Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on April 26, 2012, 06:07:30 PM
-
Libel case against Obama's 'gay' accuser tossed (Larry Sinclair said Axelrod rigged lie detector)
World Net Daily ^ | April 24, 2012 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on April 25, 2012 1:30:36 AM EDT by Seizethecarp
A federal judge has dismissed a libel case against a homosexual who claimed Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign paid to rig a polygraph test regarding his sensational charge that he had sex and used drugs with the future president.
Larry Sinclair – who claims he twice engaged in sexual activity and used cocaine with Obama in 1999 when Obama was an Illinois state senator – was accused by Internet publisher Daniel Parisi of making false and damaging statements that led to the demise of Parisi’s porn website, Whitehouse.com, in 2008.
The alleged defamation did not center on Sinclair’s charges of sex and drugs with Obama but on Sinclair’s claim in his 2009 book that the Obama campaign and top adviser David Axelrod had agreed to pay Parisi $750,000 to rig the results of a polygraph test.
Parisi failed to present any evidence that Sinclair’s claim about Axelrod and the Obama campaign was false, wrote U.S. District Court Judge Richard J. Leon in his Feb. 28 opinion dismissing the case.
The judge, however, said Parisi failed to show Sinclair had published any knowingly false statements and concluded that he had taken appropriate steps to verify the information before publishing it.
Sinclair’s source of his allegation against Parisi and the Obama campaign was an anonymous phone call, but he tried to confirm the information with Parisi, who refused to respond, Leon states in his opinion. Also, a Chicago Tribune reporter contacted the tipster and affirmed Sinclair’s statement, the judge said.
Sinclair represented himself in court while Parisi was represented by Patton Boggs, one of the most expensive, prestigious and politically connected law firms in the nation’s capital.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Click to Add Topic
-
bump
-
*yawn*
-
someone has a bizarre fascination with this story
I wonder why?
-
someone has a bizarre fascination with this story
I wonder why?
Self loathing closet case I suppose.
-
someone has a bizarre fascination with this story
I wonder why?
President Down-Lo is subject to being blackmailed.
-
President Down-Lo is subject to being blackmailed.
Not possible
-
You would need EVIDENCE in order to black mail. And as we can see from your attempts, none exists.
-
Funny how desperate things have gotten.
While I don't like OB, wanted Romney instead.....many people who hated OB, predicted a landslide, criticized the most trivial things have resorted to retarded accusations without any evidence to back it up.
Is that all they have?
Their hate and their delusions?
Funny and sad at the same time.
-
Funny how desperate things have gotten.
While I don't like OB, wanted Romney instead.....many people who hated OB, predicted a landslide, criticized the most trivial things have resorted to retarded accusations without any evidence to back it up.
Is that all they have?
Their hate and their delusions?
Funny and sad at the same time.
I have no idea who you are talking about.
-
You would need EVIDENCE in order to black mail. And as we can see from your attempts, none exists.
Bingo
-
I have no idea who you are talking about.
Not just the obvious guy, others too. :D
-
Funny how desperate things have gotten.
While I don't like OB, wanted Romney instead.....many people who hated OB, predicted a landslide, criticized the most trivial things have resorted to retarded accusations without any evidence to back it up.
Is that all they have?
Their hate and their delusions?
Funny and sad at the same time.
the same can be said of Mods who admit these people are making retarded accusations without any evidence to back it up (something they've done for the last 4 years so not exactly a recent phenomenon ) yet lecture the rest of us on the appropriate and sanitized way to call them out on their blatant, retarded bullshit.
These are the same people who STARTED THREADS telling the other members of the board FU !!!! in the title and somehow we can't call them fucking morons when they act like fucking morons and even the mods agree that's how they are acting like fucking morons
very sad indeed (in the pathetic sense of the word) and actually not that funny afterall
-
the same can be said of Mods who admit these people are making retarded accusations without any evidence to back it up (something they've done for the last 4 years so not exactly a recent phenomenon ) yet lecture the rest of us on the appropriate and sanitized way to call them out on their blatant, retarded bullshit.
These are the same people who STARTED THREADS telling the other members of the board FU !!!! in the title and somehow we can't call them fucking morons when they act like fucking morons and even the mods agree that's how they are acting like fucking morons
very sad indeed (in the pathetic sense of the word) and actually not that funny afterall
If you want to act like a little kid and call people names find another place to do it. This isn't the place for you. No one is forcing you to respond to retarded threads, you do that by choice and i wonder who looks more foolish in the process.....the one who posts or the one who keeps responding to it?
In the mean time, these rules are here to stay.
-
If you want to act like a little kid and call people names find another place to do it. This isn't the place for you. No one is forcing you to respond to retarded threads, you do that by choice.
In the mean time, these rules are here to stay.
I don't "want" to but sometimes and especially with some people, its the only appropriate response
-
I don't "want" to but sometimes and especially with some people, its the only appropriate response
No, you do it by choice.
-
No one is forcing you to respond to retarded threads, you do that by choice and i wonder who looks more foolish in the process.....the one who posts or the one who keeps responding to it?
-
No one is forcing you to respond to retarded threads, you do that by choice and i wonder who looks more foolish in the process.....the one who posts or the one who keeps responding to it?
we've had this conversation before
if someone says something that I personally find offensive then I'm not going to ignore it
same goes for things which even YOU agree are, in your words, "retarded", blatant lies. etc...
why should those idiots be able to pollute the board with their crap without being called out for it
-
we've had this conversation before
if someone says something that I personally find offensive then I'm not going to ignore it
same goes for things which even YOU agree are, in your words, "retarded", blatant lies. etc...
why should those idiots be able to pollute the board with their crap without being called out for it
Because....
That's our opinion. And as we can choose to respond or not. If you wanna call someone out for posting a retarded post, you can do that. You just can't call them out using abusive ad-hom, personal attacks, name calling etc.
BTW..... If you have looked at my posting over the last 4 years, you don't find me falling in line with:
OB the Coke head
OB the pres who plays too much golf
OB the spendy vacationer
OB the "what did Michelle Say"
OB the Kenyan
OB the draft dodger
Ob the commy
or whatever ridiculous stupid shit has been posted
What you have seen me do is laugh and ridicule the poster(s).
-
Because....
That's our opinion. And as we can choose to respond or not. If you wanna call someone out for posting a retarded post, you can do that. You just can't call them out using abusive ad-hom, personal attacks, name calling etc.
BTW..... If you have looked at my posting over the last 4 years, you don't find me falling in line with:
OB the Coke head
OB the pres who plays too much golf
OB the spendy vacationer
OB the "what did Michelle Say"
OB the Kenyan
OB the draft dodger
Ob the commy
or whatever ridiculous stupid shit has been posted
What you have seen me do is laugh and ridicule the poster(s).
I wasn't saying you agreed with that nonsense
I was saying that you agreed it was nonsense or as you put it "retarded accusations"
only problem is that retarded accusations are allowed but calling them retarded accusation or more accurately, calling the person who posts them "a fucking moron" is not allowed, even after repeated requests for proof are ignored
so what we have is an eco-system where this shit used to take care of itself and now, with the new rules, where it's allowed to run rampant and take over the board
Other than a few days following the election, where 333 got a well earned beat down by myself and a few others, for the most part we all would try to challenge his positions first and only resort to the other shit as he melted down....which he always did when confronted with the fact that he was lying
-
You would think people who have a known reputation as a liar he would have some dignity and stop. Or at least try to lie a bit better. There is no excuse for such sorry lying with all that practice they have.
-
No one is forcing you to respond to retarded threads, you do that by choice and i wonder who looks more foolish in the process.....the one who posts or the one who keeps responding to it?
He's a Bay Area lib
NOTHING is ever his fault. It's always someone else, lol
-
I wasn't saying you agreed with that nonsense
I was saying that you agreed it was nonsense or as you put it "retarded accusations"
only problem is that retarded accusations are allowed but calling them retarded accusation or more accurately, calling the person who posts them "a fucking moron" is not allowed, even after repeated requests for proof are ignored
so what we have is an eco-system where this shit used to take care of itself and now, with the new rules, where it's allowed to run rampant and take over the board
Other than a few days following the election, where 333 got a well earned beat down by myself and a few others, for the most part we all would try to challenge his positions first and only resort to the other shit as he melted down....which he always did when confronted with the fact that he was lying
It didn't stop him from posting before or after. And although you may have tried to challenge his positions with debate and retort first before digressing into name calling there were far more instances from many more other posters, on both sides who just went directly to name calling which over time turned this place into unsupervised elementary school playground of grown men acting like retarded Mike Savage wanna bes. Some in fact, were so diligent in their ridiculing ways that easily 90% of their posts were of a inflammatory nature. In others words: Trolls and Flamers.
A Political forum is a place of opinion and debate. There will be many opinions, some retarded, some not.
-
You would think people who have a known reputation as a liar he would have some dignity and stop. Or at least try to lie a bit better. There is no excuse for such sorry lying with all that practice they have.
the poster in question truly BELIEVES the shit he posts which is why is he most likely mentally ill and not merely a shameless, pathetic liar
-
It didn't stop him from posting before or after. And although you may have tried to challenge his positions with debate and retort first before digressing into name calling there were far more instances from many more other posters, on both sides who just went directly to name calling which over time turned this place into unsupervised elementary school playground of grown men acting like retarded Mike Savage wanna bes. Some in fact, were so diligent in their ridiculing ways that easily 90% of their posts were of a inflammatory nature. In others words: Trolls and Flamers.
A Political forum is a place of opinion and debate. There will be many opinions, some retarded, some not.
the poster in question STARTED many threads with name calling
he was the only one (to the best of my recollection) who did that
-
Funny how desperate things have gotten.
While I don't like OB, wanted Romney instead.....many people who hated OB, predicted a landslide, criticized the most trivial things have resorted to retarded accusations without any evidence to back it up.
Is that all they have?
Their hate and their delusions?
Funny and sad at the same time.
They have been exposed.
-
You would think people who have a known reputation as a liar he would have some dignity and stop. Or at least try to lie a bit better. There is no excuse for such sorry lying with all that practice they have.
Are you holding on to the fantasy of thinking a person with extreme sometimes blatantly unrealistic views is going to change on a forum?
Look at the conversation i had with an extreme right poster regarding OB being born in the USA. He pretty much stated, that even though there was mountains of evidence from multiple sources that proved OB was born in the USA he believed that a comment made 20 years ago that could have easily been taken out of context that he was from Kenya is absolute proof he isn't American born.
This is what you are dealing with. How can you expect a person like that to be reasonable and admit fault?
-
It didn't stop him from posting before or after. And although you may have tried to challenge his positions with debate and retort first before digressing into name calling there were far more instances from many more other posters, on both sides who just went directly to name calling which over time turned this place into unsupervised elementary school playground of grown men acting like retarded Mike Savage wanna bes. Some in fact, were so diligent in their ridiculing ways that easily 90% of their posts were of a inflammatory nature. In others words: Trolls and Flamers.
A Political forum is a place of opinion and debate. There will be many opinions, some retarded, some not.
+1
-
the poster in question STARTED many threads with name calling
he was the only one (to the best of my recollection) who did that
yeah pretty much. working on that one at the moment.
But it should be noted, most of the time is was calling OB some stupid crap.
If it was calling a poster here a name, now it would be removed. (although i often removed/modified ones before too)
-
yeah pretty much. working on that one at the moment.
But it should be noted, most of the time is was calling OB some stupid crap.
If it was calling a poster here a name, now it would be removed. (although i often removed/modified ones before too)
to my recollection he would find some stupid story (didn't matter if it was true or not) and get so enraged that he would start a thread telling all Obama supporters FU !!! and/or include some wish of violence
that would be the "premise" of the entire thread
after seeing that more than a few times it's a natural result to want to face of with the person in question
-
to my recollection he would find some stupid story (didn't matter if it was true or not) and get so enraged that he would start a thread telling all Obama supporters FU !!! and/or include some wish of violence
that would be the "premise" of the entire thread
after seeing that more than a few times it's a natural result to want to face of with the person in question
I agree. I often did it to(facing off). And no matter how much logic, how many facts, how much name calling etc. That person never stopped or admitted nothing. So whats the use? That person will never change and to some extent, its just all forum tactics anyway.
But there are plenty of posters on both sides who will have a reasonable debate with out digressing into ad hom. And there's been much more of that lately.
-
Are you holding on to the fantasy of thinking a person with extreme sometimes blatantly unrealistic views is going to change on a forum?
Look at the conversation i had with an extreme right poster regarding OB being born in the USA. He pretty much stated, that even though there was mountains of evidence from multiple sources that proved OB was born in the USA he believed that a comment made 20 years ago that could have easily been taken out of context that he was from Kenya is absolute proof he isn't American born.
This is what you are dealing with. How can you expect a person like that to be reasonable and admit fault?
No. I can expect a person like that to be a self loathing loser. And point it out.
-
No. I can expect a person like that to be a self loathing loser. And point it out.
And then what?
Nothing changes.
-
https://www.out.com/news-opinion/2018/11/06/man-who-claims-have-had-sex-obama-running-mayor
-
Pretty wild stuff here.
Imagine someone claiming our president had sex with a porn star and was paid hush $$ to keep it quiet?
Oh...wait a minute :o
Trump bangs hot broads . Obama banged old white dudes and an ape
-
Bump
Libel case against Obama's 'gay' accuser tossed (Larry Sinclair said Axelrod rigged lie detector)
World Net Daily ^ | April 24, 2012 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on April 25, 2012 1:30:36 AM EDT by Seizethecarp
A federal judge has dismissed a libel case against a homosexual who claimed Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign paid to rig a polygraph test regarding his sensational charge that he had sex and used drugs with the future president.
Larry Sinclair – who claims he twice engaged in sexual activity and used cocaine with Obama in 1999 when Obama was an Illinois state senator – was accused by Internet publisher Daniel Parisi of making false and damaging statements that led to the demise of Parisi’s porn website, Whitehouse.com, in 2008.
The alleged defamation did not center on Sinclair’s charges of sex and drugs with Obama but on Sinclair’s claim in his 2009 book that the Obama campaign and top adviser David Axelrod had agreed to pay Parisi $750,000 to rig the results of a polygraph test.
Parisi failed to present any evidence that Sinclair’s claim about Axelrod and the Obama campaign was false, wrote U.S. District Court Judge Richard J. Leon in his Feb. 28 opinion dismissing the case.
The judge, however, said Parisi failed to show Sinclair had published any knowingly false statements and concluded that he had taken appropriate steps to verify the information before publishing it.
Sinclair’s source of his allegation against Parisi and the Obama campaign was an anonymous phone call, but he tried to confirm the information with Parisi, who refused to respond, Leon states in his opinion. Also, a Chicago Tribune reporter contacted the tipster and affirmed Sinclair’s statement, the judge said.
Sinclair represented himself in court while Parisi was represented by Patton Boggs, one of the most expensive, prestigious and politically connected law firms in the nation’s capital.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Click to Add Topic
-
Are you holding on to the fantasy of thinking a person with extreme sometimes blatantly unrealistic views is going to change on a forum?
Look at the conversation i had with an extreme right poster regarding OB being born in the USA. He pretty much stated, that even though there was mountains of evidence from multiple sources that proved OB was born in the USA he believed that a comment made 20 years ago that could have easily been taken out of context that he was from Kenya is absolute proof he isn't American born.
This is what you are dealing with. How can you expect a person like that to be reasonable and admit fault?
Bump
-
Trump bangs hot broads . Obama banged old white dudes and an ape
Pedo Pete is still upset and thus bumped this thread...
-
Pedo Pete is still upset and thus bumped this thread...
^Queer^
-
^Queer^
Illiterate queer at that. Can't see the original Obama stalker bumped it first.
-
^Queer^
Just post under your main pedophilic account loser ::)