vox-News/2011/0816/Did-Ron-Paul-s-presidential-bid-just-get-a-big-boost-from-Jon-Stewart
-
Free Market will take care of Ron Paul just like it always does.
-
The main issue with Ron Paul is that he disagrees with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As a result, the media is going to shun him and GOP doesn't want to have anything to do with him.
Have you actually read what Ron Paul said about the issue?
-
Have you actually read what Ron Paul said about the issue?
I did and it was the most asinine convoluted nonsense someone could make up. He probably would tear down the Lincoln Memorial if given the opportunity.
-
Props to Stewart for calling these scumbags out.
-
Free Market will take care of Ron Paul just like it always does.
TA, we already have someone here who spams the board with dozens of identical posts. We don't need a second person sounding like a broken record. We heard you the 10 times you said this exact same thing over the last 36 hours. Stop the mass duplicate posts or at least add something that can be commented on if you insist on saying this over and over.
-
TA, we already have someone here who spams the board with dozens of identical posts. We don't need a second person sounding like a broken record. We heard you the 10 times you said this exact same thing over the last 36 hours. Stop the mass duplicate posts or at least add something that can be commented on if you insist on saying this over and over.
Damn straight. One BlackenWhorkCohibaNeuroT oxinProNitrousetcetcetc is enough.
-
TA, we already have someone here who spams the board with dozens of identical posts. We don't need a second person sounding like a broken record. We heard you the 10 times you said this exact same thing over the last 36 hours. Stop the mass duplicate posts or at least add something that can be commented on if you insist on saying this over and over.
I take it you are not a fan of the Free Market Media then. I have yet to make a duplicate post so I don`t have any clue as to what you are referring to.
Whats ironic is that here you are bitching about Poop Paul being censored (even though he should be as Fox News owes him nothing because they are a Private Company) and yet you want to do the same. Oh brother.
-
I take it you are not a fan of the Free Market Media then. I have yet to make a duplicate post so I don`t have any clue as to what you are referring to.
Whats ironic is that here you are bitching about Poop Paul being censored (even though he should be as Fox News owes him nothing because they are a Private Company) and yet you want to do the same. Oh brother.
I'm not a fan of spamming the board. You've said this same thing over and over in a short time. Not word for word, but still the same thing. stop. If it's that important to you, start a fucking thread about it, don't just stalk every ron paul thread with the same freaking comment. We've all seen it already. You think the media has the right to shut out Ron Paul, we got it!
-
I'm not a fan of spamming the board. You've said this same thing over and over in a short time. Not word for word, but still the same thing. stop. If it's that important to you, start a fucking thread about it, don't just stalk every ron paul thread with the same freaking comment. We've all seen it already. You think the media has the right to shut out Ron Paul, we got it!
You don`t think the Free Market media should be allowed to control the direction of their company by excluding Ron Poop?
-
Do you agree with the government imposing quotas?
-
You don`t think the Free Market media should be allowed to control the direction of their company by excluding Ron Poop?
we also already have someone who ignores the posts they are replying to.
-
we also already have someone who ignores the posts they are replying to.
::)
;D
-
Do you agree with the government imposing quotas?
Such as?
-
ARE YOU GUYS STILL GOING TO DENY HE IS BEING IGNORED ON PURPOSE!!???
It couldnt be any more obvious.
Skip? Beach?
I don't believe I made the claim that he's not ignored a lot by the media. If I did and don't remember, I offer a full retraction - my bad.
But, if you're referring to loco's thread, GMAFB.
You and the other Paul supporters were crying because he wasn't named in an article about politicians who lied and strained the truth.
What the fuck kind of reasonably minded normal person would complain about their candidate NOT being named as a liar and claiming CT on top of it? :P
-
ARE YOU GUYS STILL GOING TO DENY HE IS BEING IGNORED ON PURPOSE!!???
It couldnt be any more obvious.
Skip? Beach?
No question they were ignoring him. I don't think they should have ignored him based on his finish in the Iowa poll.
Maybe the reason they were ignoring him is he's not going to win. Try and look at the numbers objectively. Take this site (pollingreport.com). http://www.pollingreport.com/wh12rep.htm None of these polls show Ron Paul as a likely winner. He has respectable poll numbers, but not poll numbers showing he will win the nomination.
Also, look at the results of the 2008 primary:
McCain: 697,767 votes
Huck: 518,002 votes
Paul: 66,360
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#val=TX
How do you think he can win the nomination if he's unable to carry his home state?
-
I don't believe I made the claim that he's not ignored a lot by the media. If I did and don't remember, I offer a full retraction - my bad.
But, if you're referring to loco's thread, GMAFB.
You and the other Paul supporters were crying because he wasn't named in an article about politicians who lied and strained the truth.
What the fuck kind of reasonably minded normal person would complain about their candidate NOT being named as a liar and claiming CT on top of it? :P
I don`t know what they expect from all their complaining, to force a business to act against their own self interests or to demand that they change their business model potentially losing profits, viewership in the process by including Ron Poop in every single news story?
Why don`t Poop Paulers just create a TV station or buy Air Time for a year on Dish Network. It can be a 24 hour Propaganda Network circle jerk devoted to twisting themselves into Pretzels in order to defend some of Ron Poops most nuttiest and shittiest ideas. They can even have a ticker at the bottom that scrolls nothing but the words FREEDOM,CONSTITUTION, LIBERTY, FREE MARKET in lieu of anything educational.
-
I don't believe I made the claim that he's not ignored a lot by the media. If I did and don't remember, I offer a full retraction - my bad.
But, if you're referring to loco's thread, GMAFB.
You and the other Paul supporters were crying because he wasn't named in an article about politicians who lied and strained the truth.
What the fuck kind of reasonably minded normal person would complain about their candidate NOT being named as a liar and claiming CT on top of it? :P
If you look at that thread I admitted you were right there. Lol
-
Racial quotas, affirmative action (even religious tests in some state constitutions).
-
I don`t know what they expect from all their complaining, to force a business to act against their own self interests or to demand that they change their business model potentially losing profits, viewership in the process by including Ron Poop in every single news story?
Why don`t Poop Paulers just create a TV station or buy Air Time for a year on Dish Network. It can be a 24 hour Propaganda Network circle jerk devoted to twisting themselves into Pretzels in order to defend some of Ron Poops most nuttiest and shittiest ideas. They can even have a ticker at the bottom that scrolls nothing but the words FREEDOM,CONSTITUTION, LIBERTY, FREE MARKET in lieu of anything educational.
I am starting to enjoy how much thus irritates you. Hahaha
-
Have you actually read what Ron Paul said about the issue?
Doesn't matter, disagreeing with the Civil Rights Act is pretty much a presidential killer. If Ron won the nomination, they would brand him as a racist in the very first ad.
-
Racial quotas, affirmative action (even religious tests in some state constitutions).
Can you show me where those things are in the Civil Rights Act?
-
I don't believe I made the claim that he's not ignored a lot by the media. If I did and don't remember, I offer a full retraction - my bad.
But, if you're referring to loco's thread, GMAFB.
You and the other Paul supporters were crying because he wasn't named in an article about politicians who lied and strained the truth.
What the fuck kind of reasonably minded normal person would complain about their candidate NOT being named as a liar and claiming CT on top of it? :P
Why not mention the ones who did not lie?
-
I don`t know what they expect from all their complaining, to force a business to act against their own self interests or to demand that they change their business model potentially losing profits, viewership in the process by including Ron Poop in every single news story?
Why don`t Poop Paulers just create a TV station or buy Air Time for a year on Dish Network. It can be a 24 hour Propaganda Network circle jerk devoted to twisting themselves into Pretzels in order to defend some of Ron Poops most nuttiest and shittiest ideas. They can even have a ticker at the bottom that scrolls nothing but the words FREEDOM,CONSTITUTION, LIBERTY, FREE MARKET in lieu of anything educational.
I'm beginning to think that you're obsessed with Ron Paul.
-
[VIDEO] Cafferty calling out the MSM for the *Blatant* Ron Paul Media Blackout Recently
at=42[/youtube]
-
[VIDEO] Cafferty calling out the MSM for the *Blatant* Ron Paul Media Blackout Recently
at=42[/youtube]
Who cares if it is blatant. They have every right to exert their Free Market principles. What is the goal in posting this?
-
Who cares if it is blatant. They have every right to exert their Free Market principles. What is the goal in posting this?
Too drive you nuts and it seems to be working. ;D
-
Too drive you nuts and it seems to be working. ;D
It doesn`t bother me whatsoever. I can do this all day.
-
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/news-media-treating-ron-paul-presidential-campaign-unfairly-190149609.html
Is Ron Paul the victim of a media blackout?
The Republican congressman and 2012 presidential candidate was shut out of the Sunday public affairs shows this past weekend despite his neck-and-neck second place finish to tea party favorite Michele Bachmann in Saturday's Ames, Iowa straw poll. He was likewise excluded from most of the second-day newspaper headlines about the preliminary political contest, leaving some news watchers to question whether Paul is receiving unfair treatment from the mainstream press.
"Ron Paul just got shafted," Politico's Roger Simon wrote on Monday. "Why didn't Paul get the same credit for his organizational abilities as Bachmann did for hers?"
"This pretending Ron Paul doesn't exist for some reason has been going on for weeks," said "Daily Show" host Jon Stewart in a segment Monday night that skewered coverage of the libertarian-leaning candidate. "How did Ron Paul become the thirteenth floor in a hotel? ... Even when the media does remember Ron Paul, it's only to reassure themselves that there's no need to remember Ron Paul."
-
Its for a good reason - to protect obama on foreign policy. The more rp gets attention the more it shines the light on the lies obama told, tells, and will always tell on the wars, one of his most vulnerable areas.
Think people - think. Its all about protecting obama at all costs.
-
Its for a good reason - to protect obama on foreign policy. The more rp gets attention the more it shines the light on the lies obama told, tells, and will always tell on the wars, one of his most vulnerable areas.
Think people - think. Its all about protecting obama at all costs.
No. Its just that Ron Paul is bad for business. They don`t owe him anything so why cater to him?
-
No. Its just that Ron Paul is bad for business. They don`t owe him anything so why cater to him?
no RP has a lot of cred on the war issues and the more he gets attention, the more it points out obamas lies and the fact that he was right all along on many things. now I have a few issues with RP, but they pale in comparison to my general favorability towards him.
-
no RP has a lot of cred on the war issues and the more he gets attention, the more it points out obamas lies and the fact that he was right all along on many things. now I have a few issues with RP, but they pale in comparison to my general favorability towards him.
These are the same tired old Nostrums from 2004. Fox News is certainly not in the tank for Obama and they don`t want anything to do with Poop Paul. He does nothing for their business model. They should have taken a restraining order out on him months ago.
-
oh brother, what a bunch of bs. ::)
http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2011/08/17/bravo-rick-perry-for-bringing-the-fed-into-the-conversation/
Bravo, Rick Perry, for bringing the Fed into the conversation
August 17, 2011: 1:47 PM ET
In political campaigns, the subject of the Federal Reserve has long been left to the fringe candidates. Rick Perry may have chosen his words poorly, but at least he has the American public talking about the Fed's role.
-
oh brother, what a bunch of bs. ::)
http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2011/08/17/bravo-rick-perry-for-bringing-the-fed-into-the-conversation/
Bravo, Rick Perry, for bringing the Fed into the conversation
August 17, 2011: 1:47 PM ET
In political campaigns, the subject of the Federal Reserve has long been left to the fringe candidates. Rick Perry may have chosen his words poorly, but at least he has the American public talking about the Fed's role.
suck my d**k, CNN, you bitches.
RPaul has been talking about this for years.
-
STFU TA
Im not a RP guy anymore but seriously wish you could get banned from political.
-
Hey TA you fucktard listen to this even mentions your buddies sanders and kucinich. in first minute
-
Hey TA you fucktard listen to this even mentions your buddies sanders and kucinich. in first minute
And?
Buddy Roemer puts Ron Paul to shame.
-
STFU TA
Im not a RP guy anymore but seriously wish you could get banned from political.
Adam can ramble on all day long, his tactics are a complete turn off to everyone, he's his own worst enemy. Too bad, sometimes he has valid points but they are over shadowed by his immaturity.
-
Adam can ramble on all day long, his tactics are a complete turn off to everyone, he's his own worst enemy. Too bad, sometimes he has valid points but they are over shadowed by his immaturity.
Buddy Roemer> Ron Paul
Its too bad the Poopers have already latched on with their shit hooks to Ron. I think I could even vote for Buddy Roemer. He really shines when it comes to economics. I don`t think Ron Paul would fare too well against him.
-
give me a good 5 minute videi, not any longer. from Roemer on economics.
thx.
-
give me a good 5 minute videi, not any longer. from Roemer on economics.
thx.
-
He doesn't say anything that hasn't already been mentioned by Ron or others at some point.
-
-
He doesn't say anything that hasn't already been mentioned by Ron or others at some point.
Campaign Finance Reform.
-
1 video fuck face. :)
Bindare do you have anything on this Roemer dude?
-
Seriously,
After watching this video right here, I think I could vote for him over Obama.
-
Fuck you ... 39 minute video.
-
I'm watching this right now.
http://www.videobb.com/watch_video.php?v=eUTI82HdfSYL
sons of guns
-
Jon Stewart was right: Reporters are ignoring Ron Paul, analysis finds
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/reporters-ignoring-ron-paul-analysis-finds-210444969.html
charts and links in the link provided to lazy to do all the stuff for a proper post so click the linky if you want
-
Jon Stewart was right: Reporters are ignoring Ron Paul, analysis finds
.By Joe Pompeo | The Cutline – 7 hrs ago.. .
As we reported on Tuesday, the Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul has been getting limited coverage from the news media, despite his second-place finish in last weekend's Iowa straw poll. Now there's some actual data to back that perception up.
As our colleague Chris Moody points out, an analysis by the PEW Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism shows that Paul is one of the least covered candidates in the race. (See chart below)
(http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/ZxHdaBlcgO14K2sMZHZlYA--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTYzMA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/blogs/thecutline/Chart.jpg)
"From January 1-August 14, Paul has been a dominant newsmaker in only 27 campaign stories," according to the analysis. "That is less than one-quarter of the media attention generated by former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney (120 stories), who is the top newsmaker among Republican candidates. And he has received 25 percent as much coverage as Bachmann, the Minnesota Congresswoman."
And thats the problem, these "News agencies" call the people that work for them journalists but they are far from that.
-
Jon Stewart was right: Reporters are ignoring Ron Paul, analysis finds
.By Joe Pompeo | The Cutline – 7 hrs ago.. .
As we reported on Tuesday, the Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul has been getting limited coverage from the news media, despite his second-place finish in last weekend's Iowa straw poll. Now there's some actual data to back that perception up.
As our colleague Chris Moody points out, an analysis by the PEW Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism shows that Paul is one of the least covered candidates in the race. (See chart below)
(http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/ZxHdaBlcgO14K2sMZHZlYA--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTYzMA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/blogs/thecutline/Chart.jpg)
"From January 1-August 14, Paul has been a dominant newsmaker in only 27 campaign stories," according to the analysis. "That is less than one-quarter of the media attention generated by former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney (120 stories), who is the top newsmaker among Republican candidates. And he has received 25 percent as much coverage as Bachmann, the Minnesota Congresswoman."
And thats the problem, these "News agencies" call the people that work for them journalists but they are far from that.
Do you know who is NOT ignoring Ron Paul? PBS, NPR. Do you know who wanted to get rid of PBS, NPR?