Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: delta9mda on January 10, 2012, 10:12:30 PM

Title: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: delta9mda on January 10, 2012, 10:12:30 PM
he doesnt get enough credit, got the 8 mr O way before Ronnie. discuss
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: goomba420 on January 10, 2012, 10:14:39 PM
goal physique right there. great inspiration for natural bodybuilders like myself
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Max B on January 11, 2012, 12:45:09 AM
He could claim natural today and enter team
Universe because he doesnt use insulin. Guys like meso adraina and patnelli could easily win 10 mr os if they started using those evil drugs
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: nzmusclemonster on January 11, 2012, 12:49:34 AM
Does Lee even work out? He looks like shit compared to Banana.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Wiggs on January 11, 2012, 01:18:33 AM
See my various Lee Haney threads...Dude is greatest all time.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Dr Dutch on January 11, 2012, 02:25:20 AM
Lee Haney was the last real mr O....
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Purge_WTF on January 11, 2012, 04:43:27 AM
Lee Haney was the last real mr O....
 

  I'd give that title to Zane, but Lee was a great bodybuilder.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: wes on January 11, 2012, 04:45:29 AM
Awesome shot.I never saw that pic before.

Back in the day,I never liked Lees build,but after years of big gutted oilbags,I`m a die hard Haney fan for life!!
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: MORTALCOIL on January 11, 2012, 04:46:03 AM
 

  I'd give that title to Zane, but Lee was a great bodybuilder.

What about Samir in 83? Even though it was a once in a lifetime thing, that showing is till one of the best ever at a Mr 'O.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: david94 on January 11, 2012, 05:10:15 AM
he doesnt get enough credit, got the 8 mr O way before Ronnie. discuss

Does he have bigger arms than Dan Hill?
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: DK II on January 11, 2012, 05:13:16 AM
 

  I'd give that title to Zane, but Lee was a great bodybuilder.

seconded.


BB should have stopped after Zane.

Actually with Arnold it peaked, just went downhill from that, but Zane's aestehtiques are unmatched.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: MORTALCOIL on January 11, 2012, 05:17:24 AM
seconded.


BB should have stopped after Zane.

Actually with Arnold it peaked, just went downhill from that, but Zane's aestehtiques are unmatched.

Cue Groink calling Zane a twink, post pics of himself and induce a 40 pages+ thread.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: affeman on January 11, 2012, 05:20:21 AM
he doesnt get enough credit, got the 8 mr O way before Ronnie. discuss

lol What for?

Wouldn't even turn pro nowadays with that physique. He dominated probably the weakest era in BB, that's about it.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Figo on January 11, 2012, 05:22:51 AM
What about Samir in 83? Even though it was a once in a lifetime thing, that showing is till one of the best ever at a Mr 'O.
x 2
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Figo on January 11, 2012, 05:24:50 AM
lol What for?

Wouldn't even turn pro nowadays with that physique. He dominated probably the weakest era in BB, that's about it.
lol, no

And the weakest is now, or when a very much past his prime dickerson won it in 82
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: affeman on January 11, 2012, 05:28:02 AM
lol, no

And the weakest is now, or when a very much past his prime dickerson won it in 82

You're a complete retard if you say nowadays is the weakest era. People always tend to put down the current state and glorify past times ("U know, back in the days...." ::)), eventough it's completely ridicolous.

Nowadays is probably one of the most competitive era ever, comparable to the 90s.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: _bruce_ on January 11, 2012, 05:28:17 AM
Looks great - even arms look good there.
Had a height advantage.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: booty on January 11, 2012, 05:31:17 AM
I remember when he was the reigning Mr Olympia.  He blew everyone away in the lineup.   
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: MORTALCOIL on January 11, 2012, 05:33:56 AM
You're a complete retard if you say nowadays is the weakest era. People always tend to put down the current state and glorify past times ("U know, back in the days...." ::)), eventough it's completely ridicolous.

Nowadays is probably one of the most competitive era ever, comparable to the 90s.

No, it's not. The problem is that you can't compare the last ten years with the 80s. The '90s were redifining for Bbing and while you can still compare the '90s to the 80s to some extent, it has entered a new era with Yates specially and the trend has been going on. But apart from sheer size, nothing today is close to the '90s. Conditioning, proportions, symmetry, aesthetics, and so on......
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: david94 on January 11, 2012, 05:46:21 AM
No, it's not. The problem is that you can't compare the last ten years with the 80s. The '90s were redifining for Bbing and while you can still compare the '90s to the 80s to some extent, it has entered a new era with Yates specially and the trend has been going on. But apart from sheer size, nothing today is close to the '90s. Conditioning, proportions, symmetry, aesthetics, and so on......

Almost every guys of the 90s are off compared to guys now, except Yates, Shawn Ray or Munzer.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: MORTALCOIL on January 11, 2012, 05:55:25 AM
Almost every guys of the 90s are off compared to guys now, except Yates, Shawn Ray or Munzer.

Who except Heath comes in conditioned today? Jay? In the past ten years, only Dexter was consistent with his conditioning. Flex '93 was conditioned (maybe not at the '0 as much as at the AC and Ironman but still), Ronnie '98 was also good.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: affeman on January 11, 2012, 06:02:11 AM
Who except Heath comes in conditioned today? Jay? In the past ten years, only Dexter was consistent with his conditioning. Flex '93 was conditioned (maybe not at the '0 as much as at the AC and Ironman but still), Ronnie '98 was also good.

The only reason the guys from the 90 were more shredded is cause the quality of the pics and videos from that area is worse lol ::)
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: david94 on January 11, 2012, 06:04:19 AM
Who except Heath comes in conditioned today? Jay? In the past ten years, only Dexter was consistent with his conditioning. Flex '93 was conditioned (maybe not at the '0 as much as at the AC and Ironman but still), Ronnie '98 was also good.

I agree with you, Flex was only conditioned one time in his life.
For the rest, Levrone could not be big and shredded at the same time, Nasser's back was a swimming pool,
Dillet was smooth every were, Labrada had a shitty skin and watery back, Cormier was even more off than Wheeler during all his career and I don't even talk about the rest of the guys (Matarazzo lol, Aaron Baker etc...)

Of course, today bbers are more shredded and even bigger. The only good thing with the 90's is there were more unique guys like Flex, Levrone or Ray for example, but the overall level is worse than today's.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: wes on January 11, 2012, 06:09:36 AM
Nowadays is probably one of the most competitive era ever, comparable to the 90s.
(http://www.littlestuffedbull.com/images/comics/haha082109/haha-avengers262.jpg)
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: wes on January 11, 2012, 06:10:23 AM
What about Samir in 83? Even though it was a once in a lifetime thing, that showing is till one of the best ever at a Mr 'O.
Yes it was!
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: MORTALCOIL on January 11, 2012, 06:14:15 AM
As you said, they were at least three competitors that were very consistent condition wise in the 9ās (Yates, Ray and Munzer). I can't name three competitors as consistent in that department int he last ten years. And if we're talking about structure (cue the Heath comments): look at the top 6 from any 'O from 91 to 97 maybe even 99 (Cormier's best showing maybe and much better than any current pro IMO). They're all better than today's pro. Dillett may have fucked up his conditioning regularly but his structure was very good, so was Fux's, Levrone's, Nasser's, Yates'....Today, apart from Freeman and Wolf, who do you have?
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: lm on January 11, 2012, 06:16:22 AM
if you are a fan of weight, then today is probably the most competitive era.

but if you are a fan of what most consider bodybuilding, then you just have to look at the quality of people who never won an Olympia and draw your conclusions:

Ray, Flex and Levrone are arguably the best to have never won it.

Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: wes on January 11, 2012, 06:17:10 AM
As you said, they were at least three competitors that were very consistent condition wise in the 9ās (Yates, Ray and Munzer). I can't name three competitors as consistent in that department int he last ten years. And if we're talking about structure (cue the Heath comments): look at the top 6 from any 'O from 91 to 97 maybe even 99 (Cormier's best showing maybe and much better than any current pro IMO). They're all better than today's pro. Dillett may have fucked up his conditioning regularly but his structure was very good, so was Fux's, Levrone's, Nasser's, Yates'....Today, apart from Freeman and Wolf, who do you have?
Don`t forget Vince Taylor,Lee Labrada,Demay,Gaspari,Momo,and Pastel,as well as Clairmont,Buchanan,Matarazzo,Paris, etc. etc.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Oly15 on January 11, 2012, 06:22:00 AM
goal physique right there. great inspiration for natural bodybuilders like myself

You're not natural you roach clown.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: david94 on January 11, 2012, 06:27:04 AM
As you said, they were at least three competitors that were very consistent condition wise in the 9ās (Yates, Ray and Munzer). I can't name three competitors as consistent in that department int he last ten years. And if we're talking about structure (cue the Heath comments): look at the top 6 from any 'O from 91 to 97 maybe even 99 (Cormier's best showing maybe and much better than any current pro IMO). They're all better than today's pro. Dillett may have fucked up his conditioning regularly but his structure was very good, so was Fux's, Levrone's, Nasser's, Yates'....Today, apart from Freeman and Wolf, who do you have?

As I said there were more legend during the 90s but it's not today's bodybuilders fault, it's just a coincidence.
By the way you also have a lot of legends during the past 10 years, like Coleman, Dexter, Phil Heath, Cutler who is more competitive than Flex and Levrone even if it's hard to admit it.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: wes on January 11, 2012, 06:28:51 AM
As I said there were more legend during the 90s but it's not today's bodybuilders fault, it's just a coincidence.
By the way you also have a lot of legends during the past 10 years, like Coleman, Dexter, Phil Heath, Cutler who is more competitive than Flex and Levrone even if it's hard to admit it.

True,but most of the lesser light pros these days suck.....not all,but a lot of them.

Too much oil,shitty proportions,no calves,shit posing,big guts..................
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: david94 on January 11, 2012, 06:35:33 AM
True,but most of the lesser light pros these days suck.....not all,but a lot of them.

Too much oil,shitty proportions,no calves,shit posing,big guts..................

If you talk about average pro shows I totally agree with you, shits like Henz Senior or Jari Mentula didn't exist 15 years ago. But if you only talk about the Olympia, the overall level is better today as guys are bigger and leaner.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: MORTALCOIL on January 11, 2012, 06:36:14 AM
As I said there were more legend during the 90s but it's not today's bodybuilders fault, it's just a coincidence.
By the way you also have a lot of legends during the past 10 years, like Coleman, Dexter, Phil Heath, Cutler who is more competitive than Flex and Levrone even if it's hard to admit it.


Was Coleman ever better than in '98 (maybe the 01 AC)? To me, the fact that people are in awe of his '03 O showing is a proof of how much people no longer give a sit about certain basics. Dexter, I'll agree once again. Jay was consistent for a while from 2001 to 2004 then the waistline exploded and he just had one great showing at the 'O in 2009. Half of his sandows are as good as Columbu's and he won his first one against a way downhill Coleman (Vince Taylor placed 11th or something at 50 years old-I wouldn't really count it as competitive).
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: wes on January 11, 2012, 06:40:50 AM
If you talk about average pro shows I totally agree with you, shits like Henz Senior or Jari Mentula didn't exist 15 years ago. But if you only talk about the Olympia, the overall level is better today as guys are bigger and leaner.
Bigger is not better......better is better!!

It`s all subjective bro.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: wes on January 11, 2012, 06:41:48 AM
Was Coleman ever better than in '98 (maybe the 01 AC)? To me, the fact that people are in awe of his '03 O showing is a proof of how much people no longer give a sit about certain basics. Dexter, I'll agree once again. Jay was consistent for a while from 2001 to 2004 then the waistline exploded and he just had one great showing at the 'O in 2009. Half of his sandows are as good as Columbu's and he won his first one against a way downhill Coleman (Vince Taylor placed 11th or something at 50 years old-I wouldn't really count it as competitive).
Vince Taylor has tons of overall pro wins!!

He wasn`t always 50 years old!  ;D
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: david94 on January 11, 2012, 06:50:49 AM
Was Coleman ever better than in '98 (maybe the 01 AC)? To me, the fact that people are in awe of his '03 O showing is a proof of how much people no longer give a sit about certain basics. Dexter, I'll agree once again. Jay was consistent for a while from 2001 to 2004 then the waistline exploded and he just had one great showing at the 'O in 2009. Half of his sandows are as good as Columbu's and he won his first one against a way downhill Coleman (Vince Taylor placed 11th or something at 50 years old-I wouldn't really count it as competitive).

I used Coleman as example because he won most of his titles during the last 10 years. For the rest, you had an elite during the 90s but this elite was not as dedicated as today's guys (Wheeler, Cormier, Dillet etc...). Now you have a little bit less amazing guys but you also have more great guys than the 90s. Aside from the top 6, you didn't really have interesting guys. Now you have a lot of good guys like Beyeke, Rockel, Centopani, Freeman, Alves, Mc Millian, Shawn Roden, etc...
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: wes on January 11, 2012, 06:52:27 AM
I used Coleman as example because he won most of his titles during the last 10 years. For the rest, you had an elite during the 90s but this elite was not as dedicated as today's guys (Wheeler, Cormier, Dillet etc...). Now you have a little bit less amazing guys but you also have more great guys than the 90s. Aside from the top 6, you didn't really have interesting guys. Now you have a lot of good guys like Beyeke, Rockel, Centopani, Freeman, Alves, Mc Millian, Shawn Roden, etc...
Good list of up and comers!!
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: njflex on January 11, 2012, 06:53:17 AM
Vince Taylor has tons of overall pro wins!!

He wasn`t always 50 years old!  ;D
he has the most pro wins combined ,,,dude was incredible.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: wes on January 11, 2012, 06:54:29 AM
he has the most pro wins combined ,,,dude was incredible.
And,still looks great!
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Samourai Pizzacat on January 11, 2012, 07:04:56 AM
You're not natural you roach clown.

You have to calibrate your sarcasm meter...
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Figo on January 11, 2012, 07:31:03 AM
You're a complete retard if you say nowadays is the weakest era. People always tend to put down the current state and glorify past times ("U know, back in the days...." ::)), eventough it's completely ridicolous.

Nowadays is probably one of the most competitive era ever, comparable to the 90s.

its not a nostalgia thing, the late 80s and early 90s was the most competitive era with quality size, strong line ups of individual bber of a high caliber that had distinct looks to their physiques

What's retarded is anyone that has the view that bbing has reached a new level..
What exactly makes this era better besides the new found ability to hold more size, and have striations and a gut?
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: wes on January 11, 2012, 07:33:11 AM
its not a nostalgia thing, the late 80s and early 90s was the most competitive era with quality size, strong line ups of individual bber of a high caliber that had distinct looks to their physiques

What's retarded is anyone that has the view that bbing has reached a new level..
What exactly makes this era better besides the new found ability to hold more size, and have striations and a gut?

Good post per usual!
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: njflex on January 11, 2012, 07:39:09 AM
its not a nostalgia thing, the late 80s and early 90s was the most competitive era with quality size, strong line ups of individual bber of a high caliber that had distinct looks to their physiques

What's retarded is anyone that has the view that bbing has reached a new level..
What exactly makes this era better besides the new found ability to hold more size, and have striations and a gut?

its clinging,,,and the only thing keeps it going is the expo's and supplement companies both whom sponsor show's now.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Figo on January 11, 2012, 07:47:20 AM
Good post per usual!
thanks,

I'm not trying to put down, nor do I hate current bbers

I'm amazed at kai greene's leg size, the freaky back, and the size of his arms, but do I want to look like him? No. Do I get the illusion that I could possibly ever look like him? No.
At least with zane we had the delusion that was attainable, it was real, same with samir, benfatto, and with guys like haney, then yates, it was a new level, but still appeared human

Am I freaked out by heaths arms? Yes, but I know they're pumped full of seo, and also know that if he doesn't follow a complex regime of aas, gh, seo, slin, that size will be gone in a few months

Haney wouldve also become much smaller off, but he wouldn't have shrunk

Wait till vic leaves his current habitat, and when we see his first pics back outside, the we'll have a good example of current generation bbing sans assistance
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: wes on January 11, 2012, 07:55:07 AM
Yet another good post Figo...........my sentiments exactly to tee.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Wiggs on January 11, 2012, 07:55:12 AM
Pathetic arms on Lee ::)

Remember, no SEO, no synthol..All real...not this balonie BS today.
At 5'11.5 and 245 and long limbs, stage ready I'm guessing they probably 20 inches. Nothing mindblowing but to your average person totLee awesome and they had great shape.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: wes on January 11, 2012, 07:56:54 AM
Nice shot Wiggs...arms look huge there!
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Figo on January 11, 2012, 08:02:58 AM
Pathetic arms on Lee ::)

Remember, no SEO, no synthol..All real...not this balonie BS today.
At 5'11.5 and 245 and long limbs, stage ready I'm guessing they probably 20 inches. Nothing mindblowing but to your average person totLee awesome and they had great shape.
there was thread where his arm size was discussed, I think gh15 said 19 or 19.5, whatever it was, that torso dwarfed his limbs, massive chest and back

And he had a now almost extinct v taper
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: MORTALCOIL on January 11, 2012, 08:05:01 AM
Nice shot Wiggs...arms look huge there!

You mean that's Wiggs latest pic? Fuckin' amazing improvement in a week or so! Ok, I'm out.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Wiggs on January 11, 2012, 08:07:15 AM
You mean that's Wiggs latest pic? Fuckin' amazing improvement in a week or so! Ok, I'm out.

Yeah bro, I've been working my ass off. Bringing back the old school look.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: MORTALCOIL on January 11, 2012, 08:09:06 AM
Yeah bro, I've been working my ass off. Bringing back the old school look.

I hope you can get a decent job thanks to that. Sandow holder maybe.
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: Wiggs on January 11, 2012, 08:11:18 AM
That's the goal bro, that's the goal. ;D
Title: Re: Lee Freaking Haney
Post by: G_Thang on January 11, 2012, 08:15:28 AM
You're a complete retard if you say nowadays is the weakest era. People always tend to put down the current state and glorify past times ("U know, back in the days...." ::)), eventough it's completely ridicolous.

Nowadays is probably one of the most competitive era ever, comparable to the 90s.

you must be on drugs.  phil has no comp.  jay was a train wreck mr o who had to wait for ronnie to get old and kai is fat, wet piece of shit only wiggs could schmoe after.  ;D  evan won't compete and kulco has to get rid of the glaze before he can even win a 10k show.