Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: Shockwave on April 22, 2012, 05:04:56 PM
-
U.N. to debut plan for world socialism in June–time for US to exit?
http://noisyroom.net/ ^ | 4.21.12 | Jeffrey Klein
Posted on April 21, 2012 3:28:15 PM EDT by Whenifhow
The United Nations is holding its’ “Conference on Sustainable Development” in Rio de Janero, Brazil, over three separate sessions in June, to which organizers, led by UN Conference Secretary-General of Rio+20, Sha Zukang [who 'really doesn't like Americans'], expect 193 attendees from governments, the private sector, NGOs and other stakeholders, according to the Sarah de Sainte Croix March 20, 2012 article in The Rio Times.
The stated themes of this colossal conference, which is structured around a 204-page report titled, “Working Towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy, A United Nations System-Wide Perspective,” are “the green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication,” … [by and through] … “the institutional framework for sustainable development,” according to George Russell’s excellent and quoted-filled FOXNews article today.
More specifically, the debates will cover a … ‘breathtaking array of carbon taxes, transfers of trillions of dollars from wealthy countries to poor ones, and new spending programs to guarantee that populations around the world are protected–from the effects of the very programs the world organization wants to implement.
According to Russell, the Obama Administration officials have supported this “agenda,” which is designed to ‘make dramatic and enormously expensive changes in the way that the world does nearly everything—or, as one of the documents puts it, “a fundamental shift in the way we think and act.”
According to U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, proposals on how the “challenges can and must be addressed,” include:
–’More than $2.1 trillion a year in wealth transfers from rich countries to poorer ones, in the name of fostering “green infrastructure … climate adaptation … other green economy” measures.’
–’New carbon taxes for industrialized countries [amounting to] about $250 billion a year, or 0.6 percent of [US] GDP by 2020. Other environmental taxes are mentioned, but not specified.’
–’Further unspecified price hikes … derived from agriculture, fisheries, forestry, or other kinds of land and water use [industries], all of which would be radically reorganized–[to] “contribute to a more level playing field between established, ‘brown’ technologies and newer, greener ones.”‘
– ‘Major global social spending programs, including a “social protection floor” and “social safety nets” for the world’s most vulnerable social groups for reasons of “equity.”’
–’Even more social benefits for those displaced by [this] green economy revolution—such as those put out of work in undesirable fossil fuel industries. The benefits, called “investments,” would include “access to nutritious food, health services, education, training and retraining, and unemployment benefits.”‘
–’A guarantee that if those sweeping benefits weren’t enough, more would be granted … “Any adverse effects of changes in prices of goods and services, vital to the welfare of vulnerable groups, must be compensated for and new livelihood opportunities provided.”‘
“Transforming the global economy will require action locally (e.g., through land use planning), at the national level (e.g., through energy-use regulations) and at the international level (e.g., through technology diffusion),” the document says.
It involves “profound changes in economic systems, in resource efficiency, in the composition of global demand, in production and consumption patterns and a major transformation in public policy-making.” It will also require “a serious rethinking of lifestyles in developed countries.”
This ‘UN guidebook for global social engineering,’ was prepared by the Geneva-based United Nations Environmental Management Group (UNEMG), a consortium of 36 U.N. agencies, development banks and environmental bureaucracies–all of which rely on the contributions, from tax collecting nations for their very existence–not a single entity engaged in the production of goods or services, producing a profit and owning singular wealth.
This UN doctrine seems to directly channel Marx and Engel’s scribe of 1848, “The Communist Manifesto,” wherein its’ organizational and operational structure appears to largely be a paraphrasical equivalent to the 10 short-term demands Marx prescribed in section II., “Proletarians and Communists.”
However, instead of the UN overthrowing the capitalist system, it simply wants to tie it to a leash and be subject to the UN … [a] ‘dictatorship of the proletariat,’ to redistribute wealth around the world to “magically elevate the poverty class to the middle class.
The United States, arguably the most fertile and favorable ground for such a massive experiment, has already spent $15 [T]rillion in taxpayer treasure over the past 47 years attempting to circumvent market forces and eliminate poverty–with no affect.
Additionally, study after study has revealed the UN to have grown into an impossibly dysfunctional gargantuan, having negligent management skills, metrics and accountability, and a source of financially wasteful pandering–second only to the U.S. General Services Administration.
Actually, as this directly smacks of the long-discussed “UN Agenda 21,” America must treat this audacity of the United Nations as a wake up call, and say “[last] check please”–then hit the UN exit doors without delay.
Get ready for the UN to start taking trillions we dont have to pay for African welfare.
-
american are crazy
canadians live beside you are we're socialists...
-
american are crazy
canadians live beside you are we're socialists...
Do you want the UN to dictate to your government to give trillions of dollars to pay for the greeks welfare checks?
Do you want Canada to bow to a foreign authority?
Do you want Canada to be responsible for directly giving its tax revenue to pay off Greece or Frances debt?
-
american are crazy
canadians live beside you are we're socialists...
Difference between Canadian socialism and a Venezuelan type of socialism. The UN is looking for the Chavez type socialism.
-
I love how they treat citizens of poor countries as an endangered species when they are breeding like rats. What sane person could ever support this? There has to be more to this.
Seems to me they should put all there efforts into reducing the fertility rate of these poor countries to 0. That would help the most.
-
Think about this - how many of you guys would love to see you counties revenue be directly diverted to the extremist muslims in Sudan?
Or any of the other extremist muslim 3rd world shitholes that are UN members? Pretty sure it would suck to watch the UN take your countries money and give it to a Muslim dictator so that he can "eliminate poverty" (read: wage genocide on whoever they feel like)
-
Who is controlling the cash and what track record of success do they have?
-
It is a flawed plan, even though the intentions of an integrated global economy are interesting and even needed.
-
It is a flawed plan, even though the intentions of an integrated global economy are interesting and even needed.
I think that there are far too many cultural and economic differences for ANY worldwide economy/government to work.
You simply wont ever get every country to submit to a foreign powers rules.
-
I think that there are far too many cultural and economic differences for ANY worldwide economy/government to work.
You simply wont ever get every country to submit to a foreign powers rules.
Were are rapidly approaching a point in which problems in one part of the world become problems of all the world, be it economical crisis or social rebellions. I acknowledge and agree different cultures exist and collide, but the world does not allow for all those differences to live in harmony, they will end up being either pacifically or aggresivelly extinguished.
Also, the western 1st world has abused the third world and is the cause of many social injustices (trickle down economics and political intervention in Latin America for example, or slavery and political submission in Afirca). it is only fair that they help rebuild what they have destroyed. And I dont say this with any remorse or hate, I actually love the US and the European culture.
-
I love how they treat citizens of poor countries as an endangered species when they are breeding like rats. What sane person could ever support this? There has to be more to this.
Seems to me they should put all there efforts into reducing the fertility rate of these poor countries to 0. That would help the most.
The elite (ie-anglo/Jew alliance) want a population of mullattos--like Brazil.
Soon they will take away guns too.
-
Were are rapidly approaching a point in which problems in one part of the world become problems of all the world, be it economical crisis or social rebellions. I acknowledge and agree different cultures exist and collide, but the world does not allow for all those differences to live in harmony, they will end up being either pacifically or aggresivelly extinguished.
Also, the western 1st world has abused the third world and is the cause of many social injustices (trickle down economics and political intervention in Latin America for example, or slavery and political submission in Afirca). it is only fair that they help rebuild what they have destroyed. And I dont say this with any remorse or hate, I actually love the US and the European culture.
Eh.... the world cannot and will never operate in any utopian ideal, survival of the fittest is always going to reign supreme in one form or another.
This IMHO is just another attempt for the 3rd world to try and strongarm money from the 1st world. Is the way the US operates "fair" for the rest of the world? Nope. But when the US falls, another will rise and operate EXACTLY the same way. Just now it'll be a global superpower (the UN) with an much smaller percentage of elites and instead of their idea of spreading the money around bringing living standards up, its just going to wind up tearing down the living standards for those lucky enough to live in 1st world countries while doing next to nothing for the 3rd world.
Basically, IMHO, this whole idea will just result in the whole world turning into a 3rd world country and consolidating the U.N. (not the Countries in it, the organization itself) as the power center of the globe.
Its just a power grab. If they can re-distribute the wealth around the globe, they get to dictate how much everyone gets. And that always winds up with the organization itself taking a dispropotionate amount and leaving everyone else with bread crumbs.
Id rather it be on a country by country basis (read; some 1st world countries and some 3rd world) so at least those with the will or the means have an opportunity to bail the fuck out to somewhere that isnt a shithole.
One World Government just means equally shitty living for all IMHO, because those with that kind of power will never give a fuck about anyone but themselves and their friends.
-
Time to look for acres in Wyoming.
-
Do you want the UN to dictate to your government to give trillions of dollars to pay for the greeks welfare checks?
Do you want Canada to bow to a foreign authority?
Do you want Canada to be responsible for directly giving its tax revenue to pay off Greece or Frances debt?
you are a fear monger and a simpleton
you couldn't understand the geopolitik of a box of legos
-
you are a fear monger and a simpleton
you couldn't understand the geopolitik of a box of legos
IE send more money to Obama gore bsn ki moon and the commies to piss away on bullshit.
-
you are a fear monger and a simpleton
you couldn't understand the geopolitik of a box of legos
A.Fear monger? Yes
B.Simpleton? No
Good job actually refuting anything though bro, guess you'd be happy to have the UN tell your government that it has to give them trillions of dollars so they can disperse it to the 3rd world.
(In case you havent figured it out, thats called a foreign body organization taxing you for things that have nothing to do with you or your country)
BTW, epic job calling me a simpleton when you just posted this savage gem
canadians live beside you are we're socialists...
Oh the irony.
-
The elite (ie-anglo/Jew alliance) want a population of mullattos--like Brazil.
Soon they will take away guns too.
What I don't understand is how can the Elite calculate that they will be safe in such a world of mullattos? They will stand out like a sore thumb.
Seems to me the best thing to do to stop this is cut off the head of the snake. These Elites need to be identified one by one and put away for good doing hard manual labor in some third world hell hole.
-
They have money beyond your wildest dreams--they manipulate world economy.
You can't touch them because we don't even see them.
The idea is to eliminate nationalist sentiment held by white people in Europe and America.
Nationalism is contrary to globalism, and usually it is the white people (or east asians) that hold such sentiments.
-
They have money beyond your wildest dreams--they manipulate world economy.
You can't touch them because we don't even see them.
The history behind the World bankers is quite disturbing.
-
Noisyroom.com is an incredibly fair and reliable source.
Thanks for posting.
-
Noisyroom.com is an incredibly fair and reliable source.
Thanks for posting.
I actually got it from 333's post in the Political board.
Thanks for pointing that out though. ;D
-
Noisyroom.com is an incredibly fair and reliable source.
Thanks for posting.
This is being reported from many sources jack ass.
-
This is being reported from many sources jack ass.
You sure do call people names a lot on the internet.
You must be pretty tough.
-
Does being a member of the United Nations in itself not directly conflict with our constitution? ???
-
Does being a member of the United Nations in itself not directly conflict with our constitution? ???
Yeah. I see the UN as constantly trying to usurp our Sovereignty. The want to be the global rule makers, which is directly in violation of our constitution.
The U.S. should NEVER bow to a foreign ruler/body.
-
America is supposed to be the global rule makers? Where is that in the constitution?
-
America is supposed to be the global rule makers? Where is that in the constitution?
Where did I say that? I dont believe America has the right the rules for anyone else, just as I dont believe any foreign body has the right to write our rules.
How did you get me saying that the US shouldnt bow to a foreign body to mean that we should be the global rule maker?
There shouldnt BE a global rule maker. Each country should be responsible for its own sovereignty.
There shouldnt be any organization with the authority to dictate that foreign countries have to pay taxes to them. Like I said, our constitution and the whole revolutionary war was fought because they didnt want some faceless country across the ocean telling people that they had to pay taxes for shit that had absolutley nothing to do with them. How is the UN trying to force the US to agree to pay these "global green taxes" any different? (which winds up being the US paying a disproportionatley huge % of that tax)