Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Benny B on October 12, 2011, 08:23:53 PM
-
Herman Cain...King of all House Negroes. ::)
2012 Republican Presidential candidate Herman Cain was on the radio show of right-winger Neal Boortz and Cain had a laugh over Boortz's comments regarding slave ancestors. The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur breaks it down.
-
you better be careful...herman has enough money to buy you up and make you his own house black benny
-
Benny - we have a pol board for a reason.
-
Benny - we have a pol board for a reason.
PEA BRAIN - I am telling you to FUCK OFF for a reason. :-*
-
Benny u are so retarted. Obama has brainwashed u. Why would anyone vote for obama, he has failed. Have things gotten better sense he has been elected? No, they have gotten worse and we are in record debt and he has created no jobs. so why the hell you you vote for him again?
-
Benny u are so retarted. Obama has brainwashed u. Why would anyone vote for obama, he has failed. Have things gotten better sense he has been elected? No, they have gotten worse and we are in record debt and he has created no jobs. so why the hell you you vote for him again?
At least spell "retarded" correctly. ::)
(http://ih0.redbubble.net/image.5571852.2263/sticker,375x360.png)
-
:D
-
:D
lol
-
Any black republican will be called a house guy by filthy turds like Benny. The niggs like Benny don't want the welfare and free handouts to stop that is the only reason!
-
The Obama Problem
By Monty Pelerin
The Obama Problem is simple to explain but impossible to solve. The problem is Obama himself, and most people not named Barack or Michelle understand that.
President Obama's political career is in free-fall. He will not be reelected. Many Democrats and media personalities now understand what appeared impossible even mere months ago.
Mr. Obama burst onto the political scene as a relatively unknown wunderkind. He could read a mean teleprompter and did so with fanfare at the 2004 Democrat Convention. He had good speechwriters, an intelligent and disciplined campaign strategy, a carefully crafted biography, and a highly compliant media. He was charismatic and eloquent. Joe Biden awkwardly described him as "the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy."
The Perfect Storm
The 2008 election was the political equivalent of a perfect storm." Two factors were key to Obama's election:
Americans were disgusted with Washington, and especially with George Bush. The media anointed Obama as their man. They publicized his strengths and hid his weaknesses. They painted him as an outsider, someone who could bridge the gap between political parties and make Washington function. The media engineered Obama into the nomination and threw Hillary Clinton overboard in the primary process.
The Republicans chose a sure loser to run -- shopworn Washington-establishment figure Senator John McCain. McCain offered nothing that had not already been rejected by the public. He was little more than an elderly George W. Bush who carried the additional baggage of a Washington insider. It is likely that any Democrat would have easily beaten McCain.
When the perfect storm cleared, Obama was president.
No president in recent history began his term with higher expectations and goodwill than Barack Obama, but the promise and exhilaration that accompanied his election was short-lived. In less than three years, Obama plummeted from the heights (his "Messiah" entry) to the depths (a "worse than Jimmy Carter" figure).
The turnaround was astonishing in its speed and magnitude. To put matters in perspective, it took George Bush almost eight years to hit bottom. And Bush always had little support from the media, a force that continues to protect Obama.
How Things Went So Wrong So Quickly
To understand Obama's loss in popularity, it is necessary to recognize that Barack Obama was a fluke. He was an unlikely candidate, pushed to his party's nomination as a result of the media. His election was another quirk, more aberration than achievement. The perfect storm virtually ensured that the Democrat candidate would win in 2008. It is not a strain to conclude that the mainstream media, rather than the electorate, put Obama into the highest office in the land.
In hindsight, a great mistake was made. Even the fawning media and the Democrat establishment now recognize that, although are unwilling to publicly admit it. Their behavior is analogous to refusing to discuss a friend's terminal illness in the hope that it will somehow go away.
The media and the Democratic Party are at risk if the tragedy they foisted on the nation continues. Their future is intertwined with the Obama Problem. Both sponsored him, and both may ultimately be held accountable. The battle so easily won in 2008 may cost them subsequent battles, if not the war itself.
Both know the risk. They just have no easy way of solving the problem.
Opinions regarding the factors responsible for Mr. Obama's political demise abound. A full menu is available -- the economy, broken promises, cronyism, socialism, bailouts, corruption, disillusionment, inexperience, incompetence, Chicago-style politics, etc. Pundits have a target-rich environment from which to approach the failure of the Obama presidency.
The factors above are relevant but one level removed from the root cause. The real problem is that there never was any substance to Obama. He was the political equivalent of a Potemkin village. There was nothing behind the façade. There was no "there" there. All of the problems arise from this obvious flaw.
President Obama is little more than a run-of-the-mill Hollywood extra hired to play president of the United States. A brilliant marketing campaign coupled with the perfect storm put him in office. The marketing campaign was so good that it merits a case study for the Harvard Business School.
The "man with no past" and a Hollywood veneer turned out to be a perfect candidate. "Sizzle" rather than substance was sold. Little was known about Obama and his past, allowing David Axelrod to market the political equivalent of a Rorschach blot.
Voters saw in Obama whatever they desired in a candidate. To some, Obama was a breath of fresh air, a man of principles. To others he was an outsider, not a crass politician. Others saw him as a chance to prove that they were not racists. Still others saw him as the reincarnation of Roosevelt or whomever else they admired.
Obama was a blank slate to be imagined or drawn upon by the voters. He was their chameleon, and each voter could use his or her imagination to create the ideal candidate. Not surprisingly, voters bought this product that existed only in their minds. They elected Chauncey Gardiner. Unfortunately, this fraud did not come with Peter Sellers' range or abilities.
A brilliant marketing strategy can make a first sale, but performance and satisfaction are required for the second. Axelrod's skill in marketing had no counterparty in production. No one seemed to be concerned about delivering a product that actually worked.
Obama entered office unorganized and unstructured. Nothing in his background suggested that he knew anything about management, organization, or leadership. Nor did anyone see the need for bringing in talent with these skills. As a result, the Hollywood mannequin was almost immediately exposed as nothing but flair, hype, and hot air. The public had bought a product that did not perform.
Marketing can do many things, but it cannot sell a product that people have tried and rejected. That is Obama's reelection problem. At the risk of being unsophisticated and abusing the concept of Occam's Razor, Obama's reelection problem can be expressed in one simple sentence: "Now, too many people know him."
Obama's only strength was Axelrod's ability to play on the imagination of voters. That strength no longer exists. People now know the product and have rejected it. They did not get even Chauncey Gardiner. Embarrassed and angry, the public is stuck with Chance the Gardener.
The irony is that Mr. Obama has not changed. He is the same man who was elected. His problem is not communicating, Republicans, George Bush, tsunamis, or anything else. His problem is the man in the mirror. There is no more there than an image.
Obama was all hype and no substance. That realization has dawned on voters, resulting in horrendous polling. Richard Nixon was never liked, but he was at least thought competent. Obama was liked but never competent. Now Obama is living proof of the old adage that familiarity breeds contempt. He is neither liked nor competent.
Even the hapless Jimmy Carter did not attain that status.
Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2011/10/the_obama_problem.html at October 13, 2011 - 09:28:32 AM CDT
-
Benny - we have a pol board for a reason.
Benny is going to hide over here until the mods move his thread, because he keeps getting the taste slapped out his mouth on the Politicial Forum.
-
LOL the young turks are trying so hard to twist this in a negative light but its not working
-
its obvious herman cain is FAAAR PAST all the negative feelings towards slavery
if anything black slave ancestors would be turning in there graves at all the welfare handouts this generation has been giving WITHOUT all the hardwork the slaves did just to have a place to stay
-
its obvious herman cain is FAAAR PAST all the negative feelings towards slavery
if anything black slave ancestors would be turning in there graves at all the welfare handouts this generation has been giving WITHOUT all the hardwork the slaves did just to have a place to stay
Good post Johhny. The black bum demoncraps need to quit bitching about what happend generations ago. It has nothing to do with them anymore. You're not gonna get your 40 acres and mule so get over it!
-
Good post Johhny. The black bum demoncraps need to quit bitching about what happend generations ago. It has nothing to do with them anymore. You're not gonna get your 40 acres and mule so get over it!
I wish we could give the whiners 40 acres and a mule and cut them off for good. We would save hundreds of billions of dollars.
-
LOL the young turks are trying so hard to twist this in a negative light but its not working
Seriously. He wasnt laughing at slavery, just giving a light laugh to a joke, just like we all do when someone says something stupid and we give a courtesy laugh
-
Herman Cain...King of all House Negroes. ::)
2012 Republican Presidential candidate Herman Cain was on the radio show of right-winger Neal Boortz and Cain had a laugh over Boortz's comments regarding slave ancestors. The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur breaks it down.
Slaves on large Plantations lived better than any other place had they lived ANYWHERE ELSE in America during this time. FACT. Deal with it.
-
LOL the young turks are trying so hard to twist this in a negative light but its not working
Its not negative and they are wrong for trying to twist it. If a black were lucky enough to get on a good plantation, then that was the best possible place to be by far. Food and shelter were provided, families were usually kept intact and a lot were treated as family in these large plantation houses.
The WORST place a black could end up as a "Freed Man" in the North. There were no opportunities to practice a trade of any kind for them, nobody wanted them around and were pushed to live in shanties or even worse conditions. They were killed and murdered and the authorities of course would do nothing. This was not the case in the South. The total opposite.
-
Might I also remind that one of the LARGEST Slave owners in the South was a Free Black man in Carteret County, NC. John Carruthers Stanly
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_TGfl23VjLM/TZHmwUVJt6I/AAAAAAAACnU/x9bWfE8Mc9I/s640/John+Wright+Stanley+House.jpg)
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fJTwYU9iDqQ/TZHwBimo9dI/AAAAAAAACnY/Kossvmas3eE/s200/John+Carruthers+Stanly.jpg)
John Carruthers Stanly
1774-1846
Black Slaveholder
Stanly, born a slave in 1774, was the son of an African Ibo woman and the white prominent merchant-shipper John Wright Stanly. He was apprenticed to Alexander and Lydia Stewart, close friends and neighbors of his father. They saw to it that John received an education and learned the trade of barbering. At an early age, they helped him establish his own barbershop in New Bern. Many of the town’s farmers and planters frequented his barbershop for a shave or a trim. As a result, Stanly developed a successful business. By the time he reached the age of twenty-one, literate and economically able to provide for himself, his owners petitioned the Craven County court in 1795 for his emancipation. However, he was not completely satisfied with the ruling of the court and in 1798, through a special act, the state legislature confirmed the emancipation of John Carruthers Stanly, which entitled him to all rights and privileges of a free person.
Between 1800 and 1801, Stanly purchased his slave wife, Kitty, and two mulatto slave children. By March 1805, they were emancipated by the Craven County Superior Court. A few days later, Kitty and Stanly were legally married in New Bern and posted a legal marriage bond in Raleigh. Stanly’s wife was the daughter of Richard and Mary Green and the paternal granddaughter of Amelia Green. Two years later, in 1807, Stanly was successful in getting the court to emancipate his wife’s brother.
Some politically correct Court Historians end the story here, if they acknowledge the existence of black slaveholders at all. What a noble thing, to purchase and emancipate one's own family! But there is much more to the story.
After securing his own and his family’s freedom, Stanly began to focus more on business matters. He obtained other slaves to work for him. Two of them, Boston and Brister, were taught the barbering trade. Once they became skillful barbers, Stanly let them run the operation while he used the money they helped him earn to invest in additional town property, farmland, and more slaves.
Through his business acumen, Stanley eventually became a very wealthy plantation owner and the largest slaveholder in all of Craven County. He profited from investments in real estate, rental properties, the slave operated barbershop, and plantations from which he sold commodities such as cotton and turpentine.
Stanly’s plantations and rental properties were operated by skilled slaves along with help from some hired free blacks. To improve his rental properties in New Bern, he used skilled slaves and free blacks to build cabins and other residences and to repair and renovate these properties. During the depression of the early 1820s it was slave labor that kept Stanly economically stable.
The 1830 census reveals that Stanly owned, 163 slaves. He has been described as a harsh, profit-minded task master whose treatment of his slaves was no different than the treatment slaves received from white owners. Stanly’s goal, shared by white southern planters, was on expanding his operations and increasing his profits.
During the early 1820s, Stanly’s wife, Kitty, was taken seriously ill. She became bedridden and, despite careful attention by two slave nurses, she died around 1824. It was at this same time that Stanly began to face a series of financial difficulties. His fortune began to plummet when the Bank of New Bern, due to the national bank tightening controls of some state and local banks, was forced to collect all outstanding debts. Unfortunately, Stanly had countersigned a security note for John Stanly, his white half-brother, in the amount of $14,962. Stanly was forced to assume the debt. This, along with his own debts forced him to refinance his mortgages and sell large pieces of property, including slaves. When these options did not resolve his economic woes, he resorted to mortgaging his turpentine, cotton, and corn crops, as well as selling his barbershop, which had been operating continuously for forty years. Without a steady flow of income, his fortunes continued to decline. In 1843, his last 160 acres of land were sold at public auction. Three years later, at the age of 74, John Carruthers Stanly died. At the time of his death he still owned seven slaves.
-
Might I also remind that one of the LARGEST Slave owners in the South was a Free Black man in Carteret County, NC. John Carruthers Stanly
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_TGfl23VjLM/TZHmwUVJt6I/AAAAAAAACnU/x9bWfE8Mc9I/s640/John+Wright+Stanley+House.jpg)
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fJTwYU9iDqQ/TZHwBimo9dI/AAAAAAAACnY/Kossvmas3eE/s200/John+Carruthers+Stanly.jpg)
John Carruthers Stanly
1774-1846
Black Slaveholder
Stanly, born a slave in 1774, was the son of an African Ibo woman and the white prominent merchant-shipper John Wright Stanly. He was apprenticed to Alexander and Lydia Stewart, close friends and neighbors of his father. They saw to it that John received an education and learned the trade of barbering. At an early age, they helped him establish his own barbershop in New Bern. Many of the town’s farmers and planters frequented his barbershop for a shave or a trim. As a result, Stanly developed a successful business. By the time he reached the age of twenty-one, literate and economically able to provide for himself, his owners petitioned the Craven County court in 1795 for his emancipation. However, he was not completely satisfied with the ruling of the court and in 1798, through a special act, the state legislature confirmed the emancipation of John Carruthers Stanly, which entitled him to all rights and privileges of a free person.
Between 1800 and 1801, Stanly purchased his slave wife, Kitty, and two mulatto slave children. By March 1805, they were emancipated by the Craven County Superior Court. A few days later, Kitty and Stanly were legally married in New Bern and posted a legal marriage bond in Raleigh. Stanly’s wife was the daughter of Richard and Mary Green and the paternal granddaughter of Amelia Green. Two years later, in 1807, Stanly was successful in getting the court to emancipate his wife’s brother.
Some politically correct Court Historians end the story here, if they acknowledge the existence of black slaveholders at all. What a noble thing, to purchase and emancipate one's own family! But there is much more to the story.
After securing his own and his family’s freedom, Stanly began to focus more on business matters. He obtained other slaves to work for him. Two of them, Boston and Brister, were taught the barbering trade. Once they became skillful barbers, Stanly let them run the operation while he used the money they helped him earn to invest in additional town property, farmland, and more slaves.
Through his business acumen, Stanley eventually became a very wealthy plantation owner and the largest slaveholder in all of Craven County. He profited from investments in real estate, rental properties, the slave operated barbershop, and plantations from which he sold commodities such as cotton and turpentine.
Stanly’s plantations and rental properties were operated by skilled slaves along with help from some hired free blacks. To improve his rental properties in New Bern, he used skilled slaves and free blacks to build cabins and other residences and to repair and renovate these properties. During the depression of the early 1820s it was slave labor that kept Stanly economically stable.
The 1830 census reveals that Stanly owned, 163 slaves. He has been described as a harsh, profit-minded task master whose treatment of his slaves was no different than the treatment slaves received from white owners. Stanly’s goal, shared by white southern planters, was on expanding his operations and increasing his profits.
During the early 1820s, Stanly’s wife, Kitty, was taken seriously ill. She became bedridden and, despite careful attention by two slave nurses, she died around 1824. It was at this same time that Stanly began to face a series of financial difficulties. His fortune began to plummet when the Bank of New Bern, due to the national bank tightening controls of some state and local banks, was forced to collect all outstanding debts. Unfortunately, Stanly had countersigned a security note for John Stanly, his white half-brother, in the amount of $14,962. Stanly was forced to assume the debt. This, along with his own debts forced him to refinance his mortgages and sell large pieces of property, including slaves. When these options did not resolve his economic woes, he resorted to mortgaging his turpentine, cotton, and corn crops, as well as selling his barbershop, which had been operating continuously for forty years. Without a steady flow of income, his fortunes continued to decline. In 1843, his last 160 acres of land were sold at public auction. Three years later, at the age of 74, John Carruthers Stanly died. At the time of his death he still owned seven slaves.
how old is that house? very cool story
-
Might I also remind that one of the LARGEST Slave owners in the South was a Free Black man in Carteret County, NC. John Carruthers Stanly
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_TGfl23VjLM/TZHmwUVJt6I/AAAAAAAACnU/x9bWfE8Mc9I/s640/John+Wright+Stanley+House.jpg)
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fJTwYU9iDqQ/TZHwBimo9dI/AAAAAAAACnY/Kossvmas3eE/s200/John+Carruthers+Stanly.jpg)
John Carruthers Stanly
1774-1846
Black Slaveholder
Stanly, born a slave in 1774, was the son of an African Ibo woman and the white prominent merchant-shipper John Wright Stanly. He was apprenticed to Alexander and Lydia Stewart, close friends and neighbors of his father. They saw to it that John received an education and learned the trade of barbering. At an early age, they helped him establish his own barbershop in New Bern. Many of the town’s farmers and planters frequented his barbershop for a shave or a trim. As a result, Stanly developed a successful business. By the time he reached the age of twenty-one, literate and economically able to provide for himself, his owners petitioned the Craven County court in 1795 for his emancipation. However, he was not completely satisfied with the ruling of the court and in 1798, through a special act, the state legislature confirmed the emancipation of John Carruthers Stanly, which entitled him to all rights and privileges of a free person.
Between 1800 and 1801, Stanly purchased his slave wife, Kitty, and two mulatto slave children. By March 1805, they were emancipated by the Craven County Superior Court. A few days later, Kitty and Stanly were legally married in New Bern and posted a legal marriage bond in Raleigh. Stanly’s wife was the daughter of Richard and Mary Green and the paternal granddaughter of Amelia Green. Two years later, in 1807, Stanly was successful in getting the court to emancipate his wife’s brother.
Some politically correct Court Historians end the story here, if they acknowledge the existence of black slaveholders at all. What a noble thing, to purchase and emancipate one's own family! But there is much more to the story.
After securing his own and his family’s freedom, Stanly began to focus more on business matters. He obtained other slaves to work for him. Two of them, Boston and Brister, were taught the barbering trade. Once they became skillful barbers, Stanly let them run the operation while he used the money they helped him earn to invest in additional town property, farmland, and more slaves.
Through his business acumen, Stanley eventually became a very wealthy plantation owner and the largest slaveholder in all of Craven County. He profited from investments in real estate, rental properties, the slave operated barbershop, and plantations from which he sold commodities such as cotton and turpentine.
Stanly’s plantations and rental properties were operated by skilled slaves along with help from some hired free blacks. To improve his rental properties in New Bern, he used skilled slaves and free blacks to build cabins and other residences and to repair and renovate these properties. During the depression of the early 1820s it was slave labor that kept Stanly economically stable.
The 1830 census reveals that Stanly owned, 163 slaves. He has been described as a harsh, profit-minded task master whose treatment of his slaves was no different than the treatment slaves received from white owners. Stanly’s goal, shared by white southern planters, was on expanding his operations and increasing his profits.
During the early 1820s, Stanly’s wife, Kitty, was taken seriously ill. She became bedridden and, despite careful attention by two slave nurses, she died around 1824. It was at this same time that Stanly began to face a series of financial difficulties. His fortune began to plummet when the Bank of New Bern, due to the national bank tightening controls of some state and local banks, was forced to collect all outstanding debts. Unfortunately, Stanly had countersigned a security note for John Stanly, his white half-brother, in the amount of $14,962. Stanly was forced to assume the debt. This, along with his own debts forced him to refinance his mortgages and sell large pieces of property, including slaves. When these options did not resolve his economic woes, he resorted to mortgaging his turpentine, cotton, and corn crops, as well as selling his barbershop, which had been operating continuously for forty years. Without a steady flow of income, his fortunes continued to decline. In 1843, his last 160 acres of land were sold at public auction. Three years later, at the age of 74, John Carruthers Stanly died. At the time of his death he still owned seven slaves.
In todays vernacular, would he be a "balla" or a "boss?" ;D
-
The Young Turkeys are a prime example of how stupid you look when you cant let go of the past
-
Slaves on large Plantations lived better than any other place had they lived ANYWHERE ELSE in America during this time. FACT. Deal with it.
Getbig's resident redneck goober.
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaw!
Fucking lowlife piece of shit. >:(
-
pretty impossible for obama not to get reelected... he will win by a nice margin
-
nice racism benny...
-
Benny is going to hide over here until the mods move his thread, because he keeps getting the taste slapped out his mouth on the Politicial Forum.
LOL @ Tobey once again spouting bullshit.
(http://schoolworkhelper.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Uncle-Tom%E2%80%99s-Cabin.png)
It's like I have to take on the whole board of morons, weak-kneed sellouts and Toms, pseudo-intellectual rednecks like TA who try too hard, and the overt racists posting on this board. Luckily, I am the right man to lay waste to this board of losers. ;D Its a fun change of pace for me...after to dealing with educated successful people all day, I can come to getbig and see the sad underbelly of America. A country filled with bitter, mostly unemployed, FOX News-watching dummies.
McMoron, you've never slapped the taste out of anyone's mouth in your life. You're soft. Oh, I'm sure you've talked tough to some Black person in the presence of whites, but you don't pop any of that shit off in an all Black environment. You get your Uncle Tom handkerchief-head ass kicked and you know it.
Why don't you put up some threads on G&O where I got my ass kicked back when I was actually posting on the politics board? We'd all LOVE to see them since you talk about this so much. I'll be waiting, Mantan...
(http://www.moderntimes.com/palace/b/40_image/phantom.jpg)
-
nice racism benny...
Wassup, TonyMcNuts! ;D You ready to admit you're from the south yet, or are you still too embarrassed? :-\
I see when you perceive "racism" on my part you are quick to comment, but the DOZENS of overtly racist comments towards minorities that occur daily on this board render no comment from you. Why is that, McNuts??? ???
-
TA, bascially Mr. Stanly was a mulatto who saw that he was better than the slaves, invested in "free labor"...until he found out, he was a slave to the system...and was made to pay The Master...
Sadly, being a slave back then was inhumane, and the brain fuckery that happened for most of the US's existance, is why blacks have certain mindsets now, ie good hair vs bad hair, light skin vs dark skin, good negro,
As the KKK refers to blacks, "obsolete farm machinery",
rich people don't want ro do manual labor, and at that time, "slavery" was a way of getting very cheap labor, just like the illegal immigrants of today.
-
Its not negative and they are wrong for trying to twist it. If a black were lucky enough to get on a good plantation, then that was the best possible place to be by far. Food and shelter were provided, families were usually kept intact and a lot were treated as family in these large plantation houses.
The WORST place a black could end up as a "Freed Man" in the North. There were no opportunities to practice a trade of any kind for them, nobody wanted them around and were pushed to live in shanties or even worse conditions. They were killed and murdered and the authorities of course would do nothing. This was not the case in the South. The total opposite.
This is perhaps the single stupidest post I have ever seen on Getbig, and that's saying something. It is simply amazing how many times you can be factually wrong in just two short paragraphs.
You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
-
This is perhaps the single stupidest post I have ever seen on Getbig, and that's saying something. It is simply amazing how many times you can be factually wrong in just two short paragraphs.
You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
It's frankly amazing that he would put up such bullshit on this board, or ANY board for that matter.
-
It's frankly amazing that he would put up such bullshit on this board, or ANY board for that matter.
Quite ironic coming from a fellow obama supporter and donor no?
-
(http://www.mcssl.com/content/178853/battle_flag_1024x768.gif)
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/84/Red-Man2.png)
(http://myweb.northshore.edu/users/kpickard01/work-gallery/big/MailPouchBarn.jpg)
(http://www.flatt-and-scruggs.com/eboysf.jpg)
(http://a1.l3-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/9/44cdd06a8343d46d9a071e068f8a5a9b/l.jpg)
-
Quite ironic coming from a fellow obama supporter and donor no?
???
How so PEA BRAIN? Please elaborate.
-
Getbig's resident redneck goober.
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaw!
Fucking lowlife piece of shit. >:(
Listen Darkie, its your choice to remain ignorant of history and believe in an untrue, revisionist version of events, but you shall not denigrate me in any fashion.
-
This is perhaps the single stupidest post I have ever seen on Getbig, and that's saying something. It is simply amazing how many times you can be factually wrong in just two short paragraphs.
You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
Do I have to go through all of this again? I know History is a weak point with the lot of you but I urge to at least learn something so I don`t have to explain everything. It is rather tiresome to make the same posts over and over and over again.
You do know where I live, don`t you?
-
Listen Darkie
I didn't need to go past those first two words...
You are indeed a pseudo-intellectual, with an ego that does not match your brain, accomplishments, or education.
You are a redneck GOOBER, in addition to being a narrow-minded, worthless piece of shit. In the game of intellect and insults, you have met your superior. I will enjoy adding you to my list of people receiving random getbig beat downs.
Ugly, inbred, big-eared, rat-faced bastard. :D
-
This is perhaps the single stupidest post I have ever seen on Getbig, and that's saying something. It is simply amazing how many times you can be factually wrong in just two short paragraphs.
You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
Within Southern Culture, there is this belief in that the slaves were best as slaves, than free. After all a beast of burden or a dog gets fed regularly, and shelter, once feral, they miss out.
The thing is, freedom is what you make it, and one of the benefits of freedom is you have the choice to make your own path...
Not so much as a slave, hell even the owners didn't recognize a "slave marriage", if he was tapping that woman's ass before and he wanted to some more---well he gets what he wants.
-
Within Southern Culture, there is this belief in that the slaves were best as slaves, than free. After all a beast of burden or a dog gets fed regularly, and shelter, once feral, they miss out.
The thing is, freedom is what you make it, and one of the benefits of freedom is you have the choice to make your own path...
Not so much as a slave, hell even the owners didn't recognize a "slave marriage", if he was tapping that woman's ass before and he wanted to some more---well he gets what he wants.
Owners certainly recognized Slave Marriages.
(http://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2005/spring/images/manson-testimony-lg.jpg)
Benjamin and Sarah Manson's marriage, however, had been graced with a formal ceremony. Benjamin, who was brought to Tennessee from Virginia as a young boy by his then-owner, Nancy Manson, later described the event in a pension application he filed as the dependent of his deceased son John: "We were married on Dr. L. W. White's farm 5 miles from Lebanon [Tennessee]. . . . Rev Ben White [a black preacher] said the marriage ceremony." The "wedding ceremony," he continued, "took place on the porch of the owner of Sarah [Dr. White]. . . . It was with the knowledge and consent of my master [Mr. Joseph L. Manson, son of Nancy Manson] and Sarah's master that we were married." Shortly after their marriage, Sarah's owner purchased Benjamin. "He [Dr. White] had me for a number of years," Benjamin explained, "then Mr. Manson bought me back and owned me till I was emancipated."
Formal marriage ceremonies for slave couples like Benjamin and Sarah were generally reserved for house servants. In such cases, slaveowners would have a white minister or a black plantation preacher perform the ceremony, and a large feast and dance in the "quarters" would follow honoring the slave couple. The ceremony could include the slave marriage ritual of "jumping the broom," which required slave couples to jump over a broomstick. The custom of jumping the broom could vary from plantation to plantation. On some farms, the slave bride and groom would place separate brooms on the floor in front of each other. The couple would then step across the brooms at the same time joining hands to signal that they were truly married. On other farms, each slave partner was required to jump backward over a broom held a foot from the ground. If either partner failed to clear the broom successfully, the other partner would be declared the one who would rule or boss the household. If both partners cleared the broom without touching it, then there would be no "bossin."
While historians and scholars differ on the origin, exact meaning, and the frequency of the "irregular" marriage ritual, most agree that the act of "jumping the broom" was a "binding force" in the slave couple's relationship and made them feel "more married."
The marriage arrangement of couples who resided on different plantations ("broad" marriages) was often the cause of great concern for most slaveowners. Fearing that slave marriages between plantations could potentially contribute to lost time from work and increase the risk of slaves developing attitudes of independence, owners encouraged their slaves to marry on the plantation where they lived. When this was not possible, wealthy owners would in some cases buy the spouse of his slave. Generally, slave men would receive passes to visit their wives on weekends, and those slave husbands, like Benjamin, who lived on a farm that neighbored their wife could visit nightly. Children of "broad" marriages were the property of the slave woman's owner, and the owner of a slave man had no legal right to their services. Between 1865 and 1867, most southern states in some form or another legalized former slave marriages and recognized the children of such marriages as legitimate.
-
Do I have to go through all of this again? I know History is a weak point with the lot of you but I urge to at least learn something so I don`t have to explain everything. It is rather tiresome to make the same posts over and over and over again.
You do know where I live, don`t you?
Ugly-ass inbred :D
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAW! ::)
The Song Sung Before The Union Troops Went On To Kick The Redneck Cracker Ancestors Of The "True Adonis" ;D
Back around the time that northern Christians, abolitionists, free blacks, anti-slavery activists and Kansas land owners first formed the Republican party, John Brown, an abolitionist and Baptist preacher, gave his life to put an end to slavery.During the civil war northern soldiers sang this old song as they marched off to battle. After "Julia Ward Howe" heard Union troops singing this, *the original (published Dec. 1861 in the Chicago Tribune) version of the song, she wrote her own words to it's tune. Soon after, her version was published Feb 1862 in the "Atlantic Monthly" as "The Battle Hymn Of The Republic"
-
-
I love it when far lefties attack each other. Pass the popcorn.
-
-
-
Most Black people are clueless when it comes to their own history. Ones that have had family remain in the South know their history and Vince Goodrum is one of them.
People such as Benny know very little about themselves and its a shame because they`d rather believe in myths that shadow history. The North absolutely despised Blacks and the murder rate was abysmal for them once past the Mason Dixon line. They were worthless in the North and had zero opportunity to practice a trade or anything for that matter.
Had they remained in Africa, they would have been African slaves which was a worse fate than living in the North.
-
Ugly-ass inbred :D
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAW! ::)
The Song Sung Before The Union Troops Went On To Kick The Redneck Cracker Ancestors Of The "True Adonis" ;D
Back around the time that northern Christians, abolitionists, free blacks, anti-slavery activists and Kansas land owners first formed the Republican party, John Brown, an abolitionist and Baptist preacher, gave his life to put an end to slavery.During the civil war northern soldiers sang this old song as they marched off to battle. After "Julia Ward Howe" heard Union troops singing this, *the original (published Dec. 1861 in the Chicago Tribune) version of the song, she wrote her own words to it's tune. Soon after, her version was published Feb 1862 in the "Atlantic Monthly" as "The Battle Hymn Of The Republic"
The Permanent Slavery Act
During his first inaugural speech, given on March 4, 1861, President Abraham Lincoln stated that he approved of a Constitutional amendment which would guarantee permanent slavery in the United States. The “Great Emancipator” said, "I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service. Holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable." This amendment, supported by Lincoln, is shown here.
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-yxa-CnOl8fc/TeWsltqgwNI/AAAAAAAAAFk/wqN0loi_HW0/s1600/Northern+Permanent+Slavery+Amendment.jpg)
This act was passed on March 2, 1861 (The same day the Morrill Tariff was passed ) by both houses of Congress with a 66% vote. This was after the first seven states seceded from the Union, forming the Confederate States of America.
It is interesting that we are talking about the Federal Government, and not the Confederate Government, passing an amendment to the Constitution guaranteeing permanent slavery. If this amendment had been ratified by ¾ of the states, the federal government would have been prevented from abolishing slavery in any state! Again, that is was the Northern Congress, and not the Southern Congress that passed this amendment – with President Lincoln’s approval, is to me amazingly hypocritical.
Moreover, this indicates that slavery was not the issue that caused the Civil War. Clearly the North approved of slavery, and was willing to try enacting a Constitutional amendment to preserve slavery. If the Confederate states wanted to ensure the protection of slavery, then all they would have had to do is return to the Union and ratify this amendment. Something the South did not do. The South did not ratify the Northern Congressionally passed Permanent Slavery Act.
There are many who believe that Lincoln’s support of the Permanent Slavery Act was nothing more than a political maneuver to manipulate the Southern states into returning to the Union, and thus being subject to the new 40% tax imposed on them by the Morrill Tariff. With the South importing and exporting as much as 80% of the nations goods, they would have paid an equal amount of the nation’s import taxes. All from an area which made up only 33% of the nations population. The South complained that the tax was unfair and burdensome to its population, and they were right, especially when one considers that the revenue from the tax would have been spent on Northern interests and not in the South.
The South also questioned Lincoln’s right to serve as President, as he was elected with only 39% of the popular vote. A question that has plagued numerous presidential election since then. In addition, in his inaugural speech Lincoln stated that he would not invade the South, except to collect taxes and possess tax collection stations (such as Fort Sumter). He stated, “The power confided to me will be used to hold, occupy, and possess the property and places belonging to the government, and to collect the duties and imposts [import taxes]; but beyond what may be necessary for these objects, there will be no invasion, no using of force against or among the people anywhere.” I am confident that the South, especially South Carolina clearly remembered the broken promise of President Buchanan to not take over Fort Sumter. A promise made only a few months before Lincoln took office, and broken almost immediately.
The South’s concern was that Lincoln would invade the South, abolish State sovereignty, and establish a centralist federal government, all powerful, and impose higher taxes and reduce personal freedoms. Similar to the current situation in America today.
-
Can't we move beyond this bs already and just elect Cain to get rid of Obama?
-
No Friends Of The Negro Up North
From: Bernhard1848@att.net
The black families were not in need of help before the abolition armies descended upon the American South spreading destruction and devastation. Both the mayor and governor below were careful to not allow the emigration of cheap labor into their respective States. But it was Governor John Andrew of Massachusetts and his abolitionists friends who found it better to pay black mercenaries to fill Bay State regiments rather than resident whites; and since the impressed former slaves were not citizens of that State, they would not receive State assistance for their families. A good deal for Massachusetts.
Bernhard Thuersam
Cape Fear Historical Institute
Wilmington, NC
www.CFHI.net
No Friends of the Negro Up North:
(A) large number of contraband Negroes had fled to Cairo, Illinois. Seeking help for them, Brigadier General T.W. Tuttle wrote to Mayor Sherman of Chicago, saying: "I have a large number of applications from your city for Negro servants. Will you....see that they are properly put to work?" Mayor Sherman seemed to be horrified at such a suggestion, and to Tuttle's letter he quickly replied: "Your proposition to send Negroes to Chicago to work would be in violation of the laws of this State, and a great injustice to the laboring population. I cannot give my consent..."
When the Boston Post on October 30, 1862, reported that five hundred families of contraband Negroes were to be sent to Massachusetts, Governor John Albion Andrew promptly refused to permit them to come. With regard to the governor's refusal to accept the Negroes into the State, the editor of the National Intelligencer wrote:
"It...seems that the introduction of members of this oppressed race into a State where they are supposed to have so many sympathizing friends is not regarded with favor by the people of Massachusetts. So unpropitious to "loyal blacks" is the social atmosphere that it is precisely because Governor Andrew does not wish their new freedom to become license, corruption and infamy," that he declines to aid or countenance their transportation to the North. The "African" is a "brother," but South Carolina, not Massachusetts, is left to be the "brother's keeper."
It was ironic that two areas in the country which had been so hostile to slavery and opposed to enforcement of he Fugitive Slave Law were so reluctant to accept in their midst Negro families who were faced with disease and starvation and in need of help."
(The Slave Catchers, Enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law, 185-1860, Stanley W. Campbell, W.W. Norton, 1968, pp. 193-194)
-
http://www.factasy.com/civil_war/2008/02/29/some_surprising_facts_abut_confederacy
2. The Confederate president himself, Jefferson Davis, came to strongly support ending slavery. So did CSA Secretary of State Judah Benjamin, Governor William Smith of Virginia, and leading CSA Congressmen Ethelbert Barksdale and Duncan Kenner (who was one of the largest slaveholders in the South).
3. The CSA's two highest ranking generals, Robert E. Lee and Joseph E. Johnston, both disliked slavery and supported emancipation in various forms. Lee called slavery "a moral and political evil." Johnston called it "a curse." (Johnston initially opposed using slaves as soldiers only because he feared it would be disruptive and ineffective, not because he had any sympathy for slavery. He later came to support the proposal.) Other Confederate generals who supported emancipation included General Daniel Govan, General John Kelly, and General Mark Lowrey.
4. The majority of Confederate generals did not own slaves and did not come from slaveholding families (Hattaway and Beringer, Jefferson Davis, Confederate President, p. 37).
5. Thousands of African Americans, Hispanics, and Indians fought for the Confederacy. Many of the slaves who served in the Confederate army did so because they hoped that by doing so they would be granted freedom after the war or because they were specifically promised freedom if they would serve. The same was true of most of the slaves who fought for the Continental Army during the Revolutionary War.
The chief inspector of the U.S. Sanitary Commission, Dr. Lewis Steiner, reported that he saw about 3,000 well-armed black Confederate soldiers in Stonewall Jackson’s army--he added that those soldiers were "manifestly an integral portion of the Southern Confederate Army" (Issac W. Heysinger, Antietam and the Maryland and Virginia Campaigns of 1862, New York: Neale Publishing Company, 1912, pp. 122-123; cf. John J. Dwyer, general editor, The War Between the States: America’s Uncivil War, Denton, Texas: Bluebonnet Press, 2005, p. 409).
Three Confederate states authorized free blacks to enlist in state militia units. The first to do so was Tennessee, which passed a law on June 21, 1861, authorizing the recruitment of state militia units composed of "free persons of color" between the ages of 15 and 50. In 1862, Louisiana assembled the all-black 1st Louisiana Native Guard, and Alabama authorized the enlistment of creoles for a state militia unit in Mobile.
6. The Confederate Congress specified that black soldiers in the Confederate army were to receive the same pay, rations, and clothing that white soldiers received. In contrast, black soldiers in the Union army were paid much less than white soldiers were paid for over a year. The Union army began using former slaves and free blacks as soldiers in September 1862. They were paid $7 per month. Technically, they were paid $10 a month, but they were forced to pay a clothing allowance of $3, which meant their net monthly pay was only $7. White soldiers, on the other hand, received $13 per month and were not forced to pay a clothing allowance. Thus, in the Union army white soldiers were paid nearly twice as much as black soldiers were paid. Black Union soldiers didn’t start receiving equal pay until June 1864. When the Confederate Congress authorized the recruitment of slaves as soldiers, it stipulated that they were to receive “the same rations, clothing and compensation as are allowed to other troops” (An Act to Increase the Military Force of the Confederate States, March 13, 1865, Section 3). In addition, when the Confederate Congress authorized salaries for black musicians in the Confederate army in 1862, it specified that they were to receive the same pay as white army musicians, stating "whenever colored persons are employed as musicians in any regiment or company, they shall be entitled to the same pay now allowed by law to musicians regularly enlisted."
7. According to the 1860 census, only 31 percent of Southern families owned slaves. Seventy-five percent of the families that owned slaves, owned less than ten and often worked side by side with them in the fields. Approximately half of the free blacks in America lived in the South. The percentage of Southern citizens who held slaves was probably no more than 25 percent (some scholars put the percentage as low as 10 percent).
-
;)
16. Anti-Semitism was more of a problem in the North than it was in the South (Hattaway and Beringer, Jefferson Davis, Confederate President, p. 137). In relation to this, it should be pointed out that the Confederate Secretary of State, Judah Benjamin, was Jewish.
-
Lincoln wanted to move all of the blacks to Africa, favored colonization to Panama, Liberia, Haiti and wanted to put the plan in motion. He didn`t want them here, but knew it to be impossible to do in the long run. We still do not know if Lincoln ever abandoned that idea.
In Lincoln`s letter to Horace Greely (who happend to also live in my town with his wife) He stated as follows:
http://showcase.netins.net/web/creative/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm
My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.
Lincoln`s intention was not to preserve or destroy slavery, but to preserve the Union. The war was not fought for Slavery or against it, simply PRESERVATION OF THE UNION.
-
Lincoln wanted to move all of the blacks to Africa, favored colonization to Panama, Liberia, Haiti and wanted to put the plan in motion. He didn`t want them here, but knew it to be impossible to do in the long run. We still do not know if Lincoln ever abandoned that idea.
In Lincoln`s letter to Horace Greely (who happend to also live in my town with his wife) He stated as follows:
http://showcase.netins.net/web/creative/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm
My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.
Lincoln`s intention was not to preserve or destroy slavery, but to preserve the Union. The war was not fought for Slavery or against it, simply PRESERVATION OF THE UNION.
Which state are you from?
-
Do I have to go through all of this again? I know History is a weak point with the lot of you but I urge to at least learn something so I don`t have to explain everything. It is rather tiresome to make the same posts over and over and over again.
You do know where I live, don`t you?
Does place of origin excuse the truth? Please explain.
-
Most Black people are clueless when it comes to their own history. Ones that have had family remain in the South know their history and Vince Goodrum is one of them.
People such as Benny know very little about themselves and its a shame because they`d rather believe in myths that shadow history. The North absolutely despised Blacks and the murder rate was abysmal for them once past the Mason Dixon line. They were worthless in the North and had zero opportunity to practice a trade or anything for that matter.
Had they remained in Africa, they would have been African slaves which was a worse fate than living in the North.
I've never seen anyone, even someone with absolutely no education, be as misinformed on slavery as you.
Are you trolling?
-
I love it when obama voters attack each other.
-
I love it when obama voters attack each other.
Nobody cares what you like, pee wee.
-
Nobody cares what you like, pee wee.
LOL. Get me som popcorn. The far left has the long knives out.
-
TA Logic - I'm from Germany so Hitler was trying to help the Jews get a nation of their own.
-
TA Logic - I'm from Germany so Hitler was trying to help the Jews get a nation of their own.
Look, you are not entitled to your own version of History and Facts. You gain nothing by subscribing to a set of myths that simply aren`t true.
-
Look, you are not entitled to your own version of History and Facts. You gain nothing by subscribing to a set of myths that simply aren`t true.
You're not willing to take an honest look at history because you were born in a certain place. You're an absolute idiot.
Hope this helps.
----------------
TA Logic - I'm from Japan so the Rape of Nanking was actually a damn-building project in southern China.
-
LOL. Get me som popcorn. The far left has the long knives out.
He`s just angry that you and I exposed the Wall Street Protesting Morons for what they are.
-
You're not willing to take an honest look at history because you were born in a certain place. You're an absolute idiot.
Hope this helps.
----------------
TA Logic - I'm from Japan so the Rape of Nanking was actually a damn-building project in southern China.
Care to refute any of the Historical Documents I posted? I have a ton more.
-
He`s just angry that you and I exposed the Wall Street Protesting Morons for what they are.
I'll be down there tomorrow and will see if I can get some pics.
-
I'll be down there tomorrow and will see if I can get some pics.
Wow! Guess the imaginary law practice will take another financial hit. ::)
-
I'll be down there tomorrow and will see if I can get some pics.
ROFLMAO yes! Get some good ones for us!
-
ROFLMAO yes! Get some good ones for us!
I'll have my phone, so I'll get what I can.
-
Look, you are not entitled to your own version of History and Facts. You gain nothing by subscribing to a set of myths that simply aren`t true.
Your knowledge of history far outweighs firsthand accounts, right? After all, you were born in the South, thus becoming an instant expert and inherently containing all knowledge and facts.
That pesky Frederick Douglass didn't have a thing on you. He was just born into slavery, grew up under that system, escaped to the North and wrote a book about it. You have WAY more information than he ever could. Too bad you can't debate him and explain to him how he had no idea what he was talking about.
Before this thread, I thought you were intelligent. Sure, I may have disagreed with you on points, but I still considered you possessing intellect. Now, I realize my folly.
--------------------
TA Logic - I'm from America so I know it's true that the Native Americans invited Columbus over in order to begin trade with the white man.
-
Your knowledge of history far outweighs firsthand accounts, right? After all, you were born in the South, thus becoming an instant expert and inherently containing all knowledge and facts.
That pesky Frederick Douglass didn't have a thing on you. He was just born into slavery, grew up under that system, escaped to the North and wrote a book about it. You have WAY more information than he ever could. Too bad you can't debate him and explain to him how he had no idea what he was talking about.
Before this thread, I thought you were intelligent. Sure, I may have disagreed with you on points, but I still considered you possessing intellect. Now, I realize my folly.
--------------------
TA Logic - I'm from America so I know it's true that the Native Americans invited Columbus over in order to begin trade with the white man.
I posted First Hand accounts and haven`t even begun to post Primary sources from the Black Confederates or the Plantation Owners or even of the average family in the South.
Have you even read anything regarding the Civil War, the Antebellum South or anything from the time period? I encourage you to do so.
-
I posted First Hand accounts and haven`t even begun to post Primary sources from the Black Confederates or the Plantation Owners or even of the average family in the South.
Have you even read anything regarding the Civil War, the Antebellum South or anything from the time period? I encourage you to do so.
I'm very well read on the subject.
I finished Frederick Douglass' FIRST HAND ACCOUNT of slave life in the South and it absolutely destroys every weak and stupid attempt at a point you have even tried to make.
I'm currently reading The Age of Lincoln and it puts to rest your notions of Lincoln's intentions. While it's true that the war was originally fought to preserve the union, you fail to understand COMPLETELY how attitudes changed as the war progressed. (Do you really, by the way, think you're shedding some revolutionary light on claiming that in the first place? Really, everyone with even cursory understanding on the subject already accepts that as being fact, so I don't understand how you could be so smug about it.)
You seem stuck in the southern myth that slavery wasn't that bad or that black people didn't really suffer that badly under it. THIS IS A COMPLETELY IGNORANT ARGUMENT TO MAKE AND MAKES YOU LOOK INCREDIBLY STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.
You asked yourself on here if I knew where you were from. That is quite simply an admission that you are not willing to look at things objectively.
You're a child and it would appear that you are the one who has some reading to do.
-
Wassup, TonyMcNuts! ;D You ready to admit you're from the south yet, or are you still too embarrassed? :-\
I see when you perceive "racism" on my part you are quick to comment, but the DOZENS of overtly racist comments towards minorities that occur daily on this board render no comment from you. Why is that, McNuts??? ???
Cause you're a fucking loser.
-
LOL @ Tobey once again spouting bullshit.
(http://schoolworkhelper.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Uncle-Tom%E2%80%99s-Cabin.png)
It's like I have to take on the whole board of morons, weak-kneed sellouts and Toms, pseudo-intellectual rednecks like TA who try too hard, and the overt racists posting on this board. Luckily, I am the right man to lay waste to this board of losers. ;D Its a fun change of pace for me...after to dealing with educated successful people all day, I can come to getbig and see the sad underbelly of America. A country filled with bitter, mostly unemployed, FOX News-watching dummies.
McMoron, you've never slapped the taste out of anyone's mouth in your life. You're soft. Oh, I'm sure you've talked tough to some Black person in the presence of whites, but you don't pop any of that shit off in an all Black environment. You get your Uncle Tom handkerchief-head ass kicked and you know it.
Why don't you put up some threads on G&O where I got my ass kicked back when I was actually posting on the politics board? We'd all LOVE to see them since you talk about this so much. I'll be waiting, Mantan...
(http://www.moderntimes.com/palace/b/40_image/phantom.jpg)
You've been hiding on G&O for weeks and the regulars over there have been SCREAMING that you take your cowardly behind to the Political forum and receive your beatings proper.
But, NOPE!! You hide over there, because you taken to pieces and cry like a baby, when you do.
And NEWS FLASH, genius!! I don't put political topics on G&O. I put them on the POLITICAL Forum (that's why it exists).
Your lack of testicular fortitude makes for great slapstick comedy. The only way you take on a board full of morons is when YOU are the sole participants on that board. Otherwise, you get cut to pieces, spewing your usual mindless drivel (or should I say, copying and pasting that from HP, without crediting that site).
You hide from the political forum for two reasons: 1) You get BEAT DOWN; 2) You get BEAT UP!!!
-
Tha Fuck are we talking about over here?
-
Within Southern Culture, there is this belief in that the slaves were best as slaves, than free. After all a beast of burden or a dog gets fed regularly, and shelter, once feral, they miss out.
The thing is, freedom is what you make it, and one of the benefits of freedom is you have the choice to make your own path...
Not so much as a slave, hell even the owners didn't recognize a "slave marriage", if he was tapping that woman's ass before and he wanted to some more---well he gets what he wants.
Almost sounds like our welfare system. :-\