Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Hugo Chavez on September 06, 2011, 06:00:34 PM
-
104 people in the last year busted in Florida for living in sin... 60 day jail sentence... WHAT!!!! ::)
-
104 people in the last year busted in Florida for living in sin... 60 day jail sentence... WHAT!!!! ::)
No doubt MCWAY loves this one.... ;D
-
I like this guy, Ritch Workman, working to repeal stupid laws instead of working to make more stupid laws like most politicians do. excellent!!!
-
I like this guy, Ritch Workman, working to repeal stupid laws instead of working to make more stupid laws like most politicians do. excellent!!!
I had no idea this existed but it is as stupid as it comes.
-
Would jack from Three's Company have received two 60-day sentences?
-
Cops who actually enforced this law and busted the 104 people: "Well, it's the law duh, duh, duh, duh, duh. Can't think for myself, duh, duh, duh, duh."
:P
-
How the hell can this law stand?
(Naturally the retards who support government invading your privacy and limiting your freedom on the basis of their own distorted "morality" would fight to keep this law)
-
How the hell can this law stand?
(Naturally the retards who support government invading your privacy and limiting your freedom on the basis of their own distorted "morality" would fight to keep this law)
MCWAY is very upset that they are going to get rid of this.
-
I understand why they enacted this (before Florida became a no-fault divorce state), but it's a dumb law. And any law enforcement officer who arrested someone over this should be ashamed of himself.
-
I understand why they enacted this (before Florida became a no-fault divorce state), but it's a dumb law. And any law enforcement officer who arrested someone over this should be ashamed of himself.
think about this... for law enforement to be logging this many arrests per year they must actively be looking for it. I mean this is the kind of thing that how the hell would you know unless you were investigating for it? That's some sick shit right there.
-
think about this... for law enforement to be logging this many arrests per year they must actively be looking for it. I mean this is the kind of thing that how the hell would you know unless you were investigating for it? That's some sick shit right there.
Perhaps. Or it could be a woman (or man) scorned dropping a dime on a former lover.
-
Perhaps. Or it could be a woman (or man) scorned dropping a dime on a former lover.
true, that's part of this same law. Just stupid it effects people that are not commiting adulty. All states should have common law marriage rights imo. Last I looked it was down to like 9 states left that do.
-
true, that's part of this same law. Just stupid it effects people that are not commiting adulty. All states should have common law marriage rights imo. Last I looked it was down to like 9 states left that do.
They need to go.
-
They need to go.
are you saying no states should allow common law marriage?
-
are you saying no states should allow common law marriage?
Talking about cohabitation and adultery. Those laws need to go.
-
Talking about cohabitation and adultery. Those laws need to go.
oh, sorry, wasn't sure, thanks.
-
There are quite a few state laws hanging around from 40,50, even 80 years ago that have never been taken off the books which seem quite retarded. Good to see this guy actually doing something about it and attempting to get rid of retarded shit like this.
-
My all time favorite stupid law lol:
"The Chico City Council in California enacted a ban on nuclear weapons setting a $500 fine for anyone detonating one within city limits."
LOL every time I think about that...
But that's not really in the same ball park of wrong as Florida's stupid cohabitation laws... The Chico City law above is just a pointless lol...
-
Maybe they were just trying to discourage young people from having kids out of wedlock so tax-payers don't become surrogate parents. In that case, they should just deny welfare benefits to people who do that.
-
Maybe they were just trying to discourage young people from having kids out of wedlock so tax-payers don't become surrogate parents. In that case, they should just deny welfare benefits to people who do that.
I think the law goes back to like 1874 so the motivation of it might not include welfare and all that.. Probably more religious based.