Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Hugo Chavez on February 19, 2012, 05:22:13 AM
-
Ok, he says it's ok to be a homo, but not ok to act on it. How the hell does that work? I'm just curious if anyone here agrees with Santorum on gays?
What does the religious right want gays to do? Was it better back in the day when a gay person had to hide it often to the point of marrying someone of the opposite sex? How fair is that to the person who doesn't know they married someone gay? That probably led to some seriously depressing sex lives.
Is praying the gay away a real option people believe works? Please explain all this shit, the right's stance on gays seems bizzaro sometimes.
What's Santorum say to his gay friend he says he has...
"hey Ricky, mind if I come over to watch the game with you guys"
"Sure John, as long as you haven't fucked anyone in the ass"
"but I'm gay, you know that"
"It's ok to be gay, just don't be gay"
-
repubs wanted some pretty bad choices in this race. cain? trump? Did anyone REALLY picture cain's slick yet uninformed act working with the leaders of the world? Of course not. but they defended him because the left attacked him.
MSNBC could run a piece on monday claiming "ronald mcdonald NOT qualified to be president" and Michelle obama warning kids about the dangers of fast food.
And on tuesday morning, fox and friends woudl be talking about the "draft ronald for president 2012" movement is really starting to take root haha!
-
repubs wanted some pretty bad choices in this race. cain? trump? Did anyone REALLY picture cain's slick yet uninformed act working with the leaders of the world? Of course not. but they defended him because the left attacked him.
MSNBC could run a piece on monday claiming "ronald mcdonald NOT qualified to be president" and Michelle obama warning kids about the dangers of fast food.
And on tuesday morning, fox and friends woudl be talking about the "draft ronald for president 2012" movement is really starting to take root haha!
240, what about this gay stuff... Where do you stand on it? Is Santorum right on this or wrong? Why?
-
240, what about this gay stuff... Where do you stand on it? Is Santorum right on this or wrong? Why?
santorum wants to be president. while i think personally he hates it... i think he'll try to say 1 thing to gop primary voters, and 1 thing in the general election.
santorum is like a child - you can see his face as he thinks. like when cain was asked if he'd take a polygraph - his face instantly said "time to lie!" and people knew it.
Santorum is like that - he's very easy to read. i dont see mitt or santorum beating obama, and neither does intrade. obama getting stronger and the superPACs have allowed politicians to DEMOLISH each other in PRIMARIES> that's huge. Romney would have won long before we heard about his taxes or cayman islands, in 2008. superPacs are evil.
anyway, i think sanotrum hates gay ppl, but they're just a political pwn to be used for his purposes
-
He views gay sex as a sin and an act against nature, which it is.
-
He views gay sex as a sin and an act against nature, which it is.
You're religious? Isn't it a sin to even think of it? Santorum says it's ok to be a homo, but not act on it... lol
-
Howard Stern speaks out about homophobia
-
You're religious? Isn't it a sin to even think of it? Santorum says it's ok to be a homo, but not act on it... lol
Not religious at all, but gay sex is against nature.
-
Not religious at all, but gay sex is against nature.
ok, what does that mean? That is should be illegal because it's not natural? We do a lot of things that aren't exactly natural. Plus homo stuff does happen in nature.
-
ok, what does that mean? That is should be illegal because it's not natural? We do a lot of things that aren't exactly natural. Plus homo stuff does happen in nature.
Not illegal, but not celebrated condoned or treated as same as hetro sex either.
-
Not illegal, but not celebrated condoned or treated as same as hetro sex either.
So gay people should not be allowed to celebrate? OK, that's odd.. That's their business imo. Shouldn't they at least have the same rights as others?
-
So gay people should not be allowed to celebrate? OK, that's odd.. That's their business imo. Shouldn't they at least have the same rights as others?
Sure, but at the same time I have the right to point out the obvious.
-
Ok, he says it's ok to be a homo, but not ok to act on it. How the hell does that work?
I'm just curious if anyone here agrees with Santorum on gays?
I'm guessing he has some religious foundation for his belief, but I think at one time he argued that gay sex is not constitutionally protected behavior. This is going back, so I may not have my facts right.
No I don't agree with him on this issue or just about any other.
-
-
Not religious at all, but gay sex is against nature.
what about a guy banging his chick in the ass? also against nature also a sin?
-
B/c he understands that being gay has an innate aspect but is also a choice.
Does it make sense to say its ok to get angry but not to act on it?
yea it does...
some ppl have a natural propensity to homosexuality some ppl have a natural propensity to anger, both must CHOOSE to engage in such behavior.
being gay and acting on it is really no different than being angry and acting on it
-
B/c he understands that being gay has an innate aspect but is also a choice.
Does it make sense to say its ok to get angry but not to act on it?
yea it does...
some ppl have a natural propensity to homosexuality some ppl have a natural propensity to anger, both must CHOOSE to engage in such behavior.
being gay and acting on it is really no different than being angry and acting on it
did you just use being angry and not acting on it as an analogy to being gay and not acting on it? really? lol...
-
did you just use being angry and not acting on it as an analogy to being gay and not acting on it? really? lol...
no i used the propensity to homosexuality and the propensity for violence through anger sorry I didnt clarify but the concept is basically the same.
Both have innate characteristics that most would agree its ok to feel but for some reason we fill its ok to act on the homo but not the anger...
-
If it was possible to decide shortly after conception who was queer and who was not how many religious fundametalists would find a biblical way to justify abortion for fairy fetuses?
-
no i used the propensity to homosexuality and the propensity for violence through anger sorry I didnt clarify but the concept is basically the same.
Both have innate characteristics that most would agree its ok to feel but for some reason we fill its ok to act on the homo but not the anger...
People act on anger all the time and there's nothing wrong with that. Acting on anger doesn't mean you're punching someone in the face. It could just be confronting a person with your opinion where you wouldn't have if not motivated by anger. Anger is natural. I'm angry at the crap coming out of Santorum. If I was not angry at it, I probably wouldn't be posting this shit.
Do you really think it's reasonable to ask that 2 homos not act on their desires for eachother? Why give a fuck about what they do? It's not effecting me any. If they both want to do that, who am or you or anyone to tell them they can't?
-
People act on anger all the time and there's nothing wrong with that. Acting on anger doesn't mean you're punching someone in the face. It could just be confronting a person with your opinion where you wouldn't have if not motivated by anger. Anger is natural. I'm angry at the crap coming out of Santorum. If I was not angry at it, I probably wouldn't be posting this shit.
Do you really think it's reasonable to ask that 2 homos not act on their desires for eachother? Why give a fuck about what they do? It's not effecting me any. If they both want to do that, who am or you or anyone to tell them they can't?
yes huggy ppl act out on anger but we also have laws to restrict it...
i think you need to re-do the first post then...you asked if it makes sense or "sence" ;)
If a person believes that homosexuality and the normalizing of it is harmful to the culture and direction of the country then wouldnt it make sense that they feel the way santorum does?
I agree with you I dont care what the faries do...but dont sit here and expect me to look at it like is normal or worse even treat it like its normal B/C IT ISNT!!!
Why do we have to go so far out of the way to accomadate such a small % of ppl for some shit that is plainly and obviously abnormal?
-
yes huggy ppl act out on anger but we also have laws to restrict it...
i think you need to re-do the first post then...you asked if it makes sense or "sence" ;)
If a person believes that homosexuality and the normalizing of it is harmful to the culture and direction of the country then wouldnt it make sense that they feel the way santorum does?
I agree with you I dont care what the faries do...but dont sit here and expect me to look at it like is normal or worse even treat it like its normal B/C IT ISNT!!!
Why do we have to go so far out of the way to accomadate such a small % of ppl for some shit that is plainly and obviously abnormal?
show me one law written against "anger" Yea, you can't go beat someone to a bloody pulp but those laws are not againt anger. you can't beat the crap out of someone for fun and there are idiots that do that. Same law applies to them, not based on their emotion at the time of the crime.
PS.. I'm not going to cry over a freaking typo... have at it...
-
show me one law written against "anger" Yea, you can't go beat someone to a bloody pulp but those laws are not againt anger. you can't beat the crap out of someone for fun and there are idiots that do that. Same law applies to them, not based on their emotion at the time of the crime.
PS.. I'm not going to cry over a freaking typo... have at it...
LOL i was just poking fun, calm down...
again Im sorry I meant violence as anger is sometimes the reason for violence...
there are laws against violence
but the same could be said for homosexuality...there are laws that say same sex marriage is illegal. It doesnt specify that only those same sex marriages that are between homosexuals are illegal.
-
LOL i was just poking fun, calm down...
again Im sorry I meant violence as anger is sometimes the reason for violence...
there are laws against violence
but the same could be said for homosexuality...there are laws that say same sex marriage is illegal. It doesnt specify that only those same sex marriages that are between homosexuals are illegal.
With anger, there are acceptable and unacceptable expressions. With gay sex, there are NO acceptable expressions in the eyes of Santorum and the religious right. Also, a law isn't right just because it exists. Hell, a lot of laws are unconstitutional but there they sit, on the books...
-
The first and most important reason for sex is pro creation and sustaining the population.
Gay sex is a perversion of that.
An asshole is supposed to be used to exrete toxins and waste from, not stick your dick into.
-
The first and most important reason for sex is pro creation and sustaining the population.
Gay sex is a perversion of that.
An asshole is supposed to be used to exrete toxins and waste from, not stick your dick into.
Crude, but accurate!!
-
With anger, there are acceptable and unacceptable expressions. With gay sex, there are NO acceptable expressions in the eyes of Santorum and the religious right. Also, a law isn't right just because it exists. Hell, a lot of laws are unconstitutional but there they sit, on the books...
Lets rephrase my analogy to violence not anger. I used anger b/c i felt it was implied that i was referring to violence caused by anger but for this lets just say violence no matter what the cause.
Some ppl have a natural propensity to violence which is ok but not ok to act on...
I agree with you on the idea of laws not being the bases of right and wrong.
Dont really see what youre getting at though your original question was whether or not it makes sense. If he believes that homosexuality is wrong but also that homosexuality has an innate aspect to it then wouldnt it make sense that he feels having those feelings is something a person must deal with but that not acting on them is the way to approach the situation?
same with propensity to violence?
-
The first and most important reason for sex is pro creation and sustaining the population.
Gay sex is a perversion of that.
An asshole is supposed to be used to exrete toxins and waste from, not stick your dick into.
whats hillarious is that the left which is so pro gay is also extremely anti religous and pro evolution...
I like how they turn a blind eye to the contradiction.
-
Lets rephrase my analogy to violence not anger. I used anger b/c i felt it was implied that i was referring to violence caused by anger but for this lets just say violence no matter what the cause.
why change it to violence? There are acceptable expressions of violence too. If I take my printer out back and bash it with a baseball bat nothing will happen, nobody will give a shit.
-
Ok, wouldn't you think it was stupid as hell if Santorum expected people to never express their anger? Yea, that would be fucking stupid.
-
The first and most important reason for sex is pro creation and sustaining the population.
Gay sex is a perversion of that.
An asshole is supposed to be used to exrete toxins and waste from, not stick your dick into.
so you would agree that assfucking a hot chick is also a perversion and that you have never been tempted let alone wandered up the Bournville Boulevard?
-
so you would agree that assfucking a hot chick is also a perversion and that you have never been tempted let alone wandered up the Bournville Boulevard?
Yes, anal sex is a perversion of the main biological reason for sex. Plus, its not all that sanitary and healthy from what I have read.
-
Yes, anal sex is a perversion of the main biological reason for sex. Plus, its not all that sanitary and healthy from what I have read.
quiet so but you probaly also read that many people have sex without reference to its biological purpose
-
quiet so but you probaly also read that many people have sex without reference to its biological purpose
Of course they do. However, the main biological reason for sex is pro creation, not pleasure.
-
Santorum is a POFS as 333 would say.
Anyone else notice that all the candidates were being fed.now days are the same?
Every one they give us runs on the premise of telling us how to live our lives, saying.if they're elected.they will make sure to enact rules and regs forcing people to.comply with their views.on how people should live.
How did we.wind up here? Where did things go so wrong?
-
Santorum is a POFS as 333 would say.
Anyone else notice that all the candidates were being fed.now days are the same?
Every one they give us runs on the premise of telling us how to live our lives, saying.if they're elected.they will make sure to enact rules and regs forcing people to.comply with their views.on how people should live.
How did we.wind up here? Where did things go so wrong?
We have only ourselves to blame. You know what is funny though - I never remember even an ounce of the same scrutiny from demos over their picks in 2008.
-
why change it to violence? There are acceptable expressions of violence too. If I take my printer out back and bash it with a baseball bat nothing will happen, nobody will give a shit.
that would still be frowned upon by some...we have ppl that want to take violence out of video games on comic heros...
lol I doubt santorum would have a problem with gay ppl shaking hands or hugging I think its the sexual act of homosexuality he objects to more than anything. Yea he would probably like for ppl not to be homosexual at all just like some would like ppl not to be violent at all...
-
Yes, anal sex is a perversion of the main biological reason for sex. Plus, its not all that sanitary and healthy from what I have read.
You would never go down on a chic or let one on you?
-
You would never go down on a chic or let one on you?
Very different thananal sex. The asshole is where literally SHIT comes out which is the waste and toxins from the body.
sorry bro - you want to stick your tounge in there and cock - have at it. To me it's no different than sticking your mouth over a tail pipe from a car.
-
Very different thananal sex. The asshole is where literally SHIT comes out which is the waste and toxins from the body.
sorry bro - you want to stick your tounge in there and cock - have at it. To me it's no different than sticking your mouth over a tail pipe from a car.
Legally I guess it's not different than anal sex. It was also included under the legal definition of sodomy in the US. The same laws that Santorum would like to see again.
And don't say I want to stick my tounge up an ass ::) this isn't about me. It's about keeping the government out of people's personal affairs.
-
Not religious at all, but gay sex is against nature.
(no homo)
I've always heard homosexuality was completely normal in nature? Lions or Tigers? Several other animals?
Maybe I'm wrong?
(no homo)
-
Legally I guess it's not different than anal sex. It was also included under the legal definition of sodomy in the US. The same laws that Santorum would like to see again.
And don't say I want to stick my tounge up an ass ::) this isn't about me. It's about keeping the government out of people's personal affairs.
Not disagreeing at all. Just stating my personal belief.
-
The first and most important reason for sex is pro creation and sustaining the population.
Gay sex is a perversion of that.
An asshole is supposed to be used to exrete toxins and waste from, not stick your dick into.
In that case, oral sex is a sin. Birth control is a sin. Condoms are a sin. Pulling out is a sin. Vasectomy is a sin. Masturbation is a sin. People who are born or become impotent or sterile are sinners.
Now let's just wait for dumb ass Santororororum to say this. ::)
-
B/c he understands that being gay has an innate aspect but is also a choice.
Does it make sense to say its ok to get angry but not to act on it?
yea it does...
some ppl have a natural propensity to homosexuality some ppl have a natural propensity to anger, both must CHOOSE to engage in such behavior.
being gay and acting on it is really no different than being angry and acting on it
I assume you have scientific evidence of this? I also assume you will post it for the rest of us to view as well.
I don't believe sexuality is a choice. I don't remember choosing to be straight. I knew I liked tits and koosh growing up.
When did you choose to be straight? How many cocks did you suck before choosing to be heterosexual?
-
I assume you have scientific evidence of this? I also assume you will post it for the rest of us to view as well.
I assume you have scientific evidence to the contrary. I also assume you will post it for the rest of us to view as well.
What is the reason for 2 different genders? If faggotry is completely normal and determined by DNA as you idiots believe, why 2 genders? It should have been only 1 gender with the capacity to procreate.
-
I assume you have scientific evidence to the contrary. I also assume you will post it for the rest of us to view as well.
What is the reason for 2 different genders? If faggotry is completely normal and determined by DNA as you idiots believe, why 2 genders? It should have been only 1 gender with the capacity to procreate.
-
(no homo)
I've always heard homosexuality was completely normal in nature? Lions or Tigers? Several other animals?
Maybe I'm wrong?
(no homo)
Lions or Tigers? Even if it occurred it is still abnormal. And why would that be used as the standard for human sexuality?
Humans are supposed to be on a higher level of consciousness and intelligence than those animals. Hell, if we are going to look to them as to what is normal in nature, then I guess every single man can start killing the children that their girlfriends may have had with other men in order to get them in the mood. Or perhaps we should adopt the Koala bear diet. Start eating whatever comes out of our parents' rear ends.
-
I assume you have scientific evidence to the contrary. I also assume you will post it for the rest of us to view as well.
What is the reason for 2 different genders? If faggotry is completely normal and determined by DNA as you idiots believe, why 2 genders? It should have been only 1 gender with the capacity to procreate.
I am not the one passing it off as fact. Try again Retardario.
Why 2 genders? Certainly not for toe tapping bathroom Christians to have a choice of.
If God indeed made them this way, who the fuck are you to question what he has done? Besides a dumbass pussy stain that hasn't even read the fairy tale book he claims to follow.