Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Straw Man on August 29, 2011, 08:31:01 PM
-
just a little reminder
Cheney's book is out tomorrow
http://www.nytimes-se.com/2009/07/04/ex-secretary-apologizes-for-wmd-hoax/
Ex-Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice reassured soldiers that the Bush Administration had known well before the invasion that Saddam Hussein lacked weapons of mass destruction.
"Now that all of you brave servicemen and women are returning, it’s important to us to reassure you, and the American people, that we were certain Hussein had no W.M.D.s and that he would never launch a first strike against the U.S.,”
“I want you to know that if we had had the slightest suspicion that Saddam could use W.M.D.s against you, we never would have sent hundreds of thousands of you to be sitting ducks on the Iraqi border for several months.”
“Do you really think we would have given Saddam a major public relations coup by allowing him to annihilate tens of thousands of you right there on holy territory?
-
just a little reminder
Cheney's book is out tomorrow
http://www.nytimes-se.com/2009/07/04/ex-secretary-apologizes-for-wmd-hoax/
Ex-Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice reassured soldiers that the Bush Administration had known well before the invasion that Saddam Hussein lacked weapons of mass destruction.
It would be fine except that everyone was made to swallow that lovely anthrax shot since Desert Storm including myself which has some nasty side effects.... ::)
-
Unbelievable...... Another of the many royal scams perpetrated on the American people.
-
That article is very fishy. It calls her Mr. Rice at one point.
Also, why have I never heard of this before? It blows the whole lid off the Iraq War.
I think Iraq was pure crap, but there's just something fishy here.
-
Or did I just get punked?
WTF is going on around here?
-
That article is very fishy. It calls her Mr. Rice at one point.
Also, why have I never heard of this before? It blows the whole lid off the Iraq War.
I think Iraq was pure crap, but there's just something fishy here.
There certainly should be soldiers who remember when and where she said these things no?
-
Click through Straws' link - its a spoof.
Straw - are you freaking kidding with bullshit?
And you have the balls to attack me?
-
Lol I guess it is.
-
Lol I guess it is.
And I am the one attacked by Straw and Lurker for making shit up?
Straw - you = OWNED!
-
He might not have realized it was bunk site. I didn't until you pointed it out lol
-
just a little reminder
Cheney's book is out tomorrow
http://www.nytimes-se.com/2009/07/04/ex-secretary-apologizes-for-wmd-hoax/
Ex-Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice reassured soldiers that the Bush Administration had known well before the invasion that Saddam Hussein lacked weapons of mass destruction.
Ex-Secretary Apologizes for W.M.D. Scare
300,000 Troops Never Faced Risk of Instant Obliteration
By Frank Larimore
Published: July 4th, 2009 ????????
Straw, did you really believe this?
-
LOL
From the same website:
Court Indicts Bush on High Treason Charge
By Bart Garzon
Published: July 4th, 2009
http://www.nytimes-se.com/2009/07/04/court-indicts-bush-on-high-treason-charge/
-
Source: StrawManPedia.com (http://www.all-lies.com/misinfo/index.shtml)
-
Straw needs to STFU about me for few good months for peddling this shit.
Next dipshit to go down is Lurker.
-
BUMP FOR STRAW!!!!
TIME TO PAY THE PIPER ON YOUR LIES AND DISHONESTY
-
Ex-Secretary Apologizes for W.M.D. Scare
300,000 Troops Never Faced Risk of Instant Obliteration
By Frank Larimore
Published: July 4th, 2009 ????????
Straw, did you really believe this?
YES - HE REALLY BOUGHT IN TO THIS CRAP!
-
Ex-Secretary Apologizes for W.M.D. Scare
300,000 Troops Never Faced Risk of Instant Obliteration
By Frank Larimore
Published: July 4th, 2009 ????????
Straw, did you really believe this?
Bwahahahahahahahaha! ;D
-
Bwahahahahahahahaha! ;D
Straw needs to own up quick on this and not say a peep about me for a llloooonnnnggggg time.
-
LOL . . . .
btw - did you actually read the story you posted?
-
LOL . . . .
LMAO!
Time for Straw to man up and admit he was duped and tried to peddle bogus lies.
-
BUMP FOR STRAW!!!!
TIME TO PAY THE PIPER ON YOUR LIES AND DISHONESTY
what lies
I got punked by a fake website
so what
-
LMAO!
Time for Straw to man up and admit he was duped and tried to peddle bogus lies.
Everyone lays an egg every now and then. It has happened to me. But this one is really funny. :) Come to think of it, so were all the other ones (George Washington was a "filthy stinking lib" etc.). lol
-
what lies
I got punked by a fake website
so what
How could you have possibly read that story and the other crap on that site and believed it was real?
I knew it was a spoof at about .02 seconds.
-
Everyone lays an egg every now and then. It has happened to me. But this one is really funny. :) Come to think of it, so were all the other ones (George Washington was a "filthy stinking lib" etc.). lol
that was not even the same
I posted an actual quote from Washington and nothing else with the post other than the title (go find the link if you doubt me)
this is just a fake website that looked pretty damn real and was getting some play yesterday due to Cheney's book
and let's not forget that there were no WMD's and both Powell and Condi admitted as much prior to the invasion of Iraq
-
How could you have possibly read that story and the other crap on that site and believed it was real?
I knew it was a spoof at about .02 seconds.
got it in an link and read it quickly
looked real to me and given the fact that there WERE NO WMD's it seemed plausible (though I was suprised I hadn't rememberd the so called story from 2 years ago)
again, how exactly do you call it my lie when it's not my words and I was not aware it was false
you're not really a lawyer are you?
-
got it in an link and read it quickly
looked real to me and given the fact that there WERE NO WMD's it seemed plausible (though I was suprised I hadn't rememberd the so called story from 2 years ago)
again, how exactly do you call it my lie when it's not my words and I was not aware it was false
you're not really a lawyer are you?
LMAO!
Had you actually spent a minute or two reading that site you would have realized it was fake.
-
LMAO!
Had you actually spent a minute or two reading that site you would have realized it was fake.
didn't spend any time reading "the site"
again, did I not admit it was a mistake.
you should try it sometime
it's what normal adults do when they find out they made a mistake
-
didn't spend any time reading "the site"
again, did I not admit it was a mistake.
you should try it sometime
it's what normal adults do when they find out they made a mistake
Well - lets see - it was supposedly a NYT piece - but first red flag should have been in the HTML address itself!
From there I knew it was false and just laughed my ass clicking through that bogus nonsense knowing you thought it was real.
-
lol Geez give the guy a break.
Didn't you post some bogus article you got from an Email a few months ago 33333? and wasn't a fellow conservative that called you out on it?
-
lol Geez give the guy a break.
Didn't you post some bogus article you got from an Email a few months ago 33333? and wasn't a fellow conservative that called you out on it?
Oh really ? ? ? ?
I get trolled by Straw and Lurker like no one else and i am supposed to not pile on and rub it in when Straw gets caught in an epic hoax?
hhhmmmm?
-
Oh really ? ? ? ?
I get trolled by Straw and Lurker like no one else and i am supposed to not pile on and rub it in when Straw gets caught in an epic hoax?
hhhmmmm?
you can do whatever you'd like.
Doesn't matter to me
I admitted a mistake and did not lie
You've made hundreds of false statements, claims, etc.. and I don't recall you ever admitting any of them
-
Well - lets see - it was supposedly a NYT piece - but first red flag should have been in the HTML address itself!
From there I knew it was false and just laughed my ass clicking through that bogus nonsense knowing you thought it was real.
Tell me your bitch ass isnt talking.. your dumb ass references a fuckin Indian blogger as a reputable source.. you need to shut the fuck up chump
-
Tell me your bitch ass isnt talking.. your dumb ass references a fuckin Indian blogger as a reputable source.. you need to shut the fuck up chump
LMFAO - Obama Admn refuses to release any details of the cost of the lavish extravaganza. Wonder why.
-
LMFAO - Obama Admn refuses to release any details of the cost of the lavish extravaganza. Wonder why.
what about he and the Secret service calling swat.. did he release the details on that.. something you still havent owned up to
-
what about he and the Secret service calling swat.. did he release the details on that.. something you still havent owned up to
Own up to what? His security detail called in those goons on granny.
-
Own up to what? His security detail called in those goons on granny.
See.. you still do it.. lol... his security detail didnt do anything.. And who were the goons.. as i remember you said obama called swat on grannies...
but the real story was that towns police chief called its regular police placed in riot gear to clear a path because there were people blocking the presidents motorcade.. now if you cant own up to the real story or you want to dance around it.. fine.. but your punk dosent have a leg to stand on when it comes to the integrity of a story.. maybe you need to shut your fat ass mouth
-
Oh really ? ? ? ?
I get trolled by Straw and Lurker like no one else and i am supposed to not pile on and rub it in when Straw gets caught in an epic hoax?
hhhmmmm?
;D
i think its embarrassing enough with out you rubbing it in. And you already know you'll bump it from time to time. ;D
-
;D
i think its embarrassing enough with out you rubbing it in. And you already know you'll bump it from time to time. ;D
honestly, I'm not embarrassed at all
everyone makes mistakes and it's not like I tried to defend it or anything
-
honestly, I'm not embarrassed at all
everyone makes mistakes and it's not like I tried to defend it or anything
ok
-
honestly, I'm not embarrassed at all
everyone makes mistakes and it's not like I tried to defend it or anything
You still support Obama. Nothing can possibly shame you at this point.
-
You still support Obama. Nothing can possibly shame you at this point.
it's not like I have any viable alternative
what's the point of being like you and ranting and raving over a fabricated and often contradictory CT while professing hatred for your own country and the majority of your fellow citizens
-
See.. you still do it.. lol... his security detail didnt do anything.. And who were the goons.. as i remember you said obama called swat on grannies...
but the real story was that towns police chief called its regular police placed in riot gear to clear a path because there were people blocking the presidents motorcade.. now if you cant own up to the real story or you want to dance around it.. fine.. but your punk dosent have a leg to stand on when it comes to the integrity of a story.. maybe you need to shut your fat ass mouth
bump
-
bump
-
it's not like I have any viable alternative
Ain't that the truth
-
biggity bump. .and check mate
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/04/the_myth_of_the_anti-tea_party.html
the story of the "SWAT team" called out to threaten tea partyers in Quincy, Ill. In the words of Jim Hoft, the Gateway Pundit:
The SWAT Team was called in today at the Quincy Tea Party Rally ... local Quincy Tea Party Leader Steve McQueen was directing protesters when the SWAT team was called in.
The only problem with that? The SWAT team wasn't called in. Local police, wearing riot gear, briefly marched down the street to clear it for the president's motorcade.
UPDATE: More details from John Cook.
The story, from the Quincy Herald Whig.
There were a few tense moments when the crowd moved west down York toward Third Street after the president's motorcade arrived. A Secret Service agent asked the crowd to move back across the street to the north side.
When the crowd didn't move and began singing "God Bless, America" and the national anthem, Quincy Deputy Police Chief Ron Dreyer called for members of the Mobile Field Force to walk up the street.
The officers, mainly from Metro East departments near St. Louis and dressed in full body armor, marched from the east and stood on the south side of York facing the protesters.
There was no physical contact, and the officers did not come close to the crowd, but there were catcalls and more than a few upset tea party members, including a woman who shouted, "This is communism!"
McQueen also assisted in asking people to step back to the north side of York. The crowd moved back, the officers stayed for about 15 minutes and left, and there were no other incidents.
The video of cops in riot gear walking down the street in formation is more weird than threatening. But the sexed-up version of this story is so good that HotAir headlines it "SWAT team outside Obama event beats back geriatric tea-party hordes," even though the blog's own take on the story is less intense.
This isn’t a SWAT team, actually, just local cops in riot gear,
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/04/the_myth_of_the_anti-tea_party.html
-
now all 333 has to do is admit he made a mistake
or he could just pretend he was right all along and keep digging that hole
-
now all 333 has to do is admit he made a mistake
or he could just pretend he was right all along and keep digging that hole
I went with the reporting at the time and header of the youtube clip.
Stil utterly ridiculus tyo have these clowns out there like that.
-
I went with the reporting at the time and header of the youtube clip.
Stil utterly ridiculus tyo have these clowns out there like that.
translation = you got fooled by a fake story and can't admit it
in fact you double and tripled down, pretending it was true even after given proof that it was false
-
translation = you got fooled by a fake story and can't admit it
in fact you double and tripled down, pretending it was true even after given proof that it was false
Ha ha ha - did you see those goons with nightsticks? What where they there for hhhmmm?
-
Ha ha ha - did you see those goons with nightsticks? What where they there for hhhmmm?
and what does that prove?
you're an attorney
right?
-
and what does that prove?
you're an attorney
right?
If they had those ridiculous uniforms on with night sticks - they were there for crowd control, not protecting the perimeter for the motorcade. Were that the case, they would have had rifles.
They were there because that oversized twink Obama and his security detail thought granny would be starting shit.
-
If they had those ridiculous uniforms on with night sticks - they were there for crowd control, not protecting the perimeter for the motorcade. Were that the case, they would have had rifles.
They were there because that oversized twink Obama and his security detail thought granny would be starting shit.
great
you must have some proof for this statement (which happens to be contrary to the evidence)
let's see it
-
great
you must have some proof for this statement (which happens to be contrary to the evidence)
let's see it
Its reality.
LE protecting a motorcade has rifles and firearms, not riot gear and batons.
-
33,
there's no need to be a dick to people when they get predictions wrong.
everybody here gets it wrong.
-
33,
there's no need to be a dick to people when they get predictions wrong.
everybody here gets it wrong.
Really? Maybe you should tell that to my legion of stalkers.
-
Its reality.
LE protecting a motorcade has rifles and firearms, not riot gear and batons.
where's the proof to your claim (contrary to evidence) that Obama was involved
let's see it