Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on March 23, 2012, 03:02:42 PM
-
Pew Research: Republicans More Knowledgeable Than Democrats
Center for Individual Freedom ^ | March 22, 2012 | TIMOTHY H. LEE
So Republicans are more knowledgeable than Democrats, contrary to what many would like to believe.
According to whom? None other than the Pew Research Center, a left-of-center organization. Moreover, Pew’s latest survey only reaffirms previous surveys demonstrating the same result.
In fact, the results weren’t even close.
In a scientific survey of 1,168 adults conducted during September and October of last year, respondents were asked not only multiple-choice questions, but also queries using maps, photographs and symbols. Among other subjects, participants identified international leaders, cabinet members, Supreme Court justices, nations on a world map, the current unemployment and poverty rates and war casualty totals.
In a 2010 Pew survey, Republicans outperformed Democrats on 10 of 12 questions, with one tie and Democrats outperforming Republicans on just 1 of the 12. In the latest survey, however, Republicans outperformed Democrats on every single one of 19 questions.
Amusingly, the Pew report attempted to soften the stark partisan knowledge disparity:
(Excerpt) Read more at cfif.org ...
-
Republicans generally outperformed Democrats on the current quiz. On 13 of the 19 questions, Republicans score significantly higher than Democrats and there are no questions on which Democrats did better than Republicans. In past knowledge quizzes, partisan differences have been more muted, though Republicans often have scored somewhat higher than Democrats.”
“Generally outperformed?” “Somewhat higher?” That’s a curiously charitable way to describe the surveys, which went from previous blowouts to a complete shutout in the latest edition.
Those Pew results are confirmed by some surprising other sources. According to a New York Times headline dated April 14, 2010, “Poll Finds Tea Party Backers Wealthier and More Educated.” Shattering widespread myths, that survey revealed that Tea Party supporters were more likely to possess a college degree than their counterparts (23% to 15%), and also more likely to have completed post-graduate studies (14% to 10%). Tea Partiers were also more likely to have completed “some college” by a 33% to 28% margin, and substantially less likely to have not completed high school than non-supporters (3% versus 12%), or to possess only a high school degree (26% versus 35%).
Those results will probably come as a rude awakening to supporters of Barack Obama, but it won’t to anyone paying attention. As just the latest example, consider the cheap laugh line that Obama keeps repeating on his current reelection tour thinly disguised as an energy policy apologia. As gasoline prices continue to rise due in part to his agenda, Obama likens anyone critical of his failed energy decisions to a modern-day “Flat Earth Society” in speech after speech.
The problem for Obama is that his attempted slur betrays historical illiteracy, as summarized nicely by conservative blogger Clayton Cramer:
“Now, if you attended high school, or college, you would know (or should know) that there was no educated European who thought the Earth was flat. None. The dispute that made it hard for Columbus to get funding was that he insisted the Earth was 18,000 miles in circumference, so the Indies were a plausible voyage west from Spain. The experts who told the various governments of Europe that Columbus wasn’t going to be successful thought the Earth was closer to 25,000 miles around – and sailing west to the Indies was going to be a failure. Had there not been the Americas in the way, Columbus and crew would have died of thirst.”
On his current tour, Obama also inaccurately maligned former President Rutherford B. Hayes as disdainful of the telephone. As Mona Charen also noted this week, Obama also “told us that America invented the automobile and that John F. Kennedy had met with Nikita Kruschev when we were on the brink of nuclear war,” when in fact the automobile was invented in Germany and Kennedy actually met Kruschev one year prior to the Cuban Missile Crisis.
This is the same President who referred to “57 states,” misstated the Citizens United decision in an address to the nation, pronounced Navy “corpsman” as “corpse-man” and blatantly misrepresented that Japanese automobiles now average 45 miles per gallon to our 27.5 standard.
Meanwhile, gas prices continue to break records while the Trash-Talker-in-Chief trots out fraudulent “flat earth” and “Rutherford B. Hayes” rhetoric.
None of this disparages anyone of any educational pedigree. It does, however, once again debunk the notion among preening liberals that they collectively maintain a knowledge or educational superiority.
-
http://pewresearch.org/politicalquiz/quiz/index.php
Proof - women in general are less informed than men.
-
If Republicans are more knowledgeable than Democrats
and College grads are more knowledgeable than non-college grads
does that mean that the idea of college being a "liberal brainwashing center", etc, is false?
;D
-
If Republicans are more knowledgeable than Democrats
and College grads are more knowledgeable than non-college grads
does that mean that the idea of college being a "liberal brainwashing center", etc, is false?
;D
Many people who go to college do not become more educated over the four years they spend there.
-
But but but people who watch Fox News are less informed and therefore all Republicans are dumb!!! ::)
Many people who go to college do not become more educated over the four years they spend there.
Hey, that's me! ;D
I'm dropping out after this semester though.
-
But but but people who watch Fox News are less informed and therefore all Republicans are dumb!!! ::)
Hey, that's me! ;D
I'm dropping out after this semester though.
I breezed through college and it was-joke. I have learned drastically more on my own efforts than anything in college.
-
younger people are more likely to be dems.
older people (who have more years of experience with maps, photographs and symbols) are going to score higher.
Seriously, to the bedwetting clinton voters here who are all santorum-crazy now... Were you smarter at 18 or at your current 30- or 40-somthing? Are you going to tell us you knew more about maps, photographs and symbols when you were a friggin' senior in high school, than while in college, or now?
-
All the educated people vote republican. Now that brings screams from lefties but where they get ti wrong si they think unemployed phd education adn hsitory and sub teachers are educated while I think mba enginner and small biz person with 0 degree makring money by producing are educated. :)
http://cfif.org/v/index.php/commentary/54-state-of-affairs/1357-pew-research-republicans-more-knowledgeable-than-democrats (http://cfif.org/v/index.php/commentary/54-state-of-affairs/1357-pew-research-republicans-more-knowledgeable-than-democrats)
-
younger people are more likely to be dems.
older people (who have more years of experience with maps, photographs and symbols) are going to score higher.
Seriously, to the bedwetting clinton voters here who are all santorum-crazy now... Were you smarter at 18 or at your current 30- or 40-somthing? Are you going to tell us you knew more about maps, photographs and symbols when you were a friggin' senior in high school, than while in college, or now?
So do you think the poll compared older Repubs to younger Dems? I don't see that anywhere so, once again, your point isn't the least bit relevant to the findings.
Nice try on your attempt to rationalize their stupidity, though.
-
Pew could have saved a few bucks and simply monitored this website. The empirical evidence and results of the study would have been identical.
-
Pew Research: Republicans More Knowledgeable Than Democrats
Center for Individual Freedom ^ | March 22, 2012 | TIMOTHY H. LEE
So Republicans are more knowledgeable than Democrats, contrary to what many would like to believe.
According to whom? None other than the Pew Research Center, a left-of-center organization. Moreover, Pew’s latest survey only reaffirms previous surveys demonstrating the same result.
In fact, the results weren’t even close.
In a scientific survey of 1,168 adults conducted during September and October of last year, respondents were asked not only multiple-choice questions, but also queries using maps, photographs and symbols. Among other subjects, participants identified international leaders, cabinet members, Supreme Court justices, nations on a world map, the current unemployment and poverty rates and war casualty totals.
In a 2010 Pew survey, Republicans outperformed Democrats on 10 of 12 questions, with one tie and Democrats outperforming Republicans on just 1 of the 12. In the latest survey, however, Republicans outperformed Democrats on every single one of 19 questions.
Amusingly, the Pew report attempted to soften the stark partisan knowledge disparity:
(Excerpt) Read more at cfif.org ...
Yeah those repub are regular Einsteins ::)
-
I breezed through college and it was-joke. I have learned drastically more on my own efforts than anything in college.
Of course you did.
-
younger people are more likely to be dems.
older people (who have more years of experience with maps, photographs and symbols) are going to score higher.
Seriously, to the bedwetting clinton voters here who are all santorum-crazy now... Were you smarter at 18 or at your current 30- or 40-somthing? Are you going to tell us you knew more about maps, photographs and symbols when you were a friggin' senior in high school, than while in college, or now?
yeah, I think this answered it. Older people are going to be able to recognize more maps and symbols. Pretty much common sense here.
-
yeah, I think this answered it. Older people are going to be able to recognize more maps and symbols. Pretty much common sense here.
So the ignorant gave us Obama?
-
So the ignorant gave us Obama?
No, they gave us Palin. A real sparkle of intellect.
Thank god the rest of the country was smarter and voted for the opposite party.
-
No, they gave us Palin. A real sparkle of intellect.
Thank god the rest of the country was smarter and voted for the opposite party.
Russia definately agrees with that given what obama is doing.
-
yeah, I think this answered it. Older people are going to be able to recognize more maps and symbols. Pretty much common sense here.
No, you didn't actually answer anything. Nowhere does it state this poll compared young Dems to old Repubs. Common sense says that you shouldn't make shit up as you go but hey, should we be surprised you're doing that again?
Can you provide proof that this poll only interviewed young Dems and old Repubs? I won't hold my breath. ::)
-
So much for those "studies" done in the past by liberal professors claiming that conservatives were less educated, had smaller areas of the brain or susceptible to alzheimer's.
-
You mean like the stats that show conservative christian states have the highest rate of poverty, high school drop outs, teen pregnancies, drug use, retardation and incest?
-
No, you didn't actually answer anything. Nowhere does it state this poll compared young Dems to old Repubs. Common sense says that you shouldn't make shit up as you go but hey, should we be surprised you're doing that again?
Can you provide proof that this poll only interviewed young Dems and old Repubs? I won't hold my breath. ::)
I believe the mean age of repubs is 58, and the mean age of dems is 55? Is that correct? Repubs trend older. And older people have more experience with things like 'symbols' lol. So this surgey makes sense - older people will have used maps more than younger people, since they've been on earth moving around more.
In terms of education - dems get the very smart and very dumb. Repubs get the middle.
http://dabacon.org/pontiff/?p=539
-
The Moral Foundations Project (http://faculty.virginia.edu/haidtlab/mft/index.php) discovered something similar... When they asked people who describe themselves as "very liberal" to answer their moral foundations questionnaire from the perspective of a conservative, the liberals got most answers very wrong. When they asked people who describe themselves as "very conservative" to answer their moral foundations questionnaire from the perspective of a liberal, the conservatives did fairly well. So it would seem like this could indicate that perhaps many left-liberals are the way they are because they do not understand the conservative point of view.
-
So much for those "studies" done in the past by liberal professors claiming that conservatives were less educated, had smaller areas of the brain or susceptible to alzheimer's.
Woah... so this "study" is the end all be all huh... Real Earth shattering shit here... jesus h christ you guys are pathetic
-
All the educated people vote republican. Now that brings screams from lefties but where they get ti wrong si they think unemployed phd education adn hsitory and sub teachers are educated while I think mba enginner and small biz person with 0 degree makring money by producing are educated. :)
http://cfif.org/v/index.php/commentary/54-state-of-affairs/1357-pew-research-republicans-more-knowledgeable-than-democrats (http://cfif.org/v/index.php/commentary/54-state-of-affairs/1357-pew-research-republicans-more-knowledgeable-than-democrats)
hahahahahahahaahahhahaha hahaahahahahaahahahaahah ahaahahahahaahahahahahah aahahahahahahaahahahaha
this fucking post sums it up, LMAO. Such a reasoned well thought out post. The fact that one test with a small sample size is calling you guys to make factual claims on intelligence based on party indicates that you are stupid. The fucking power of this poll is shit, atypical outliers can skew it tremendously, all kinds of issues.
-
hahahahahahahaahahhahahahahaahahahahaahahahaahahahaahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahaha
this fucking post sums it up, LMAO. Such a reasoned well thought out post. The fact that one test with a small sample size is calling you guys to make factual claims on intelligence based on party indicates that you are stupid. The fucking power of this poll is shit, atypical outliers can skew it tremendously, all kinds of issues.
This
-
So much for those "studies" done in the past by liberal professors claiming that conservatives were less educated, had smaller areas of the brain or susceptible to alzheimer's.
here go to a place called pubmed, become familiar with reading studies and discerning the methodology, after this you may be able to apply critical thinking skills. What you are suggesting is that the variable that detects truth is temporality.
-
The "Moral Foundations" site has this for political knowledge:
(http://www.yourmorals.org/surveyresults_graph_libertarians3.php?u=1091864&tbl=general_political_knowledge&type=&scale=18&match=&rev=&title=Results&ytitle=Score&xtitle=&labels[]=Knowledge&&vars[0][]=totalscore&)
As you can see, left-liberals (blue) generally score lower than conservatives (red) and libertarians (gold).
-
Here start with this published study. RETARDS.
Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Mar-Apr;19(2):126-8.
Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Smith GC, Pell JP.
Source
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University, United Kingdom. gcss2@cam.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To determine whether parachutes are effective in preventing major trauma related to gravitational challenge. Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
DATA SOURCES:
Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases; appropriate internet sites and citation lists.
STUDY SELECTION:
Studies showing the effects of using a parachute during free fall.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:
Death or major trauma, defined as an injury severity score > 15.
RESULTS:
We were unable to identify any randomised controlled trials of parachute intervention.
CONCLUSIONS:
As with many interventions intended to prevent ill health, the effectiveness of parachutes has not been subjected to rigorous evaluation by using randomised controlled trials. Advocates of evidence based medicine have criticised the adoption of interventions evaluated by using only observational data. We think that everyone might benefit if the most radical protagonists of evidence based medicine organised and participated in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of the parachute.
-
hahahahahahahaahahhahahahahaahahahahaahahahaahahahaahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahaha
this fucking post sums it up, LMAO. Such a reasoned well thought out post. The fact that one test with a small sample size is calling you guys to make factual claims on intelligence based on party indicates that you are stupid. The fucking power of this poll is shit, atypical outliers can skew it tremendously, all kinds of issues.
Check out the Moral Foundations Project. Their results mimic the results of the study in the OP.
-
here go to a place called pubmed, become familiar with reading studies and discerning the methodology, after this you may be able to apply critical thinking skills. What you are suggesting is that the variable that detects truth is temporality.
You are talking to Retardario. I don't think he is capable of learning that skill set.
-
The "Moral Foundations" site has this for political knowledge:
(http://www.yourmorals.org/surveyresults_graph_libertarians3.php?u=1091864&tbl=general_political_knowledge&type=&scale=18&match=&rev=&title=Results&ytitle=Score&xtitle=&labels[]=Knowledge&&vars[0][]=totalscore&)
As you can see, Democrats (blue) generally score lower than Conservatives (red) and Libertarians (gold).
I dont see shit, all i see is a bar graph without context, what the fuck is knowledge? what type of knowledge, does age factor in? ethnicity? education? place of testing, method of testing, method of evaluation, what was the power? what was the N? who made the questions? are they valid? if so prove it, are they reliable? is so prove it? Seriously, is this the type of evidence you accept?
-
Check out the Moral Foundations Project. Their results mimic the results of the study in the OP.
ok i will.
-
I dont see shit, all i see is a bar graph without context, what the fuck is knowledge? what type of knowledge, does age factor in? ethnicity? education? place of testing, method of testing, method of evaluation, what was the power? what was the N? who made the questions? are they valid? if so prove it, are they reliable? is so prove it? Seriously, is this the type of evidence you accept?
Go to yourmorals.org and take the test yourself to find the results. It's a massive study conducted by the psychologists behind the Moral Foundations Theory.
-
http://pewresearch.org/politicalquiz/quiz/index.php
Proof - women in general are less informed than men.
oh god MY GUTS lmao, one of the questions is who is the co-founder of apple, LOLOLOLOLOL. do you realize how fucking biased that question is, how stupid it is, how little it tests (i honestly am not sure what the question is trying to get at, it's fucking stupid).
you have pop culture,politics, geography etc it's a fucking general knowledge test. Where are the science questions? history? what is this test even measuring? 10-12 questions? ya thats certainly enough proof. Go read a fucking book.
WOW i ashamed to even respond to this. Is this what America has come to? this type of intellect, this type of reason. Good luck with the downfall, you idiots are the cause.
-
oh god MY GUTS lmao, one of the questions is who is the co-founder of apple, LOLOLOLOLOL. do you realize how fucking biased that question is, how stupid it is, how little it tests (i honestly am not sure what the question is trying to get at, it's fucking stupid).
you have pop culture,politics, geography etc it's a fucking general knowledge test. Where are the science questions? history? what is this test even measuring? 10-12 questions? ya thats certainly enough proof. Go read a fucking book.
WOW i ashamed to even respond to this. Is this what America has come to? this type of intellect, this type of reason. Good luck with the downfall, you idiots are the cause.
Has anyone claimed that it is anything else than a general knowledge test in 10-12 questions?
-
oh god MY GUTS lmao, one of the questions is who is the co-founder of apple, LOLOLOLOLOL. do you realize how fucking biased that question is, how stupid it is, how little it tests (i honestly am not sure what the question is trying to get at, it's fucking stupid).
you have pop culture,politics, geography etc it's a fucking general knowledge test. Where are the science questions? history? what is this test even measuring? 10-12 questions? ya thats certainly enough proof. Go read a fucking book.
WOW i ashamed to even respond to this. Is this what America has come to? this type of intellect, this type of reason. Good luck with the downfall, you idiots are the cause.
It would be even worse for leftists like yourself if it got more serious into civics.
-
hahahahahahahaahahhahahahahaahahahahaahahahaahahahaahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahaha
this fucking post sums it up, LMAO. Such a reasoned well thought out post. The fact that one test with a small sample size is calling you guys to make factual claims on intelligence based on party indicates that you are stupid. The fucking power of this poll is shit, atypical outliers can skew it tremendously, all kinds of issues.
You realize that MagikUsar is a gimmick that shows up every few weeks, logs 500 posts a day for a week or so and gets timed out by Ron, right? Oh wait, you're a retard. My bad. Carry on.
hahahahahahahaahahhahaha hahaahahahahaahahahaahah ahaahahahahaahahahahahah aahahahahahahaahahahaha
-
You realize that MagikUsar is a gimmick that shows up every few weeks, logs 500 posts a day for a week or so and gets timed out by Ron, right? Oh wait, you're a retard. My bad. Carry on.
hahahahahahahaahahhahaha hahaahahahahaahahahaahah ahaahahahahaahahahahahah aahahahahahahaahahahaha
no i don't i have a job and don't keep track of fucking gimmicks and how often they post, brutal self owning indicating you have no fucking life. However, since you are up to date on the gossip of getbig, could you list all the the gimmicks so i don't make this mistake again, i would do it but as you see i couldn't give a fuck and have a life outside the internet.
aren't you that skinny fag got with the big nose?
-
no i don't i have a job and don't keep track of fucking gimmicks and how often they post, brutal self owning indicating you have no fucking life. However, since you are up to date on the gossip of getbig, could you list all the the gimmicks so i don't make this mistake again, i would do it but as you see i couldn't give a fuck and have a life outside the internet.
aren't you that skinny fag got with the big nose?
Hahaha, MELTDOWN.
I have to laugh at all the guys who fall back on that "I have a life" line when their posts on this forum usually paint them as a creepy stalker who can't differentiate between reality and the internet. Oh well. Carry on.
Your posts indicate that the findings of these polls are definitely accurate.
-
You mean like the stats that show conservative christian states have the highest rate of poverty, high school drop outs, teen pregnancies, drug use, retardation and incest?
Why are you complaining? You fit that description.
-
Go to yourmorals.org and take the test yourself to find the results. It's a massive study conducted by the psychologists behind the Moral Foundations Theory.
typical response from someone who hasn't the slightest fucking clue, "go look yourself it's all there".
ok i see these survey's? now who verified this surveys? are they used in any clinical setting? standardized? valid? reliable?
"libertarians like ron paul?" off the blog page. He couldn't be more fucking conservative. He is a fucking constitution loving, christian that is for small government and minimal change and infringement, perhaps they should shine the light of bias on themselves. Real fucking heavyweights here.
-
Why are you complaining? You fit that description.
I am neither social conservative, christian or republican.
Carry on with having to work through your incest disabilities.
-
Hahaha, MELTDOWN.
I have to laugh at all the guys who fall back on that "I have a life" line when their posts on this forum usually paint them as a creepy stalker who can't differentiate between reality and the internet. Oh well. Carry on.
Your posts indicate that the findings of these polls are definitely accurate.
k bro, you sound like a popular guy. I would point out that you responded to me first so creepy stalker seems ironic.
if you find people keep saying they have a life to you perhaps the common variable is you and not everyone else, just a thought "fury".
-
k bro, you sound like a popular guy. I would point out that you responded to me first so creepy stalker seems ironic.
if you find people keep saying they have a life to you perhaps the common variable is you and not everyone else, just a thought "fury".
"I have a life" is the fallback defense on here, "bro". ::)
-
Has anyone claimed that it is anything else than a general knowledge test in 10-12 questions?
do you have a reading comprehension problem, refer to reply #2.
-
"I have a life" is the fallback defense on here, "bro". ::)
you post almost 400% more then me loser, lolololololololo. it is the defense when you have a fucking lifeless loser who knows the ins and outs of gimmicks and calls you a retard because others don't have the time nor care to track fags on the internet.
if a person doesnt clean and insults me i will point out there hygiene, this is the case here. The fallback with losers is to point out what a loser the person is, it was my gut reaction to your faggy response, don't blame me, go outside.
-
Hahaha, I can see this guy sitting there smashing his keyboard in a fit of rage. MELTDOWN.
lolololololololo!
-
Woah... so this "study" is the end all be all huh... Real Earth shattering shit here... jesus h christ you guys are pathetic
About as Earth shattering as those biased studies by liberals on conservatives. Why are you getting your little panties in a bunch now? If you didn't criticize all those liberal studies claiming that conservatives were intellectually inferior, how can you now come out against this one? You are right. You are pathetic.
-
I am neither social conservative, christian or republican.
Carry on with having to work through your incest disabilities.
That means you are liberal, retarded, democrat and pole smoker. Thanks for clearing that up.
-
That means you are liberal, retarded, democrat and pole smoker. Thanks for clearing that up.
I'm a liberal, a war veteran and I just got laid (by a hot asian chick).
What does that make me?
-
here go to a place called pubmed, become familiar with reading studies and discerning the methodology, after this you may be able to apply critical thinking skills. What you are suggesting is that the variable that detects truth is temporality.
You mean those incredible critical thinking skills that liberal morons like yourself use to link conservatism to loss of brain matter?
Who are you trying to fool? You are about as intelligent as dog crap.
-
I'm a liberal, a war veteran and I just got laid (by a hot asian chick).
What does that make me?
That means you are not Lurkerthefag.
-
Hahaha, I can see this guy sitting there smashing his keyboard in a fit of rage. MELTDOWN.
lolololololololo!
jesus you don't take the internet this serious do you? I'm sorry if i upset you i'm just messing with you.
the exclamation point really points out how intensely you are laughing, ain't no sweat off your bag bro!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
That means you are liberal, retarded, democrat and pole smoker. Thanks for clearing that up.
Funny you should fall back on the little "gay" tactic.
Especially when it has been noted that red conservative bible belt states leads the way for online gay porn searches.
Bible belt states lead the US in gay pornography searches between 2004 and 2011
The states of the Bible belt, America's conservative corridor, lead the country in searching Google for homosexual online media content between 2004 and 2011.
So in addition to be flat out stupid (biblical fault or parental choice.. take your pick), you have quite the stench of faggotry on yourself even without having to tip us off with your little gay fall backs.
"Thanks for clearing that up."
-
About as Earth shattering as those biased studies by liberals on conservatives. Why are you getting your little panties in a bunch now? If you didn't criticize all those liberal studies claiming that conservatives were intellectually inferior, how can you now come out against this one? You are right. You are pathetic.
You are right you can't so now that i know this study is shit, post the other shitty ones supporting liberals and we can point out the methodological flaws, bad science is bad science.
-
That means you are not Lurkerthefag.
Look at this Tinkerbell taking his projections out for a walk.
-
You mean those incredible critical thinking skills that liberal morons like yourself use to link conservatism to loss of brain matter?
Who are you trying to fool? You are about as intelligent as dog crap.
loss of brain matter? wtf does that even mean, lol.
-
Look at this Tinkerbell taking his projections out for a walk.
You constantly stalk a grown man and demand to meet him in person. The odds aren't in favor of you being straight.
-
You constantly stalk a grown man and demand to meet him in person. The odds aren't in favor of you being straight.
The odds aren't in favor of you being smart either.
Evident as above.
-
Funny you should fall back on the little "gay" tactic.
Especially when it has been noted that red conservative bible belt states leads the way for online gay porn searches.
Bible belt states lead the US in gay pornography searches between 2004 and 2011
The states of the Bible belt, America's conservative corridor, lead the country in searching Google for homosexual online media content between 2004 and 2011.
So in addition to be flat out stupid (biblical fault or parental choice.. take your pick), you have quite the stench of faggotry on yourself even without having to tip us off with your little gay fall backs.
"Thanks for clearing that up."
And the logical conclusion is that ALL christians watch porn. Because God knows that everyone in the so called "Bible belt" is a truly practicing christian. In fact, EVERYONE, in those states are christians. Everyone. LOL!!!
So much for critical thinking skills.
-
Look at this Tinkerbell taking his projections out for a walk.
HEHEHEEHEH!!!
You are a stalker on this forum and use little girl words like "tinkerbell".
LOL!!!
-
You are right you can't so now that i know this study is shit, post the other shitty ones supporting liberals and we can point out the methodological flaws, bad science is bad science.
Do your own homework. They are in previous pages in this board, as well as the G&O board.
I doubt you will be pointing any flaws, since you didn't back then.
-
No, logical is most in those areas watch gay porn. Conservative + Christian + Bible Belt + Gay Porn... well I would suggest you do the math but I think it is outside the realm of operating with just two brain cells.
Maybe the next time God kills all his children on the planet that Jesus created (your claim) in the universe that Jesus created (your claim again) maybe he will just eliminate gay porn all together for his inbred offspring and their might be hope for them yet.
-
HEHEHEEHEH!!!
You are a stalker on this forum and use little girl words like "tinkerbell".
LOL!!!
I certainly do when talking to and about one such as yourself. Appropriate description.
"HEHEHEEHEH!!!"
-
33333, you can thank me now.
The board fag will be stalking me from now on.
-
Once more with the "gay" comments.
::)
You really are projecting hard huh? Is that the Republican or Christian part of you?
-
Do your own homework. They are in previous pages in this board, as well as the G&O board.
I doubt you will be pointing any flaws, since you didn't back then.
ya sure, ill go looking for these phantom studies all over getbig, good point.
-
I'm a liberal, a war veteran and I just got laid (by a hot asian chick).
What does that make me?
Chicks with dicks don't count.
Did your unit have a stop over in Thailand or something?
I just hope that "he" was not a minor.
-
I'm a liberal, a war veteran and I just got laid (by a hot asian chick).
What does that make me?
Very fucking confused.
-
I'm a liberal, a war veteran and I just got laid (by a hot asian chick).
What does that make me?
A politically misguided hero who just got lucky.
-
Hahaha, MELTDOWN.
I have to laugh at all the guys who fall back on that "I have a life" line when their posts on this forum usually paint them as a creepy stalker who can't differentiate between reality and the internet. Oh well. Carry on.
Your posts indicate that the findings of these polls are definitely accurate.
Summary - Fury Picture/Text
Name: Fury
Posts: 18580 (7.764 per day)
Position: Getbig V
Date Registered: September 07, 2005, 03:48:20 PM
Last Active: March 27, 2012, 08:51:55 PM
Summary - Necrosis Picture/Text
Name: Necrosis
Posts: 5384 (2.464 per day)
Position: Getbig V
Date Registered: April 03, 2006, 11:22:35 AM
Last Active: Today at 04:44:51 AM
And he is the creepy one? LOL ;D
-
I'm a liberal, a war veteran and I just got laid (by a hot asian chick).
What does that make me?
Lucky ;)
-
Aren't you overdue for a 10-page thread where 4-6 of those pages consist of you talking to yourself, BlackenWhorkProNitrousEt cEtcEtc? If we were to add up all the posts on your 12+ gimmicks, I'd guess it would be up around 30k.
-
Aren't you overdue for a 10-page thread where 4-6 of those pages consist of you talking to yourself, BlackenWhorkProNitrousEt cEtcEtc? If we were to add up all the posts on your 12+ gimmicks, I'd guess it would be up around 30k.
hey everyone look at the loser, hahahahaheeheheheheheheh e
-
Aren't you overdue for a 10-page thread where 4-6 of those pages consist of you talking to yourself, BlackenWhorkProNitrousEt cEtcEtc? If we were to add up all the posts on your 12+ gimmicks, I'd guess it would be up around 30k.
Haha you really are a pathetic fuck arent you :D
Summary - whork Picture/Text
Name: whork
Posts: 389 (0.125 per day)
Position: Getbig III
Date Registered: September 24, 2003, 01:27:45 AM
Last Active: Today at 07:31:12 AM
Name: Fury
Posts: 18603 (7.771 per day)
Position: Getbig V
Date Registered: September 07, 2005, 03:48:20 PM
Last Active: Today at 07:31:01 AM
Even with 12+ gimmicks you would still have 6 times the posts i have. You really are a fucking mess arent you?
-
Hahaha, he comes back a day later to post the same thing again. Now that's the sign of a battered ego.
I like how I can keep you off your gimmicks and the 30,000 posts they have just by pointing out how schizophrenic you are. Talk about mental ownage. :D :D :D :D
How sad is your life that you spend nearly every day on an internet forum talking to yourself?
-
Hahaha, he comes back a day later to post the same thing again. Now that's the sign of a battered ego.
I like how I can keep you off your gimmicks and the 30,000 posts they have just by pointing out how schizophrenic you are. Talk about mental ownage. :D :D :D :D
How sad is your life that you spend nearly every day on an internet forum talking to yourself?
I dont know you tell me? :D
-
I dont know you tell me? :D
How ironic you show up right after BF posted that.
Go figure.
-
How ironic you show up right after BF posted that.
Go figure.
Asperger's boy has nothing better to do with his life than talk to himself all day on a dozen gimmicks.
-
How ironic you show up right after BF posted that.
Go figure.
How ironic you show up right after BF postet as well..
Go figure.
-
Asperger's boy has nothing better to do with his life than talk to himself all day on a dozen gimmicks.
Even if you multiplied my posts with a dozen you would still out post me times 6. You really are owning yourself here ;)
-
Even if you multiplied my posts with a dozen you would still out post me times 6. You really are owning yourself here ;)
Sure thing, Simple Jack. I'm too lazy to add up the posts on your 12+ accounts but it's safe to assume that it's upward of 30k.
Does your doctor recommend talking to yourself on here as a way of developing social skills, Asperger's boy? ???
-
Sure thing, Simple Jack. I'm too lazy to add up the posts on your 12+ accounts but it's safe to assume that it's upward of 30k.
Does your doctor recommend talking to yourself on here as a way of developing social skills, Asperger's boy? ???
autism is strong in this thread.
-
Haha you really are a pathetic fuck arent you :D
Summary - whork Picture/Text
Name: whork
Posts: 389 (0.125 per day)
Position: Getbig III
Date Registered: September 24, 2003, 01:27:45 AM
Last Active: Today at 07:31:12 AM
Name: Fury
Posts: 18603 (7.771 per day)
Position: Getbig V
Date Registered: September 07, 2005, 03:48:20 PM
Last Active: Today at 07:31:01 AM
Even with 12+ gimmicks you would still have 6 times the posts i have. You really are a fucking mess arent you?
why did you post this twice? LMAO
-
I'm a liberal, a war veteran and I just got laid (by a hot asian chick).
What does that make me?
Really? What branch and what was you MOS?
Being a liberal war vet, dude you're like a leftwing Unicorn!
-
How ironic you show up right after BF posted that.
Go figure.
lolol...Blacken is always lurking in the background.
-
why did you post this twice? LMAO
I meant to post you vs. him first since he accused you of living on this board
He had a lot more posts than you so i found it ironic :)
Then he accused me of living here, never go out etc so i postet mine vs. his since he has like 50 times the posts i have
Then he accused me of having 12+ gimmick accounts
Its hard to be as thick as this Fury guy :)
-
I breezed through college and it was-joke. I have learned drastically more on my own efforts than anything in college.
I don't quite buy that you went to College, but it's plausible I guess. Community Colleges are desperate for money and will admit just about anyone with a wad of cash. Great investment though: by your own admission you learned nothing.
And by "learned drastically more on my own efforts" I assume you mean "I take notes when listening to Mark Levin and Andrew Wilkow and memorize what they say."
-
:)
I don't quite buy that you went to College, but it's plausible I guess. Community Colleges are desperate for money and will admit just about anyone with a wad of cash. Great investment though: by your own admission you learned nothing.
And by "learned drastically more on my own efforts" I assume you mean "I take notes when listening to Mark Levin and Andrew Wilkow and memorize what they say."
Post any civics history legal economics iq test and we can compare who knows more.
-
:)
Post any civics history legal economics iq test and we can compare who knows more.
Lol, brutal comeback... An iq test over the Interwebs!