Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Jovo on April 27, 2012, 12:31:15 AM

Title: question about muscle
Post by: Jovo on April 27, 2012, 12:31:15 AM
When people train with weights, and add some quality lean mass, are they really adding muscle or just making there muscle cells hold more energy(glycogen), ofcourse they add some muscle fibers and the like, but is it mostly just water + glycogen ?

then when you stop training for a while you end up looking flat, but then you start weight training again and eat a bodybuilder oriented diet, in you start to get this "muscle memory" effect in which you add all that size back in a short time  than what it took you to get there years ago.

So is it possible that you never really lose muscle or gain much of it, but rather "program" your cells to hold more glycogen ?

And when you take steroids, they make you grow more fibers  in the cells, but you get off of them and you end up looking flat again ( thisi what i have gathered from reading here), but then you start taking them again in unison with weght training and a bodybuilder style diet, and you add all this "size" in a short time....

Could it be possible that it's not actually ALL of the actual muscle fibers getting lost, but rather the body going back to homeo stasis and holding normal ammounts of glycogen + water in muscles ?


This was just something i thought about the past few days
Title: Re: question about muscle
Post by: nzmusclemonster on April 27, 2012, 12:46:32 AM
Bodybuilding is the muscle.
Title: Re: question about muscle
Post by: BigCyp on April 27, 2012, 02:43:11 AM
A lot of truth to that post, esp for natural BB.

I don't think that the body can 'lose' muscle as quickly as it appears when you stop training for a couple of months (considering that even if you go on a cutting diet/reduced cals/cardio/low carb etc - you only lose about 15% of lean tissue along with the bf and water)

It would be hard to imagine losing 15 pounds of muscle 'fibers' just by not training for a couple months - the body would not need to use this tissue unless you were in massive calorie deficit, as well as not training.

Obviously when you're on/off the gear etc it's a different matter.
Title: Re: question about muscle
Post by: DK II on April 27, 2012, 02:56:38 AM
Bodybuilding is the muscle.

this.
Title: Re: question about muscle
Post by: Jovo on April 27, 2012, 02:58:11 AM

Obviously when you're on/off the gear etc it's a different matter.

but what about the likes of kevin levrone who would get off for 6 months or so, then diet into a show, surely he couldn't grow o much fibers in such a short period ?

Title: Re: question about muscle
Post by: bigjim on April 27, 2012, 03:12:40 AM
but what about the likes of kevin levrone who would get off for 6 months or so, then diet into a show, surely he couldn't grow o much fibers in such a short period ?



Genetics plus high amounts of drugs = Magic.
Title: Re: question about muscle
Post by: BigCyp on April 27, 2012, 03:56:05 AM
Genetics plus high amounts of drugs = Magic.

Hahaha exactly,

"What about x y z..............magic."