Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The_Hammer on July 16, 2012, 04:05:56 PM
-
Well, not actually according to Forbes. What a f*cking tight wad!
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/ (http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/)
(http://blogs-images.forbes.com/rickungar/files/2012/05/MW-AR658_spendi_20120521163312_ME.jpg)
-
But Rush Limbaugh and FOX NEWS said he was spending $200 million per day for his trips to India!
No way they'd lie!
[/youtube]
-
Did you know that Mitt Romney donated 4 million, or 19% of his salary to charity last year, while Biden only donated $300, or .0013 of his salary?
-
Did you know that Mitt Romney donated 4 million, or 19% of his salary to charity last year, while Biden only donated $300, or .0013 of his salary?
&feature=plcp[/youtube]
-
&feature=plcp[/youtube]
And, it's about 4 million more than bothe the POTUS and his lap dog combined, gimmick.
-
Did you know that Mitt Romney donated 4 million, or 19% of his salary to charity last year, while Biden only donated $300, or .0013 of his salary?
Considering that Romney has a quarter billion dollars and Biden's net worth is under 500,000 dollars....it really falls to the waist side.
One thing is for sure. Romney is a lot better at managing money than Biden...he's fucking horrible at it
-
Considering that Romney has a quarter billion dollars and Biden's net worth is under 500,000 dollars....it really falls to the waist side.
One thing is for sure. Romney is a lot better at managing money than Biden...he's fucking horrible at it
But Mitt Romney made a lot of money at the expense of a lot of blue collar, working class folks when he destroyed their jobs and pension plans.
&feature=plcp[/youtube]
-
But Mitt Romney made a lot of money at the expense of a lot of blue collar, working class folks when he destroyed their jobs and pension plans.
&feature=plcp[/youtube]
Obama supporters are in NO position to talk about Mitt Romney and destroying jobs, when their guy has 42 straight months of at least 8% unemployment.
How many people got laid off when Solyndra and all those other "green" job debacles went belly up?
-
But Mitt Romney made a lot of money at the expense of a lot of blue collar, working class folks when he destroyed their jobs and pension plans.
&feature=plcp[/youtube]
That sucks. This is 2012, no one gives a shit about blue collar workers. That is why we have underdeveloped shithole countries to do this work for us. Oh, you didn't want to get a college degree and would rather be in a greedy union and make $40/hr doing a bullshit job some uneducated chinese child can do... fuck off. You deserve to be unemployed.
-
what to beleive the obscure statistics source
or the mainstream media
-
what to beleive the obscure statistics source
or the mainstream media
Forbes is an obscure source?
-
That sucks. This is 2012, no one gives a shit about blue collar workers. That is why we have underdeveloped shithole countries to do this work for us. Oh, you didn't want to get a college degree and would rather be in a greedy union and make $40/hr doing a bullshit job some uneducated chinese child can do... fuck off. You deserve to be unemployed.
The working class/middle class are the backbone of this country!
&feature=plcp[/youtube]
-
The working class/middle class are the backbone of this country!
&feature=plcp[/youtube]
And Obama waffled them with the biggest tax hike in history, known as ObamaCare. Ask the vets; their premiums will go up FOURFOLD. 75% of all costs for this mess hit those under $120K. And contrary to all the rhetoric, you can't always keep your plan or doctor if you like them.
-
President Obama wants to take a similar approach as Bill Clinton in taxing the wealthy and cutting taxes for the middle class.
[/youtube]
-
But Rush Limbaugh and FOX NEWS said he was spending $200 million per day for his trips to India!
No way they'd lie!
[/youtube]
and i bet the idiots that watch fox new believe that...idiosts...200 million ina day lol
-
and i bet the idiots that watch fox new believe that...idiosts...200 million ina day lol
You don't exactly glow with intellect. Are you black?
-
You don't exactly glow with intellect. Are you black?
I wouldn't dignify this ignorant question with a response.
Fight ignorance!
-
Well, not actually according to Forbes. What a f*cking tight wad!
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/ (http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/)
(http://blogs-images.forbes.com/rickungar/files/2012/05/MW-AR658_spendi_20120521163312_ME.jpg)
I wouldnt put too much stock in what this homo says
-
You don't exactly glow with intellect. Are you black?
How would you know? How many posts have you actually read of mine on here to determine if I am intelligent or not? ::) ::)
-
The question of whether or not Obama is great is a moot point. He is still so many light years better and more preferable than Romney that it isn't even funny.
Good job, republicans.
-
Considering that Romney has a quarter billion dollars and Biden's net worth is under 500,000 dollars....it really falls to the waist side.
One thing is for sure. Romney is a lot better at managing money than Biden...he's fucking horrible at it
1. Bullshit, he's worth a hell of a lot more than that.
2. If he isn't maybe should start a business so he can make more.
Simple,.isn't it?
-
Well, not actually according to Forbes. What a f*cking tight wad!
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/ (http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/)
(http://blogs-images.forbes.com/rickungar/files/2012/05/MW-AR658_spendi_20120521163312_ME.jpg)
-
Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower? Would You Believe It's Barack Obama? (Forbes Online)
It’s enough to make even the most ardent Obama cynic scratch his head in confusion.
Amidst all the cries of Barack Obama being the most prolific big government spender the nation has ever suffered, Marketwatch is reporting that our president has actually been tighter with a buck than any United States president since Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Who knew?
Check out the chart –
(http://blogs-images.forbes.com/rickungar/files/2012/05/MW-AR658_spendi_20120521163312_ME.jpg)
So, how have the Republicans managed to persuade Americans to buy into the whole “Obama as big spender” narrative?
It might have something to do with the first year of the Obama presidency where the federal budget increased a whopping 17.9% —going from $2.98 trillion to $3.52 trillion. I’ll bet you think that this is the result of the Obama sponsored stimulus plan that is so frequently vilified by the conservatives…but you would be wrong.
The first year of any incoming president term is saddled—for better or for worse—with the budget set by the president whom immediately precedes the new occupant of the White House. Indeed, not only was the 2009 budget the property of George W. Bush—and passed by the 2008 Congress—it was in effect four months before Barack Obama took the oath of office.
Accordingly, the first budget that can be blamed on our current president began in 2010 with the budgets running through and including including fiscal year 2013 standing as charges on the Obama account, even if a President Willard M. Romney takes over the office on January 20, 2013.
So, how do the actual Obama annual budgets look?
Courtesy of Marketwatch-
In fiscal 2010 (the first Obama budget) spending fell 1.8% to $3.46 trillion.
In fiscal 2011, spending rose 4.3% to $3.60 trillion.
In fiscal 2012, spending is set to rise 0.7% to $3.63 trillion, according to the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate of the budget that was agreed to last August.
Finally in fiscal 2013 — the final budget of Obama’s term — spending is scheduled to fall 1.3% to $3.58 trillion. Read the CBO’s latest budget outlook.
No doubt, many will wish to give the credit to the efforts of the GOP controlled House of Representatives. That’s fine if that’s what works for you.
However, you don’t get to have it both ways. Credit whom you will, but if you are truly interested in a fair analysis of the Obama years to date—at least when it comes to spending—you’re going to have to acknowledge that under the Obama watch, even President Reagan would have to give our current president a thumbs up when it comes to his record for stretching a dollar.
-
This was posted in forbes a month later: http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/06/14/president-obama-the-biggest-government-spender-in-world-history/
"President Obama’s own 2013 budget shows that as a result federal debt held by the public will double during Obama’s four years as President. That means in just one term President Obama will have increased the national debt as much as all prior Presidents, from George Washington to George Bush, combined
-
The dollar is nearing its end.
Obama(or better the "people" he represents) is just putting the pedal to the metal.
-
Well, not actually according to Forbes. What a f*cking tight wad!
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/ (http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/)
(http://blogs-images.forbes.com/rickungar/files/2012/05/MW-AR658_spendi_20120521163312_ME.jpg)
This was debunked a million times several months ago.
Stay current, please!
This was posted in forbes a month later: http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/06/14/president-obama-the-biggest-government-spender-in-world-history/
"President Obama’s own 2013 budget shows that as a result federal debt held by the public will double during Obama’s four years as President. That means in just one term President Obama will have increased the national debt as much as all prior Presidents, from George Washington to George Bush, combined
-
Yes...the study cited by Forbes assigns spending passed after Bush left office (spending he had vowed to veto) to Bush rather than Obama.
-