Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Sherief Shalaby on August 21, 2011, 06:01:31 AM
-
rare videos from 1990!!..
-
rare videos from 1990!!..
so rare it's been posted twice already.
-
so rare it's been posted twice already.
they are still considered rare idiot :-X
-
they are still considered rare idiot :-X
Idiot? and idiot would post a video that's been posted at least twice already and claim it's ' rare ' ;)
yest another backfire thread by you ;D
-
He had a small waist and his head looked bigger.
-
Idiot? and idiot would post a video that's been posted at least twice already and claim it's ' rare ' ;)
yest another backfire thread by you ;D
so am i supposed to check all GB history before starting a new thread to be sure it's not repeated!! ::)
and yes it's still rare in general for many ppl!!..
-
well the most dramatic change after this were his calves
-
so am i supposed to check all GB history before starting a new thread to be sure it's not repeated!! ::)
and yes it's still rare in general for many ppl!!..
No it's not rare it's been posted multiple times already i.e. no longer rare. another backfired thread from our resident idiot
-
He had a small waist and his head looked bigger.
Head's the only thing that didn't grow...
-
creepy narator
-
so am i supposed to check all GB history before starting a new thread to be sure it's not repeated!! ::)
and yes it's still rare in general for many ppl!!..
I just went onto youtube & typed in 'Ronnie Colman' & those vids came up.
Black Orchids are rare, Unicorns are rare, the phoenix is rare!!
Get an Oxford dictionary, FSS!
PT
-
so am i supposed to check all GB history before starting a new thread to be sure it's not repeated!! ::)
and yes it's still rare in general for many ppl!!..
It's not rare, no matter how you side step the issue. How can something posted on youtube and/or Getbig be remotely rare? Just because your sand infested town doesn't have access to the net often does not mean it's rare. ::)
-
Nevermind ND, Sherief. He's a Yates fan. Just post a " rare " Yates video and you'll be back in his graces. ;)
-
Nevermind ND, Sherief. He's a Yates fan. Just post a " rare " Yates video and you'll be back in his graces. ;)
he loves argument for argument sake..
-
I just went onto youtube & typed in 'Ronnie Colman' & those vids came up.
Black Orchids are rare, Unicorns are rare, the phoenix is rare!!
Get an Oxford dictionary, FSS!
PT
so you just went to youtube to check them after i had posted them here which shows you hadn't seen them before.. so for you they were rare when you opened this thread..
rare is anything that is still not common and i dont think these videos are common even if some of you saw before..
anyway not a big deal to argue about asshole..
-
he loves argument for argument sake..
There is no argument , you posted a video and claimed it's rare when it's already been posted on here multiple times , I just pointed it out and you melted down instantly calling me an idiot , the irony lol
you = backfire
-
There is no argument , you posted a video and claimed it's rare when it's already been posted on here multiple times , I just pointed it out and you melted down instantly calling me an idiot , the irony lol
you = backfire
man it's not a big deal.. it's just a word i used to start the thread..
believe it or not when i saw your name as the first to post a reply and before reading your post i was sure it was going to be about the word "rare'!!..
-
Wish i was that small.
-
so you just went to youtube to check them after i had posted them here which shows you hadn't seen them before.. so for you they were rare when you opened this thread..
rare is anything that is still not common and i dont think these videos are common even if some of you saw before..
anyway not a big deal to argue about asshole..
Obviously, hence your need to post this ^^^^
PT
-
man it's not a big deal.. it's just a word i used to start the thread..
believe it or not when i saw your name as the first to post a reply and before reading your post i was sure it was going to be about the word "rare'!!..
It's not a big deal ' idiot ' and ' asshole ' ...............sure it isn't ::) and it's not a big deal and it's just a word , yet you tried justify it's use ::) I agree that it's not a big deal , until you melted and made it one.
-
The schmoeness is strong in this vid, but look at that potential in Ronnie back in the day. Fuckin crazy
-
creepy narator
a very controlling one two seems like ronnie and that white guy were afraid of him ???
-
It's not a big deal ' idiot ' and ' asshole ' ...............sure it isn't ::) and it's not a big deal and it's just a word , yet you tried justify it's use ::) I agree that it's not a big deal , until you melted and made it one.
i still consider these videos rare and sure as always i consider you a big idiot but it's really boring to exchange posts about if it's ok to call them rare or not!!..
-
i still consider these videos rare and sure as always i consider you a big idiot but it's really boring to exchange posts about if it's ok to call them rare or not!!..
If ND's not getting to you, stop addressing his posts, whether they're a rebuke to you or not.
-
he looked like a stud there, big frame, small waist, incredible shape the muscle would just pop out of his body when flexing, best genetics ever simply.
-
If ND's not getting to you, stop addressing his posts, whether they're a rebuke to you or not.
dont tell me what to do piece of shit :D
-
so rare it's been posted twice already.
So...
this makes it three? My math isn't that great...
-
No it's not rare it's been posted multiple times already i.e. no longer rare. another backfired thread from our resident idiot
Take it easy on him. At least he didn't post a picture of that washed up synthol abusing cookie monster he's obsessed with. ;D
-
genetics and amazing response
this guy was made for bbing
-
amazing athlete
-
This was cool to see
-
dont tell me what to do piece of shit :D
Actually, I told you what not to do. now you can shit in your hand.
-
genetics and amazing response
this guy was made for bbing
The last of the great foundations.
-
He was big there already.
-
genetics and amazing response
this guy was made for bbing
Okay, I agree with this. Ronnie was a freak.
But in all seriousness, the last half of his Olympia career saw his physique progressively looking worse and worse - his belly became bloated, his definition and separation started disappearing, his balance was going...
In my view, no matter how many titles he wins, that is nothing to be proud of.
-
can someone post that pic of ron in the red shirt when he was a bit smaller, had hair and a goatee i think? looks unreal.
-
Okay, I agree with this. Ronnie was a freak.
But in all seriousness, the last half of his Olympia career saw his physique progressively looking worse and worse - his belly became bloated, his definition and separation started disappearing, his balance was going...
In my view, no matter how many titles he wins, that is nothing to be proud of.
like dorian he didnt deserve about half his olympia titles..
-
like dorian he didnt deserve about half his olympia titles..
Ronnie is a legend.
Honestly, I don't know why.
I know why Zane is a legend. I understand why Haney is a legend.
Judging should be rewarding perfection rather than awesomeness. A bodybuilder who can maintain perfection is deserving of being called a legend. Arnold's physique didn't get worse. Zane's physique never got worse. Haney's physique never got worse.
Why does Ronnie, whose physique got worse and worse each Olympia, get called a legend?
Honestly, I don't understand why.
-
Ronnie is a legend.
Honestly, I don't know why.
I know why Zane is a legend. I understand why Haney is a legend.
Judging should be rewarding perfection rather than awesomeness. A bodybuilder who can maintain perfection is deserving of being called a legend. Arnold's physique didn't get worse. Zane's physique never got worse. Haney's physique never got worse.
Why does Ronnie, whose physique got worse and worse each Olympia, get called a legend?
Honestly, I don't understand why.
-
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=32515&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
-
Yes, he looks great there, no doubt about it but that was only for a couple of years.
He became more and more bloated, lost his separation and just looked shit in general.
If he had kept up his early form, sure, he is a legend.
-
Ronnie is a legend.
Honestly, I don't know why.
I know why Zane is a legend. I understand why Haney is a legend.
Judging should be rewarding perfection rather than awesomeness. A bodybuilder who can maintain perfection is deserving of being called a legend. Arnold's physique didn't get worse. Zane's physique never got worse. Haney's physique never got worse.
Why does Ronnie, whose physique got worse and worse each Olympia, get called a legend?
Honestly, I don't understand why.
You don't know much about BBing history, do you?
Arnold is constantly criticized for his '80 appearance, for no legs, being too small and taking half the amount of time he usually did to prepare for the contest. Some say he lost in 72 to Sergio, or that he shouldn't have won in 70- which Arnold himself said "Sergio was just as good if not better than me that day, but I won based on how I posed since Sergio forgot I was even there."
Zane didn't get worse? Perhaps you forget that he was in obscurity before he even won his first Olympia, taking a decade or so to win it, after beating Arnold and then getting trounced by Arnold for much of the time it took for him to win the O.
Haney didn't get worse? What about the drug tested Olympia, where many people showed up off, including Lee.
The human body can't take going all out for a number of years, and that's why everyone declines. Everyone. Including Arnold, Zane, Yates, Ronnie and your average gym rat.
There's a Rutger Hauer quote from Blade Runner that applies..."The light that burns twice as bright, burns half as long. And you have burned so very, very brightly, Roy."
-
You don't know much about BBing history, do you?
Arnold is constantly criticized for his '80 appearance, for no legs, being too small and taking half the amount of time he usually did to prepare for the contest. Some say he lost in 72 to Sergio, or that he shouldn't have won in 70- which Arnold himself said "Sergio was just as good if not better than me that day, but I won based on how I posed since Sergio forgot I was even there."
Zane didn't get worse? Perhaps you forget that he was in obscurity before he even won his first Olympia, taking a decade or so to win it, after beating Arnold and then getting trounced by Arnold for much of the time it took for him to win the O.
Haney didn't get worse? What about the drug tested Olympia, where many people showed up off, including Lee.
The human body can't take going all out for a number of years, and that's why everyone declines. Everyone. Including Arnold, Zane, Yates, Ronnie and your average gym rat.
There's a Rutger Hauer quote from Blade Runner that applies..."The light that burns twice as bright, burns half as long. And you have burned so very, very brightly, Roy."
Arnold didn't get progressively worse , 1980 he was on just smaller than usual , he wrapped up 1975 in outstanding condition
Zane , same thing he didn't get worse like the erics is commenting on
Haney finished his career ontop with his best showing ever , 1990 was a fluke and most people looked off
Ronnie always maintained his best Olympia was his first and it was because he was spot-on , erics makes a valid point that Ronnie got progressively worse in terms of his physique but it was still good enough to beat the guys he was competing with .
-
Arnold didn't get progressively worse , 1980 he was on just smaller than usual , he wrapped up 1975 in outstanding condition
Zane , same thing he didn't get worse like the erics is commenting on
Haney finished his career ontop with his best showing ever , 1990 was a fluke and most people looked off
Ronnie always maintained his best Olympia was his first and it was because he was spot-on , erics makes a valid point that Ronnie got progressively worse in terms of his physique but it was still good enough to beat the guys he was competing with .
My rebuke towards Eric was that everyone comes in off...do I agree with this "dynasty" crap that the Mr O wins for years and years on end? No way. I think the best guy onstage should win, and EVERY year someone seems to show up better, most guys only have one or two good showings.
-
You don't know much about BBing history, do you?
Bodybuilding history is interesting.
Arnold is constantly criticized for his '80 appearance, for no legs, being too small and taking half the amount of time he usually did to prepare for the contest...
Arnold maintained a quality physique during his competitive years. After 1975, Arnold was no longer a competitive bodybuilder so 1980 should be seen as an ad-lib moment. He looked great for only 8 weeks training but it's a no brainer that the judges screwed up royally by giving him the title that year.
Some say he lost in 72 to Sergio, or that he shouldn't have won in 70- which Arnold himself said "Sergio was just as good if not better than me that day, but I won based on how I posed since Sergio forgot I was even there."
Arnold's physique wasn't regressing during those years. His victories, and whether he deserved them or not, are issues of judging.
Zane didn't get worse? Perhaps you forget that he was in obscurity before he even won his first Olympia, taking a decade or so to win it, after beating Arnold and then getting trounced by Arnold for much of the time it took for him to win the O.
Zane didn't get worse. Perhaps others got better, but Zane never got worse.
His being in obscurity before his first Olympia win doesn't mean anything. His phsyique was always improving and it took him a decade for him to improve enough to win the Olympia.
Haney didn't get worse? What about the drug tested Olympia, where many people showed up off, including Lee.
No, Haney didn't get worse and worse over time. Everyone is allowed to come in off every now and then, but Haney's physique never displayed a consistent regression in quality over time.
-
Here is Ronnie 2004 compared to 1998 , the difference is painfully obvious this is what erics is touching on
-
he looked like a stud there, big frame, small waist, incredible shape the muscle would just pop out of his body when flexing, best genetics ever simply.
For a black man
-
8)
-
Look at Levrone, looking over at Ronnie thinking "holy shit :'("
-
Here is Ronnie 2004 compared to 1998 , the difference is painfully obvious this is what erics is touching on
What I am really touching on is what makes someone 'a legend'.
Sure, Coleman won 8 Olympia titles and a million pro-titles. Yes, he dominated for a decade, no questions there. Sure, his form in his first couple of Olympia wins was incredible! You'll get little argument from me there.
But irrespective of these facts, his physique, in and of itself, simply got worse and worse. Does that say something about the quality of his competitors? Does it say something about the judging process? Does it say something about the influence of image creation in the media? Whatever it suggests, it doesn't change the fact that his physique progressively got worse and worse.
If Ronnie's legend status is due to his first couple of wins, okay, I can understand that. That means that Samir is a legend because of his 1983 form, after all, he too got worse over time.
But if it is not because of his first couple of wins, then no, I don't understand why Ronnie gets the status of legend.
-
What I am really touching on is what makes someone 'a legend'.
Sure, Coleman won 8 Olympia titles and a million pro-titles. Yes, he dominated for a decade, no questions there. Sure, his form in his first couple of Olympia wins was incredible! You'll get little argument from me there.
But irrespective of these facts, his physique, in and of itself, simply got worse and worse. Does that say something about the quality of his competitors? Does it say something about the judging process? Does it say something about the influence of image creation in the media? Whatever it suggests, it doesn't change the fact that his physique progressively got worse and worse.
If Ronnie's legend status is due to his first couple of wins, okay, I can understand that. That means that Samir is a legend because of his 1983 form, after all, he too got worse over time.
But if it is not because of his first couple of wins, then no, I don't understand why Ronnie gets the status of legend.
You answered your own question , 8 Olympia wins and most pro victories tied Haney for most Olympia wins , that's legendary status right there
-
You answered your own question , 8 Olympia wins and most pro victories tied Haney for most Olympia wins , that's legendary status right there
Fair enough.
Chris Dickerson won shows over decades, and in differing organisations. So too did Robby Robinson and Albert Beckles. Frank Zane is a craftsman when it comes to his physique while Shawn Ray and Lee Labrada never destroyed the look of their bodies despite competing for over a decade in the pro ranks.
To me, these are the kinds of bodybuilders that deserve the title of legend. Longevity and craftsmen.
But, I can respect the fact that Ronnie was the man for a decade despite competing with a body that looked worse and worse almost each time he stepped on a stage.
-
"rear calves raises" haha
-
Fair enough.
Chris Dickerson won shows over decades, and in differing organisations. So too did Robby Robinson and Albert Beckles. Frank Zane is a craftsman when it comes to his physique while Shawn Ray and Lee Labrada never destroyed the look of their bodies despite competing for over a decade in the pro ranks.
To me, these are the kinds of bodybuilders that deserve the title of legend. Longevity and craftsmen.
But, I can respect the fact that Ronnie was the man for a decade despite competing with a body that looked worse and worse almost each time he stepped on a stage.
Samir on Ronnie and his status ;D
Q ] When people talk of the greatest Olympian's Ronnie's name is usually high on the list. In fact, he is widely regarded as the best bodybuilder of all time.
Samir Bannout : [ A ] I hate to say this but they are blind. People that don't approve of what we are talking about right now are blind. You have to understand. Look, Ronnie Coleman is probably the most muscular bodybuilder ever. If he could have drawn a better picture of himself on the stage he would have had more appeal, but he did not. He makes himself look worse
-
Wish i was that small.
you aint kidding..
-
Samir on Ronnie and his status ;D
Q ] When people talk of the greatest Olympian's Ronnie's name is usually high on the list. In fact, he is widely regarded as the best bodybuilder of all time.
Samir Bannout : [ A ] I hate to say this but they are blind. People that don't approve of what we are talking about right now are blind. You have to understand. Look, Ronnie Coleman is probably the most muscular bodybuilder ever. If he could have drawn a better picture of himself on the stage he would have had more appeal, but he did not. He makes himself look worse
Yes! This is true, true, true.
I remember reading that interview and when I read the part you just quoted, I thought my God, he is right. He nailed it on the head. Bodybuilders are now experts on making themselves look worse. It's incredible that the sport has regressed to the point where the 'number one' bodybuilder on the planet can get away with being so by not only physically making his physique worse and worse (bloated belly, melting conditioning) but also in getting worse in how he presents it.
Of course, they will tell us that bodybuilding is about physique, as if presenting a physique has nothing to do with how it looks...
-
You don't know much about BBing history, do you?
Arnold is constantly criticized for his '80 appearance, for no legs, being too small and taking half the amount of time he usually did to prepare for the contest. Some say he lost in 72 to Sergio, or that he shouldn't have won in 70- which Arnold himself said "Sergio was just as good if not better than me that day, but I won based on how I posed since Sergio forgot I was even there."
Zane didn't get worse? Perhaps you forget that he was in obscurity before he even won his first Olympia, taking a decade or so to win it, after beating Arnold and then getting trounced by Arnold for much of the time it took for him to win the O.
Haney didn't get worse? What about the drug tested Olympia, where many people showed up off, including Lee.
The human body can't take going all out for a number of years, and that's why everyone declines. Everyone. Including Arnold, Zane, Yates, Ronnie and your average gym rat.
There's a Rutger Hauer quote from Blade Runner that applies..."The light that burns twice as bright, burns half as long. And you have burned so very, very brightly, Roy."
no even in 1990 haney who was away from his best deserved to win.. it was close between him and labrada but still overall he was better..
imo haney was the only multi mr. olympia winner who deserved all his wins.. not sure about arnold but dorian, ronnie, and, cutler all didnt deserve all their sandows!!..
-
Look at Levrone, looking over at Ronnie thinking "holy shit :'("
yes ".. holy shit, what bloated abs.." :-X
-
no even in 1990 haney who was away from his best deserved to win.. it was close between him and labrada but still overall he was better..
imo haney was the only multi mr. olympia winner who deserved all his wins.. not sure about arnold but dorian, ronnie, and, cutler all didnt deserve all their sandows!!..
I think Labrada deserved it in 1990. He just looked so much more balanced and professional.
The only Mr Olympia who truly deserved all of his wins was Samir Bannout :)
-
I think Labrada deserved it in 1990. He just looked so much more balanced and professional.
The only Mr Olympia who truly deserved all of his wins was Samir Bannout :)
i have the whole video of mr. olympia 90 and i see lee the deserved winner..
before this olympia it was always "not even close" between haney and his first runner up but in 90 and because he was clearly off (for him) labrada was somehow close but still lost most poses to haney..
here is the posedown:
-
i have the whole video of mr. olympia 90 and i see lee the deserved winner..
before this olympia it was always "not even close" between haney and his first runner up but in 90 and because he was clearly off (for him) labrada was somehow close but still lost most poses to haney..
Haney certainly sharpened up after the prejudging which makes one question the sense of having a posedown round worth the same amount as the prejudging rounds.
Bodybuilding has no idea what it's doing.
-
I have seem millions of youtube bodybuilding video's, and this is a first for me, so give the guy a break ;)
-
I have seem millions of youtube bodybuilding video's, and this is a first for me, so give the guy a break ;)
this confirms ND's assholeness again :-X
-
this confirms ND's assholeness again :-X
Hahahahahah no this confirms he didn't see it , you can't escape the FACT it's been posted here multiple times already and you thought you were posting something ' rare ' ;D
this confirms your trend of making threads that backfire in your face ;)
-
Hahahahahah no this confirms he didn't see it , you can't escape the FACT it's been posted here multiple times already and you thought you were posting something ' rare ' ;D
this confirms your trend of making threads that backfire in your face ;)
even if it's not rare and i called it rare do you think it would have deserved all this effort from you if you were not asshole??.. :-\
and i didnt think i was posting something "rare" as if it's something big ::),.. i just found this video by chance on youtube and it was the first time to see it so i shared here and wrote any fukin title to state the fukin thread and i swear when i read your name as the first to comment and before reading what you wrote i expected your comment would be on the word "rare" and not on the video itself because your have cecome very predictable and boring..