Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: pillowtalk on October 08, 2011, 06:15:14 AM
-
John Paul Holdren (born March 1, 1944) is advisor to President Barack Obama for Science & Technology, Director of the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy, & Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science & Technology (PCAST)
Population is the root of all humanities problems, homosapiens are a cancer.
Webster Tarpleythinks this guy is worse that Hitler, Stalin, Polpot, etc...
I say no, no, no. This all sounds like logic to me. Genocide says Tarpley - I say Eugenics.
GetBIG says what?? Sorry I now that it is 60 mins, & that will put a chunk in your TV/Budweiser routine, but bear with me ;D
PT
-
this is all true. i think this was already explained by Mr Smith in the nineties.
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Tb80zV4TFI0/Sj0Hzj4LP_I/AAAAAAAAAuI/bqwpzSGLhD0/s400/HW-AgentSmith.jpg)
-
Population? If people stopped living like sardines, we maybe able to have a 20 billion people on earth. You have mountain ranges, deserts, Wide open oceans, underneath the oceans, or the skies...imagine Cities in the oceans, within mountain ranges.
-
Population? If people stopped living like sardines, we maybe able to have a 20 billion people on earth. You have mountain ranges, deserts, Wide open oceans, underneath the oceans, or the skies...imagine Cities in the oceans, within mountain ranges.
Resources?
-
Population? If people stopped living like sardines, we maybe able to have a 20 billion people on earth. You have mountain ranges, deserts, Wide open oceans, underneath the oceans, or the skies...imagine Cities in the oceans, within mountain ranges.
For what reason would we want to be 20 billion people? That would further increase poverty and drainage of natural resources.
-
For what reason would we want to be 20 billion people? That would further increase poverty and drainage of natural resources.
Who'd want 6 billion? 50 yrs ago, nobody would have thought we'd have over 6 billion people on the planet, and people were saying the same thing...You are making the assumption that we are using current technologies and natural resources like oil....
-
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_JmpkIMgnzIE/SidzHr_lTDI/AAAAAAAAfYs/tmfOX4kGFmg/s400/Extreme+bodybuilders+turn+into+ugly+muscled+balloons++3.jpg)
-
Who'd want 6 billion? 50 yrs ago, nobody would have thought we'd have over 6 billion people on the planet, and people were saying the same thing...You are making the assumption that we are using current technologies and natural resources like oil....
look at the dying populations of fish in our seas stupid. just to take one example.
-
(http://tight-shirt.com/pic/bodybuilder-robert-burneika-with-muscular-chest-big-beefy-thighs-and-big-hands-in-tight-t-shirt.jpg)
-
look at the dying populations of fish in our seas stupid. just to take one example.
Again, you are assuming that we'd use the same technologies and drainage and chemicals, and most important over fishing of certain populations, w/o restocking...stupid.
back in the 50s, 60's, 70's DDT was being used, which caused bird egg shells to be too fragile among other things. Predator species like the Bald Eagle, Peregine Falcon, and Osprey were majorly hit. The use of DDT was halted, and over time the populations became healthy.
Man chooses not to remain balanced with the environment. Coming up with diff technologies and replacing what you take, one can maintain a healthy equilibrium.
-
Did anyone actually watch the entire vid??
PT
-
Who'd want 6 billion? 50 yrs ago, nobody would have thought we'd have over 6 billion people on the planet, and people were saying the same thing...You are making the assumption that we are using current technologies and natural resources like oil....
There are other organisms that exist on this planet, population control is a must, less population equates to a higher quality of life and a healthy, fully functional biosphere.
-
There are other organisms that exist on this planet, population control is a must, less population equates to a higher quality of life and a healthy, fully functional biosphere.
quite true...but we congregate en mass along coastal regions...there are a shitload of "livable" places...
population control usually is in the form of disease, famine, war...
Less population doesn't always equate to higher quality of life, especially if there is less genetic diversity amongst the species.
-
quite true...but we congregate en mass along coastal regions...there are a shitload of "livable" places...
population control usually is in the form of disease, famine, war...
Less population doesn't always equate to higher quality of life, especially if there is less genetic diversity amongst the species.
Mixed with technology it does.
x2 Billion is easily enough for genetic diversity, we can do with out the nigres though. Eugenics is all about propagating the higher end of evolution.
PT
-
Mixed with technology it does.
x2 Billion is easily enough for genetic diversity, we can do with out the nigres though. Eugenics is all about propagating the higher end of evolution.
PT
2 billion would suffice and industry, farming, transport, would need to be streamlined to allow Gaia to balance herself with our race again.
You can throw Khazars on that list too.
-
Mixed with technology it does.
x2 Billion is easily enough for genetic diversity, we can do with out the nigres though. Eugenics is all about propagating the higher end of evolution.
PT
We do w/o them Indians too, remember, the country you are in has over 1 billion people, and most are poor...And most of the Chinese are poor as well...
2 billion would suffice and industry, farming, transport, would need to be streamlined to allow Gaia to balance herself with our race again.
You can throw Khazars on that list too.
Gaia will balance herself out...shake us off like fleas, wouldn't be the first time things have happened. Almost all ancient civilizations have a Great Flood story...and then there was the Ice Age...and there was the end of the Cretaceous Period
-
Antiquity and Middle Ages
A dramatic population bottleneck is theorized for the period around 70,000 BC (see Toba catastrophe theory). After this time, and until the development of agriculture, it is estimated that the world population stabilized at about one million people whose subsistence entailed hunting and foraging, a lifestyle that by its nature ensured a low population density. The total world population probably never exceeded 15 million inhabitants before the invention of agriculture. By contrast, it is estimated that more than 55 million people lived in the combined eastern and western Roman Empire (AD 300–400).
The Plague of Justinian caused Europe's population to drop by around 50% between 541 and the 8th century. The population of Europe was more than 70 million in 1340. The Black Death pandemic in the 14th century may have reduced the world's population from an estimated 450 million to between 350 and 375 million in 1400. It took roughly 200 years for Europe's population to regain its 1340 level. China experienced a population decline from an estimated 123 million around 1200 to an estimated 65 million in 1393, which was presumably due to a combination of Mongol invasions and plague. William McNeill clearly states that China's population decline is better explained by bubonic plague than by Mongol ferocity.
At the founding of the Ming Dynasty in 1368, China's population was reported to be close to 60 million, and toward the end of the dynasty in 1644 it might have approached 150 million. England's population reached an estimated 5.6 million in 1650, up from an estimated 2.6 million in 1500. New crops that had come to Asia and Europe from the Americas via the Spanish colonizers in the 16th century contributed to the population growth. Since being introduced by Portuguese traders in the 16th century,maize and manioc have replaced traditional African crops as the continent’s most important staple food crops. Alfred W. Crosby speculated that increased production of maize, manioc, and other American crops "...enabled the slave traders [who] drew many, perhaps most, of their cargoes from the rain forest areas, precisely those areas where American crops enabled heavier settlement than before."
The population of the Americas in 1500 may have been between 50 and 100 million. The pre-Columbian North American population probably numbered somewhere between 2 million and 18 million. Encounters between European explorers and populations in the rest of the world often introduced local epidemics of extraordinary virulence. Archaeological evidence indicates that the death of around 90% of the Native American population of the New World was caused by Old World diseases such as smallpox, measles, and influenza. Over the centuries, the Europeans had developed high degrees of immunity to these diseases, while the indigenous peoples had no such immunity.
Human population control
Human population control is the practice of artificially altering the rate of growth of a human population.
Historically, human population control has been implemented by limiting the population's birth rate, by contraception or by government mandate, and has been undertaken as a response to factors including high or increasing levels of poverty, environmental concerns, religious reasons, and overpopulation.
PT
-
We do w/o them Indians too, remember, the country you are in has over 1 billion people, and most are poor...And most of the Chinese are poor as well...
Gaia will balance herself out...shake us off like fleas, wouldn't be the first time things have happened. Almost all ancient civilizations have a Great Flood story...and then there was the Ice Age...and there was the end of the Cretaceous Period
I agree, 95% of this country is due for the protein bank. Black faced, Australoid mtDNA , sub 80/IQ muddafuckers.
Just like sub-Saharan Aficans they is, stinky little fuckers too, just like your lot.
Fixed the last bit for ya ;)
PT
-
Been saying for years that overpopulation is at the root of most of man's problems.
I love when folks spout off how there is so much available space for more. Like a majority of our resources and farmlands, etc. are also located in those regions.
Fact: We are drowning in our own. Seven BILLION?!
I am not one of those who responds with joy when someone tells of having yet another child ... or a "wonderful family of ... X" amount.
Sooner or later there are going to have to be decisions made that will be unlike any ever made in the history of the human race.
We are a plague and we must be stopped.
-
"Fucking virus with shoes" - Bill Hicks
The population of the world went from sub x3 Billion in 1950, to post x6 Billion in 2000. Fucker doubled in 50 years.
It was at x1 Million for centuries, & then WHAM it doubled in just 50 years.
PT
-
Crazy shit. Welcome to the future. Zero diversity, trillions of coffee brunette brown eyes sitting on top of each other.
-
Been saying for years that overpopulation is at the root of most of man's problems.
I love when folks spout off how there is so much available space for more. Like a majority of our resources and farmlands, etc. are also located in those regions.
Fact: We are drowning in our own. Seven BILLION?!
I am not one of those who responds with joy when someone tells of having yet another child ... or a "wonderful family of ... X" amount.
Sooner or later there are going to have to be decisions made that will be unlike any ever made in the history of the human race.
We are a plague and we must be stopped.
Already making them over here..........
This was posted earlier by my partner in crime.
Why call someone "stupid"? Thats neither professional nor dignified! Such vile offerings merely succeed in revealing to the world that you are the scum of the earth!
But lets move on.
Groink, as you attempt to view the matter through your static belief that "the United states is what it is, and forever will be thus" you overlook a few things.
Before I get into why both the US and EU are heading for the shit, lets recap a few points:
- India is a shithole, it has a population largely comprised of morons.
- Whilst India's population are majority morons, the country is headed by the elite of the Indian caste system - a very capable Indian subsected cohort comprising approx 5% of the total population (this is important, we'll get into it shortly)
- India's population (and I am guessing most here are not aware of this) totals 1.2 billion, only second to China, and even then its arguable depending on which figures you are viewing, thus India could contrive a standing army on par with China if the fancy takes them. India is also a nuclear power.
OK, all of that to one side (for a moment) here is what you REALLY have overlooked, and trust me, you will like it, or failing that, you won't; it depends if you are a lover of the dark side?
The United states has a population of approx 300 Million; as of 2011 this population is approx 40% non-white (provision for that demographic comprised of estimated illegal aliens given).
The Guardian Of London: US set for dramatic change as white America becomes minority by 2042:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/aug/15/population.race
Addendum: The above article from the Guardian of London (circa 2008) asserts 2042 will be the year whites lose their majority; you should note that only eight years earlier the same Guardian of London had asserted 2050 (in an article entitled "The Last Days Of A White World, found here) as the year of such demographic change. To wit: all data suggests that the United States will hit minority white status possibly as early as 2035.
Why is this important? Well, there is something termed "Smart Fraction Theory" to deal with.
Smart Fraction Theory dictates that a nation (and more so its per-capita GDP) can only ever be as successful as the percent of its population possessing IQ's of 120 or more (ie: those folks capable of performing the "smart" jobs) and how many of them a nation has (ie: the more they have, the greater said nations "Smart fraction as a percentage of the population" will be)
With regard to the United States (and indeed the West as a whole) we are in the midst of a dysgenic effect whereby our population is manifesting a lower average IQ than that exhibited 100 years ago.
Dr. Phil. Helmuth Nyborg - IQ, immigration and Europe's future (part 1-4)
This is occuring for a few reasons - as comprehensively outlined by Nyborg in the above video lecture - but suffice to say immigration (legal or otherwise) of non-whites is the main factor. As Nyborg asserts, all forecasts suggest that the west will experience a drastic drop in IQ over the next sixty years. This disastrous drop in IQ will be on the order of 20 IQ points, and will occur by virtue of a "relaxation of both internal and external Darwinian selection". If you missed that, at some point circa 2070, the average IQ of the west as a whole will resemble that of a present day U.S black ghetto... which isn't surprising given that by 2070, the United States population will comprise approx 80% from the non-white demographic (50% non-white cira 2035-2040)
As said, this drop in IQ will occur by virtue of whites becomming a minority, whilst the non-whites (with lower IQ's) become the majority. The high IQ whites will be out-bred, the scum will breed with scum and there will an on-going increase in non-white immigration; pure dysgenics in action! It is a time bomb!
To wit; India at the present time has a vast population exceeding one billion, the VAST majority (one billion plus) of whom are morons.
However, and as Rushton has detailed (and Pillowtalk has touched upon) whilst the majority are morons, India is ruled by an elite that lead a goodly 75 million lighter skinned folks (ie: the beautiful ladies Pillowtalk posted earlier; folks with "eugenic ancestral trails" from mixing with whites over centuries etc) These Indians are very capable intellectually and know they are superior to the darker "untouchable" scum beneath them.
Let us momentarilly return to Smart Fraction Theory; a nations intellectual elite and their ability.
Whilst the US and EU are in the midst of dysgenic decline, the Indian elite - as Pillowtalk has mentioned - are fucked off with having one billion scumbags dragging down what could be a very high per capita GDP of the higher quality 75 million capable Indians (ie: as of 1998, India had 5% of its TOTAL population forming a smart fraction as a percentage of the population as a whole, this compared to America's 30% at the time)
If you missed that, the United States in 1998 had 30% of approx 270 millon people (its already undoubtedly attenuated since 1998) whereas India had 5% of approx one Billion. Thus the raw, absolute numbers of capable people possessed by each country are far from miles apart. The only difference being, that India has a larger population dragging that 5% down. Make no mistake, high caste India has the gold, the brains and the numbers to be a very potent force in world politics, it is however encumbered by in excess of one billion lower caste scumbags, of whom, hold the intellectually superior Indians back!
How would you feel if you were one of those 75 million capable Indians being held down by over one billion scumbags, six hundred million of whom cannot read or write? Small clue, you are seeing the embyonic stages of similar feelings manifesting as an increase in far right movements across Europe, along with the Tea party clowns in America. The whites across the west (whether they realise it or not) are becomming restless/angry with tax dollar grabbing policies that have [since 1964] sucked whites dry in order to feed, water and hitherto coddle the non-whites (yeah yeah, most tea partiers havent a clue, but as the next decade rolls out, they will "get it")
To wit, Indians could - with a generation of eugenics - solve their dillema, all while you "dumb whites in the west" will be drowing in Afriturds and Mexcrement!
Thus, and as you can now understand, many Indian nationalists are not afraid of voicing support for eugenics to get rid of the useless untouchables, of whom, perpetually compromise the efforts of the elite Indian set; and that is the point you have missed!. Whether Gandhi having tea and cakes with Margret Sanger and Hitler; or members of the Gandhi family fucking up family planning programs decades later, its only a matter of time before they get things right over there in curry land.
India shares China's views on genetic issues:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1116969/
Indeed, just the other week, Pillowtalk informed me that India has a program that bribes sub-humans with 'rewards' such as food blenders (yes really) if they agree to be sterilized! A scumbag such as Taylor would no doubt offer to have his balls chopped off for a bong and a basketball such are his deracinated, degenerate ways!
India: "Cars, Microwaves And Food-Blenders For Sterilization":
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13982031
Over the next 50 years, if a eugenics program is followed, India's "Smart fraction as a percentage of the population" will increase, whilst that of the US and the EU (thanks to the dysgenic effect of non-white immigration so admired by both you and your lover fat alex) will decline to unthinkable levels.
As a result, at best, by 2060, India will have completed a eugenics program and will then be in a position to blow the [what will then be a minority white] United States out of the water; at worst... both the [minority white] United States and the [still overpopulated] Indian sub-continent will be equals in squalor; the west will become TOTALLY fucked; and the amazing thing is... IT'S ALL BY DESIGN!!! You stupid, football watching, white whores that swallow contraceptive pills fucking, beer drinking morons!!
In terms of national prosperity, the worst case scenario, is that India remains the same (ie: massive sub-human population) and - as Nyborg et al assert based on all available data - the United States & Europe join her ie: India will remain dragged down by low caste untouchables, and America (along with Europe) will be dragged down by those non-white immigrants, of which, morons such as Coach, Gaylor and yourself love sooooo much, oh the fucking irony here LOL
The Decay Of Western Civilization; Double Relaxed Darwinian Selection:
https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/nyborg-2011-the-decay-of-western-civilization-double-relaxed-darwinian-selection.pdf
Nyborg: The Genetic Decline Of Western Civilization; Denmark As A Case Study:
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/05/helmuth-nyborg-on-the-genetic-decline-of-western-civilization-denmark-as-a-cast-study/
Make no mistake, immigration is a weapon; without it (and more so the non-white hordes it doth usher in) those vectors of cultural marxist critical theory [so very reliant upon said hordes] would have no revolutionary group thru which to agitate. Immigration has been implemented by those not of the white race; Google "Hart and Cellar" if you want to learn more; you won't though, why? because you are a lazy, vile scumbag. Lets not pretend you have even the first clue what was just written.
"Immigration is fine, as long as they are legal" LOLLOLOLOL, EPIC ignorance of racial demographic trends, of which, are the harbinger of your dysgenic destiny!
The United States you are bragging about is dying, and all thanks to those resposnsible for targetting both her, and Europe, with mass immigration and cultural marxism in order they destroy the west; in short, you are fucked!
"80 years", LOL, why not have a guess which group were well into their journey through your institutions "80 years" ago? Mister white man so verilly lacking knowledge of the milenia worth of history pertaining to his own volk, much less the last "80 years".
Groink you, and many whites like you, have no idea; but please, keep posting silly videos of planes as if it matters.
On a lighter note, and for those sick with worry, here is what will actually happen: In short, we - in the West - are approaching another "King Edward of England, 18 July 1290 AD" moment; renaissance is upon the horizon!
Google it if you feel the need ;)
mutandis mutatis
Crap rebuttal based on fuck all facts incomming at 5, 4, 3, 2...
PT
-
Cliffs: Kill all the blacks and South Asians (Indian people and the like), leave some East Asian, Chinese and all of the whites? Sounds like a good plan.
-
In concluding his article on eugenics, Kevles should not have used the words “History at the least has taught us ...” because they imply that most people condemn eugenics now.1 Those who condemn eugenics may actually be a minority. In China, where the population exceeds 1.2 billion, geneticists overwhelmingly support eugenics.2 India, Russia, and other populous countries share China's views on genetic issues.
The social values that guided early Western eugenicists and still underlie Chinese eugenics “give greater importance to the well-being of social groups than that of the individual.”3 By contrast, current Western values, concerned as they are with individual rights rather than with the common good,3 represent the exact opposite of both Chinese values and the social ethics that evolution fostered for millions of years—social ethics that proved to be the best ethics for ensuring the survival of social groups.4
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1116969/
PT
-
So when it comes down to it, who the hell actually qualifies to stay alive? No one on GetBig makes the cut.
-
Cliffs: Kill all the blacks and South Asians (Indian people and the like), leave some East Asian, Chinese and all of the whites? Sounds like a good plan.
Fuck off gimmick. India has a good 75 million (approx) with an IQ over 125.
Not to mention all the Gold in private hands over here, now that will come in handy when shit goes tit's up & paper money is not worth the cotton it is printed on ;)
PT
-
So when it comes down to it, who the hell actually qualifies to stay alive? No one not one of the GetBig gimmicks makes the cut.
FIXED!!
PT
-
Fuck off gimmick. India has a good 75 million (approx) with an IQ over 125.
Not to mention all the Gold in private hands over here, now that will come in handy when shit goes tit's up & paper money is not worth the cotton it is printed on ;)
PT
And women from India or Sri Lanka can be very beautiful...
-
Fuck off gimmick. India has a good 75 million (approx) with an IQ over 125.
Not to mention all the Gold in private hands over here, now that will come in handy when shit goes tit's up & paper money is not worth the cotton it is printed on ;)
PT
Yeah but, when it comes down to it, you'll still need to filter out even more undesirables when you're done with the shits who can't tell between a pen and a penis. You really think you belong anywhere other than a gas chamber, and that you're actually fit to breed? You're on GetBig for fuck's sake.
-
Yeah but, when it comes down to it, you'll still need to filter out even more undesirables when you're done with the shits who can't tell between a pen and a penis. You really think you belong anywhere other than a gas chamber, and that you're actually fit to breed? You're on GetBig for fuck's sake.
& you are a gimmick, lower on the food chain than cockroaches.
Your point was??
PT
-
this is all true. i think this was already explained by Mr Smith in the nineties.
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Tb80zV4TFI0/Sj0Hzj4LP_I/AAAAAAAAAuI/bqwpzSGLhD0/s400/HW-AgentSmith.jpg)
Truth
-
& you are a gimmick, lower on the food chain than cockroaches.
Your point was??
PT
Lol epic fail. I'll see you in the gas chamber. Retard.
-
Lol epic fail. I'll see you in the gas chamber. Retard.
There will be NO gas chambers (there never was, yep, all a BIG lie don't you know).
STERILISATION - is the name of the game.
PT
-
There will be NO gas chambers (there never was, yep, all a BIG lie don't you know).
STERILISATION - is the name of the game.
PT
Semantics. My fate is your fate. Retard's fate is your fate. Whether it means we're breathing in Carbon Monoxide, or swapping our testicles for a protein mixer.
-
this is all true. i think this was already explained by Mr Smith in the nineties.
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Tb80zV4TFI0/Sj0Hzj4LP_I/AAAAAAAAAuI/bqwpzSGLhD0/s400/HW-AgentSmith.jpg)
;D thats the first thing i thought of when i saw this thread
-
only happy, educated,faithful and contributing humans should be allowed to live, wich means 99.9% of world population is just living ind espair hurting, killing, ruining each others daily. A selection will be made. Or, we ll all die.
-
only happy, educated,faithful and contributing humans should be allowed to live, wich means 99.9% of world population is just living ind espair hurting, killing, ruining each others daily. A selection will be made. Or, we ll all die.
faith correlates with low intelligence.
-
most intelligent people rule dumber people and keep them dumb at all costs to stay on top of the pyramid. That's their choice. They could do somethign different with everything they have.
There s a big difference between hapiness, and intelligence. When you re intelligent and understand how things truly work, you have more power, a global vision, and you re poised to decide for those who are udmber and cant decide of their own life and fate.
If tomorow asteroids rain on earth, who will survive? the richest, smartest, who know eachothers and who will build themselves concrete self suficient vaults while 99,9 % of the world population would die. If scientists knew something was going to happen, would they alert world population? or would they stick together with the most powerful rich ones, and they would put themselves in safety while not warning the world population.
You re either at the top of the pyramid or at the botom.
Most people use their knowledges, education, to rule over dumber people and submit them. Those with faith dont. They rule while being benevolent and are able to sacrifice themselves. They can envision someone else, a friend, son, grandson, even stranger, hapiness, and sacrifice themselves to allow it to exists in a near future. They are Angels.
If you rule without faith you re going to put yourself before everyone else. If you rule with faith mankind has a chance to survive happy forever. Still, a selection has to be made between those who deserve to live and those who dont. Those who only care about themselves will be athreat for those who care about others.
Faith is linked to the survival of mankind itself. There are so many things we still dont know, understand. Faith is life, faith is love, faith is balance and survival . Faith is what led our most modern societies where they are nowadays. And evil is what is destroying them.
We always have the choice. This oportunity, this choice itself, has been given to us by our creator.
-
not knowing much can also make you a happier person, persons with down syndrom for example
-
faith correlates with low intelligence.
So, having no faith in "your leader", "yourself", your partner coorelates to having higher intelligence.
-
So, having no faith in "your leader", "yourself", your partner coorelates to having higher intelligence.
haha dont waste your time with this mental midget.
-
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=46037&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
-
So, having no faith in "your leader", "yourself", your partner coorelates to having higher intelligence.
I think we are talking in a religious/superstitious sense here....
-
maxx, seriously.
Be glad smart, faithful people are teaching others how to be happier, how to survive, contribute to society while other losers like you only use everything they develop or receive from others for themselves and dont care about others, dont care about giving back. Your fate is written, just like the faith of those who didnt abandon God's Words.
All atheists will be wiped from the surface of earth, in fact they re erasing themselves considering they dont even want to reproduce because they simply cant take care of someone else but themselves.
-
Let only people with blue eyes survive and all your problems will dissapear over night. The earth only needs 300-400 million folk.
-
I think we are talking in a religious/superstitious sense here....
Ah...my grandmother is 92 yrs old, faithfully goes to church, and is far more happier than most people on here., she is hard of hearing, and blind in one eye...her faith has taking her thru far harder times than most on here have seen...she knows that there is evil in the world, but I only wish that I can be that happy at 92...
-
I think we are talking in a religious/superstitious sense here....
i was watching a woody allen movie yesterday called matchpoint.. its about this intelligent pessimistic fellow... over a dinner conversation he makes the point "faith is the path of least resistance". he is saying it as an insult to tose who accept faith without question. he thinks depressive, negative, lack of faith is more intellectualy admireable. but i found his comment very funny.. why would faith be the past of least resistance if there wasnt some strong force in reality to drive us in tha t direction? ;)
i would say it takes more faith to believe everything just happened to happen, and that matter and energy are self sustaining.... than to believe everything was created. being that the universe seems to be geared towards developing and improving consciousness as a main priority, as well as other philosphical concepts.. which are probably over your head.. like infinite divisibility of matter, causality, free will, the ability to even think about death and god and atheism.. etc.
-
i would also point one to the most simple and oldest of all living organisms... bacteria. the ancestor of all life forms. single celled, no nucleus, and no organelles (organs for cells). these organisms, with absolutely no internal or external sensory structures, no nervous system of any kind, nothing to them except the ability to take in energy molecules and self replicate... these organisms have the ability to sense objects outside their cell wall/membrane.. react to and move around in their environments.. and at times even display what appears to be emotional reactions.
how are these things possible? scientists have absolutely no idea.
but i think its pretty obvious. every living thing is driven by a soul. :)
-
wow meltdown x3 ;D
you can believe what you want I don't care. just stating facts. carry on. :)
-
Ah...my grandmother is 92 yrs old, faithfully goes to church, and is far more happier than most people on here., she is hard of hearing, and blind in one eye...her faith has taking her thru far harder times than most on here have seen...she knows that there is evil in the world, but I only wish that I can be that happy at 92...
That fact that you want to make it to 92 leaves me with no doubt that you are mad as bat shit!!
Life past 60 sucks the root mate. I got x20 more years down here, & then I want out................
PT
-
not knowing much can also make you a happier person, persons with down syndrome for example
That is called "ignorance is bliss" someone with down syndrome, knows that they get fed, watered, clothed, looked after all the time & don't have to get a day job. I would be in ecstasy, just dope me up on Morphine & get me a premium membership to all the best porn sites, I could die in a huge puddle of my own cum ;D
We would still be better off with x5 Billion less idiots on this planet
PT
-
i would say it takes more faith to believe everything just happened to happen, and that matter and energy are self sustaining.... than to believe everything was created. being that the universe seems to be geared towards developing and improving consciousness as a main priority, as well as other philosphical concepts.. which are probably over your head.. like infinite divisibility of matter, causality, free will, the ability to even think about death and god and atheism.. etc.
If you enlightened yourself more you would see why it makes sense. You get to a certain juncture and the outcome isnt to dissimilar anyway, its justs that ant like humans want to attatch human characteristics to everything. It doesnt work like that unfortunately.
-
Population? If people stopped living like sardines, we maybe able to have a 20 billion people on earth. You have mountain ranges, deserts, Wide open oceans, underneath the oceans, or the skies...imagine Cities in the oceans, within mountain ranges.
exactly
if people took responsibility for what they consume, 20 billion is NO problem. If you reduce animal consumption it would leave food and areal in abundance even with 20 billion people.
But most rather lie to them selves or aim to not really face up to reality and handle the choices.
-
To not believe in a creator is just pure ignorance. Way too many marvelous creations that all serve some grand purpose in this universe to just say it all happened by chance. The problem with humanity is simple. We simply think were so smart and intelligent when we really are a speck of shit in the sands of the sea in what we know of our small concept of the universe. What always gets me is that the truely intelligent humans that are actively involved in research and developments of science such as astronomy, physics, and chemistry too name a few, a good number of them cannot fathom that all this that we know of wasn't designed and created. The more that get discovered just show how powerful we are not and just how much our creator. "The more I learn, the less I truly know" like someone mentioned it takes a lot of "faith" to not believe in a creator...
-
Something on Nat Geo
http://video.nationalgeographic.com/video/player/national-geographic-channel/full-episodes/naked-science-1/ngc-extinctions-1.html (http://video.nationalgeographic.com/video/player/national-geographic-channel/full-episodes/naked-science-1/ngc-extinctions-1.html)
-
To not believe in a creator is just pure ignorance. Way too many marvelous creations that all serve some grand purpose in this universe to just say it all happened by chance. The problem with humanity is simple. We simply think were so smart and intelligent when we really are a speck of shit in the sands of the sea in what we know of our small concept of the universe. What always gets me is that the truely intelligent humans that are actively involved in research and developments of science such as astronomy, physics, and chemistry too name a few, a good number of them cannot fathom that all this that we know of wasn't designed and created. The more that get discovered just show how powerful we are not and just how much our creator. "The more I learn, the less I truly know" like someone mentioned it takes a lot of "faith" to not believe in a creator...
You have father issues. Go and educate yourself please.
-
exactly
if people took responsibility for what they consume, 20 billion is NO problem. If you reduce animal consumption it would leave food and areal in abundance even with 20 billion people.
But most rather lie to them selves or aim to not really face up to reality and handle the choices.
20 Million with comfort, huh?? Based on your opinion or do we have some research to go on??
Animal consumption, WTF say goodbye to meat & milk products, do you have a thing against the right amino profile going to your body??
PT
-
exactly
if people took responsibility for what they consume, 20 billion is NO problem. If you reduce animal consumption it would leave food and areal in abundance even with 20 billion people.
But most rather lie to them selves or aim to not really face up to reality and handle the choices.
Lol it would be a fucking zoo, albeit with a single species. Quality of life would be fubar, some type of purgatory.
-
If you enlightened yourself more you would see why it makes sense. You get to a certain juncture and the outcome isnt to dissimilar anyway, its justs that ant like humans want to attatch human characteristics to everything. It doesnt work like that unfortunately.
i would also point one to the most simple and oldest of all living organisms... bacteria. the ancestor of all life forms. single celled, no nucleus, and no organelles (organs for cells). these organisms, with absolutely no internal or external sensory structures, no nervous system of any kind, nothing to them except the ability to take in energy molecules and self replicate... these organisms have the ability to sense objects outside their cell wall/membrane.. react to and move around in their environments.. and at times even display what appears to be emotional reactions.
how are these things possible? scientists have absolutely no idea.
but i think its pretty obvious. every living thing is driven by a soul. :)
-
Population? If people stopped living like sardines, we maybe able to have a 20 billion people on earth. You have mountain ranges, deserts, Wide open oceans, underneath the oceans, or the skies...imagine Cities in the oceans, within mountain ranges.
No way dude. That's too many people. Do you really want to have a couple billion more farting, sweaty people? I'd rather see more animals on the planet.
There is no way in hell the earth can sustain that many people. Earth is not a huge planet. We are already having problems with 7 billion.
-
why dont you "cancer cell" , threatening "nature" , kill yourself then ???
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones
-
20 Million with comfort, huh?? Based on your opinion or do we have some research to go on??
Animal consumption, WTF say goodbye to meat & milk products, do you have a thing against the right amino profile going to your body??
PT
synthetics