Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: SomeKindofMonster on March 07, 2012, 06:17:57 PM
-
Hulkster Somewhat Justified - McGough says 1999 Coleman's best Olympia but..
He says Coleman 2001 AC is his best physique.
Around 8:10 he states it very clearly and there
are many that feel the same. Hulkster always stated that McGough
placed 1999 ahead of 1998 as far as advancing the sport
and I have to give him credit-he was right that in what McGough was saying.
-
great post! 8)
of course I was right. I always am.
only ND was stupid enough to claim that McGough felt that 98 was better than 99 or that 98 was ronnie's all time best.
99 Ronnie was way better than 98 Ronnie.
as far as what was better overall, 99 ronnie or the 2001 AC, well, thats debatable either way.
but there is no debate (except in the dumb mind of ND) as to which presentation was better, 99 or 98 ronnie.
and 99 ronnie definitely advanced the sport thats for sure. far above the bar set by Dorian Yates.
-
not this shit again 8)
Yates was better
-
great post! 8)
of course I was right. I always am.
only ND was stupid enough to claim that McGough felt that 98 was better than 99 or that 98 was ronnie's all time best.
99 Ronnie was way better than 98 Ronnie.
as far as what was better overall, 99 ronnie or the 2001 AC, well, thats debatable either way.
but there is no debate (except in the dumb mind of ND) as to which presentation was better, 99 or 98 ronnie.
and 99 ronnie definitely advanced the sport thats for sure. far above the bar set by Dorian Yates.
ND never said McGough claimed 98' was Ronnie's best overall shape; he said McGough claimed it was Ronnie's best conditioning.
Listen to the fucking interview, moron. McGough states Ronnie was harder and drier in 98', which is what ND said McGough claimed.
Brutal self-ownage from an illiterate moron.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
ND never said McGough claimed 98' was Ronnie's best overall shape; he said McGough claimed it was Ronnie's best conditioning.
Listen to the fucking interview, moron. McGough states Ronnie was harder and drier in 98', which is what ND said McGough claimed.
Brutal self-ownage from an illiterate moron.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
No offense but listen again. He said he was hard and dry and ripped but a little bit flat.
He didn't say he was harder and drier in 98 than 99. He was just explaining his condition.
When describing 99 he says he was a bit fuller which brought out some more detail.
Many times when you are a tad fuller it fills the muscles making them even harder in appearance.
The condition issue is so minute it's really not worth debating anyway.
I've glanced over a lot of posts on GB and Hulkster always stuck to his guns on this
one so I was giving him his due.
-
When describing 99 he says he was a bit fuller which brought out some more detail.
bingo.
its okay. ND and his croonies like suckmyasshole have never been able to understand english.
-
and all of this spurred from the idea that ronnie didn't improve from 97 to 98 ::)
now semantics will be played "I said better conditioned" or "I said 98 had better symmetry" or "I said better body not better physique"
-
whats really great is watching the nuthuggers squirm when quoting McGough's article of Mr. Olympias that advanced the sport.
99 ronnie is on the list.
98 ronnie is not.
and, since ronnie 99 advancing the sport came after dorian 93, it shows that McGough even thinks that ronnie's 99 shape was better than dorian's 93 shape (which everyone but dorian nuthuggers know anyway)
dorian advanced the sport in 93, and ronnie advanced it even farther in 99.
its all right on paper straight from McGough's mouth, which is taken as the gospel by the nuthuggers most of the time.
but when he goes against their agenda, they freak out LOL
-
Those photos of Coleman are just mind boggling to me. That guy still amazes me everytime I look at him in his prime.
-
will you obsessive fucks just lay this to rest?
-
no sorry :P
-
No offense but listen again. He said he was hard and dry and ripped but a little bit flat.
He didn't say he was harder and drier in 98 than 99. He was just explaining his condition.
When describing 99 he says he was a bit fuller which brought out some more detail.
Many times when you are a tad fuller it fills the muscles making them even harder in appearance.
The condition issue is so minute it's really not worth debating anyway.
I've glanced over a lot of posts on GB and Hulkster always stuck to his guns on this
one so I was giving him his due.
What the fuck has flatness got to do with conditioning? You guys are dumb as shit. I already knew you guys can't read even at the first grade level, but now it seems you can't interpret spoken words either. Nothing of what McGough said in this interview contradicts what he stated previously about Ronnie's 98' form being his best conditioning.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
bingo.
its okay. ND and his croonies like suckmyasshole have never been able to understand english.
Fuck you, Huckster. You have to resort to name calling because this is all you have. I don't take part in these debates anymore and haven't for years, but it gets annoying to read your lies, so I decided to chip in on this one.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
1998 was Colemans absolutle best imo, bigger in 1999 with Great Conditioning, but not as CONDITIONED 1998 gyno withstanding he was as good as it got for him witch arguably was one of the best physiques of all time that night in 98.
-
I also agree with Ronnie 1999 being his best.
-
great post! 8)
of course I was right. I always am.
only ND was stupid enough to claim that McGough felt that 98 was better than 99 or that 98 was ronnie's all time best.
99 Ronnie was way better than 98 Ronnie.
as far as what was better overall, 99 ronnie or the 2001 AC, well, thats debatable either way.
but there is no debate (except in the dumb mind of ND) as to which presentation was better, 99 or 98 ronnie.
and 99 ronnie definitely advanced the sport thats for sure. far above the bar set by Dorian Yates.
When in doubt make shit up , typical Hulkster. ::)
One this is OLD news , two I never said McGough claimed 98 was his best overall I know for a fact he said 2001 was many times and he said it there.
And this doesn't change the fact Ronnie was still not harder or drier than 98 or the fact that Ronnie himself said his best Olympia was 1998 , in fact he's said it at least 5 times
there is NO debate on what his best showing and 1999 is NOT it so once again you're wrong as usual.
-
ND never said McGough claimed 98' was Ronnie's best overall shape; he said McGough claimed it was Ronnie's best conditioning.
Listen to the fucking interview, moron. McGough states Ronnie was harder and drier in 98', which is what ND said McGough claimed.
Brutal self-ownage from an illiterate moron.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
I agree brutal self-ownage is right. Hulkster clings to this like gold while ignoring the fact that he says 2001 is his best showing by far
The funny thing is this is old news and 2001 still trumps 1999 8) ;D
-
No offense but listen again. He said he was hard and dry and ripped but a little bit flat.
He didn't say he was harder and drier in 98 than 99. He was just explaining his condition.
When describing 99 he says he was a bit fuller which brought out some more detail.
Many times when you are a tad fuller it fills the muscles making them even harder in appearance.
The condition issue is so minute it's really not worth debating anyway.
I've glanced over a lot of posts on GB and Hulkster always stuck to his guns on this
one so I was giving him his due.
In another interview he said multiple times that he was harder & drier in 98 , it's obvious to anyone who knows what conditioning is that Ronnie was better conditioned in 98.
And if you glanced over a lot of posts on Getbig you would have noticed that this is nothing new and Hulkster said 99 is his best overall and it's not. The vast majority all agree 2001 is and why? because he was harder & drier , Ronnie himself said 1998 is his best for the same reason at least 5 times
Hulkster stuck to his guns all this time and is still wrong. He likes 99 the best but it doesn't change the fact that it's not.
Hulkster = wrong as usual. like this topic nothing new.
-
I may be in the minority here but personally I preferred Ronnie's look in '99. I still think Flex should have won in '98.
Either way, Dorian was still better.
-
I may be in the minority here but personally I preferred Ronnie's look in '99. I still think Flex should have won in '98.
Either way, Dorian was still better.
yes
But what about Nasser?
-
yes
But what about Nasser?
Haha, when you're comparing Ronnie in his prime with anyone else, Nasser doesn't even appear on the radar.
-
I may be in the minority here but personally I preferred Ronnie's look in '99. I still think Flex should have won in '98.
Either way, Dorian was still better.
I personally think Ronnie looks better fuller like in 99 but Hulkster mistakenly said on numerous occasions 99 is his best and his conditioning is better in 99 than 98
-
whats really great is watching the nuthuggers squirm when quoting McGough's article of Mr. Olympias that advanced the sport.
99 ronnie is on the list.
98 ronnie is not.
and, since ronnie 99 advancing the sport came after dorian 93, it shows that McGough even thinks that ronnie's 99 shape was better than dorian's 93 shape (which everyone but dorian nuthuggers know anyway)
dorian advanced the sport in 93, and ronnie advanced it even farther in 99.
its all right on paper straight from McGough's mouth, which is taken as the gospel by the nuthuggers most of the time.
but when he goes against their agenda, they freak out LOL
and, since ronnie 99 advancing the sport came after dorian 93, it shows that McGough even thinks that ronnie's 99 shape was better than dorian's 93 shape (which everyone but dorian nuthuggers know anyway)
I honestly enjoy making you look stupid ;) your above statement is a simple lie from the article
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614/
" On July 4, I found myself in conversation with Lou Ferrigno. No, we weren't talking about Paul Revere and Mad King George; instead, with the 2005 Olympia Weekend looming like a Ronnie Coleman lat spread, the Hulk wanted to know who I thought was the best-ever Mr. Olympia. My response was that it was impossible to choose "
Opppsss caught in another lie 8) NO McGough doesn't feel Ronnie 99 is better than Dorian. He said it was impossible to choose but as proven before you're not above lying or knowingly using photoshopped pics and making up quotes lol
This is why I will always own you , because I don't need to lie.
And I love how you attempted to use McGough as a credible source but dismissed him numerous times when he said Ronnie was never harder or drier than Dorian or 99 is NOT His best in fact 2001 is ;) McGough doesn't agree with you liar he contradicts you
Hulkster = liar ;)
-
I honestly enjoy making you look stupid ;) your above statement is a simple lie from the article
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614/
" On July 4, I found myself in conversation with Lou Ferrigno. No, we weren't talking about Paul Revere and Mad King George; instead, with the 2005 Olympia Weekend looming like a Ronnie Coleman lat spread, the Hulk wanted to know who I thought was the best-ever Mr. Olympia. My response was that it was impossible to choose "
Opppsss caught in another lie 8) NO McGough doesn't feel Ronnie 99 is better than Dorian. He said it was impossible to choose but as proven before you're not above lying or knowingly using photoshopped pics and making up quotes lol
This is why I will always own you , because I don't need to lie.
And I love how you attempted to use McGough as a credible source but dismissed him numerous times when he said Ronnie was never harder or drier than Dorian or 99 is NOT His best in fact 2001 is ;) McGough doesn't agree with you liar he contradicts you
Hulkster = liar ;)
Hulkster owned again. He can't handle the truth.
-
Hulkster owned again. He can't handle the truth.
Exactly , when in doubt just lie and make shit up ::)
-
Exactly , when in doubt just lie and make shit up ::)
seriously, do you not see what is happening here?
if peter says jim is the biggest man in the world tom but then on the very next day states bill is now the biggest, unless you were a moron you would assume based on previous knowledge, the temporality of life and the implications of chronicity that bill is bigger then jim. Thus we can conclude like hulkster has that peters latest statment is most correct is logically sound. However, you bring a contradictory statement to the table, both cannot be right logically? why do you think this has happened, i know why because peter is biased,human and its his subjective fucking opinion that is as worthless as anyone elses when no criteria is in order to decide. In this case dorian would have to face ronnie at their primes, this never happened thus pictures are the next best thing, because as we have seen peter is unreliable (due to his contradictory statements) due to being a fucking human expressing an opinion.
-
Hulkster lost all credibility years ago on here and he has no friends. The nearest thing he ever had to a friend was Pumpster and even that seriously backfired on the two of them. LOL
-
Both of you fags sicken me.
Please go and kill yourselfs now for the sake of humanity.
The majority of your life's spent arguing over which steroid retard was "better".
-
look at ND whine lol
his opinions owned right on tape and he can't handle it.
oh, and the simple logic of McGough's article goes right over your head.
he says that ronnie 99 and dorian 93 (among the other olympians on the list) advanced the sport.
since Ronnie 99 came AFTER dorian 93, by definition he advanced the sport to a level ABOVE that of dorian who came before him (since its impossible to 'advance' the sport by going backwards (it would be a fallacy)
so yes, he DOES state by definition that ronnie 99 was better than dorian 93 and all who came before.
its simple logic.
try and understand. its very simple.
but then, you probably still won't get it LOL ::)
-
I also agree with Ronnie 1999 being his best.
great prejudging shots
keep posting them and keep watching the nuthuggers cry!
-
Hulkster lost all credibility years ago on here and he has no friends. The nearest thing he ever had to a friend was Pumpster and even that seriously backfired on the two of them. LOL
how ironic that you claim I have no credibility in a thread posted by someone else specifically to highlight how very credible I am.
think about it.
::)
it never ceases to amazing how dumb you nuthuggers are.
it really is remarkable. and that is not a good thing...
-
how ironic that you claim I have no credibility in a thread posted by someone else specifically to highlight how very credible I am.
think about it.
::)
it never ceases to amazing how dumb you nuthuggers are.
it really is remarkable. and that is not a good thing...
You haved no credibility for a long time now , not after you used photoshopped pics and then used made up quotes and then busted here again ;)
-
seriously, do you not see what is happening here?
if peter says jim is the biggest man in the world tom but then on the very next day states bill is now the biggest, unless you were a moron you would assume based on previous knowledge, the temporality of life and the implications of chronicity that bill is bigger then jim. Thus we can conclude like hulkster has that peters latest statment is most correct is logically sound. However, you bring a contradictory statement to the table, both cannot be right logically? why do you think this has happened, i know why because peter is biased,human and its his subjective fucking opinion that is as worthless as anyone elses when no criteria is in order to decide. In this case dorian would have to face ronnie at their primes, this never happened thus pictures are the next best thing, because as we have seen peter is unreliable (due to his contradictory statements) due to being a fucking human expressing an opinion.
What contradictory statements?
-
look at ND whine lol
his opinions owned right on tape and he can't handle it.
oh, and the simple logic of McGough's article goes right over your head.
he says that ronnie 99 and dorian 93 (among the other olympians on the list) advanced the sport.
since Ronnie 99 came AFTER dorian 93, by definition he advanced the sport to a level ABOVE that of dorian who came before him (since its impossible to 'advance' the sport by going backwards (it would be a fallacy)
so yes, he DOES state by definition that ronnie 99 was better than dorian 93 and all who came before.
its simple logic.
try and understand. its very simple.
but then, you probably still won't get it LOL ::)
yes according to your logic ( retard logic ) he states specifically 99 isn't is best or that he's better than Dorian 93
And entertaining your retard logic than Frank Zane is better than Sergio and Arnold because he's listed chronologically after them ::) LMFAO
you're still a moron
99 isn't his best
98 he is better conditioned
you are a liar who is busted
keep crying
-
Hulkster lost all credibility years ago on here and he has no friends. The nearest thing he ever had to a friend was Pumpster and even that seriously backfired on the two of them. LOL
He did , it all started with his photoshopped pics that he kept posting even after he learned they were worked , then he made up quotes :-\ no he's back to lying trying to prove Ronnie really was better.
-
Hulkster's next post
Totally ignore the facts. Post the same thing he's already posted claim some half-ass ' victory ' and call anyone who points out his lies ' nutthuggers ' the stupid kid is so predictable :-\
-
He did , it all started with his photoshopped pics that he kept posting even after he learned they were worked , then he made up quotes :-\ no he's back to lying trying to prove Ronnie really was better.
Hulkster just comes across as a desperate lonely wanker on this forum. No one pays attention to him even though he is longing for just a small amount of attention. What a sad arsehole he is!
-
as if ND is any better off than Hulkster. same shit, different muscle man
-
(http://www.nowhavefun.com/celebritypictures/d/53268-1/45+Dorian+Yates+picture.jpg)
-
Hulkster's next post
Totally ignore the facts. Post the same thing he's already posted claim some half-ass ' victory ' and call anyone who points out his lies ' nutthuggers ' the stupid kid is so predictable :-\
don't forget the fake screenshots we exposed hulkster of posting years ago
-
Bizzy's screencaps were not faked at all. look the same as the nice new ones Iceman is posting
whats hilarious was the "global conspiracy" of faked video clips of the 99 olympia that the nuthuggers wanted everyone to believe.
THAT is funny.
and sad at the same time.
apparently, all the video clips of the 99 olympia prejudging on truevideo, youtube and other places were all FAKED according to the nuthuggers.
all because ronnie was that much better than dorian LMAO ::)
-
Bizzy's screencaps were not faked at all. look the same as the nice new ones Iceman is posting
whats hilarious was the "global conspiracy" of faked video clips of the 99 olympia that the nuthuggers wanted everyone to believe.
THAT is funny.
and sad at the same time.
apparently, all the video clips of the 99 olympia prejudging on truevideo, youtube and other places were all FAKED according to the nuthuggers.
all because ronnie was that much better than dorian LMAO ::)
Keep melting down liar
Bizzy's screencaps were not faked at all. look the same as the nice new ones Iceman is posting
No they are not in the least and you know it. If that were the case you would be posting the Bizzy ones and you're not ;) for a reason
You think if you keep repeating the same lie over-and-over it will become the truth and it wont. Kevin Horton the best contest photographer in the business outed you and your fake pics. that cased is closed
whats hilarious was the "global conspiracy" of faked video clips of the 99 olympia that the nuthuggers wanted everyone to believe
I love how you quoted ' global conspiracy ' whose quote is that? ??? we know what 99 shots are worked , the ones Kevin Horton busted you using ;)
THAT is funny.
and sad at the same time.
The irony of this statement , especially from you of all people
apparently, all the video clips of the 99 olympia prejudging on truevideo, youtube and other places were all FAKED according to the nuthuggers.
No they're not just the ones you were busted trying to pass off as ' overwhelming proof ' only the ones a professional busted you trying to pass off , iceman posted great shots that looked nothing like the ones you used to post and NO ONE said they were worked , keep trying to lie I will keep correcting them
-
I love how you quoted ' global conspiracy ' whose quote is that?
no one
but every time a video link of the 99 prejudging was posted from any web source (including those NOT posted by bizzy) you and the nuthuggers claimed they were worked.
just as you are doing now.. ::)
so, for a long time all video links of the prejudging, including those posted by Bizzy, screens posted by neoseminole etc were all 'faked' according to all of you.
most of these links are removed from the web due to copyright restrictions now, because they were the real deal from the IFBB, ironic, since you said they were faked and they were the genuine article, untouched.
you and the nuthuggers knew dorian could never compete with that so you had no choice but to claim they were worked
-
no one
but every time a video link of the 99 prejudging was posted from any web source (including those NOT posted by bizzy) you and the nuthuggers claimed they were worked.
just as you are doing now.. ::)
so, for a long time all video links of the prejudging, including those posted by Bizzy, screens posted by neoseminole etc were all 'faked' according to all of you.
most of these links are removed from the web due to copyright restrictions now, because they were the real deal from the IFBB, ironic, since you said they were faked and they were the genuine article, untouched.
you and the nuthuggers knew dorian could never compete with that so you had no choice but to claim they were worked
Keep lying kid it's still not going to save you.
No one claimed all 99 footage is fake , just the junk you got busted posting by Kevin Horton 8)
No where does it say 99 is better than 93 , no where does anyone claim 99 is his best , no where does anyone claim all 99 footage is fake
You're a liar and have been busted as so for a long time.
-
;D
-
No where does it say 99 is better than 93 ,
yes it does when the article states that 99 ronnie advanced the sport.
if you "advance the sport" then you are raising the bar above the level that the person before you set (dorian 93) then you are better by definition.
why do you not understand this? its simple logic.
duh. ::)
-
ND is so stupid he can't even undestand the whole premise behind Mcgough's article
bwahaahahahaha
he thinks that you can advance the sport by being worse than the person that came before you
bwhahahahahahaha
newsflash:
advancing doesn't work that way.
if you don't understand the meaning of the word, look it up in a dictionary.
bwahahahahahaha
-
yes it does when the article states that 99 ronnie advanced the sport.
if you "advance the sport" then you are raising the bar above the level that the person before you set (dorian 93) then you are better by definition.
why do you not understand this? its simple logic.
duh. ::)
No it doesn't
" On July 4, I found myself in conversation with Lou Ferrigno. No, we weren't talking about Paul Revere and Mad King George; instead, with the 2005 Olympia Weekend looming like a Ronnie Coleman lat spread, the Hulk wanted to know who I thought was the best-ever Mr. Olympia. My response was that it was impossible to choose "
in fact he says it's impossible to chose
-
ND is so stupid he can't even undestand the whole premise behind Mcgough's article
bwahaahahahaha
he thinks that you can advance the sport by being worse than the person that came before you
bwhahahahahahaha
newsflash:
advancing doesn't work that way.
if you don't understand the meaning of the word, look it up in a dictionary.
bwahahahahahaha
Hulkster is so stupid he feels Frank Zane was listed after Sergio and Arnold is better than both of them ;)
The shitty Canadian school system failed you moron.
Hulkster claims McGough says Ronnie is better
fact
" On July 4, I found myself in conversation with Lou Ferrigno. No, we weren't talking about Paul Revere and Mad King George; instead, with the 2005 Olympia Weekend looming like a Ronnie Coleman lat spread, the Hulk wanted to know who I thought was the best-ever Mr. Olympia. My response was that it was impossible to choose "
Thanks for playing stupid.
-
you and the nuthuggers knew dorian could never compete with that so you had no choice but to claim they were worked
nope. total opposite.
the shots u posted matched no other source available.
thats how we knew you played with them before posting
ur shots were darker than any other source, making ronnie look more conditioned and better than reality....thats why ronnie himself choses 1998.
-
98 lighting made everyone look better conditioned, 98 and 99 different lighting and different venues, 99 is the best coleman. Peters 'opinion' is his, but it is only an opinion.
-
98 lighting made everyone look better conditioned, 98 and 99 different lighting and different venues, 99 is the best coleman. Peters 'opinion' is his, but it is only an opinion.
It's your ' opinion ' that the 98 lighting made everyone look better conditioned , as well as 99 is the best Coleman , you're entitled to it however lets put things into prospective
McGough has been in the bodybuilding game for over 40 years , he has a wealth of experience and first hand knowledge , he's seen Ronnie and Dorian through their entire careers , he's been to most of the shows live and in person for decades !!! his opinion is accurate and unbiased as well as consistent
I would take his word on the subject over almost anyones , especially yours and Hulksters.
Ronnie himself said 98 was his best Olympia at least 5 times and the reason he said so is consistent with what McGough and others have said , he was simply better conditioned.
I think Ronnie looks better fuller like in 99 but it's obvious to anyone who knows what they're looking for he's not as hard or dry and for this reason many consider 98 or 01 his best showings.
-
It's your ' opinion ' that the 98 lighting made everyone look better conditioned , as well as 99 is the best Coleman , you're entitled to it however lets put things into prospective
McGough has been in the bodybuilding game for over 40 years , he has a wealth of experience and first hand knowledge , he's seen Ronnie and Dorian through their entire careers , he's been to most of the shows live and in person for decades !!! his opinion is accurate and unbiased as well as consistent
I would take his word on the subject over almost anyones , especially yours and Hulksters.
Ronnie himself said 98 was his best Olympia at least 5 times and the reason he said so is consistent with what McGough and others have said , he was simply better conditioned.
I think Ronnie looks better fuller like in 99 but it's obvious to anyone who knows what they're looking for he's not as hard or dry and for this reason many consider 98 or 01 his best showings.
LOL....exactly, saw both the 1998 O and 99 O when they first hit the selfs on VHS and imo 98 is Rons Best, 99 Bigger, fuller, yip however his Conditioning was not the same as 98, flex was the same Bigger, fuller in 99 but not as sharp as 98, with the Possible exception of 2001 a/c he never again repeated this TYPE of all round Conditioning.
-
If he was more conditioned, which is hard to determine due to different lighting, but lets just say he was, it doesnt make him better than 99. If conditioning won shows that dwarf edward corea should have won the arnold
-
If he was more conditioned, which is hard to determine due to different lighting, but lets just say he was, it doesnt make him better than 99. If conditioning won shows that dwarf edward corea should have won the arnold
this
-
Ronnie says at the 2:00 mark that the Arnold Classic 2001 was his best showing ever.
-
Ronnie says at the 2:00 mark that the Arnold Classic 2001 was his best showing ever.
lol @ ND for quoting anything Ronnie says as truth
brb, saying Dorian has the best back I'd ever seen, then saying I had a better back
brb, saying Dorian would beat me in a competition, then saying nobody can beat me
brb, saying 98 Mr. O was my best showing, then saying 01 ASC was my best showing
-
lol @ ND for quoting anything Ronnie says as truth
brb, saying Dorian has the best back I'd ever seen, then saying I had a better back
brb, saying Dorian would beat me in a competition, then saying nobody can beat me
brb, saying 98 Mr. O was my best showing, then saying 01 ASC was my best showing
98 = best Olympia
01 = best ever showing
And I also quoted many other people who said the same and so have you ;) so I don't just need to quote Ronnie
-
Ronnie says at the 2:00 mark that the Arnold Classic 2001 was his best showing ever.
What happened to 1999? 8)
-
lol @ ND for quoting anything Ronnie says as truth
brb, saying Dorian has the best back I'd ever seen, then saying I had a better back
brb, saying Dorian would beat me in a competition, then saying nobody can beat me
brb, saying 98 Mr. O was my best showing, then saying 01 ASC was my best showing
never taking steroids
-
What happened to 1999? 8)
It doesn't matter to me which year Ronnie thinks is his best, lol. I'm just a fan of Ronnie.