Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: King Shizzo on July 16, 2012, 09:30:49 AM
-
Take for example male pattern baldness. Obviously science can explain how we lose our hair, but the question is why? Does nature see it that humans no longer need to have excessive bodyhair? Will everyone be bald in 10,000 years? What about the remnants of a tail that we all have? What about the appendix? Why has it become a useless organ? Let's discuss our slow transformation into aliens.
-
I would say there are less bald people now days. I am 31 and have a lucious head of hair. Most people I know or hang with have full heads of hair. I'd say it's the other way around. People with hair are seen as more attractive , thus more breeding.
-
I would say there are less bald people now days. I am 31 and have a lucious head of hair. Most people I know or hang with have full heads of hair. I'd say it's the other way around. People with hair are seen as more attractive , thus more breeding.
I would say that it probably hasn't changed much for thousands of years. Remember, 10,000 years on Earth's timeline is probably less then a second. There is always a reason why things happen. For example, Male pattern Baldness (as well as general body hair) is not needed as much due to the warmer climates we have today. If we have another 1000 year Ice-age, then maybe the full head of hair will make a comeback ;D
-
I'll let you know how it goes, I plan on outliving death.
-
I'll let you know how it goes, I plan on outliving death.
One day we will be able to go into Walmart and buy years of life. 10 years = 10,000 Prepaid card of course :D
-
Shizz, very insightful.
I couldn't agree more.
Of course it is natural progression.
Why do people need hair?
Evolution is slow, relatively.
What you witness nowadays is the evolution OF evolution. Mind over matter. Medicine over complacence or lack of knowledge.
-
You witness evolution daily dumbass. It's not things dramatically change on a given day, it is a gradual change.
-
You witness evolution daily dumbass. It's not things dramatically change on a given day, it is a gradual change.
How is dramatic? People have been walking around for thousands a cand thousand of years and losing hair all over their bodies the entire time?
Why are you calling people dumbass?
-
I would say there are less bald people now days. I am 31 and have a lucious head of hair. Most people I know or hang with have full heads of hair. I'd say it's the other way around. People with hair are seen as more attractive , thus more breeding.
No way, I see so many kids now barely in their 20's with receeding hair lines part of why the whole shaved head look is so in, they have no other choice! kids today have shit diets and that most likely has a big factor on the hair loss. Actually we are seeing humans devolve now. Morals and values have never been so bad, respect to one's fellow man is at an all time low.
It ain't looking good...
-
How is dramatic? People have been walking around for thousands a cand thousand of years and losing hair all over their bodies the entire time?
Why are you calling people dumbass?
dumbass, shithead, asshole, negro, kuntface. It's all interchangeable. I decided to use dumbass for that post. Will use some other derogatory word in my next post. It is my way of showing some love.
-
I don't care as long as we look anything similar to this...
-
I don't care as long as we look anything similar to this...
Why does this new species of human have such huge traps?
-
Why does this new species of human have such huge traps?
have you ever cracked one off?
-
have you ever cracked one off?
more times than I can count but I don't squeeze my traps.
-
It's easy to see. I went to the catacombs/crypts in Rome and those little skeletons and graves looked like yoda. And that's only 500 years ago for the monk skeletons.
-
It's not evolution. It's our bodies slowly ageing due to "wear and tear" i.e oxidative damage, and RNA transcription mutations.
...and i vaguely remember reading a new hypothesis/discovery in regards to the function/purpose of the appendix.
-
Maybe it's time for Dutchguy, Phd in evolutionary biology, to give some lectures to the getbig kiddies...?
Or even better: ask Wes.
-
The remnants of our tail is the Coccyx correct? Wtf did we need a tail for? What do religious people say to the fact that humans once had a tail? Some people still have that weird tail to this day. Remember George in the movie Shallow Hal? I think that is a real condition.
-
The remnants of our tail is the Coccyx correct? Wtf did we need a tail for? What do religious people say to the fact that humans once had a tail? Some people still have that weird tail to this day. Remember George in the movie Shallow Hal? I think that is a real condition.
Remnant indeed. We don't need it. But there's no natural selection against a coccyx. So it may disappear eventually with random genetic drift May take 100,000ths of years...
-
Take for example male pattern baldness. Obviously science can explain how we lose our hair, but the question is why? Does nature see it that humans no longer need to have excessive bodyhair? Will everyone be bald in 10,000 years? What about the remnants of a tail that we all have? What about the appendix? Why has it become a useless organ? Let's discuss our slow transformation into aliens.
I agree with everything except that part. Surgeons have termed it useless. It actually does play a role in the body. In todays society, a woman gets a hysterectomy, the surgeon says "what the hell" and takes out the appendix. Guess what? HE GETS PAID EXTRA for that. No one ever fights that. No one questions that. They just say "Meh, well, he is the surgeon after all".
-
Remnant indeed. We don't need it. But there's no natural selection against a coccyx. So it may disappear eventually with random genetic drift May take 100,000ths of years...
The same for head hair I would assume.
-
It's not evolution. It's our bodies slowly ageing due to "wear and tear" i.e oxidative damage, and RNA transcription mutations.
...and i vaguely remember reading a new hypothesis/discovery in regards to the function/purpose of the appendix.
Evolution or the result of the chemical shit we all put in our bodies (colors, fillers, binders, 1-methylcyclopropene, etc)
-
I agree with everything except that part. Surgeons have termed it useless. It actually does play a role in the body. In todays society, a woman gets a hysterectomy, the surgeon says "what the hell" and takes out the appendix. Guess what? HE GETS PAID EXTRA for that. No one ever fights that. No one questions that. They just say "Meh, well, he is the surgeon after all".
Thats the point. Today, the appendix is useless, but i'm sure it served a function in yesteryear. Same goes for the Coccyx. Could we have been monkeys with tails? I have never seen anything on this topic before.
-
Head hair is more complicated. Full head of hair means youth means strenght and virility. But male balding indicates testosterone, meaning strength and virility too. But the opposite could also be true: virile men have more test, and as a complication they get bald sooner. Not every fenotypic trait can be explained evolutionary. Sometimes shit just happens. These virile men impregnate many women even before they get bald. What happend to a body after most of the reproduction phase has no evolutionary impact.... :D
-
Evolution is bullshit. People have not evolved in thousands of years. Case in point:
(http://www.betternetworker.com/files/imagecache/gallery_full/usergalleries/40685/sidechest.gif)
-
Take for example male pattern baldness. Obviously science can explain how we lose our hair, but the question is why? Does nature see it that humans no longer need to have excessive bodyhair? Will everyone be bald in 10,000 years? What about the remnants of a tail that we all have? What about the appendix? Why has it become a useless organ? Let's discuss our slow transformation into aliens.
here's the future ;D ;D
-
here's the future ;D ;D
wider than heath.
-
I would say there are less bald people now days. I am 31 and have a lucious head of hair. Most people I know or hang with have full heads of hair. I'd say it's the other way around. People with hair are seen as more attractive , thus more breeding.
Reading your post sounds like your a woman,with woman friends...
-
I don't care as long as we look anything similar to this...
negroid structure with white skin. Future of humanity.
-
Thats the point. Today, the appendix is useless, but i'm sure it served a function in yesteryear. Same goes for the Coccyx. Could we have been monkeys with tails? I have never seen anything on this topic before.
its not useless you dumbass it acts as a lymphnode, when it gets inflamed people get it taken out rather than changing there diet
just like tonsils, if they become inflamed people take them out rather than changing there diet
you are so damn ignorant!
-
I can`t believe how stupid the majority of people are in regards to simple Science. Its really disheartening to see such ignorance so blatant and unrelenting.
-
Great thread, you guys all brought up some interesting points. Here's another- why are humans the only (nearly) hairless Primate? Especially females even more so. And why do we have webbing between our fingers? Other primates don't. Sounds like there was something unique that humans went through..
-
Great thread, you guys all brought up some interesting points. Here's another- why are humans the only (nearly) hairless Primate? Especially females even more so. And why do we have webbing between our fingers? Other primates don't. Sounds like there was something unique that humans went through..
The aquatic ape horseshit has been debunked.
We still also have all our hair it's just far finer than it ever was.
Anyhow brazil is the future, soon we will loose all conception of race and directly after that will come the age of the tranny.
-
In order for baldness to ascend, bald men have to father more children...
-
Well the threads on getbig are getting shittier so maybe not ::)
-
My cock has hair on it, its a bitch to use a razor on it...
-
The aquatic ape horseshit has been debunked.
We still also have all our hair it's just far finer than it ever was.
Anyhow brazil is the future, soon we will loose all conception of race and directly after that will come the age of the tranny.
I guess you don't live in a America, do you?
Brazil is the future in terms of looks for the US, but then, you went off target.
-
Anyhow brazil is the future,
What, favelas and death squads? Cool!
-
Great thread, you guys all brought up some interesting points. Here's another- why are humans the only (nearly) hairless Primate? Especially females even more so. And why do we have webbing between our fingers? Other primates don't. Sounds like there was something unique that humans went through..
Did you watch that special on Mermaids?
-
They made an interesting point on the whole "water ape" theory. Is it that far fetched to think that a species of our ancestors branched off into the water and stayed there? It's not so unbelievable when you take into account that the killer whale has wolf ancestors on land. They also brought up a cool fact that we can see today. The Polar bear was in the grizzly family. It branched off and slowly has adapted to it's environment (webbed front claws etc...) they say that eventually, the Polar bear will convert to the water completely. Pretty cool stuff. Anyone know of any more examples?
-
They made an interesting point on the whole "water ape" theory. Is it that far fetched to think that a species of our ancestors branched off into the water and stayed there? It's not so unbelievable when you take into account that the killer whale has wolf ancestors on land. They also brought up a cool fact that we can see today. The Polar bear was in the grizzly family. It branched off and slowly has adapted to it's environment (webbed front claws etc...) they say that eventually, the Polar bear will convert to the water completely. Pretty cool stuff. Anyone know of any more examples?
Do I think our ancestors were mermaids? No. But what, 95% or more of humans are (and always have been) living at the water's edge? Where did ancient civilisations spring up? All deltas and sea coasts. So some minor adaptations are to be expected.
-
is it will make a bald guy feel better if hes told that in 10000 years everyone will be bald, then so be it
-
They made an interesting point on the whole "water ape" theory. Is it that far fetched to think that a species of our ancestors branched off into the water and stayed there? It's not so unbelievable when you take into account that the killer whale has wolf ancestors on land. They also brought up a cool fact that we can see today. The Polar bear was in the grizzly family. It branched off and slowly has adapted to it's environment (webbed front claws etc...) they say that eventually, the Polar bear will convert to the water completely. Pretty cool stuff. Anyone know of any more examples?
Well you've also got your mother, who after moving into my shed for 4 weeks developed hard skin on her knees to adapt to the intense fellation routine
-
Did you watch that special on Mermaids?
Go suck on a coccyx!
HTH :D
-
I would say there are less bald people now days. I am 31 and have a lucious head of hair. Most people I know or hang with have full heads of hair. I'd say it's the other way around. People with hair are seen as more attractive , thus more breeding.
Better hair pieces, plugs, all sorts of creams (check the steroid section). Plus beginning baldies now shave their heads to mask the problem. This wasn't done 40 years ago (or even 20).
-
They made an interesting point on the whole "water ape" theory. Is it that far fetched to think that a species of our ancestors branched off into the water and stayed there? It's not so unbelievable when you take into account that the killer whale has wolf ancestors on land. They also brought up a cool fact that we can see today. The Polar bear was in the grizzly family. It branched off and slowly has adapted to it's environment (webbed front claws etc...) they say that eventually, the Polar bear will convert to the water completely. Pretty cool stuff. Anyone know of any more examples?
That's if it still has it's environmnt, or if it is still around...A lot of the megafauna of the Pliestocene are not here...you know Cave Bears that would make the Polar it's little brother, and Dire Wolves, and Irish Elk with antlers wide as hell and of course the Smilodon.
-
most of the time evolution means technological and scientific evolution . 15 years ago we could not discuss here . but that doesnt mean that much ..