Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: suckmymuscle on September 17, 2011, 10:15:04 PM
-
Bodybuilding judges don't care about cheating as far as steroids, GH, etc, because they know this is the only way to show the muscularity that looks impressive and not like that of any regular surfer you see at a beach. As long as they can excuse that such muscularity was build on "training, nutrition and supplementation", they are ok with it. But they do not like and do mark down things like synthol and muscle implants. Why? Because they are obvious cheating that cannot be excused by "training and nutrition". A super-huge muscle still leaves room to be explained by "training and nutrition" if you make the excuse that the guy who owns the muscles has super-Human genetics or things like that, but a muscle with lumps that are wombly cannot be explained. It is obvious cheating, and the judges mark it down. Jay made a huge mistake this year. A missing muscle can be excused by the judges(Dorian's non-existent left biceps in 1997), but they do not excuse lump of oil because it marks the posessor as a cheater.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
Thank god for once the judges made the right decision. 2007 was bad enough.
-
Bodybuilding judges don't care about cheating as far as steroids, GH, etc, because they know this is the only way to show the muscularity that looks impressive and not like that of any regular surfer you see at a beach. As long as they can excuse that such muscularity was build on "training, nutrition and supplementation", they are ok with it. But they do not like and do mark down things like synthol and muscle implants. Why? Because they are obvious cheating that cannot be excused by "training and nutrition". A super-huge muscle still leaves room to be explained by "training and nutrition" if you make the excuse that the guy who owns the muscles has super-Human genetics or things like that, but a muscle with lumps that are wombly cannot be explained. It is obvious cheating, and the judges mark it down. Jay made a huge mistake this year. A missing muscle can be excused by the judges(Dorian's non-existent left biceps in 1997), but they do not excuse lump of oil because it marks the posessor as a cheater.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
Agreed, a Half missing bicep is one thing...a Obvious site injection is Deemed or should be marked down as Blatant cheating
-
its correct though. the shot is what did it. jay was better on sat, phil was worse.
that shot was verything.
-
you guys are fucktards. why would jay shoot seo into his good side? there was an injury, not seo injection.
-
its correct though. the shot is what did it. jay was better on sat, phil was worse.
that shot was verything.
Stop it
-
you guys are fucktards. why would jay shoot seo into his good side? there was an injury, not seo injection.
Ever think they shoot it on both sides and he just hit a vein on the left side. It was already healing tonight and he posed well with it.
-
live by the needle, die by it
-
If the judges had some real balls and didn't get distracted by Jay Cutler's beautiful blue eye shadow, they should have marked him down far enough out of the top five and made a statement.
-
anyone who has spent any time in bodybuilding knows thats what a really fucked up inject looks like
-
anyone who has spent any time in bodybuilding knows thats what a really fucked up inject looks like
Cutler was so insecure that he felt the need to load up a needle and try to change his body the night before. So silly.
-
Bodybuilding judges don't care about cheating as far as steroids, GH, etc, because they know this is the only way to show the muscularity that looks impressive and not like that of any regular surfer you see at a beach. As long as they can excuse that such muscularity was build on "training, nutrition and supplementation", they are ok with it. But they do not like and do mark down things like synthol and muscle implants. Why? Because they are obvious cheating that cannot be excused by "training and nutrition". A super-huge muscle still leaves room to be explained by "training and nutrition" if you make the excuse that the guy who owns the muscles has super-Human genetics or things like that, but a muscle with lumps that are wombly cannot be explained. It is obvious cheating, and the judges mark it down. Jay made a huge mistake this year. A missing muscle can be excused by the judges(Dorian's non-existent left biceps in 1997), but they do not excuse lump of oil because it marks the posessor as a cheater.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
Hey Stupid, that's not what you said a few threads ago. You said he would win. You said that if Dorian could win with a torn bicep Jay could win. He saw Jay's bicep. You claimed it wouldn't or shouldn't matter.
Another stupid post by Stupid.
When you reply with "meltdown" can you please post the pic with all that fire. I like fire.
-
Hey Stupid, that's not what you said a few threads ago. You said he would win. You said that if Dorian could win with a torn bicep Jay could win. He saw Jay's bicep. You claimed it wouldn't or shouldn't matter.
Another stupid post by Stupid.
When you reply with "meltdown" can you please post the pic with all that fire. I like fire.
Holy fuck, this f.aggot really likes to melt down ;D. Your anger is amusing, old man. I will just post pictures of your nuclear blasts of anger until your rage increases to the point where you tire of making multi-paragraph posts directed at me. Here goes another picture, old queen. I have a ton of them saved just for you. :D
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
Holy fuck, this f.aggot really likes to melt down ;D. Your anger is amusing, old man. I will just post pictures of your nuclear blasts of anger until your rage increases to the point where you tire of making multi-paragraph posts directed at me. Here goes another picture, old queen. I have a ton of them saved just for you. :D
SUCKMYMUSCLE
I wanted the pic with the fire.
Post the fire meltdown pic or I'll really have a meltdown.
-
I wanted the pic with the fire.
Post the fire meltdown pic or I'll really have a meltdown.
You forgot to call him stupid
-
He didn't shoot it... it was a tear... I heard, from a reliable source, that Jay's scared of needles. :D
-
He didn't shoot it... it was a tear... I heard, from a reliable source, that Jay's scared of needles.
LMFAO, that has to be the most ridiculous thing i have ever read on getbig.
-
He didn't shoot it... it was a tear... I heard, from a reliable source, that Jay's scared of needles. :D
100lbs of muscle suggest otherwise
-
So is it obvious cheating that most of the women appeared to have breast implants?
-
So is it obvious cheating that most of the women appeared to have breast implants?
You would first have to look at whether they improve placings or not.
-
So is it obvious cheating that most of the women appeared to have breast implants?
Funny situation isn't it. Women are required to have implants, men cannot have implants.
-
Wow you thought of this all on your own. Momma must be proud of you! Good job Suckymuscle keep up the good work!
-
In bodybuilding, we only like the better cheats. We don't like the less competent cheats. We reward good cheats.
-
didn't iris kyle get placed in last because of an obvious site inject?
-
the needle is jay's best friend
these guys love to inject. it's like cumming for many of these psychos.
-
You would first have to look at whether they improve placings or not.
In my book, it should disqualify them. But then, I believe the same is true for anyone female or male who has fake judge-able body-parts.
-
Bodybuilding judges don't care about cheating as far as steroids, GH, etc, because they know this is the only way to show the muscularity that looks impressive and not like that of any regular surfer you see at a beach. As long as they can excuse that such muscularity was build on "training, nutrition and supplementation", they are ok with it. But they do not like and do mark down things like synthol and muscle implants. Why? Because they are obvious cheating that cannot be excused by "training and nutrition". A super-huge muscle still leaves room to be explained by "training and nutrition" if you make the excuse that the guy who owns the muscles has super-Human genetics or things like that, but a muscle with lumps that are wombly cannot be explained. It is obvious cheating, and the judges mark it down. Jay made a huge mistake this year. A missing muscle can be excused by the judges(Dorian's non-existent left biceps in 1997), but they do not excuse lump of oil because it marks the posessor as a cheater.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
My definition/view on what " cheating " is When a JOHN DOE comes along, whos NEVER worked out, exercised, weight trained a day in thier life, and takes Steroids from DAY 1 of ever working out, and the ONLY way to have FAKE MUSCLE is to have MUSCLE IMPLANTS.