Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: TRIX on September 29, 2011, 01:48:38 AM

Title: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: TRIX on September 29, 2011, 01:48:38 AM
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/philheathcrazyarm.jpg)

brb the most detailed arms ever yet gets accused of Synthol

http://rutube.ru/tracks/4844370.html?v=56efcc57467c346b78e4b2b0a477420c
video

The best arms ever (not the biggest) but the best
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: purenaturalstrength on September 29, 2011, 01:53:02 AM
sweet tank top on camera guy
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Tito24 on September 29, 2011, 02:00:34 AM
too bad the rest of him is nothing.

coleman had quality wise much better arms, you saw muscle maturity on them and those of heath look like they can melt anytime from the sun.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: TRIX on September 29, 2011, 02:10:27 AM
yes colemans looked dense, but is denser = better?

(http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/8071/img2348zg4.jpg)
(http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/3199/img05297ez.jpg)
(http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/4861/img05211cc.jpg)
(http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/158/img05339iv.jpg)

Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: TRIX on September 29, 2011, 02:17:21 AM
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/hhhhhhh.jpg)(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/hhhhh.jpg)(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/hhh.jpg)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Meso_z on September 29, 2011, 04:00:39 AM
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/philheathcrazyarm.jpg)

brb the most detailed arms ever yet gets accused of Synthol

http://rutube.ru/tracks/4844370.html?v=56efcc57467c346b78e4b2b0a477420c
video

The best arms ever (not the biggest) but the best
Insane..
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: JasonH on September 29, 2011, 04:04:12 AM
Best arms in bodybuilding history IMO.

Obviously not the biggest, but all things considered I would rather have Heath's arms than any other pro, past or present.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: TheTrueVictor on September 29, 2011, 05:00:24 AM
Best arms in bodybuilding history IMO.

Obviously not the biggest, but all things considered I would rather have Heath's arms than any other pro, past or present.

Me too. With the exception of maybe having arms like Arnold or Flex Wheeler.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Papper on September 29, 2011, 05:07:10 AM
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/philheathcrazyarm.jpg)

That's crazy!!!

I thought Heath has had the best current bis and tris for a while now.

Then Roelly came and took over the tricep department. But as a combination, Heath is probably number one.

This pic could use some comparison to Roellys similar pics.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Red Hook on September 29, 2011, 05:11:55 AM
This guy might disagree...

(http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/7/b/7bdbd-30a0c_Sergio_Oliva2.jpg)

(http://www.davedraper.com/gallery/data/510/2VinceGirondaSergioOliva.jpg)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=392853.0;attach=425218;image)



Let's see Phil try this pose!
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=392853.0;attach=425259;image)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: mass243 on September 29, 2011, 05:40:23 AM
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/philheathcrazyarm.jpg)


Holy shtifuk  :o

Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Tito24 on September 29, 2011, 05:48:04 AM
(http://i55.tinypic.com/e9g9cx.jpg)

BOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MM
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: GroinkTropin on September 29, 2011, 06:23:55 AM
Phil Heath has the BEST arms in the biz right now, and it's not even really all that close. I am only sorry there are so many haters as you never know how long the man will be around, it won't be forever, and someday you will be saying "Man I can't stand this new Mr. Olympia, I wish Phil Heath would make a comeback!!!" so it's quite sad some of you can't enjoy the now you know? He's #1 right now, quit hating...
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Hurricane Beef ! on September 29, 2011, 06:30:09 AM
Pound 4 pound no one touches Ed.

THE BEEF
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Tito24 on September 29, 2011, 06:30:51 AM
(http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/3333/1190065449105ek0.jpg)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Tito24 on September 29, 2011, 06:31:47 AM
(http://muscleshots.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/mystery15.jpg)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Tito24 on September 29, 2011, 06:35:49 AM
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__xoggXWTQr0/SfbeiN1WQ_I/AAAAAAAAGIY/wZwphH3cQKk/s400/VictorMartinez46.jpg)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Tito24 on September 29, 2011, 06:36:30 AM
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_mC1TEdZ4gks/SqKx3qkbDOI/AAAAAAAAAE4/FDX7DwdE3Qk/s400/victor-martinez-2004-1+copy.jpg)

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-96DveukY2nE/TYyNe2y7mZI/AAAAAAAAHEA/tWZM9njfb9s/s400/victor%2Bmartinez.jpg)

(http://www.ifbb.com/newsletter/images/108/illnew03-3.jpg)


victor owns that little twat heath
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: DK II on September 29, 2011, 06:39:01 AM
 ;D
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: OTHstrong on September 29, 2011, 06:42:15 AM
Pound 4 pound no one touches Ed.

THE BEEF
holy shit, who is that?
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: mass243 on September 29, 2011, 06:43:35 AM

(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/leecha4.jpg)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: KevinP85 on September 29, 2011, 06:55:31 AM
(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs185.ash2/44815_1494259271297_1078522545_1395757_2237592_n.jpg)
(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs070.ash2/36856_100726749982092_100001343012397_2622_591618_n.jpg)
(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs150.snc4/36856_100726746648759_100001343012397_2621_5411733_n.jpg)

Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: mass243 on September 29, 2011, 07:04:08 AM

(http://www.missajc.com/friends/images/2008-03Mar08/14_MissaBill.jpg)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: BiGHer on September 29, 2011, 07:04:58 AM
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/hhhhhhh.jpg)(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/hhhhh.jpg)(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/hhh.jpg)

Looks small in these pics  :-\
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: mass243 on September 29, 2011, 07:05:42 AM
(http://www4.rgu.ac.uk/graphics/Small%20bicep%202.JPG)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: KevinP85 on September 29, 2011, 07:07:09 AM
Young victor m ;D
(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs365.snc4/44866_1494260111318_1078522545_1395775_1319055_n.jpg)
(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs185.ash2/44866_1494260191320_1078522545_1395777_4055140_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: DK II on September 29, 2011, 07:08:55 AM
Looks small in these pics  :-\

I wish i was that small.  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Parker on September 29, 2011, 07:44:24 AM
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__xoggXWTQr0/SfbeiN1WQ_I/AAAAAAAAGIY/wZwphH3cQKk/s400/VictorMartinez46.jpg)
Mr. Sandman, please bring me a dream...

Vic's new nickname, Mr. Sandman 
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Parker on September 29, 2011, 07:46:22 AM
Looks small in these pics  :-\
2006, he was about 215-220...
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: TRIX on September 29, 2011, 07:48:47 AM
new pic

(http://a.yfrog.com/img612/3710/q6fie.jpg)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: no one on September 29, 2011, 07:54:50 AM
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/philheathcrazyarm.jpg)

brb the most detailed arms ever yet gets accused of Synthol

http://rutube.ru/tracks/4844370.html?v=56efcc57467c346b78e4b2b0a477420c
video

The best arms ever (not the biggest) but the best

lemme help you out here cause you fucking retards dont seem to get it

IF YOU PUT IT IN PROPERLY AND DEEP ENOUGH IT WILL NOT CAUSE YOU TO LOSE SEPARATION.

im getting tired of idiots, like you, who dont know what they are talking about, talking like they know what they are talking about.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: GroinkTropin on September 29, 2011, 09:41:54 AM
(http://muscleshots.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/mystery15.jpg)

Vic has to win at least ONE friggin Olympia I mean damn...
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: greeneyes on September 29, 2011, 09:49:20 AM
(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs185.ash2/44866_1494260191320_1078522545_1395777_4055140_n.jpg)

he pulled his underwear  :-X
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: goomba420 on September 29, 2011, 10:21:38 AM
why don't you post a picture of his FDB? NO peak whatsoever

(http://www.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/_M2X1747.jpg)

and lets not even compare him to 2003 ronnie

Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 29, 2011, 10:55:41 AM
His arms are crazy  :o  :o  :o
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 29, 2011, 10:58:16 AM
why don't you post a picture of his FDB? NO peak whatsoever

(http://www.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/_M2X1747.jpg)

and lets not even compare him to 2003 ronnie



His biceps aren't on par with Ronnie's ( few are ) his advantage is triceps and forearms
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: cephissus on September 29, 2011, 11:05:59 AM
lemme help you out here cause you fucking retards dont seem to get it

IF YOU PUT IT IN PROPERLY AND DEEP ENOUGH IT WILL NOT CAUSE YOU TO LOSE SEPARATION.

im getting tired of idiots, like you, who dont know what they are talking about, talking like they know what they are talking about.

good post.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Khofo on September 29, 2011, 11:13:15 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: goomba420 on September 29, 2011, 11:14:32 AM
:)

dude.. are you seriously propping your bicep up with the other hand? ???
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Khofo on September 29, 2011, 11:15:42 AM
dude.. are you seriously propping your bicep up with the other hand? ???

 ???
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: NeoSeminole on September 29, 2011, 12:20:42 PM
8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: TRIX on September 29, 2011, 01:20:39 PM
lemme help you out here cause you fucking retards dont seem to get it

IF YOU PUT IT IN PROPERLY AND DEEP ENOUGH IT WILL NOT CAUSE YOU TO LOSE SEPARATION.

im getting tired of idiots, like you, who dont know what they are talking about, talking like they know what they are talking about.

then why doesnt everyone have phil heath arms? :D

you are full of shit
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: cephissus on September 29, 2011, 01:25:15 PM
then why doesnt everyone have phil heath arms? :D

you are full of shit

lol... so because he has outstanding arms, there is no oil in them.   flawless reasoning.  ::)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: jaejonna on September 29, 2011, 01:30:26 PM
IMO Phil Heath has the best overall arms in history... Ronnie had the sickest biceps but Heath as of late just looks ridiculous ... and everyone knows I call it as I see it ....
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: dogbowl on September 29, 2011, 04:23:51 PM
Phil Heath probably does have the best arms ever.  I dont agree that Ronnie had the best biceps.  They look short, especially in the front double bicep.

Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Natural Man on September 29, 2011, 04:25:49 PM
(http://www.davedraper.com/gallery/data/510/2VinceGirondaSergioOliva.jpg)


nice to see bodybuilders always dressed like fucktards.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: DK II on September 29, 2011, 04:28:22 PM
(http://www.davedraper.com/gallery/data/510/2VinceGirondaSergioOliva.jpg)


nice to see bodybuilders always dressed like fucktards.

I agree 100%, the floral design is pretty gay.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Parker on September 29, 2011, 04:38:20 PM
Phil Heath probably does have the best arms ever.  I dont agree that Ronnie had the best biceps.  They look short, especially in the front double bicep.


Ronnie had a split peak--literally a peak upon a peak...which is rare...only a few bbers have had that.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 29, 2011, 04:44:58 PM
Ronnie had a split peak--literally a peak upon a peak...which is rare...only a few bbers have had that.
In Flex magazine right before the millennium they picked the best parts and they chose Darren has having the best biceps  , I thought Ronnie would
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: DK II on September 29, 2011, 04:51:19 PM
In Flex magazine right before the millennium they picked the best parts and they chose Darren has having the best biceps  , I thought Ronnie would

Darrem Charles looks fucking great there.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 29, 2011, 04:58:53 PM
Darrem Charles looks fucking great there.

That's from 2003 he placed 7th   
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: JZMB on September 29, 2011, 04:59:37 PM
Pound 4 pound no one touches Ed.

THE BEEF

Eduardo Correa got insane triceps up here
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Parker on September 29, 2011, 05:04:33 PM
In Flex magazine right before the millennium they picked the best parts and they chose Darren has having the best biceps  , I thought Ronnie would
Yeah, Darrem has awesome biceps...Flex mag is hit or miss, they did that "You build the bber thing", and they used Mike Matarazzo's arms for the bber (using the best bodyparts for the bber)---Mike has big arms, but lack detail, no real pop to them.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 29, 2011, 05:13:33 PM
Yeah, Darrem has awesome biceps...Flex mag is hit or miss, they did that "You build the bber thing", and they used Mike Matarazzo's arms for the bber (using the best bodyparts for the bber)---Mike has big arms, but lack detail, no real pop to them.

Yeah I recalled they received a lot of flack from their choices as well.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Nirvana on September 29, 2011, 05:42:54 PM
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_mC1TEdZ4gks/SxBaaiDRO6I/AAAAAAAAC7U/vB5RbjGmwa8/s1600/Ronnie+coleman+2+at+2003+Mr.+Olympia.JPG)
(http://www.bodybuildinguniverse.com/images/coleman/coleman11.jpg)
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=80192)
(http://www.kappero.com/dir/sport/images/ronnie%2Bcoleman.jpg)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Palpatine Q on September 29, 2011, 06:26:27 PM
This guy might disagree...

(http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/7/b/7bdbd-30a0c_Sergio_Oliva2.jpg)

(http://www.davedraper.com/gallery/data/510/2VinceGirondaSergioOliva.jpg)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=392853.0;attach=425218;image)





Let's see Phil try this pose!
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=392853.0;attach=425259;image)

This guy doesn't come close to heath's arms
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: apply85 on September 29, 2011, 06:40:10 PM
Take a look at that pic of milos before and after seo in the front db, then look at heath's fdb, you will see the oil in his bicep
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Khofo on September 29, 2011, 07:24:38 PM
Phil arms are fuLL of séO  
Colemn & oliva arms are 100% légit musclE
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Nirvana on September 29, 2011, 07:27:28 PM
where were all the heath fans before the olympia?
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: DK II on September 29, 2011, 07:37:22 PM
where were all the heath fans before the olympia?

Heath = Hype.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Hurricane Beef ! on September 29, 2011, 07:47:39 PM
Eduardo Correa got insane triceps up here

Ronnie, no equal . . . Ed pound for pound, no one touches him now.

THE BEEF
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Hulkster on September 29, 2011, 08:00:16 PM
LOL this thread is a complete joke.

heath doesn't touch ronnie in the arm department.
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Hulkster on September 29, 2011, 08:01:01 PM
^
ouch. not even close..
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: gh15 on September 29, 2011, 08:38:09 PM
^
ouch. not even close..

you are right,, its nto close ,, it cant be compared,, ron colman arms are much much beter than any bodybuilder to ever grace stage,, philsulina arms are enhanced with seo and! if you compare them to someone then kevin is better example ,, but to compare them to ron ?? fellas lost their mind,,

philsulina only body part that can be compared to kevin is arms ,, the only thing on philsulina that is pro level is the arms and the detail in the back...that is it ,, and its nto mr o level it is PRO LEVEL

gh15 approved
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: gh15 on September 29, 2011, 08:40:20 PM
and kevin triceps were better ,, what i say is the over all arm can be compard to kevin ,, kevin arms were better but atleast it is closer and comparable ...to compare philsulina arms with ron colman? gotta be nuts

gh15 approved
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Nasty Nate on September 29, 2011, 10:38:14 PM
kevins triceps and phils both have that meaty hang to them, such a cool look
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: TRIX on September 30, 2011, 12:47:43 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/G8isL.jpg)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: TRIX on September 30, 2011, 12:52:48 AM
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/index-62.jpg)
Title: Re: Phil Heath has no SEO in his arms (better arms than coleman ever had)
Post by: Hulkster on September 30, 2011, 07:09:31 AM
 8)