Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: gmflex on November 24, 2011, 10:48:12 AM
-
-
There were times when Cutler looked decent... ???
-
When you look at this you see just how dominant Ronnie's size is, Especially in the upper body.
-
Back in '01 I thought Jay got robbed. I was wrong.
He did look good, though.
-
Jay does look amazing here but Ronnie wasn't going to be denied
-
Coleman looked like utter turd that year. How the hell did he win the contest?
-
The best the fridge has looked but Ronnie still just kills him.
-
I'm happy to have had the opportunity to attend that O. Man the energy was crazy during the thr prejudging and when Jay came out people went nuts. The buzz before the show was that Jay looked great and a guy I knew that did stuff for the IFBB told me and I remember saying "Jay Cutler? Are you sure"? lol Jay looked fucking great.
-
I'm happy to have had the opportunity to attend that O. Man the energy was crazy during the thr prejudging and when Jay came out people went nuts. The buzz before the show was that Jay looked great and a guy I knew that did stuff for the IFBB told me and I remember saying "Jay Cutler? Are you sure"? lol Jay looked fucking great.
you live in vegas, can go to any mr o. what's the problem, wiggs?
-
you live in vegas, can go to any mr o. what's the problem, wiggs?
I was in the military living in Germany from 98-01 and 05-08.
-
phil heath wrecks them both
hahahhahahahahaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaa
-
The best the fridge has looked but Ronnie still just kills him.
Yep, I'd say Jay pushed him more there than Flex did in 98 or 99, although Ronnie wasn't his best in 2001. Jay's 2003 AC & Olympia shape and his 2009 form would probably beat his 2001 version, but he did look very good there.
-
That was the year when Ronnie only got the win due to points from the posing round? Cuz Ronnie is an excellent poser.
-
That was the year when Ronnie only got the win due to points from the posing round? Cuz Ronnie is an excellent poser.
Actually it was the posedown...and the posedown then wasn't supposed to be scored... ::)
-
When you look at this you see just how dominant Ronnie's size is, Especially in the upper body.
x2
-
and yet Jay beat Ron at the pre-judging ::)
-
those two shouldn't be compared
maybe weider wanted to masturbate on the both at the same time ???
-
Can you believe there are people who said Jay should've won that year? ;D Ronnie was way off and still it wasn't even a contest.
-
To compete with Ronnie's mass; Jay bumped up the food and the drugs. He finally had the freaky size by the time 2006 rolled around.... But his waistline was ruined in the process.
(http://i45.servimg.com/u/f45/11/15/36/36/rh9k3210.jpg)
-
Just an observation here. How can a black guy have whiter hands than a white honky?
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=403283.0;attach=443214;image)
-
was this pic 2006?
To compete with Ronnie's mass; Jay bumped up the food and the drugs. He finally had the freaky size by 2006 rolled around.... But his waistline was ruined in the process.
(http://i45.servimg.com/u/f45/11/15/36/36/rh9k3210.jpg)
-
Lets point it right.. Jay is awesome bodybuilder,, but no single one human being had matched Coleman..
simple as that
-
Just an observation here. How can a black guy have whiter hands than a white honky?
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=403283.0;attach=443214;image)
protan on Jays hands and not on Ronnies.
-
jay making Ronnie look narrow
Ronnie has no delts when relaxed
Coleman has bigger upper legs
jay has calves
-
was this pic 2006?
Yeah. Straight up diesel
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/contest_media/2353/357/d/jaycut2006olympia_pre21229070963.jpg)
-
jay making Ronnie look narrow
Ronnie has no delts when relaxed
Coleman has bigger upper legs
jay has calves
we looking at the same pic?
-
I'm not sure if any of you have seen these pics from this angle, so I decided to post them because I haven't seen these on the boards.
Ronnie is a beast. GOAT!!!
Prejudging Set 1
-
Set 2
-
Set 3
-
Great shots , look nothing like that junk Hulkster tried to push for an eternity.
-
Set 4
-
best ever. sorry phil heath.
-
His left lat was always quite a bit smaller than his right.
-
Set 5
-
Finals Set 1
-
Set 2
-
Set 3
-
Set 4
Look at the 3rd pic. That has got to be the best MM I've ever seen.
-
Second to nobody - except a prime Yates.
-
Fucking awesome shots!
-
awesome set of pictures, really incredible.
-
best bodybuilder ever
-
the craziest thing about this side chest is that hes barely flexing, unbelievable.
-
he looks small
-
and then some little tiny whining scrawny cockroaches dare to stutter philsulina heath is better.
haha. can you believe these stains exist?
-
those biceps are insane
-
definitely the 2nd best bodybuilder ever.i always thought he was better in 99 than 98.
-
Look at the things I have outlined here. INSANE mix of size, hardness and symmetry. GOAT!
(http://www.stalkerzone.dk/upload/33csnap-00051.jpg)
-
definitely the 2nd best bodybuilder ever.i always thought he was better in 99 than 98.
He was drier in 98, but shape-wise I'd say his 99 form was much better - his legs were a lot bigger and the overall size made him look more balanced.
Good pics, Bobby.
-
What dumbasses are trying to compare Coleman to Heath?
No fucking comparison.
Most separated MM ever. Probably the best MM ever.
IMO its Ronnie's best pose, shows off all his strengths, hides all of his weakness'
Top 2 all time, no doubt.
Anyone trying to compare to Heath needs to have his head examined.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=403446.0;attach=443491;image)
-
I'll post more pics later.
-
I'll post more pics later.
Great shots , keep em coming !
-
What dumbasses are trying to compare Coleman to Heath?
No fucking comparison.
I wouldn't go that far. The 99 Mr O version of Ronnie would beat this year's version of Phil, but not by a huge margin. Flex Wheeler was built similar to Phil, weighed less and was just as narrow and he pushed Ronnie in that Olympia. And Phil is more complete than Flex, although Flex looks slightly better shape-wise. 2003 Ronnie was a lot bigger, but he was about 257 lb in the 99 O, while Phil was just under 250 lb this year - less than a 10 lb difference.
-
I wouldn't go that far. The 99 Mr O version of Ronnie would beat this year's version of Phil, but not by a huge margin. Flex Wheeler was built similar to Phil, weighed less and was just as narrow and he pushed Ronnie in that Olympia. And Phil is more complete than Flex, although Flex looks slightly better shape-wise. 2003 Ronnie was a lot bigger, but he was about 257 lb in the 99 O, while Phil was just under 250 lb this year - less than a 10 lb difference.
Yeah, but Phils structure blows next to Ronnies, not to mention the difference in separation.
Phil may weight nearly the same, but in respect to muscular quality, IMO, there is no comparison.
The look of Phils muscularity compared to Ronnies, is the same of Ronnie's to Dorians... Looks very marshmellowy when compared to Ronnie.
I feel, if youre going to compare the 2 conditioning wise, that a later Ronnie would be more comparable. 2003 for instance.
-
Yeah, but Phils structure blows next to Ronnies, not to mention the difference in separation.
Phil may weight nearly the same, but in respect to muscular quality, IMO, there is no comparison.
The look of Phils muscularity compared to Ronnies, is the same of Ronnie's to Dorians... Looks very marshmellowy when compared to Ronnie.
I feel, if youre going to compare the 2 conditioning wise, that a later Ronnie would be more comparable. 2003 for instance.
Ronnie does have a better structure, true, which is one of the reasons he'd beat Phil. Flex looked ridiculous in that Olympia with all the oil, but that didn't stop him from beating Cormier who had better muscle quality, so it might not be that big a factor. Plus Phil actually looks great in all of his mandatory poses and is more balanced than Flex, IMO, and also more conditioned.
My point is Phil won't get blown away and would hold his own, but would get beaten in the end all things considered.
-
Ronnie does have a better structure, true, which is one of the reasons he'd beat Phil. Flex looked ridiculous in that Olympia with all the oil, but that didn't stop him from beating Cormier who had better muscle quality, so it might not be that big a factor. Plus Phil actually looks great in all of his mandatory poses and is more balanced than Flex, IMO, also more conditioned.
My point is Phil won't get blown away and would hold his own, but would get beaten in the end all things considered.
Yeah you wont see me arguing that, my point is that Phil has a long way to go and a lot of Olympias to win before hes mentioned in the same sentance as Ronnie as far as being the GOAT is concerned.
-
Yeah you wont see me arguing that, my point is that Phil has a long way to go and a lot of Olympias to win before hes mentioned in the same sentance as Ronnie as far as being the GOAT is concerned.
Absolutely, I can agree with that.
-
Holy shit lol
-
great shots iceman. Thanks
-
More Prejudging
-
...............
-
More Finals
-
............
-
....
-
great shots. destroys both yates and heath.
the naysayers are freaking out.
-
great shots. destroys both yates and heath.
the naysayers are freaking out.
ironic they look nothing like your worked ones huh? ;)
-
ironic they look nothing like your worked one huh? ;)
none of those shots are from the side by side prejudging.
sorry.
nice try. but you fail again.
-
none of those shots are from the side by side prejudging.
sorry.
hahahahahaha dude trash those , save these. post these
-
Here we go again.
-
none of those shots are from the side by side prejudging.
sorry.
nice try. but you fail again.
Hahahahaha swapped out the original pic you posted huh? ;)
it doesn't matter if it's prejudging or not the quality isn't gonna change , your pictures suck compared to these and have been proven to be tampered with , you have been failing for years now.
-
He looks great but not as impressive as the legendary Yates b&w pics.
I'm not trolling.
-
none of those shots are from the side by side prejudging.
sorry.
nice try. but you fail again.
HAHAHAA!!!
Only you, in a thread where everyone is praising Ronnie, is going to come in and post a pic of Yates, and not only post worked pics of Ronnie to try and validate your claims, but try and defend them (worked Ronnie pics) when much clearer high quality pics are 2 posts up, proving you wrong.
You truely are one of a kind Hulkster, one of a kind.
He doesnt fail Hulkster, you do. There is no way youre so blind you cant realize youre the laughing stock of this board, right up there with Derek A and Vince G.
(Well, maybe not quite that bad)
-
HAHAHAA!!!
Only you, in a thread where everyone is praising Ronnie, is going to come in and post a pic of Yates, and not only post worked pics of Ronnie to try and validate your claims, but try and defend them (worked Ronnie pics) when much clearer high quality pics are 2 posts up, proving you wrong.
You truely are one of a kind Hulkster, one of a kind.
He doesnt fail Hulkster, you do. There is no way youre so blind you cant realize youre the laughing stock of this board, right up there with Derek A and Vince G.
(Well, maybe not quite that bad)
Great post !! he is an idiot for clinging to those ridiculous pics , like I said he should trash all those worked ones and keep and post these , Ronnie doesn't need his pic's tampered with the guy looks outstanding
-
great shots. destroys both yates and heath.
the naysayers are freaking out.
Colemans 1998 MR O Shape Vs a Prime Yates would be Colemans best shot in Defeating a prime yates 50/50 ether-way imo... he would need that Dryness with full muscles bellys @ UNDER 250lbs to compete with Yates for the win not his Outrageous size from 99 onwards, it was Yates ALL ROUND Conditioning that made him the best not the size factor difference in the competition in relation to Direct Visuals and other Dialog in relation to Criteria on whos "Better"
-
These pics made me want to create some GIFs of Ronnie's back from the '99 Olympia.
(http://i43.tinypic.com/2lxxdt4.gif)
(http://i43.tinypic.com/5xn2th.gif)
-
Colemans 1998 MR O Shape Vs a Prime Yates would be Colemans best shot in Defeating a prime yates 50/50 ether-way imo... he would need that Dryness with full muscles bellys @ UNDER 250lbs to compete with Yates for the win not his Outrageous size from 99 onwards, it was Yates ALL ROUND Conditioning that made him the best not the size factor difference in the competition in relation to Direct Visuals and other Dialog in relation to Criteria on whos "Better"
2001 Arnold Classic version of Ronnie may have been able to beat Dorian.
-
Coleman was Ridiculous in 1998 @ the Olympia Gyno withstanding his Best IMO Dry, Full, waist small, outrageous taper, etc his BDB and MM was Prehaps the best ever @ that show
-
2001 Arnold Classic version of Ronnie may have been able to beat Dorian.
Yip he was Really really good @ that show too, i feel he was just a tad Fuller @ the 1998 O than the 01 Arnold but point taken.
-
with all the Ronnie threads, why no Team Coleman?
-
Yip he was Really really good @ that show too, i feel he was just a tad Fuller @ the 1998 O than the 01 Arnold but point taken.
it would be great to be able to see a 2003 Olympia Ronnie vs. a 1993 Olympia Dorian, i think it would be very, very close.
-
These pics made me want to create some GIFs of Ronnie's back from the '99 Olympia.
(http://i43.tinypic.com/2lxxdt4.gif)
(http://i43.tinypic.com/5xn2th.gif)
Great work Pota in the Visuals, however those Gifs have been sharpen by someone over time witch Translates into a Far more Dramatic Display of Dryness and Density in these Images Coleman was Incredible that year Regardless just not his Best IMO.
-
it would be great to be able to see a 2003 Olympia Ronnie vs. a 1993 Olympia Dorian, i think it would be very, very close.
It would be as close as you not hitting a women, raising a black kid with your mudshark broad and not living in a trailor or me getting a job.
That's pretty close...BTW you are not Mirza. I don't believe it for a god damn second but I'll play along for now...
-
it would be great to be able to see a 2003 Olympia Ronnie vs. a 1993 Olympia Dorian, i think it would be very, very close.
Absolutely both in those respective years set new Benchmarks IMO...Yates with Never seen before all round Combination of Size, Conditioning, Density @ a tad under 260lbs....Then Coleman @ 280-odd Lbs with Size and muscle bellys that was on another planet never seen before, that shot of Coleman and cutler in the "relaxed" mandatory from the back in 2003.. :o :o :o :o god damn Alien.
-
Great shots , look nothing like that junk Hulkster tried to push for an eternity.
Yeah. ronnie looks better, even.
-
Jay clearly won in 2001 based on skin pigmentation alone.
Ronnie lost before either one of them lifted a weight for the first time.
-
Can you believe there are people who said Jay should've won that year? ;D Ronnie was way off and still it wasn't even a contest.
i don t understand till doday what kind of retarded people say jay was even tie with ronnie
jay wasn t even a clear 2nd
-
Why was my (Ronnie Coleman - New Pics From 1999 Mr. Olympia!!!) thread merged with this thread? Ronnie 1999 has nothing to do with Jay or this thread. The topic of this thread was Jay vs. Ronnie 2001.
-
It would be as close as you not hitting a women, raising a black kid with your mudshark broad and not living in a trailor or me getting a job.
That's pretty close...BTW you are not Mirza. I don't believe it for a god damn second but I'll play along for now...
Daaaaaaaaamn!
:D
-
Here are the rest of the comparisons from this contest.
Prejudging
-
Set 2
That quad sweep!!!
-
Set 3
-
Set 4
-
Set 5
-
Set 6
-
jay making Ronnie look narrow
Ronnie has no delts when relaxed
Coleman has bigger upper legs
jay has calves
1st cap from beginning of prejudging.
2nd from last callout...
Ronnie's delts look pretty big to me.
-
Set 7
-
Set 8
-
Set 9
-
Set 10
-
Set 11
-
Set 12
-
Set 13
-
Set 14
-
Set 15
4th pic - SMH
-
.....................
-
Rest of the finals Top 6
-
Set 2
-
Set 3
-
Set 4
-
Set 5
-
Set 6
-
Set 7