Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: the trainer on July 23, 2012, 12:54:06 PM
-
Because i am a big strong bodybuilder who trains the dangerous art of karate and knows dim mak the death touch, one simple touch in your pressure point and you can be knocked out or killed depending on what i want to do to you, so get down to the dojo and leave the guns alone.
-
;D feel lucky punk
-
;D feel lucky punk
just kidding i'm not a fan of guns either. ;D ;D
-
just kidding i'm not a fan of guns either. ;D ;D
see you at the dojo :)
-
Because i am a big strong bodybuilder who trains the dangerous art of karate and knows dim mak the death touch, one simple touch in your pressure point and you can be knocked out or killed depending on what i want to do to you, so get down to the dojo and leave the guns alone.
I just showed my bullets your post, and they started laughing histerically. ;D
-
Because i am a big strong bodybuilder who trains the dangerous art of karate and knows dim mak the death touch, one simple touch in your pressure point and you can be knocked out or killed depending on what i want to do to you, so get down to the dojo and leave the guns alone.
[post forwarded to Special Operations Command]
(http://www.specialoperations.com/Focus/Official/socomlogo.gif)
-
I just showed my bullets your post, and they started laughing histerically. ;D
I just showed my old english teacher your post and she started crying hysterically ;D
-
I just showed my old english teacher your post and she started crying hysterically ;D
Boom, you got me. :D
-
Gunz are good. Come into my home uninvited and feel the gunz.
-
Yes, but having a Firearm, it's usually enough by just SHOWING your firearm to deterr these individuals.
When you have trained Tapout and begun following the code of "No Firearms", you have to resort to physical violence for the thugs, thieves and bangers to understand.
-
Yes, but having a Firearm, it's usually enough by just SHOWING your firearm to deterr these individuals.
When you have trained Tapout and begun following the code of "No Firearms", you have to resort to physical violence for the thugs, thieves and bangers to understand.
I disagree a big 255lbs bodybuilder with traps like a bull, thugs normally think twice about messing with me.
-
I disagree a big 255lbs bodybuilder with traps like a bull, thugs normally think twice about messing with me.
Youre right, they'd rather just laugh and shoot you. ;D
-
Youre right, they'd rather just laugh and shoot you. ;D
I do not need to touch my enemy to knock him out i use my inner chi watch and learn
&feature=related
-
I do not need to touch my enemy to knock him out i use my inner chi watch and learn
&feature=related
Pshhaaa.
Have Chuck Norris teach you the secret of the bearded fist, you'll never need anything else.
-
Because i am a big strong bodybuilder who trains the dangerous art of karate and knows dim mak the death touch, one simple touch in your pressure point and you can be knocked out or killed depending on what i want to do to you, so get down to the dojo and leave the guns alone.
I will knock you right the fuck out.
-
I will knock you right the fuck out.
Serious stuff right here
-
Serious stuff right here
Yes with YAGR seemingly missing someone needs to keep a tight ship around here.
-
I will knock you right the fuck out.
If you try that shit this is what will happen to you.
&feature=related
-
If you try that shit this is what will happen to you.
&feature=related
:D :D :D^^^
-
lol
-
I do not need to touch my enemy to knock him out i use my inner chi watch and learn
&feature=related
And it works with burglars too ?
-
-
Boom, you got me. :D
;D
-
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity."
Sigmund Freud
General Introduction to Psychoanalysis.
-
Could be - maybe a sign of not being willing or able to defend one self or fight in general?
-
>America in charge of not having school shootings
-
>America in charge of not having school shootings
Because its just such a common occurance to have some crazy person shoot up a school.
It happens now and then, people are acting people are slaughtering classrooms of children everyday.
Jesus Christ.
-
There have been 31 school shootings in America since columbine. There has only been 14 worldwide combined.
There's always a ton of coverage in Canada about these shooting, even cutting out songs on the radio because it's called "die young. " But I say fuck all you morons. I stopped caring the day you killed Dimebag Darrell.
-
"it is a characteristic of human nature to be inclined to regard anything which is disagreeable as untrue and then without much difficulty to find arguments against it ."
Sigmund Freud
.
-
A fear that the government wants to take your guns so that they can take over and let "the gays lose" is a sign of self-loathing homosexuality.
~mindspin~
Random Thoughts of Brilliance
-
The obsessive desire to own guns is a sign of being stuck in the phallic stage of development, the Oedipus complex is in full flight, and the realisation that one cannot kill their father and fuck their mother leads some to become obsessed with having a bigger penis in the false hope they can finally achieve their aim of fucking their mother. Realising this is an impossibility they turn to phallic symbols, guns being the most powerful phallic symbol their is, these poor souls stuck in this stage of psychosexual development fill their lives with as many guns as they can, they obsess over their guns, they constantly talk about them, they play with them and derive great solace from this activity. The only way for the man-child to move beyond this stage is to identify with the same-sex parent as a means of vicariously possessing the Mother. - Sigmund Freud
-
The obsessive desire to own guns is a sign of being stuck in the phallic stage of development, the Oedipus complex is in full flight, and the realisation that one cannot kill their father and fuck their mother leads some to become obsessed with having a bigger penis in the false hope they can finally achieve their aim of fucking their mother. Realising this is an impossibility they turn to phallic symbols, guns being the most powerful phallic symbol their is, these poor souls stuck in this stage of psychosexual development fill their lives with as many guns as they can, they obsess over their guns, they constantly talk about them, they play with them and derive great solace from this activity. The only way for the man-child to move beyond this stage is to identify with the same-sex parent as a means of vicariously possessing the Mother. - Sigmund Freud
I picture you cowering in the corner, looking for extra foam padding to line your jock strap. I can't help it...it's all I can see when I read whatever whine-fest you've recently typed
-
Because its just such a common occurance to have some crazy person shoot up a school.
It happens now and then, people are acting people are slaughtering classrooms of children everyday.
Jesus Christ.
It is pretty common, at least twice a year
-
I picture you cowering in the corner, looking for extra foam padding to line your jock strap. I can't help it...it's all I can see when I read whatever whine-fest you've recently typed
Seriously, only poster that can make anything he posts sound like he's practically on the ground begging for mercy.
I've never encountered another person (online or in person) that comes across as such a bitter, sniveling, cowering wretch of a human being.
-
It is pretty common, at least twice a year
Really? People walk into elementary schools twice a year and gun down classrooms full of kids?
School shootings may happen twice a year, but 99 times out of 100, its some punk ass banger that walks in and shoots some dude that disrespected him.
-
The obsessive desire to own guns is a sign of being stuck in the phallic stage of development, the Oedipus complex is in full flight, and the realisation that one cannot kill their father and fuck their mother leads some to become obsessed with having a bigger penis in the false hope they can finally achieve their aim of fucking their mother. Realising this is an impossibility they turn to phallic symbols, guns being the most powerful phallic symbol their is, these poor souls stuck in this stage of psychosexual development fill their lives with as many guns as they can, they obsess over their guns, they constantly talk about them, they play with them and derive great solace from this activity. The only way for the man-child to move beyond this stage is to identify with the same-sex parent as a means of vicariously possessing the Mother. - Sigmund Freud
You're starting to become the Pussy version of Uberman. You might actually be well below Uberman. At least he has balls, and isn't afraid of a fight. You on the other hand exude pussification 99% of the time.
-
It is pretty common, at least twice a year
School shootings are very rare
Fifty-five million kids went to school on the day that 20 were massacred at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut. Even in the United States, therefore, the chances of a child’s dying in a school shooting are remote. As my friend Steven Pinker demonstrates in his monumental study of human violence, The Better Angels of Our Nature, our perception of danger is easily distorted by rare events. Is gun violence increasing in the United States? No. But it certainly seems to be when one recalls recent atrocities in Newtown and Aurora. In fact, the overall rate of violent crime has fallen by 22 percent in the past decade (and 18 percent in the past five years).
20 children out of 55 MILLION , I don't want to down play the loss of 20 children however facts are facts , these events are extremely rare.
-
Hahahahahaha yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Could be - maybe a sign of not being willing or able to defend one self or fight in general?
Knowing how to fight won't help against a mugger/killer/gangbanger with a gun.
-
-
Anti gun people always ask " What do you need an AR15 for with a 30 round magazine? "
Very easy to answer , for lawful protection of self and others
-
Anti gun people always ask " What do you need an AR15 for with a 30 round magazine? "
Very easy to answer , for lawful protection of self and others
Thats stupid and immature. The home owner should have just called the cops and waited for the real professionals to arrive in 10-15 minutes.
-
Thats stupid and immature. The home owner should have just called the cops and waited for the real professionals to arrive in 10-15 minutes.
I disagree.
A real man fights with his hands so he should have just bum-rushed those Ne'er-do-wells with some right hook combinations.
-
There have been 31 school shootings in America since columbine. There has only been 14 worldwide combined.
And then there is the fear of math......
-
I picture you cowering in the corner, looking for extra foam padding to line your jock strap. I can't help it...it's all I can see when I read whatever whine-fest you've recently typed
Struck a nerve did I, it comes as no surprise that those child-men who feel so desperately insecure and fearful to the point of having to secure a person arsenal of guns will project onto others their desperate insecurity and fear to divert attention away from their deep lack of masculinity. Owning and obsessing over guns is a fail safe way to communicate to others that you are desperately afraid and live in fear. For women to do this, it is understandable, for men to do it, it is embarrassing.
-
I picture you cowering in the corner, looking for extra foam padding to line your jock strap. I can't help it...it's all I can see when I read whatever whine-fest you've recently typed
You're starting to become the Pussy version of Uberman. You might actually be well below Uberman. At least he has balls, and isn't afraid of a fight. You on the other hand exude pussification 99% of the time.
Struck a nerve did I, it comes as no surprise that those child-men who feel so desperately insecure and fearful to the point of having to secure a person arsenal of guns will project onto others their desperate insecurity and fear to divert attention away from their deep lack of masculinity. Owning and obsessing over guns is a fail safe way to communicate to others that you are desperately afraid and live in fear. For women to do this, it is understandable, for men to do it, it is embarrassing. Only men who don't know how to use their wits and brawn feel a fervent desire to own GUNS. Needing GUNS is the surest sign that you are a massive pussy!
-
Struck a nerve did I, it comes as no surprise that those child-men who feel so desperately insecure and fearful to the point of having to secure a person arsenal of guns will project onto others their desperate insecurity and fear to divert attention away from their deep lack of masculinity. Owning and obsessing over guns is a fail safe way to communicate to others that you are desperately afraid and live in fear. For women to do this, it is understandable, for men to do it, it is embarrassing.
amen
-
Kind of weird that those men who openly advertise their deep fear and insecurity and admit that they need a gun because they are afraid accuse those men who openly admit they are bold and strong enough to traverse life without Guns as being massive pussies. perhaps they remain unconscious of their lack of manliness and this is why they regularly project it onto others. Kind of like they child who needs a night light to sleep getting defensive when the other kids tease him for his insecurity. lol at insecure pussies calling other men a pussy!
Imagine that you are a weak man and overcompensate for this weakness by owning GUNS, when others tell you that you don't need a gun to be a man and that you will be OK without GUNS you then tell everyone that you desperately need the gun to feel like a man and that you acknowledge that you are a massive pussy because of this. It makes perfect sense that someone this insecure would accuse others of being a pussy for pointing out their deep lack of masculinity.
-
Kind of weird that those men who openly advertise their deep fear and insecurity and admit that they need a gun because they are afraid accuse those men who openly admit they are bold and strong enough to traverse life without Guns as being massive pussies. perhaps they remain unconscious of their lack of manliness and this is why they regularly project it onto others. Kind of like they child who needs a night light to sleep getting defensive when the other kids tease him for his insecurity. lol at insecure pussies calling other men a pussy!
Imagine that you are a weak man and overcompensate for this weakness by owning GUNS, when others tell you that you don't need a gun to be a man and that you will be OK without GUNS you then tell everyone that you desperately need the gun to feel like a man and that you acknowledge that you are a massive pussy because of this. It makes perfect sense that someone this insecure would accuse others of being a pussy for pointing out their deep lack of masculinity.
A lot of gun owners could beat the everloving shit out of you without the help of said gun.
-
A lot of gun owners could beat the everloving shit out of you without the help of said gun.
lol at gun nuts unable to stop advertising their deep insecurities.
-
A lot of gun owners could beat the everloving shit out of you without the help of said gun.
Maybe I should buy a gun then, that makes me feel kind of scared.
-
lol at gun owners unable to stop advertising their deep insecurities.
It's not about insecurities. There are plenty of big, fast, powerful men who can drop almost any average joe on the street. I'm talking about boxers, nfl, nba, etc. players that carry.
Not to mention some pretty bad ass killers on the wrong side of the law.
-
It's not about insecurities. There are plenty of big, fast, powerful men who can drop almost any average joe on the street. I'm talking about boxers, nfl, nba, etc. players that carry.
Not to mention some pretty bad ass killers on the wrong side of the law.
It doesn't matter how big and tough they are, it is their fear of being dominated by somebody bigger and stronger. I know quite a few really strong big tough men who are terrified of a beat down, some will admit and some wont. What makes a man a man is his willingness to fight somebody bigger and stronger and accept a beat-down if that is indeed the outcome. Those that are unable to face another man the old fashioned way and throw down and resort to needing a gun show signs of insecurity. The real question is, does owning a a gun help you defend yourself in real life situations, I would argue NO, and in some situations will make you more vulnerable.
I am sure many of the thousands of people gunned down each year are gun owners. Just man up and walk through life and face your fears, sometimes you might lose a fight or two, but that's life. Essentially the whole argument is, I own a gun because my neighbour does, and because my neighbour owns a gun he may have the upper hand. So what, their will always be insecure douchbeags who try and get the upper hand over other men. Essentially I think the obsessive lust for guns for so called protection is an unconscious fear of death. Just be prepared to die, I know I am, everyday of my life.
In Japan, a Country with a strong warrior background, they deeply respect a man who is obviously weaker than another fighting passionately and without fear even though him losing is almost inevitable. That's why they love a FREAK Fight, a much larger man against a smaller man. The Japanese often heap more respect and praise on a fighter who is obviously the weaker opponent fighting valiantly and losing than the bigger better fighter who wins, simply because the guy who won was expected too. The character of a man is determined by how he fights a stronger opponent.
-
It doesn't matter how big and tough they are, it is their fear of being dominated by somebody bigger and stronger. I know quite a few really strong big tough men who are terrified of a beat down, some will admit and some wont. What makes a man a man is his willingness to fight somebody bigger and stronger and accept a beat-down if that is indeed the outcome. Those that are unable to face another man the old fashioned way and throw down and resort to needing a gun show signs of insecurity. The real question is, does owning a a gun help you defend yourself in real life situations, I would argue NO, and in some situations will make you more vulnerable.
I am sure many of the thousands of people gunned down each year are gun owners. Just man up and walk through life and face your fears, sometimes you might lose a fight or two, but that's life. Essentially the whole argument is, I own a gun because my neighbour does, and because my neighbour owns a gun he may have the upper hand. So what, their will always be insecure douchbeags who try and get the upper hand over other men. Essentially I think the obsessive lust for guns for so called protection is an unconscious fear of death. Just be prepared to die, I know I am, everyday of my life.
What fucking man is going to walk up to an NFL linebacker and demand his wallet without a weapon?
These fucking punks aren't playing by your "rules". In this world, there are people who are evil and have no intentions fighting fair just because you do.
-
What fucking man is going to walk up to an NFL linebacker and demand his wallet without a weapon?
These fucking punks aren't playing by your "rules". In this world, there are people who are evil and have no intentions fighting fair just because you do.
So what, just hand over your wallet. No need to play the macho man at every turn in life. Some days you lose, simple. If being mugged happened to you every day of your life, then yes, get a gun. But to weapon up based on the paranoid belief that you are constantly in danger is a sure sign that maybe you are scared of even your own shadow.
And you prove my point, of course the weaker more insecure man is going to need a gun to face a bigger stronger man in order to dominate him. If all he wants is your wallet, then give it too him.
-
So what, just hand over your wallet. No need to play the macho man at every turn in life. Some days you lose, simple. If being mugged happened to you every day of your life, then yes, get a gun. But to weapon up based on the paranoid belief that you are constantly in danger is a sure sign that maybe you are scared of even your own shadow.
Oh I see. We should fight for what be think is right whether we win or lose AND bend over and take it in the ass sometimes so as not to be macho all the time.
That clears it up.
-
Kind of weird that those men who openly advertise their deep fear and insecurity and admit that they need a gun because they are afraid accuse those men who openly admit they are bold and strong enough to traverse life without Guns as being massive pussies. perhaps they remain unconscious of their lack of manliness and this is why they regularly project it onto others. Kind of like they child who needs a night light to sleep getting defensive when the other kids tease him for his insecurity. lol at insecure pussies calling other men a pussy!
Imagine that you are a weak man and overcompensate for this weakness by owning GUNS, when others tell you that you don't need a gun to be a man and that you will be OK without GUNS you then tell everyone that you desperately need the gun to feel like a man and that you acknowledge that you are a massive pussy because of this. It makes perfect sense that someone this insecure would accuse others of being a pussy for pointing out their deep lack of masculinity.
Dude, aren't you crippled?
-
Dude, aren't you crippled?
Perhaps mentally.
-
Dude, aren't you crippled?
NO
-
Kind of weird that those men who openly advertise their deep fear and insecurity and admit that they need a gun because they are afraid accuse those men who openly admit they are bold and strong enough to traverse life without Guns as being massive pussies. perhaps they remain unconscious of their lack of manliness and this is why they regularly project it onto others. Kind of like they child who needs a night light to sleep getting defensive when the other kids tease him for his insecurity. lol at insecure pussies calling other men a pussy!
Imagine that you are a weak man and overcompensate for this weakness by owning GUNS, when others tell you that you don't need a gun to be a man and that you will be OK without GUNS you then tell everyone that you desperately need the gun to feel like a man and that you acknowledge that you are a massive pussy because of this. It makes perfect sense that someone this insecure would accuse others of being a pussy for pointing out their deep lack of masculinity.
200 word diatribes =
(http://assets.techdreams.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/nuclear_meltdown.jpg)
-
So what, just hand over your wallet. No need to play the macho man at every turn in life. Some days you lose, simple. If being mugged happened to you every day of your life, then yes, get a gun. But to weapon up based on the paranoid belief that you are constantly in danger is a sure sign that maybe you are scared of even your own shadow.
And you prove my point, of course the weaker more insecure man is going to need a gun to face a bigger stronger man in order to dominate him. If all he wants is your wallet, then give it too him.
Fucking christ man, you're more of a pussy than I thought. Would you seriously hand somebody your wallet if they threatened to beat the shit out of you? Were you castrated at birth, or did it happen later on in life? :D
-
Oh I see. We should fight for what be think is right whether we win or lose AND bend over and take it in the ass sometimes so as not to be macho all the time.
That clears it up.
Sometimes you have no choice, whether you like it or not, you are just as vulnerable as the next man, what are you going to do if a Tsunami hits or an Earthquake, are you going to man up and go get in it's face, whip your dick out and go come on guy, I'll fight you. It's just insanity, this is male ego gone mad, masking their vulnerability with bravado. Accept that in you life their will be times of suffering, defeat and yes, you will grow old and die. Welcome to the real world. If you want to Clint Eastwood it through your life, good luck. The fact is man is easily destroyed by microscopic bacteria, the whole macho act is just that, an illusion.
-
Fucking christ man, you're more of a pussy than I thought. Would you seriously hand somebody your wallet if they threatened to beat the shit out of you? Were you castrated at birth, or did it happen later on in life? :D
See, here in lies the problem, you twisted what was said, the premise was a man walks up to you with a gun and threatened your life unless you handed over your wallet, this scenario is far different to the one you are proposing. So no, I would relish the opportunity t beat down some punk who confronted me one on one with no weapons and demanded my wallet. And yes, my life is more important to me than my wallet, and yes, I would just simply hand over my wallet. It takes brains to determine when the odds aren't in your favour. Losing ones life only happens once, you don't get a second chance to try another tact.
-
Ekul, are you a lesbian? Serious question. By the way you view certain topics, talk, type, and try to belittle regular testosterone filled men, I'm beginning to think you're not a man. I'm being serious here. Are you a girl? I'm starting to picture you as a feminist lesbian man-hater. It's all starting to make sense now. :D
-
Ekul, are you a lesbian? Serious question. By the way you view certain topics, talk, type, and try to belittle regular testosterone filled men, I'm beginning to think you're not a man. I'm being serious here. Are you a girl? I'm starting to picture you as a feminist lesbian man-hater. It's all starting to make sense now. :D
I don't attempt to belittle men at all, I merely speak my opinion, if other men feel emasculated by this, then this is proof of what I have been saying, it is common knowledge amongst men that insecure men will attempt to bolster their masculinity by means such as guns and knives.(eg: hence the reason young men form gangs and use guns and knives). I find your post rather ironic, as you talk about how only a lesbian feminist man hater would attempt to belittle other men and then you overtly attempt to emasculate me by calling me a lesbian feminist man hater. The irony will probably be lost on you. I have the deepest respect for REAL men, but pseudo men who mask their lack of masculinity with an arsenal of guns, a constant ranting of why they need these guns because they are afraid and scared and then their denial of their fear and insecurity when challenged, this type of machismo does a genuine disservice to masculinity in general.
Real men, if they felt a genuine need to own a gun, would do so without anybody else ever knowing, they wouldn't advertise the fact, constantly rant on about the second amendment, their love of assault rifles, how they are afraid of corrupt Governments, gangbangers and home invaders. They would just be a man, put their gun in the gun safe and SHUT THE FUCK UP!
-
I don't attempt to belittle men at all, I merely speak my opinion, if other men feel emasculated by this, then this is proof of what I have been saying, it is common knowledge amongst men that insecure men will attempt to bolster their masculinity by means such as guns and knives.(eg: hence the reason young men form gangs and use guns and knives). I find your post rather ironic, as you talk about how only a lesbian feminist man hater would attempt to belittle other men and then you overtly attempt to emasculate me by calling me a lesbian feminist man hater. The irony will probably be lost on you. I have the deepest respect for REAL men, but pseudo men who mask their lack of masculinity with an arsenal of guns, a constant ranting of why they need these guns because they are afraid and scared and then their denial of their fear and insecurity when challenged, this type of machismo does a genuine disservice to masculinity in general.
Real men, if they felt a genuine need to own a gun, would do so without anybody else ever knowing, they wouldn't advertise the fact, constantly rant on about the second amendment, their love of assault rifles, how they are afraid of corrupt Governments, gangbangers and home invaders. They would just be a man, put their gun in the gun safe and SHUT THE FUCK UP!
A lot of people in history were not afraid of corrupt Governments and these corrupt Governments were not afraid of their people.
This ended badly for the people.
-
I don't attempt to belittle men at all, I merely speak my opinion, if other men feel emasculated by this, then this is proof of what I have been saying, it is common knowledge amongst men that insecure men will attempt to bolster their masculinity by means such as guns and knives.(eg: hence the reason young men form gangs and use guns and knives). I find your post rather ironic, as you talk about how only a lesbian feminist man hater would attempt to belittle other men and then you overtly attempt to emasculate me by calling me a lesbian feminist man hater. The irony will probably be lost on you. I have the deepest respect for REAL men, but pseudo men who mask their lack of masculinity with an arsenal of guns, a constant ranting of why they need these guns because they are afraid and scared and then their denial of their fear and insecurity when challenged, this type of machismo does a genuine disservice to masculinity in general.
Real men, if they felt a genuine need to own a gun, would do so without anybody else ever knowing, they wouldn't advertise the fact, constantly rant on about the second amendment, their love of assault rifles, how they are afraid of corrupt Governments, gangbangers and home invaders. They would just be a man, put their gun in the gun safe and SHUT THE FUCK UP!
You didn't answer the question? Are you male, female, lesbian? My post wasn't meant to be derogatory towards you, I was being serious? :D
-
Guns are for PUSSIES.
-
Guns are for PUSSIES.
I concur! :D
(http://imgsrv.fuskator.com/large/grMiN5am2GR/babe_Foxy+Jacky_gun_gun+in+pussy_handcuffs_handgun_impalement_insertion_solo_thinkimsexy_6.jpg)
-
You didn't answer the question? Are you male, female, lesbian? My post wasn't meant to be derogatory towards you, I was being serious? :D
No fear of you ever becoming a detective is their?
-
No fear of you ever becoming a detective is their?
Why are you avoiding the question? Are you a unich? :D
-
Because its just such a common occurance to have some crazy person shoot up a school.
It happens now and then, people are acting people are slaughtering classrooms of children everyday.
Jesus Christ.
Same goes for 9/11. It was a one off, but you're still fighting a stupid over that gay shit, bunch of pussies.
-
Why are you avoiding the question? Are you a unich? :D
No fear of you ever becoming a detective either? Seriously, those who are unable to decipher my gender here on GETBIG are seriously STUPID. I am sure eventually you will work it out, I mean their is a clue to my gender is contained in every post I make. A smart ten year old could work it out without ever having to ask me or be told. Essentially, your inability to work it out offers up the biggest clue to your intellectual capabilities and powers of observation. And the word for a castrated man is spelled "eunuch"
-
I don't attempt to belittle men at all, I merely speak my opinion, if other men feel emasculated by this, then this is proof of what I have been saying, it is common knowledge amongst men that insecure men will attempt to bolster their masculinity by means such as guns and knives.(eg: hence the reason young men form gangs and use guns and knives). I find your post rather ironic, as you talk about how only a lesbian feminist man hater would attempt to belittle other men and then you overtly attempt to emasculate me by calling me a lesbian feminist man hater. The irony will probably be lost on you. I have the deepest respect for REAL men, but pseudo men who mask their lack of masculinity with an arsenal of guns, a constant ranting of why they need these guns because they are afraid and scared and then their denial of their fear and insecurity when challenged, this type of machismo does a genuine disservice to masculinity in general.
Real men, if they felt a genuine need to own a gun, would do so without anybody else ever knowing, they wouldn't advertise the fact, constantly rant on about the second amendment, their love of assault rifles, how they are afraid of corrupt Governments, gangbangers and home invaders. They would just be a man, put their gun in the gun safe and SHUT THE FUCK UP!
All you do is project your own feelings onto everyone else. You have an irrational fear of guns and you project this fear onto anyone who disagrees with you. YOU fear what YOU would do with a gun and don't think anyone shouldn't own them for any reason , you think all people think like you , what you're really afraid of is what you would do with one , again you sound exactly like the ' gun nuts ' you rail against , unstable , irrational and YOU live in fear
Proof positive? YOU are in every gun related thread spouting off about how people who own them are crazy and are cowards. You wait until a tragic event to swoop down like a vulture who smells blood , as I said many times you don't give a flying fucking about one single kid who died st Sandy Hook , you care more about trying to prove that you are right and this is another example that you can now shout out to the world , you are very insecure and have this deep need to prove yourself right
You try so hard for attention , nobody cares about you , your views , opinions or your country , you try so hard to say look my country is better than yours we don't have any more schools shootings , you have a massive inferiority complex and want to be noticed and will use 20 dead American kids to get attention , you're a sad dude when this is all you have
Can't wait until your mega-meltdown and you don't return out of monumental embarrassment , I've seen guys like you come and go and you're manic posting as of late usually is a precursor for these meltdowns
-
Same goes for 9/11. It was a one off, but you're still fighting a stupid over that gay shit, bunch of pussies.
Dumb comparison brah, but for the record, I don't agree with our massive overreaction to that either.
-
No fear of you ever becoming a detective either? Seriously, those who are unable to decipher my gender here on GETBIG are seriously STUPID. I am sure eventually you will work it out, I mean their is a clue to my gender is contained in every post I make. A smart ten year old could work it out without ever having to ask me or be told. Essentially, your inability to work it out offers up the biggest clue to your intellectual capabilities and powers of observation. And the word for a castrated man is spelled "eunuch"
Ahahahahhahha, broseph, it's obvious to everyone here that you're melting faster than an ice cream cone in a TX summer. I'm really starting to think you're the gay version of Uberman. Your 500 word diatribes are spoken almost exactly like his. You try to be the authority/intelect on every subject, which tells me that your real life probably sucks dick. Let me guess, you're mid 30's, no family, shitty job, and yet you tell yourself daily that you're the man? Hahahahahahahah, this is too much fun. :-*
-
All you do is project your own feelings onto everyone else. You have an irrational fear of guns and you project this fear onto anyone who disagrees with you. YOU fear what YOU would do with a gun and don't think anyone shouldn't own them for any reason , you think all people think like you , what you're really afraid of is what you would do with one , again you sound exactly like the ' gun nuts ' you rail against , unstable , irrational and YOU live in fear
Proof positive? YOU are in every gun related thread spouting off about how people who own them are crazy and are cowards. You wait until a tragic event to swoop down like a vulture who smells blood , as I said many times you don't give a flying fucking about one single kid who died st Sandy Hook , you care more about trying to prove that you are right and this is another example that you can now shout out to the world , you are very insecure and have this deep need to prove yourself right
You try so hard for attention , nobody cares about you , your views , opinions or your country , you try so hard to say look my country is better than yours we don't have any more schools shootings , you have a massive inferiority complex and want to be noticed and will use 20 dead American kids to get attention , you're a sad dude when this is all you have
Can't wait until your mega-meltdown and you don't return out of monumental embarrassment , I've seen guys like you come and go and you're manic posting as of late usually is a precursor for these meltdowns
That's a fair meltdown, I am doing some serious owning when Getbiggers rave on like this. Your attempts to suggest those who believe in strict gun controls is a tactic you use regularly, you make out like their is a part of me that desires to own a gun but some irrational fear is stopping me. You obviously find it hard to believe that some people couldn't care less about guns, if the man across the road offered me his cache of guns, I wouldn't accept them. Not because I am afraid, but I have NO NEED to own a gun, they would just be a burden. One more material possession to clean and maintain. Also, I don't live in FEAR of being attacked or my Government taking over, I just don't. I rely on my brain and brawn to survive, this is all I need.
I find it really odd, that those who are so afraid that they need a gun, always accuse others of being fearful. Do you not see this is the very essence of projection. Gun Nutters openly admit the reason they own guns is because of their FEAR, and yet when anybody calls them out on this, they go straight to defensive mode and denial and project their fear onto others.
And you know what, it isn't so much GUNS, it is SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS that concern me. Often times these groups feel they have a right to force their agenda down societies throats regardless of the consequences of their actions, in this particular case it happens to be guns, it could be homosexuality, religion, you name it, these groups have an agenda, and they are determined to force it on everyone. The problem with gun owners, is that the owning of a gun empowers little men with big mouths, without the gun, you would never hear from these whiny fags, because they would be so low on the food chain, they would be too afraid too speak up for fear of being annihilated by the stronger men amongst them. hand them a gun, and the whole situation changes, finally they know what the ALPHA males have always felt and it overwhelms them, hence the noise these little men constantly make.
I can understand Women jumping up and down about gun ownership, they have a genuine reason to feel afraid due to their gender, but for men to act this way, it truly is an embarrassment. For grown men to jump up and down, and constantly tell everyone how afraid they are, and because of this they need a gun to feel less afraid, truly is an embarrassment and a blight on masculinity. What happened to MEN, this is what happens when so many men these days are raised by single feminist mothers or weak Fathers.
-
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity."
Sigmund Freud
General Introduction to Psychoanalysis.
so is using a logon name with "bad boy" in
-
That's a fair meltdown, I am doing some serious owning when Getbiggers rave on like this. Your attempts to suggest those who believe in strict gun controls is a tactic you use regularly, you make out like their is a part of me that desires to own a gun but some irrational fear is stopping me. You obviously find it hard to believe that some people couldn't care less about guns, if the man across the road offered me his cache of guns, I wouldn't accept them. Not because I am afraid, but I have NO NEED to own a gun, they would just be a burden. One more material possession to clean and maintain. Also, I don't live in FEAR of being attacked or my Government taking over, I just don't. I rely on my brain and brawn to survive, this is all I need.
I find it really odd, that those who are so afraid that they need a gun, always accuse others of being fearful. Do you not see this is the very essence of projection. Gun Nutters openly admit the reason they own guns is because of their FEAR, and yet when anybody calls them out on this, they go straight to defensive mode and denial and project their fear onto others.
And you know what, it isn't so much GUNS, it is SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS that concern me. Often times these groups feel they have a right to force their agenda down societies throats regardless of the consequences of their actions, in this particular case it happens to be guns, it could be homosexuality, religion, you name it, these groups have an agenda, and they are determined to force it on everyone. The problem with gun owners, is that the owning of a gun empowers little men with big mouths, without the gun, you would never hear from these whiny fags, because they would be so low on the food chain, they would be too afraid too speak up for fear of being annihilated by the stronger men amongst them. hand them a gun, and the whole situation changes, finally they know what the ALPHA males have always felt and it overwhelms them, hence the noise these little men constantly make.
I can understand Women jumping up and down about gun ownership, they have a genuine reason to feel afraid due to their gender, but for men to act this way, it truly is an embarrassment. For grown men to jump up and down, and constantly tell everyone how afraid they are, and because of this they need a gun to feel less afraid, truly is an embarrassment and a blight on masculinity. What happened to MEN, this is what happens when so many men these days are raised by single feminist mothers or weak Fathers.
you're afraid of dogs!
-
What happened to MEN E-Kul, this is what happens when so many men these days are raised by single feminist mothers or weak Fathers.
Fixed. Oh, the irony of your own post. ;D :P :-*
-
Fixed. Oh, the irony of your own post. ;D :P :-*
Says the man who openly admits he is so afraid, he needs a GUN, like I said, I can understand women behaving like this, but for grown men to do so, it really is embarrassing. To associate FEAR & GUN OWNERSHIP with masculinity, and Being FEARLESS and not needing a GUN with femininity is really backwards. Bordering on the absolute ridiculous. Feminism has a lot to answer for. A REAL MAN if he felt the need to own a GUN, would just do so quietly, he wouldn't advertise the FACT, rage on about 2nd amendments, masturbate over powerful assault rifles and attack anybody who believed in strict GUN CONTROL. No he would just quietly purchase a gun, lock it in the GUN SAFE and shut the fuck up about it and get on with it.
-
That's a fair meltdown, I am doing some serious owning when Getbiggers rave on like this. Your attempts to suggest those who believe in strict gun controls is a tactic you use regularly, you make out like their is a part of me that desires to own a gun but some irrational fear is stopping me. You obviously find it hard to believe that some people couldn't care less about guns, if the man across the road offered me his cache of guns, I wouldn't accept them. Not because I am afraid, but I have NO NEED to own a gun, they would just be a burden. One more material possession to clean and maintain. Also, I don't live in FEAR of being attacked or my Government taking over, I just don't. I rely on my brain and brawn to survive, this is all I need.
I find it really odd, that those who are so afraid that they need a gun, always accuse others of being fearful. Do you not see this is the very essence of projection. Gun Nutters openly admit the reason they own guns is because of their FEAR, and yet when anybody calls them out on this, they go straight to defensive mode and denial and project their fear onto others.
And you know what, it isn't so much GUNS, it is SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS that concern me. Often times these groups feel they have a right to force their agenda down societies throats regardless of the consequences of their actions, in this particular case it happens to be guns, it could be homosexuality, religion, you name it, these groups have an agenda, and they are determined to force it on everyone. The problem with gun owners, is that the owning of a gun empowers little men with big mouths, without the gun, you would never hear from these whiny fags, because they would be so low on the food chain, they would be too afraid too speak up for fear of being annihilated by the stronger men amongst them. hand them a gun, and the whole situation changes, finally they know what the ALPHA males have always felt and it overwhelms them, hence the noise these little men constantly make.
I can understand Women jumping up and down about gun ownership, they have a genuine reason to feel afraid due to their gender, but for men to act this way, it truly is an embarrassment. For grown men to jump up and down, and constantly tell everyone how afraid they are, and because of this they need a gun to feel less afraid, truly is an embarrassment and a blight on masculinity. What happened to MEN, this is what happens when so many men these days are raised by single feminist mothers or weak Fathers.
That's a fair meltdown, I am doing some serious owning when Getbiggers rave on like this. Your attempts to suggest those who believe in strict gun controls is a tactic you use regularly, you make out like their is a part of me that desires to own a gun but some irrational fear is stopping me. You obviously find it hard to believe that some people couldn't care less about guns, if the man across the road offered me his cache of guns, I wouldn't accept them. Not because I am afraid, but I have NO NEED to own a gun, they would just be a burden. One more material possession to clean and maintain. Also, I don't live in FEAR of being attacked or my Government taking over, I just don't. I rely on my brain and brawn to survive, this is all I need.
Quite the contrary you've been melting down in every thread with the word ' gun ' in it. More projection on your behalf. Guns are like abortions , don't want one don't get one. I could care less but don't presume to dictate what's best for me.
You have no need for a gun? nonsense , you needed one when the pittbull made you lunch. Perfect time to have one. And your brain & brawn failed you when the doggy attacked
I find it really odd, that those who are so afraid that they need a gun, always accuse others of being fearful. Do you not see this is the very essence of projection. Gun Nutters openly admit the reason they own guns is because of their FEAR, and yet when anybody calls them out on this, they go straight to defensive mode and denial and project their fear onto others.
All you're doing is projecting , you keep doing it as well. You have an irrational fear of guns because you are scared what YOU might do with them. You keep insisting everyone who owns a gun lives in ' fear ' more projection on you behalf. I don't live in fear , I have no emotional attachment to my guns , I view them as tools that could be used to protect my family in case the need arises , YOU view them as useless and anyone that owns them is suspect , you are EXACTLY like the gun nuts you rail against you're just to stupid to see it
And you know what, it isn't so much GUNS, it is SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS that concern me. Often times these groups feel they have a right to force their agenda down societies throats regardless of the consequences of their actions, in this particular case it happens to be guns, it could be homosexuality, religion, you name it, these groups have an agenda, and they are determined to force it on everyone. The problem with gun owners, is that the owning of a gun empowers little men with big mouths, without the gun, you would never hear from these whiny fags, because they would be so low on the food chain, they would be too afraid too speak up for fear of being annihilated by the stronger men amongst them. hand them a gun, and the whole situation changes, finally they know what the ALPHA males have always felt and it overwhelms them, hence the noise these little men constantly make.
The irony of that statement , the ' special interest groups ' exist because of simple minded people like you who keep pushing their antigun agenda on the rest of us. And what the fuck would you know about being an ' ALPHA ' ? LMMFAO you got ripped apart like a chew toy by a Pittbull and now whine and bitch and moan about how they need tp be outlawed and banned and they have no purpose in society , ALPHA males don't whine like you. They handle business. You're another pumpster it's clowns like you who bark the loudest who are only alphamales on the internet
I can understand Women jumping up and down about gun ownership, they have a genuine reason to feel afraid due to their gender, but for men to act this way, it truly is an embarrassment. For grown men to jump up and down, and constantly tell everyone how afraid they are, and because of this they need a gun to feel less afraid, truly is an embarrassment and a blight on masculinity. What happened to MEN, this is what happens when so many men these days are raised by single feminist mothers or weak Fathers.
Guns are a great equalizer for all sexes , all men aren't created equal and they are tools to be used to protect self and others. You bark like you would be able to handle yourself and it's bullshit , especially considering if you are attacked by multiple attackers , in your fantasy world that you created you would be able to handle an attacker one-on-one by reality is much different where there are no rules , and your fantasy train of thought proves you have no real world experience , you're an arm-chair warrior. You couldn't handle a dog yet you're some though guy alpha male LMMFAO you're a clown and would shit yourself when you ever were in a real situation
E-kul = 0
Pittbull = 1
-
Says the man who openly admits he is so afraid, he needs a GUN, like I said, I can understand women behaving like this, but for grown men to do so, it really is embarrassing. To associate FEAR & GUN OWNERSHIP with masculinity, and Being FEARLESS and not needing a GUN with femininity is really backwards. Bordering on the absolute ridiculous. Feminism has a lot to answer for. A REAL MAN if he felt the need to own a GUN, would just do so quietly, he wouldn't advertise the FACT, rage on about 2nd amendments, masturbate over powerful assault rifles and attack anybody who believed in strict GUN CONTROL. No he would just quietly purchase a gun, lock it in the GUN SAFE and shut the fuck up about it and get on with it.
There is a world of difference between being afraid of X and BEING PREPARED for X
-
you're afraid of dogs!
Second thread you posted this in, I responded to it in the other thread, but I know I have seriously owned somebody when they mention Pitbulls or Dogs. Do you seriously think by talking about Dogs it has any impact on me?, I feel sorry for you that you somehow think you have found a weakness and exploited it. Feel free to post videos or pictures of Pitbulls eating children, pit fighting, growling, attacking or any other thing you like. Due to my advocacy work, I deal with the most gruesome details of Pitbull attack everyday, I deal with Pitbull Nutters on a daily basis, I receive death threats, abuse, insults, you name it, I have copped it. It is water of a ducks back to me, it is a clear indication that I own some small mans mind.
-
E-Kul's fear of guns stems from his mum pulling one on him during a heated argument over who craved black cock more.
-
Second thread you posted this in, I responded to it in the other thread, but I know I have seriously owned somebody when they mention Pitbulls or Dogs. Do you seriously think by talking about Dogs it has any impact on me?, I feel sorry for you that you somehow think you have found a weakness and exploited it. Feel free to post videos or pictures of Pitbulls eating children, pit fighting, growling, attacking or any other thing you like. Due to my advocacy work, I deal with the most gruesome details of Pitbull attack everyday, I deal with Pitbull Nutters on a daily basis, I receive death threats, abuse, insults, you name it, I have copped it. It is water of a ducks back to me, it is a clear indication that I own some small mans mind.
A gun would have prevented you from being attacked by the Pittbulls just saying ;)
Your advocacy lol you mean bitching on line? Mr ALPHA male badass who would beat up someone for open carrying couldn't beat a 80lb dog lol
Where are you troll? in another gun thread trying to act like you're not as batshit crazy as the typical NRA member is
No body cares about your point of view , don't mistake of people belittling you as caring about your opinion or point of view. You're a joke whose shtick is running it's course.
-
Second thread you posted this in, I responded to it in the other thread, but I know I have seriously owned somebody when they mention Pitbulls or Dogs. Do you seriously think by talking about Dogs it has any impact on me?, I feel sorry for you that you somehow think you have found a weakness and exploited it. Feel free to post videos or pictures of Pitbulls eating children, pit fighting, growling, attacking or any other thing you like. Due to my advocacy work, I deal with the most gruesome details of Pitbull attack everyday, I deal with Pitbull Nutters on a daily basis, I receive death threats, abuse, insults, you name it, I have copped it. It is water of a ducks back to me, it is a clear indication that I own some small mans mind.
Look out behind you, its a pit bull with a gun!
-
Says the man who openly admits he is so afraid, he needs a GUN, like I said, I can understand women behaving like this, but for grown men to do so, it really is embarrassing. To associate FEAR & GUN OWNERSHIP with masculinity, and Being FEARLESS and not needing a GUN with femininity is really backwards. Bordering on the absolute ridiculous. Feminism has a lot to answer for. A REAL MAN if he felt the need to own a GUN, would just do so quietly, he wouldn't advertise the FACT, rage on about 2nd amendments, masturbate over powerful assault rifles and attack anybody who believed in strict GUN CONTROL. No he would just quietly purchase a gun, lock it in the GUN SAFE and shut the fuck up about it and get on with it.
I think you mentality of guns and owners in general is severely twisted. I never once said I was so afraid I needed a gun. Guns are not necessities. They are invaluable tools. I look at a gun like a hammer. It is a tool. Is it necessary, no. However, it is a very functional tool with many uses, so if it's available i'm going to own one. Guns are the same. I use them for hunting, extermination, protection, etc. I do not associate fear with gun ownership at all. Like I said, to me they are tools. I was taught at a very young age how to use firearms as tools. You haven't answered my question, have you ever owned or shot a firearm? :-\
-
There have been 31 school shootings in America since columbine. There has only been 14 worldwide combined.
There's always a ton of coverage in Canada about these shooting, even cutting out songs on the radio because it's called "die young. " But I say fuck all you morons. I stopped caring the day you killed Dimebag Darrell.
In 2008 there was a huge train crash a couple of months before Obama was elected president. 25 people died. It got next to no media coverage. The media only wanted to talk about the banking scam and Obama.
TRAIN CRASH
The Chatsworth train collision occurred at 16:22 PDT (23:22 UTC) on Friday September 12, 2008, when a Union Pacific freight train and a Metrolink commuter train collided head-on in the Chatsworth district of Los Angeles, California, in the United States. The scene of the accident was a curved section of single track on the Metrolink Ventura County Line just east of Stoney Point.
According to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which investigated the cause of the collision, the Metrolink train ran through a red signal before entering a section of single track where the opposing freight train had been given the right of way by the train dispatcher. The NTSB faulted the Metrolink train's engineer for the collision, concluding that he was distracted by text messages he was sending while on duty.
This mass casualty event brought a massive emergency response by both the city and county of Los Angeles, but the nature and extent of physical trauma taxed the available resources. With 25 deaths, this became the deadliest accident in Metrolink's history. Many survivors remained hospitalized for an extended period. Lawyers quickly began filing claims against Metrolink, and in total, they are expected to exceed a US$200 million liability limit set in 1997, portending the first legal challenges to that law. Issues surrounding this accident have also initiated and reinvigorated public debate on a range of topics including public relations, safety, and emergency management, which has also resulted in regulatory and legislative actions.
-
Quite the contrary you've been melting down in every thread with the word ' gun ' in it. More projection on your behalf. Guns are like abortions , don't want one don't get one. I could care less but don't presume to dictate what's best for me.
You have no need for a gun? nonsense , you needed one when the pittbull made you lunch. Perfect time to have one. And your brain & brawn failed you when the doggy attacked
All you're doing is projecting , you keep doing it as well. You have an irrational fear of guns because you are scared what YOU might do with them. You keep insisting everyone who owns a gun lives in ' fear ' more projection on you behalf. I don't live in fear , I have no emotional attachment to my guns , I view them as tools that could be used to protect my family in case the need arises , YOU view them as useless and anyone that owns them is suspect , you are EXACTLY like the gun nuts you rail against you're just to stupid to see it
The irony of that statement , the ' special interest groups ' exist because of simple minded people like you who keep pushing their antigun agenda on the rest of us. And what the fuck would you know about being an ' ALPHA ' ? LMMFAO you got ripped apart like a chew toy by a Pittbull and now whine and bitch and moan about how they need tp be outlawed and banned and they have no purpose in society , ALPHA males don't whine like you. They handle business. You're another pumpster it's clowns like you who bark the loudest who are only alphamales on the internet
Guns are a great equalizer for all sexes , all men aren't created equal and they are tools to be used to protect self and others. You bark like you would be able to handle yourself and it's bullshit , especially considering if you are attacked by multiple attackers , in your fantasy world that you created you would be able to handle an attacker one-on-one by reality is much different where there are no rules , and your fantasy train of thought proves you have no real world experience , you're an arm-chair warrior. You couldn't handle a dog yet you're some though guy alpha male LMMFAO you're a clown and would shit yourself when you ever were in a real situation
E-kul = 0
Pittbull = 1
You seem to have concocted quite the image of me their, this is all just speculation and fantasy on your behalf. I have been attacked by multiple attackers on several occasions, I have won some and I have lost some. I have also paid a LEGAL price for this. The issue isn't about how big and tough you are, but if you are willing to step up to the plate. Nobody is claiming to be some ultimate ALPHA warrior who is unbeatable, it is all about being prepared to fight for what you believe in, regardless of how strong the opposition is or the fact you may LOSE.
The claim that GUN OWNERS live in FEAR is their own, it doesn't come from me, one of their arguments is that they are afraid of Intruders and attackers and also their Government turning on them. By their own admission they are feraful. I have already stated that owning a gun fro sport shooting or hunting or law enforcement or military defence is an acceptable use of a gun. Owning one because you are a scared paranoid freak isn't.
As for the Pitbull attack, their were two pitbulls and I suffered a severed Achilles tendon and a mauled left arm. I don't believe a gun would have prevented these injuries, it happened pretty quickly, I actually didn't see the dogs until the last few seconds and the owner had the dogs under control pretty quickly. I have asked myself several times if I think a gun would have helped in that situation, and they may well have, but it also opens a greater pandoras box, their was a recent case of two policemen who were attacked by a pitbull, and one of the officers fired at the Pitbull, but due to the Pitbulls fast and sudden movements, the policeman missed and actually shot his partner and killed him. My advocacy work is because, it isn't just me that was attacked by Pitbulls, these attacks are common place and regularly it is children being killed or suffering absolutely horrendous injuries. And yes, I think fighting breeds of dog have no place in society. My Brain and brawn didn't fail me, My Brain and brawn kept me alive, that's what it is for. It was due to someone else's lack of a brain that put me in that situation.
Gun Nutters like to think that they can somehow protect themselves at all times, this is just simply not true. It is this fear of suffering or being dominated that sees them weapon up. It is better to live a good life and fight the battles that come along and accept that you can't win them all. Their will be times when the forces against us are simply stronger. And I don't believe Guns are a great equaliser, if two people in a conflict both have guns, other factors now come into play regarding who will now win the outcome. All Gun ownership does is up the ante, forcing the enemy too find other ways to dominate you, it can turn simple conflict into a deadly game, and it can also turn the mildest person into a raving lunatic. (Alex Jones)
-
Quit crying like a bitch, Jesus Christ have some dignity.
-
So what, just hand over your wallet. No need to play the macho man at every turn in life. Some days you lose, simple. If being mugged happened to you every day of your life, then yes, get a gun. But to weapon up based on the paranoid belief that you are constantly in danger is a sure sign that maybe you are scared of even your own shadow.
And you prove my point, of course the weaker more insecure man is going to need a gun to face a bigger stronger man in order to dominate him. If all he wants is your wallet, then give it too him.
so, continue to "hand over your wallet"? Or continue to hand over your chain? That then evolves into "watch your wife get raped"?
Some people don't want to continually be victimized...and many instances, victimized twice---once by the criminal, and once by the judicial system.
-
Quit crying like a bitch, Jesus Christ have some dignity.
I'll second this motion. :D
-
-
so, continue to "hand over your wallet"? Or continue to hand over your chain? That then evolves into "watch your wife get raped"?
Some people don't want to continually be victimized...and many instances, victimized twice---once by the criminal, and once by the judicial system.
Have you been continually victimised, if so, buy a gun by all means. And to think you can shoot a man in so called self defense and avoid the judicial system, I doubt that. Ever heard of George Zimmerman or Donny Aaron. Donny is a MMA guy who killed someone in so called self defence, he is currently serving a jail term. You are more likely to be raped by the judicial system after shooting in self defence than if you were a victim of a crime. And how on earth does being mugged for your wallet evolve into watching your wife get raped? That's some crazy imagination you have there.
-
E-Kul's fear of guns stems from his mum pulling one on him during a heated argument over who craved black cock more.
do you think up and express thoughts like that very often?
-
Quit crying like a bitch, Jesus Christ have some dignity.
Or What, are you going to shoot me tough guy. Personally, I have never heard anything like the bitching and moaning that comes out of the NRA Camp, they may as well go and get some silicon tittie implants, cut their cock and balls off and wear T-Shirts with the slogan, "Yes I'm a whiny fag who is too scared to live without a gun." Gun supporters are an embarrassment to all men everywhere.
-
Or What, are you going to shoot me tough guy. Personally, I have never heard anything like the bitching and moaning that comes out of the NRA Camp, they may as well go and get some silicon tittie implants, cut their cock and balls off and wear T-Shirts with the slogan, "Yes I'm a whiny fag who is too scared to live without a gun." Gun supporters are an embarrassment to all men everywhere.
::)
I'm not a member of the NRA and I don't carry a firearm. Try again numbnuts.
-
::)
I'm not a member of the NRA and I don't carry a firearm. Try again numbnuts.
That right there is gonna leave a burn lol
-
Struck a nerve did I, it comes as no surprise that those child-men who feel so desperately insecure and fearful to the point of having to secure a person arsenal of guns will project onto others their desperate insecurity and fear to divert attention away from their deep lack of masculinity. Owning and obsessing over guns is a fail safe way to communicate to others that you are desperately afraid and live in fear. For women to do this, it is understandable, for men to do it, it is embarrassing.
I agree. Never had any particular interest in guns, and its not like I have much use of them where I live either. I wouldnt mind owning one though for whatever reason, but people who like to show off their guns and what not are nothing but insecure, and deeply afraid inside.
-
You seem to have concocted quite the image of me their, this is all just speculation and fantasy on your behalf. I have been attacked by multiple attackers on several occasions, I have won some and I have lost some. I have also paid a LEGAL price for this. The issue isn't about how big and tough you are, but if you are willing to step up to the plate. Nobody is claiming to be some ultimate ALPHA warrior who is unbeatable, it is all about being prepared to fight for what you believe in, regardless of how strong the opposition is or the fact you may LOSE.
The claim that GUN OWNERS live in FEAR is their own, it doesn't come from me, one of their arguments is that they are afraid of Intruders and attackers and also their Government turning on them. By their own admission they are feraful. I have already stated that owning a gun fro sport shooting or hunting or law enforcement or military defence is an acceptable use of a gun. Owning one because you are a scared paranoid freak isn't.
As for the Pitbull attack, their were two pitbulls and I suffered a severed Achilles tendon and a mauled left arm. I don't believe a gun would have prevented these injuries, it happened pretty quickly, I actually didn't see the dogs until the last few seconds and the owner had the dogs under control pretty quickly. I have asked myself several times if I think a gun would have helped in that situation, and they may well have, but it also opens a greater pandoras box, their was a recent case of two policemen who were attacked by a pitbull, and one of the officers fired at the Pitbull, but due to the Pitbulls fast and sudden movements, the policeman missed and actually shot his partner and killed him. My advocacy work is because, it isn't just me that was attacked by Pitbulls, these attacks are common place and regularly it is children being killed or suffering absolutely horrendous injuries. And yes, I think fighting breeds of dog have no place in society. My Brain and brawn didn't fail me, My Brain and brawn kept me alive, that's what it is for. It was due to someone else's lack of a brain that put me in that situation.
Gun Nutters like to think that they can somehow protect themselves at all times, this is just simply not true. It is this fear of suffering or being dominated that sees them weapon up. It is better to live a good life and fight the battles that come along and accept that you can't win them all. Their will be times when the forces against us are simply stronger. And I don't believe Guns are a great equaliser, if two people in a conflict both have guns, other factors now come into play regarding who will now win the outcome. All Gun ownership does is up the ante, forcing the enemy too find other ways to dominate you, it can turn simple conflict into a deadly game, and it can also turn the mildest person into a raving lunatic. (Alex Jones)
You seem to have concocted quite the image of me their, this is all just speculation and fantasy on your behalf. I have been attacked by multiple attackers on several occasions, I have won some and I have lost some. I have also paid a LEGAL price for this. The issue isn't about how big and tough you are, but if you are willing to step up to the plate. Nobody is claiming to be some ultimate ALPHA warrior who is unbeatable, it is all about being prepared to fight for what you believe in, regardless of how strong the opposition is or the fact you may LOSE.
Of course I concocted quite the image of you , the exact same way you do of gun owners ;) I can only go by what you type and by doing that you come across as whiny with an massive inferiority complex , your fear of inanimate objects leads one to believe you're very scared to be near one , hold one , touch one out of fear of what you might do with one
You've been attacked on several occasions? wow sound like you live in a really dangerous place lol or maybe you're inferiority complex is leading you into fights. Sounds like AU is more violent than the U.S. if that's the case because I have never been attacked on several occasions and I grew up in some shady ass places. Then again I tend to avoid trouble and have nothing to prove that's the sign of a man
Attacked multiple times and attacked by multiple pitbulls boy you seem to find trouble , I wonder why?
The claim that GUN OWNERS live in FEAR is their own, it doesn't come from me, one of their arguments is that they are afraid of Intruders and attackers and also their Government turning on them. By their own admission they are feraful. I have already stated that owning a gun fro sport shooting or hunting or law enforcement or military defence is an acceptable use of a gun. Owning one because you are a scared paranoid freak isn't.
It comes from you projecting onto others as well as right wing nutt cases. I don't obsess over someone attacking me or doing a home invasion but I'm mindful these things do happen and I have a responsibility to protect my family , guns are part of that plan , in their cases it's a matter of ' Better to have and not need than to need and not have. ' it took the police TWENTY-FUCKING-MINUTES since the first call to respond to Sandy Hook , when police are this far away you have a responsibility to be your own first responder in the rare event something like this happens.
The shooter could have brought a Revolution Era musket and still would have time to kill all these kids.
And the people screaming about the oppressive Government are going to take their guns , it's not paranoia if it's true , the law abiding citizens are constantly being punished for the acts of criminals , you have Sen Diane Feinstein of California who is introducing a new version of the failed ' assault weapons ban ' on camera saying she would love to confiscate ALL firearms.
And what you think about what people should or shouldn't own from the other side of the planet is inconsequential , what worked ( or didn't ) for your country doesn't matter. Like I said , guns are like abortions , don't want one don't get one , but fuck off trying to tell law abiding tax paying citizens they can't because you don't see a need. Especially not when they are a constitutional right
As for the Pitbull attack, their were two pitbulls and I suffered a severed Achilles tendon and a mauled left arm. I don't believe a gun would have prevented these injuries, it happened pretty quickly, I actually didn't see the dogs until the last few seconds and the owner had the dogs under control pretty quickly. I have asked myself several times if I think a gun would have helped in that situation, and they may well have, but it also opens a greater pandoras box, their was a recent case of two policemen who were attacked by a pitbull, and one of the officers fired at the Pitbull, but due to the Pitbulls fast and sudden movements, the policeman missed and actually shot his partner and killed him. My advocacy work is because, it isn't just me that was attacked by Pitbulls, these attacks are common place and regularly it is children being killed or suffering absolutely horrendous injuries. And yes, I think fighting breeds of dog have no place in society. My Brain and brawn didn't fail me, My Brain and brawn kept me alive, that's what it is for. It was due to someone else's lack of a brain that put me in that situation.
A gun might not have saved you from injury but it sure as fuck would have stopped them dogs from ever hurting anyone again. And the policemen who shot his partner because he missed , I'm calling bullshit on that story unless you provide a link to a credible news agency.
Gun Nutters like to think that they can somehow protect themselves at all times, this is just simply not true. It is this fear of suffering or being dominated that sees them weapon up. It is better to live a good life and fight the battles that come along and accept that you can't win them all. Their will be times when the forces against us are simply stronger. And I don't believe Guns are a great equaliser, if two people in a conflict both have guns, other factors now come into play regarding who will now win the outcome. All Gun ownership does is up the ante, forcing the enemy too find other ways to dominate you, it can turn simple conflict into a deadly game, and it can also turn the mildest person into a raving lunatic. (Alex Jones)
Where do you come up with this stuff? Anyone who has a gun for protection knows better than most that they are not the end-all-be-all of protection but it's a fuck of a lot better than the alternative which is nothing. There are stories of people being shot 17 times and still living. And guns are a fantastic deterrent and a great equalizer and most of the time work without ever having to pull the trigger , and it's not some lets bang it out fisticuffs and the attack ends when the aggressor decides you took your beating like a man , it's people intend on imposing their will on you and doing egregious bodily harm these people need to be stopped at all costs and if that means their live then so be it.
99% of gun owners are responsible human beings , in order to get a license to carry firearms you have to have led an exemplary life and not have been in trouble with the law what so ever , most states you have to go for a safety course which is usually 8 hours , there are always bad apples but the vast majority are good honest people , who are sick & tired of lumped in with bad people
Your aversion to guns , especially when you admitted you don't care about the victims is telling , either you're trolling or serious in either case you still lose.
-
but fuck off trying to tell law abiding tax paying citizens they can't because you don't see a need.
A gun might not have saved you from injury but it sure as fuck would have stopped them dogs from ever hurting anyone again. And the policemen who shot his partner because he missed , I'm calling bullshit on that story unless you provide a link to a credible news agency.
Nobody is suggesting gun control because they don't see a need to own a gun, they are promoting it as an attempt to prevent innocent people being murdered at an alarming rate. I am sure if the Gun Supporters had a more effective solution, they would have implemented it long ago.
And the Pitbull story link is here, I wrongly stated that he accidentally shot and killed his partner, it turns out he did seriously injure his partner and he was listed in a critical condition.
A Memphis Police officer was shot near the downtown area Thursday afternoon. The incident occurred around 1 p.m. on Thursday, November 8, on the 500-block of Arrington Avenue. The officer, later identified as Willie Bryant with the Organized Crime Unit, was serving a warrant when he was shot. Bryant was transported to The MED where he is listed in critical condition.
Memphis Police Director Toney Armstrong stated Bryant was accidentally shot by a fellow officer who was trying to shoot a pit bull, but missed. Officer Bryant was wearing a bulletproof vest.
http://www.fox16.com/news/local/story/Police-officer-shot-by-partner-trying-to-kill-dog/tNWAt4krZEqfO37zRTlxkQ.cspx?rss=315 (http://www.fox16.com/news/local/story/Police-officer-shot-by-partner-trying-to-kill-dog/tNWAt4krZEqfO37zRTlxkQ.cspx?rss=315)
-
Serious question for gun nuts/2nd Ammendment nuts and gun advocates out there. Are you folks against any type of gun control/restriction period? (I.e. thorough background checks for potential gun buyers prior being given a firearm, loss of gun rights with convictions for violent offenses, etc.) In a 'perfect America', would there be completely free access to guns? If you do tend to support restrictions, in what manner should they be restricted? Just wondering as I wasn't raised in a gun culture, and I'm having a difficult time understanding the mindset. Personally speaking, I think any potential gun owner should have a background check completed, at minimum a CRIC (criminal record indication check - at least that's what they're called in Canada).
-
Serious question for gun nuts/2nd Ammendment nuts and gun advocates out there. Are you folks against any type of gun control/restriction period? (I.e. thorough background checks for potential gun buyers prior being given a firearm, loss of gun rights with convictions for violent offenses, etc.) In a 'perfect America', would there be completely free access to guns? If you do tend to support restrictions, in what manner should they be restricted? Just wondering as I wasn't raised in a gun culture, and I'm having a difficult time understanding the mindset. Personally speaking, I think any potential gun owner should have a background check completed, at minimum a CRIC (criminal record indication check - at least that's what they're called in Canada).
You immediately refer to anyone who chooses to exercise his constitutional rights as a "nut" then pretend you wish to engage in serious dialougue. ::)
-
You immediately refer to anyone who chooses to exercise his constitutional rights as a "nut" then pretend you wish to engage in serious dialougue. ::)
Nope, not at all. Read, "...and gun advocates..." I left the door open.
-
Nope, not at all. Read, "...and gun advocates..." I left the door open.
"2nd Amendment nuts..." your "leaving the door open" is pathetic passive-aggresive phaggotry at its finest...try to break bad on people, then when called on it, claim "misunderstanding" ::)
queer
-
"2nd Amendment nuts..." your "leaving the door open" is pathetic passive-aggresive phaggotry at its finest...try to break bad on people, then when called on it, claim "misunderstanding" ::)
queer
Nope. From my observations on the gun control debate in the U.S. (CNN, Fox, Getbig, CBC), those coming out against gun control have generally fallen into one of those 3 categories. When I say 'nut', I'm simply using a figure of speech in referring to a person not willing to reason or compromise on an issue. That's all. Meant no offense.
BTW, shouldn't you be sniffing dirty gym towels or somethings?
-
Nope. From my observations on the gun control debate in the U.S. (CNN, Fox, Getbig, CBC), those coming out against gun control have generally fallen into one of those 3 categories. When I say 'nut', I'm simply using a figure of speech in referring to a person not willing to reason or compromise on an issue. That's all. Meant no offense.
BTW, shouldn't you be sniffing dirty gym towels or somethings?
More passive-aggresive phaggotry... backtrack, backtrack, apologize, then try to sneak in an insult
You're as bad as those other annoying canucks jag/24kt/samson, bill anvil, and that towel headed camel jock a ahmed
-
Wasn't Nancy Lanza a gun nut? How did she die again? How come her arsenal of guns didn't protect her? How come twenty children were killed by a Gun Nutters Gun? Is this an indication that gun nutters present a real danger to innocent children? Why do they call them Gun Nutters? Just asking!
-
Wasn't Nancy Lanza a gun nut? How did she die again? How come her arsenal of guns didn't protect her? How come twenty children were killed by a Gun Nutters Gun? Is this an indication that gun nutters present a real danger to innocent children? Why do they call them Gun Nutters? Just asking!
queer pedo's like you present a clear and present danger to innocent children
-
Wasn't Nancy Lanza a gun nut? How did she die again? How come her arsenal of guns didn't protect her? How come twenty children were killed by a Gun Nutters Gun? Is this an indication that gun nutters present a real danger to innocent children? Why do they call them Gun Nutters? Just asking!
So, are you blaming Nancy Lanza, her son, or the guns?
-
Wasn't Nancy Lanza a gun nut? How did she die again? How come her arsenal of guns didn't protect her? How come twenty children were killed by a Gun Nutters Gun? Is this an indication that gun nutters present a real danger to innocent children? Why do they call them Gun Nutters? Just asking!
why do you assume that if a person has guns, that they are a gun nut?
My folks who live in a very rural area have guns for hunting and protection. And they are far from gun nuts. In fact, they don't even discuss guns.
And you need to stop posting all these pit bull articles. It's insane. And if all pit bulls/bully breeds were eradicated, people would go back to the three Germans that were popular before Pit Bulls---German Shepards, Rotts, and Dobermans. What then, when they attack people, will you lead a crusade against them.
-
When ever I hear these CIA media shills talking on TV asking the question "Why does a law abiding citizen need a machine gun", I never hear anyone ask them "Why does a family of 4 need a 10,000 sqft. house? Or why does a man need a car that goes 150 mph but the freeway only has a 65 mph limit? Why does a male eat more than 2000 calories a day when its not necessary?
-
More passive-aggresive phaggotry... backtrack, backtrack, apologize, then try to sneak in an insult
You're as bad as those other annoying canucks jag/24kt/samson, bill anvil, and that towel headed camel jock a ahmed
Lol. Thanks for confirming.
-
ND and Shock have this thread on lockdown- but I am chiming in to illustrate the typically pathetic leftist response to the unfortunate byproducts of a free society. It all starts and ends with bigger and more intrusive government combined with a visceral hatred for the Constitution.
Forget freedom of speech-- The first amendment needs to be altered because of what subhuman Islamic filth might do on the other side of the world. The violent reaction to my freedom of expression does not result in the condemnation of violence, it results in the condemnation of speech.
Forget the right to bare arms- The second amendment needs to be rendered useless because of the occasional nutjob flying off the handle with a gun. Never-mind the root causes which undoubtedly led to the use of guns in the first place; mental illness, bad parenting, violent videogames and movies, prescription drugs etc.
The 5th/14th Amendment needs to be stretched and perverted beyond recognition to exclusively accommodate democratic party constituencies and provide the President ( only this President for some odd reason)with the extrajudicial power to unilaterally bypass Congress and spend whatever he feels like spending.
There are numerous other examples, but I digress.
The point is that history has a funny way of repeating itself. The government doesn't give a fuck about the individual citizen unless its a scheme to confiscate and redistribute the fruits of the individual citizens labor. No one-- whether individual or organization, government agency or elected official can or will EVER do a better job protecting YOU than YOU yourself.
In the disgustingly delusional world of a leftist, when someone breaks into your house, you should cower in fear and roll into the fetal position until the police hopefully arrive. You should censor every word that comes out of your mouth so you don't accidentally offend any "historically disadvantaged or underrepresented minority" groups. Your means and abilities should not dictate your lifestyle, accomplishments or actions. A government bureaucrat is better suited to plan your life instead.
The left wants to manufacture results and control the masses-- pure and simple.
This gun debate is just another link in the chain.
-
why do you assume that if a person has guns, that they are a gun nut?
My folks who live in a very rural area have guns for hunting and protection. And they are far from gun nuts. In fact, they don't even discuss guns.
And you need to stop posting all these pit bull articles. It's insane. And if all pit bulls/bully breeds were eradicated, people would go back to the three Germans that were popular before Pit Bulls---German Shepards, Rotts, and Dobermans. What then, when they attack people, will you lead a crusade against them.
For one, I have no problem with those who are responsible gun owners and use their weapons for hunting and recreation. And I am glad they don't discuss guns, this is a sign of maturity and reasonableness.
I am unsure as to what pitbull articles you are talking about, personally, I would prefer to refrain from discussing Pitbulls, I discuss the topic ad nauseum with my advocacy work. You may not have noticed, but a lot of getbiggers CONSTANTLY bring up Pitbulls in a vain attempt to hurt my feelings. If you had read the thread, you would have seen the reason I posted a pitbull article, was because someone asked if I thought a gun may have helped when I was attacked, I answered, it was unlikely, due to the fact I likely wouldn't be proficient with a gun, because I am simply not a gun nut, and I also mentioned the recent incident where two police were attacked by a pitbull, but during the commotion, one policeman shot his partner full blast in the back with a shotgun and critically injured him while attempting to shoot the attacking dog, so a gun would add another element to the situation. Another Getbigger called bullshit unless I provided a link, and I simply followed up with brief details and the link.
Like I said, I would prefer to never mention the topic, but some Getbiggers just can't leave it alone.
And yes, I would see no problem with banning at least a dozen breeds (at least in cities and suburbs), as it is these breeds that cause almost all the fatalities and serious injuries, although nothing compares to the raw attack power of a Pitbull, the Pitbull has unique attack abilities that makes it unlike other breeds. Hence the reason they have been used for over a century and still used as fighting dogs.
Personally, I don't care if my neighbour wants to stick live hand grenades up his arse as part of his recreational activities, but if his idea of enjoyment, injures or kills me, my pet, a friend or family member or anybody near and dear, then we are going to have a problem.
-
E-Kul do you really believe that the only reasons to own a gun are hunting and recreation?
Honestly you know that even if you were nathan jones you wouldnt be able to protect yourself adequatley against a person or ppl who were hell bent on doing you harm right?
Do you really believe that the govt will always be there to take care of you?
-
Do you really believe that the govt will always be there to take care of you?
He probably does.
-
Honestly you know that even if you were nathan jones you wouldnt be able to protect yourself adequatley against a person or ppl who were hell bent on doing you harm right?
Do you really believe that the govt will always be there to take care of you?
No, I think the Government is pretty useless, they have failed to protect me so far, and I Imagine they will fail to do so well into the future.
And I understand that even if I am a huge powerful individual, that against a gun I am vulnerable and in harms way. If people are hell bent on doing me harm, they will do it, even if I own a gun, they simply just work out when I am most vulnerable, ie, sleeping, showering, shitting, out in public etc and take the chance then to get me. But, because I am not involved in the mafia, I don't worry about hit-men coming for me. On the other hand if I was mugged or my house was invaded by armed men, they are free to have what they came for.
If the society I currently lived in was overrun by gangbangers regularly raiding houses and raping children it might be a different situation, but that's not the case were I live. I am simply not a gun guy, even if they were giving them away for free I wouldn't have one. I have no desire to take another's life, even if they are threatening mine. I could do it, but I would have to be 100% sure I had no other option, but it wouldn't be something that would sit well with me. I simply don't live for the moment where I have a gun and a chance to use it.
-
On the other hand if I was mugged or my house was invaded by armed men, they are free to have what they came for.
Including your gf or wife or kids?
I simply don't live for the moment where I have a gun and a chance to use it.
And who here does?
-
Including your gf or wife or kids?
And who here does?
Can't imagine too many burglars wanting the girlfriend, if they did, well more fool them, I suppose they could have her too. And as for the kid, it sure would be nice of them to take her, it would save me a lot of money! ;D
And most of getbig seems to live for the chance to gun down something, someone, just about anybody or anything they suspect of even thinking about infringing on their rights.
-
Struck a nerve did I, it comes as no surprise that those child-men who feel so desperately insecure and fearful to the point of having to secure a person arsenal of guns will project onto others their desperate insecurity and fear to divert attention away from their deep lack of masculinity. Owning and obsessing over guns is a fail safe way to communicate to others that you are desperately afraid and live in fear. For women to do this, it is understandable, for men to do it, it is embarrassing.
like
-
ND and Shock have this thread on lockdown- but I am chiming in to illustrate the typically pathetic leftist response to the unfortunate byproducts of a free society. It all starts and ends with bigger and more intrusive government combined with a visceral hatred for the Constitution.
Forget freedom of speech-- The first amendment needs to be altered because of what subhuman Islamic filth might do on the other side of the world. The violent reaction to my freedom of expression does not result in the condemnation of violence, it results in the condemnation of speech.
Forget the right to bare arms- The second amendment needs to be rendered useless because of the occasional nutjob flying off the handle with a gun. Never-mind the root causes which undoubtedly led to the use of guns in the first place; mental illness, bad parenting, violent videogames and movies, prescription drugs etc.
The 5th/14th Amendment needs to be stretched and perverted beyond recognition to exclusively accommodate democratic party constituencies and provide the President ( only this President for some odd reason)with the extrajudicial power to unilaterally bypass Congress and spend whatever he feels like spending.
There are numerous other examples, but I digress.
The point is that history has a funny way of repeating itself. The government doesn't give a fuck about the individual citizen unless its a scheme to confiscate and redistribute the fruits of the individual citizens labor. No one-- whether individual or organization, government agency or elected official can or will EVER do a better job protecting YOU than YOU yourself.
In the disgustingly delusional world of a leftist, when someone breaks into your house, you should cower in fear and roll into the fetal position until the police hopefully arrive. You should censor every word that comes out of your mouth so you don't accidentally offend any "historically disadvantaged or underrepresented minority" groups. Your means and abilities should not dictate your lifestyle, accomplishments or actions. A government bureaucrat is better suited to plan your life instead.
The left wants to manufacture results and control the masses-- pure and simple.
This gun debate is just another link in the chain.
As you would expect, an uneducated hill billy tries to lesson everybody on politics and theory of rights. What is left unsaid, is that the author of such a "deep" and "insightful" pile of horseshit does not actually have any sort of formal education on the matter (be it philosophy, law, sociology, etc) and instead, uses the cartoon politics he has learned from TV to try and develop what resembles a mediocre argument. Not only do you not understand "left vs right" debate (as if it was a relevant debate today on political philosophy and theory of rights, because its not, such a view is way too simplistic and conceptually erratic) but you also evidently ignore the VAST literature on several topics you unknowingly scratched superficially.
The glazing of the cake is the subtle aftertaste of conspiracy and paranoia in your post..."they are all lying! they are all out to get me! Better kill em before they kill me!"
And inbefuckingfor I am a leftist, I like Marx and Hegel (smart fellas), but I openly dislike Marxism and any form of Marx-driven political program.
-
Can't imagine too many burglars wanting the girlfriend, if they did, well more fool them, I suppose they could have her too. And as for the kid, it sure would be nice of them to take her, it would save me a lot of money! ;D
And most of getbig seems to live for the chance to gun down something, someone, just about anybody or anything they suspect of even thinking about infringing on their rights.
But you're afraid of dogs!
-
and I understand that even if I am a huge powerful individual, that against a gun I am vulnerable and in harms way. If people are hell bent on doing me harm, they will do it, even if I own a gun, they simply just work out when I am most vulnerable, ie, sleeping, showering, shitting, out in public etc and take the chance then to get me. But, because I am not involved in the mafia, I don't worry about hit-men coming for me. On the other hand if I was mugged or my house was invaded by armed men, they are free to have what they came for.
they dont even have to have a gun to be a threat to your life. You dont have to be involved in crime to be subject to its violence. Ive never been to jail, never been arrested and was never involved in criminal activity other than general stupid kid shit but have seen mulitple ppl shot/stabbed. Ive known multiple ppl that have been murdered not close personal friends but friends. My brother lived with a friend and his wife who were murdered during a home invasion, their kids were in bed sleeping when it happened, luckily my brother was not home at the time.
For you to sit there and make some of the assinine generalizations and statements you do really does show you know very little on the subject.
If the society I currently lived in was overrun by gangbangers regularly raiding houses and raping children it might be a different situation, but that's not the case were I live. I am simply not a gun guy, even if they were giving them away for free I wouldn't have one. I have no desire to take another's life, even if they are threatening mine. I could do it, but I would have to be 100% sure I had no other option, but it wouldn't be something that would sit well with me. I simply don't live for the moment where I have a gun and a chance to use it.
You really think that if you just give them your shit they will leave you alone?
You say you dont want to take anybodies life like its in opposition to those that own guns ::)
who wants to take another persons life, it would tear me apart to have to kill another human being but if its between my, my family or friends and someone trying to kill them you better bet your ass im going to do everything in my power to make sure its the person trying to harm them.
You just cant seem to shake this moronic and idiotic view you have of gun owners. It is obvious in your posts you have a deep resentment toward them for whatever reason. Its also obvious that you cannot be objective on the subject because of it.
you really need to take a step back, take a breath and re-examine the entire issue.
You admit that in the end you are the only one who can protect you and your family. You admit that criminals are out there and intend to harm innocent ppl. you admit that you cannot protect yourself/family against ppl intent on doing you harm.
Yet you still rail against OTHERS rights to protect themselves. If you dont want to take steps to protect yourself and family against the threats you agree exist thats fine, but do not presume to tell others how they can and cannot protect themselves and families.
-
they dont even have to have a gun to be a threat to your life. You dont have to be involved in crime to be subject to its violence. Ive never been to jail, never been arrested and was never involved in criminal activity other than general stupid kid shit but have seen mulitple ppl shot/stabbed. Ive known multiple ppl that have been murdered not close personal friends but friends. My brother lived with a friend and his wife who were murdered during a home invasion, their kids were in bed sleeping when it happened, luckily my brother was not home at the time.
For you to sit there and make some of the assinine generalizations and statements you do really does show you know very little on the subject.
You say you dont want to take anybodies life like its in opposition to those that own guns ::)
who wants to take another persons life, it would tear me apart to have to kill another human being but if its between my, my family or friends and someone trying to kill them you better bet your ass im going to do everything in my power to make sure its the person trying to harm them.
You just cant seem to shake this moronic and idiotic view you have of gun owners. It is obvious in your posts you have a deep resentment toward them for whatever reason. Its also obvious that you cannot be objective on the subject because of it.
you really need to take a step back, take a breath and re-examine the entire issue.
You admit that in the end you are the only one who can protect you and your family. You admit that criminals are out there and intend to harm innocent ppl. you admit that you cannot protect yourself/family against ppl intent on doing you harm.
Yet you still rail against OTHERS rights to protect themselves. If you dont want to take steps to protect yourself and family against the threats you agree exist thats fine, but do not presume to tell others how they can and cannot protect themselves and families.
The issue is though, that the very thing you want to protect yourself is the very thing that has made your society so dangerous in the first place. For you to have the right to own a gun, many other innocent people have to be killed or die for this, that doesn't sound like it is fair for those who have to pay the price with their lives. It is a paradox, if everyone demands the right to own guns, then society will become incredibly unsafe, reinforcing the belief that a gun is needed to protect themselves, if everyone let go of their guns, society will become safer, lessening the need for citizens to own guns.
The view I have of gun owners as moronic is widely held, you only need to look at some examples of Gun Nutters like Timothy McVeigh and David Koresh and see how such a paranoid deluded ideology like the anti government stance that right wing gun nutters hold, soon turns into DEATH for many innocent people. Like I said, you owning a gun, paradoxically endangers innocent people. The more people who insist on owning guns the more innocent people who have to lose their lives to pay the price. I could name many situations were gun owners were still killed by a gun even though they owned guns but were unable to access them. I believe, and some studies bear this out, that by owning a gun, you are more likely to be injured or killed than if you don't during the committing of a crime. Your argument that a gun offers protection is questionable.
-
The issue is though, that the very thing you want to protect yourself is the very thing that has made your society so dangerous in the first place. For you to have the right to own a gun, many other innocent people have to be killed or die for this, that doesn't sound like it is fair for those who have to pay the price with their lives. It is a paradox, if everyone demands the right to own guns, then society will become incredibly unsafe, reinforcing the belief that a gun is needed to protect themselves, if everyone let go of their guns, society will become safer, lessening the need for citizens to own guns.
The view I have of gun owners as moronic is widely held, you only need to look at some examples of Gun Nutters like Timothy McVeigh and David Koresh and see how such a paranoid deluded ideology like the anti government stance that right wing gun nutters hold, soon turns into DEATH for many innocent people. Like I said, you owning a gun, paradoxically endangers innocent people. The more people who insist on owning guns the more innocent people who have to lose their lives to pay the price. I could name many situations were gun owners were still killed by a gun even though they owned guns but were unable to access them. I believe, and some studies bear this out, that by owning a gun, you are more likely to be injured or killed than if you don't during the committing of a crime. Your argument that a gun offers protection is questionable.
Simply b/c you believe it to be widely held doesnt mean its correct.
the reason you feel this way and I use the word "FEEL" for a reason b/c you stance is based in emotion is b/c you incorrectly view the guns as the cause of the problem. The desire to kill will be present regardless, mcveigh used a bomb not a gun and others would too if a gun wasnt available. The shooter in aurura boobie trapped his apartment with bombs too but Im guessing you didnt know that.
For every country you point out to support your stance I can point out one that supports mine. The reason is that guns arent the problem!!!!
I never said owning a gun means you will protect yourself only that it gives you the ability to do so in a much more effective way that without one.
Your emotions are getting in the way, again take a step back, take a deep breath and look at it objectively without the preconcieved notions you have.
Serious question, have your anyone youve known had bad experiences with guns?
-
Simply b/c you believe it to be widely held doesnt mean its correct.
the reason you feel this way and I use the word "FEEL" for a reason b/c you stance is based in emotion is b/c you incorrectly view the guns as the cause of the problem. The desire to kill will be present regardless, mcveigh used a bomb not a gun and others would too if a gun wasnt available. The shooter in aurura boobie trapped his apartment with bombs too but Im guessing you didnt know that.
For every country you point out to support your stance I can point out one that supports mine. The reason is that guns arent the problem!!!!
I never said owning a gun means you will protect yourself only that it gives you the ability to do so in a much more effective way that without one.
Your emotions are getting in the way, again take a step back, take a deep breath and look at it objectively without the preconcieved notions you have.
Serious question, have your anyone youve known had bad experiences with guns?
It's odd you keep calling the other side emotional, I feel little to no emotion around the issue, it is simply common sense. Personally, I have never met a group so emotional as the NRA and those that support the issue. Let's take Alex Jones for example. Honest, the people who are against gun control show far more emotion than those family members of mass murdered children who are the real victims. And like most gun Nutters, you seem oblivious to your hysterical emotionality on the issue.
McVeigh was a classic Gun Nut, visiting Gun Shows and credits these shows for influencing his anti government stance. The overly emotional, paranoid beliefs of the Gun Nutters is what shaped his desire to kill as many as possible. And like you said, even if the ability for Crazies to get their hands on the appropriate weaponry is thwarted, the desire to kill will still be there. Well I can live with that, the desire to kill is a far stretch from the actions of doing it. I have known many people who have in the heat of the moment threatened to kill others, from children to the elderly, the emotions pass and they wonder what they were thinking, such is the nature of RAGE. Many of the mass shooters have questioned immediately after why they took the actions they did, once the RAGE has passed.
And the Aurora shooter had a change of heart, and actually informed the authorities of his booby trap, the RAGE he felt had passed once he murdered masses of people. And I disagree with your statement that a gun fives you a means to protect yourself in a much more effective way, I actually think you increase the chances of you being seriously injured or killed, as you now present a greater threat to those who are trying to harm you and will become a primary target, their are studies that bear this out.
I have never had any experience with a gun, I feel absolutely no need in a modern society to think about them, own them, shoot them, purchase them etc... I have met gun nutters before, and listened to their repetitive overly emotional propaganda and lies, it really is quite embarrassing that they remain unaware of how ridiculous they sound. And to think that GUNS are not part of the problem is typical of the classic denial that Gun Nutters indulge in. It really is not only pathological, it is offensive to the many victims and ensures that many more innocent people will die until those responsible for enabling such an environment for these regular homicides to occur are held to account.
-
(http://usbacklash.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/senator-dianne-feinstein-sucks-dildo.jpg)
-
It's odd you keep calling the other side emotional, I feel little to no emotion around the issue, it is simply common sense. Personally, I have never met a group so emotional as the NRA and those that support the issue. Let's take Alex Jones for example. Honest, the people who are against gun control show far more emotion than those family members of mass murdered children who are the real victims. And like most gun Nutters, you seem oblivious to your hysterical emotionality on the issue.
McVeigh was a classic Gun Nut, visiting Gun Shows and credits these shows for influencing his anti government stance. The overly emotional, paranoid beliefs of the Gun Nutters is what shaped his desire to kill as many as possible. And like you said, even if the ability for Crazies to get their hands on the appropriate weaponry, the desire to kill will still be there. Well I can live with that, the desire to kill is a far stretch from the actions of doing it. I have known many people who have in the heat of the moment threatened to kill others, from children to the elderly, the emotions pass and they wonder what they were thinking, such is the nature of RAGE. Many of the mass shooters have questioned immediately after why they took the actions they did, once the RAGE has passed.
And the Aurora shooter had a change of heart, and actually informed the authorities of his booby trap, the RAGE he felt had passed once he murdered masses of people. And I disagree with your statement that a gun fives you a means to protect yourself in a much more effective way, I actually think you increase the chances of you being seriously injured or killed, as you now present a greater threat to those who are trying to harm you and will become a primary target, their are studies that bear this out.
I have never had any experience with a gun, I feel absolutely no need in a modern society to think about them, own them, shoot them, purchase them etc... I have met gun nutters before, and listened to their repetitive overly emotional propaganda and lies, it really is quite embarrassing that they remain unaware of how ridiculous they sound. And to think that GUNS are not part of the problem is typical of the classic denial that Gun Nutters indulge in. It really is not only pathological, it is offensive to the many victims and ensures that many more innocent people will die until those responsible for enabling such an environment for these regular homicides to occur are held to account.
Yet you probably call the murder of the unborn a matter of a "woman's right to choose." ::)
-
Yet you probably call the murder of the unborn a matter of a "woman's right to choose." ::)
Yes, and Obama is a child killer. A mass murderer.
-
Yes, and Obama is a child killer. A mass murderer.
Jury is out on that...
But one thing for sure is that Joe is hilariously short.
-
Yet you probably call the murder of the unborn a matter of a "woman's right to choose." ::)
How can you murder someone who's not born yet?
-
How can you murder someone who's not born yet?
You'll have an eternity to ask yourself why you asked such a dumb fucking question.
Hope this helps.
Joe is hilariously short.
-
I thought this was about guns?
-
I thought this was about guns?
Dude, I was so close to derailing this thread in true getbig fashion and you ruined it. :-X
-
Dude, I was so close to derailing this thread in true getbig fashion and you ruined it. :-X
Do fetuses have the right to bear arms? If every fetus had a fire arm there would be no more abortions
-
Do fetuses have the right to bear arms?
yes, unless they're black or gay
-
How can you murder someone who's not born yet?
Actually, there are even cases of the child coming out of the womb still alive during an attempted abortion, and it is still killed.
Many abortions are done late term, at a time that other kids have already come out prematurely.
I consider this clear murder. Funny that the same disgusting scum get upset about owning guns - maybe because deep down they know in their hearts that they are the ones the guns should be used on.
-
I consider this clear murder. Funny that the same disgusting scum get upset about owning guns - maybe because deep down they know in their hearts that they are the ones the guns should be used on.
Obama born alive controversy
From 1996-2003, Barack Obama made at least 7 controversial votes against bills mandating medical care for newborn children after late-term, botched abortions
http://creationwiki.org/Obama_born_alive_controversy
-
[ Invalid YouTube link ]
-
what beautiful montage... Alex Jones is the man.
-
Aren't you canadian, and a fucking fucktard one too, you'd be first on the list of people who shouldn't be allowed to have guns.
-
Aren't you canadian, and a fucking fucktard one too, you'd be first on the list of people who shouldn't be allowed to have guns.
Flawless logic. You must make your kind proud.
-
Flawless logic. You must make your kind proud.
Whatever you wanna say my kind you can, but regardless you is way more fucked. Your creepy, like that local pedophile that buys people drinks at the bar just so someone look past his subhuman nature.
-
Whatever you wanna say my kind you can, but regardless you is way more fucked. Your creepy, like that local pedophile that buys people drinks at the bar just so someone look past his subhuman nature.
reply loaded with personal reflection.
Are you a pedophile?
-
It's crazy, 95 out of 100 "like" the video on youtube. Only 5 out of 100 dislike it. But the politicians and press are trying to say people are behind them?
[ Invalid YouTube link ]
-
It's crazy, 95 out of 100 "like" the video on youtube. Only 5 out of 100 dislike it. But the politicians and press are trying to say people are behind them?
smart observation my friend and it is the key... easy to claim when information is "single channeled" the way it has been for the last century .... but no more... multi channelism dominates and propagates reality. No place place anymore for the Pierce douches of the world.
-
Some people in this thread do not know what 'logic' means.
(There is at least one x such that (x is a person and x is in this thread) and x does not know what 'logic' means.)
-
LOL at thread title 'logic and patriotism' as if the two can co-exist.
-
LOL you are overdoing the trolling just a bit lately ;D
LOL at thread title 'logic and patriotism' as if the two can co-exist.
-
Really good video!
youtube comment ;D
Ross Munro 2 minutes ago
Honestly..? Cant even figure out you've been under an oppresive government for a good 50 years already? Ignorace is bliss I guess.
-
This whole gun control debacle by politicians that the people overwhelmingly oppose should tell us all a thing or two about the media.
-
First robbery attempt in the video makes no sense. Those guys had some pretty sweet ordnance one looks to be an mk not cheap and the red up in an expensive car sutting in chrome 22 inch rims.... Doesn't look like they needed to rob anyone
-
Time to get owned by a storm of bullets.
-
YES!
-
:D
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/66896_536834476357029_313969606_n.jpg)
-
Because i am a big strong bodybuilder who trains the dangerous art of karate and knows dim mak the death touch, one simple touch in your pressure point and you can be knocked out or killed depending on what i want to do to you, so get down to the dojo and leave the guns alone.
So then you'd rather have criminals walking around with guns wouldn't you. That would be a great place to live in.
-
According to VP Joe Biden the gun for liberals are shotguns. Even liberals like guns just not semi automatics. Hmmm, let me think. Should I get shot with double 00 buck or a round from an AR15 .223? I think death is death.
-
According to VP Joe Biden the gun for liberals are shotguns. Even liberals like guns just not semi automatics. Hmmm, let me think. Should I get shot with double 00 buck or a round from an AR15 .223? I think death is death.
Biden doesn't know what he's talking about. In my opinion, I think the Government is trying to regulate guns in case a civil war would break loose and they don't want the American people to arm themselves. Look at what happened in Occupy L.A. and Occupy Oakland people were very hostile now if they had guns that would of been a much different story, which is why they're bringing in drones and the Police State is expanding a whole lot more now. They can't take that risk so they had to come up with a couple of False Flag attacks in Aurora and the Sandy Hoax shooting to try and strip away our 2nd Amendment even more, that's what I think.
-
Yes, but having a Firearm, it's usually enough by just SHOWING your firearm to deterr these individuals.
When you have trained Tapout and begun following the code of "No Firearms", you have to resort to physical violence for the thugs, thieves and bangers to understand.
bullshit. showing a firearm is likely to get you mugged AND shot... which do you prefer, mugged and live, or mugged and shot?
do you want everyone walking around toting assault rifles and reacting to car backfires?...
seriously the dumbest collection of people are the pro gun lobby.
-
bullshit. showing a firearm is likely to get you mugged AND shot... which do you prefer, mugged and live, or mugged and shot?
do you want everyone walking around toting assault rifles and reacting to car backfires?...
seriously the dumbest collection of people are the pro gun lobby.
And the people who are for gun control are also the dumbest. I guess you'd rather prefer to have them in the hands of criminals then, huh.
-
And the people who are for gun control are also the dumbest. I guess you'd rather prefer to have them in the hands of criminals then, huh.
Guns are for pussies.
-
Guns are for pussies.
And How the fuck do you think we overthrew the British, huh? Fucking dumbass.
Take for instance the shooting that happened here a few days ago in Southern California, this madman was just going around killing people and hijacking their car for no reason, who's the real 'coward'? How's one suppose to defend themselves when they encounter a person of that nature? Oh yeah you're going to try to be the big shot that you are,huh. Good luck with that boy. I don't agree with guns but they're there for self-defense when someone else has a weapon, and for standing up against tyranny! Especially!
-
Guns are for pussies.
Well then?
-
And How the fuck do you think we overthrew the British, huh? Fucking dumbass.
Take for instance the shooting that happened here a few days ago in Southern California, this madman was just going around killing people and hijacking their car for no reason, who's the real 'coward'? How's one suppose to defend themselves when they encounter a person of that nature? Oh yeah you're going to try to be the big shot that you are,huh. Good luck with that boy. I don't agree with guns but they're there for self-defense when someone else has a weapon, and for standing up against tyranny! Especially!
Bullshit rationale. Let me clarify my original position. Guns are for PUSSIES. Thank you!
-
Bullshit rationale. Let me clarify my original position. Guns are for PUSSIES. Thank you!
sounds like you're in love with the cock
let me clarify... SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE IN LOVE WITH THE COCK
thank you
-
sounds like you're in love with the cock
let me clarify... SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE IN LOVE WITH THE COCK
thank you
I appreciate a large cock and pay homage when necessary. (no homo) I cam comfortable in my own skin. However, and let me be frank, it appears your substituting guns for your obvious homosexual tendencies. Again, let me be frank, you substitute guns for your homosexual tendencies. Thank you. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
-
I appreciate a large cock and pay homage when necessary. (no homo) I cam comfortable in my own skin. However, and let me be frank, it appears your substituting guns for your obvious homosexual tendencies. Again, let me be frank, you substitute guns for your homosexual tendencies. Thank you. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
meltdown
-
Bullshit rationale. Let me clarify my original position. Guns are for PUSSIES. Thank you!
Is it really that hard to come up with a few thoughts and make a sentence as to what gives actual meaning to your statement'?
-
Is it really that hard to come up with a few thoughts and make a sentence as to what gives actual meaning to your statement'?
I am not a mathematician but by my count it has taken you 8 days to respond to the brutal owning I laid upon your feeble shoulders. You've been owned. Accept it. Move on.
-
I am not a mathematician but by my count it has taken you 8 days to respond to the brutal owning I laid upon your feeble shoulders. You've been owned. Accept it. Move on.
Well then how about this, I apologize I don't spend all of my life on here checking regularly on the chance just to respond back to you. I was simply looking for the basis as to what makes someone think the way you do but it seems you're incapable of holding a mature conversation about this topic. If that's the case then sure that's fine with me I have no problem accepting that.
-
http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/farmer-drove-at-speed-into-station-after-gun-licence-refusal-224841.html (http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/farmer-drove-at-speed-into-station-after-gun-licence-refusal-224841.html)
By Tom Gillespie The man also threatened to get a gun to sort local gardaí out.
At Westport District Court yesterday, Judge Mary Devins was told that John Burns, aged 62, from Lanmore, Liscarney, Westport, Co Mayo, drove at former garda Frank Kelly in the grounds of the local station, nearly pinning him to a wall and forcing him to jump for safety onto a raised flowerbed.
Sgt Denis Harrington said the accused then skidded his tractor to a stop and made threats to get a gun to sort local gardaí out.
Witness said that on May 25, 2011, the accused then became abusive and angry with the result that a number of people could not get into the station.
Sgt Harrington said that while being arrested, Burns struck out and kicked a witness in the shin.
“He was threatening and abusive and made another reference to getting a revolver.”
Explaining the apparent reasons for Burns’s behaviour, Sgt Harrington said his application for a firearms certificate had been refused at least twice by two garda superintendents.
He had got a gun from a dealer under false pretences and when the gardaí went looking for the gun, he had it hidden away.
Sgt Harrington said that the local station could get 100 calls a day from the accused prior to the incident with the tractor but these calls had stopped since the incident.
Rory O’Connor, defending, said Burns seemed to have a great dislike for people in uniform but he was “a nuisance more than a danger”.
The accused could not mount the steps to the witness box as he had a broken leg. His solicitor said he was just of hospital.
After Burns, who pleaded guilty to charges of dangerous driving, assault, and public order, gave an undertaking “not to bother the gardaí” further in any way, Judge Devins adjourned the charges for 12 months to see how he behaved.