Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Stark on May 31, 2012, 09:06:49 AM

Title: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: Stark on May 31, 2012, 09:06:49 AM
The whole cluster fuck in Syria is getting extremely on my nerves.
First of all nobody in the western world gives a flying fuck about a bunch of xzxzxzxz killing another bunch of xzxzxzxz – not in the abstract they don’t, they might feel that the 21:00 o’clock news report on the mass killing and slaughter of kids is a little too much reality but thankfully jungle camp and America’s got talent is on right after the news.
So since nobody gives a real fuck who does?
Well apparently “our” elected leaders do, they are so concerned that they threaten the current regime in Syria with even harder sanctions like these oil rich countries give a fuck, on top of that Mrs superbitch H. Clinton is now officially blaming the USSR for the civil war in Syria and I am thinking how the fuck can you blame another country let alone the USSR for what happens in Syria, sure Russia and those slimy communists in China (un)officially back Syria but to blame them for some trigger happy AK swinging sandcoon who rather shoots a bunch of innocent children than to see his country move into the 21th century is a bit harsh to be honest.

So I had an idea – it is by now common knowledge that twice Germany tried to take on the world and twice the world bombed us back into the stone age, twice we re-build our coutries (with help from cheap labor from turkbegistan I know I know) and Germany is standing tall above all other countries in the EU and is officially known as the powerhouse in Europe, now if this wealth and growth was a direct byproduct of years of allied carpet bombing, maybe bombing the shit out of small African countries isn’t such a bad thing after all, maybe if we bomb them more efficient they grow even faster and grow stronger (just like hair when you cut it) – it also seemed to work quite well for Japan, America nuked the fuck out of them and look at them now. I don’t know just trying to help…

(http://www.apacheclips.com/images/hitler.gif)
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: Jaime on May 31, 2012, 09:30:06 AM
Short reply. Caucasians and japs are slightly better at rebuilding shit than arabs and negro's.

Regardless, bombing is still the solution.
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: Stark on May 31, 2012, 09:48:37 AM
Short reply. Caucasians and japs are slightly better at rebuilding shit than arabs and negro's.

Regardless, bombing is still the solution.

This...
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: _bruce_ on May 31, 2012, 09:59:59 AM
Waste of ammunition - no western country should in any way be involved in those shitholes.
Unfortunately the damage is done and there'll be war for centuries.
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: Shockwave on May 31, 2012, 10:03:45 AM
Waste of ammunition - no western country should in any way be involved in those shitholes.
Unfortunately the damage is done and there'll be war for centuries.
If there was ever a rational use for Nuclear weapons, it lies somewhere in the middle-east.
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: Jaime on May 31, 2012, 10:14:27 AM
yes, make away the muslim barbaric contries and do away with isreal, all at once.

but we need the oil dont we.


The whole world would be a better option, allow evolution to start again.
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: _bruce_ on May 31, 2012, 10:17:31 AM
If there was ever a rational use for Nuclear weapons, it lies somewhere in the middle-east.

Sounds good, but due to use of "depleted" ammunition this has already been going on.

[ Invalid YouTube link ]
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: hrspwr on May 31, 2012, 11:33:19 AM
Maybe we could just drop some paperback books showing them things like how to grow a garden, use toilet paper, purify water, not have sex with little kids, or other simple concepts they might want to try.
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: Stark on May 31, 2012, 11:38:05 AM
yes, make away the muslim barbaric contries and do away with isreal, all at once.

but we need the oil dont we.

the oil is still going to be there after we have carpet bombed the whole region into submission, it might be even more favorable if we turn the place into glass than when every "aaa"rab is dead populate the place with people that actually know how to enjoy freedom.
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: Dr Dutch on May 31, 2012, 11:47:58 AM
Let's keep this Syrious.......hahahahaha ha   :-X
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: Stark on May 31, 2012, 11:52:22 AM
Sounds good, but due to use of "depleted" ammunition this has already been going on.

[ Invalid YouTube link ]

And its still in use - at least with the A-10 and I believe the Sabot rounds as well - and seriously who cares, its not like the quality of living in these countries would be in any way heavily impacted by a few shell casings of depleted uranium rounds, in fact knowing how shifty these arabs are they might even find good use of them like I dunno make an attractive neckless for one of their ten wifes the once you want to get rid of or the once you wish had cancer.
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: claymore on May 31, 2012, 01:59:21 PM
Stark if you lived in my neck of the woods, I'd buy you a steak dinner my friend !!
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: _bruce_ on May 31, 2012, 02:01:02 PM
Let's keep this Syrious.......hahahahaha ha   :-X

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: James28 on May 31, 2012, 02:47:05 PM
Stark if you lived in my neck of the woods, I'd buy you a steak dinner my friend !!

Outed!
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: orion on May 31, 2012, 04:19:29 PM
All the US has to do is level Asaad's palace.  A few drone strikes should do it and then they can figure the rest out for themselves.  Or we could send in Seal team six and double tap him.     All this fucking waiting and indecision, didn't have this problem with Libya, what gives?  How is this any different?  Hear Hillary trying to come up with all kinds of excuses but none of it makes any sense.  Time to take this guy out!
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: arce1988 on May 31, 2012, 05:58:36 PM
  have you seen them drive?
Title: Re: Why bombing middle eastern countries isn't such a bad thing after all
Post by: Naggash on May 31, 2012, 06:47:29 PM
Short reply. Caucasians and japs are slightly better at rebuilding shit than arabs and negro's.

Regardless, bombing is still the solution.

Beat me to it

You have to realise that Germany was a grand country BEFORE the bombings, unlike most of the Middle East