Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Pet shop boys on July 31, 2012, 05:15:52 AM
-
Arnold is 65, so an special issue from Ironman mag,featuring few "Arnold pictures" that have made the cover before, is on stands.
(http://www.ironmanmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/aug12-cover.jpg)
WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
-
Arnold is back on the cover of another muscle magazine for the 101 time.....I guess it helps in selling those Mags....I wonder if Arnie get any small fee at all
-
I knew he would be back !!
-
These mags stick Arnold on the cover all the fucking time. Then they act like it's something rare and you must buy it.
-
Arnold is back on the cover of another muscle magazine for the 101 time.....I guess it helps in selling those Mags....I wonder if Arnie get any small fee at all
x2.
-
yes its terrible but people probably rather buy a bbing magazine with something as "accepted" as arnold on the cover than some "steroid unknown criminal" on it.
and you have people buying the arnold magazine who would never buy a normal bbing magazine .
jesus why buy a bbing magazine anyway, its the biggest waste of money, buying supplements is still a little more useful than that.
-
While those pics are 35-40 years old......Arnold still looks better than champs like Branch or Johnny Jackson Specialy in poses like that.....
But what's funny is that you see more rare pictures of Arnold than in those magazines.
WOOOOSSSSHHHHHHHH
-
yes its terrible but people probably rather buy a bbing magazine with something as "accepted" as arnold on the cover than some "steroid unknown criminal" on it.
and you have people buying the arnold magazine who would never buy a normal bbing magazine .
jesus why buy a bbing magazine anyway, its the biggest waste of money, buying supplements is still a little more useful than that.
Because its a pain taking the computer into the bathroom to jerk off its a lot easier to take the magazine.
-
yeah he's yet to be topped.
-
Do people really still buy bodybuilding magazines?
-
Do people really still buy bodybuilding magazines?
Good question........
They're like $7.00
So I think at that price,they must be selling...specially in this particular case,with Arnold on cover and expandables coming in two weeks.
WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HH
-
Why people still buy bodybuilding magazines is beyond me.
I remember buying a pair of Muscular Development & Flex magazines back in 2000 and found them both to be utter garbage.
Muscular development was composed of 15 pages of muscle cartoons, followed by 10 pages of ghost written articles and then 200 pages of useless advertising, which would then culminating with a 3 page ramble from Valentino. The worst part is that they would always tout on their covers how their present issue was the biggest one up to date; when in reality their useless magazine was 90% advertisements and 10% garbage anyway.
Flex tried to have a little more integrity, but when you have an article supposedly written by Ronnie Coleman where he uses words that could only be attributed to a literature major, it starts to smell like shit.
Both magazines went crazy with their photoshopped covers, not to mention their pricing scheme.
Pure garbage..
"1"
-
i never saw a guy with muscles buy such a magazines, only for the naive youth
-
jesus why buy a bbing magazine anyway, its the biggest waste of money, buying supplements is still a little more useful than that.
Some people like to "look" at the pictures of the muscle-men.
-
Why people still buy bodybuilding magazines is beyond me.
I remember buying a pair of Muscular Development & Flex magazines back in 2000 and found them both to be utter garbage.
Muscular development was composed of 15 pages of muscle cartoons, followed by 10 pages of ghost written articles and then 200 pages of useless advertising, which would then culminating with a 3 page ramble from Valentino. The worst part is that they would always tout on their covers how their present issue was the biggest one up to date; when in reality their useless magazine was 90% advertisements and 10% garbage anyway.
Flex tried to have a little more integrity, but when you have an article supposedly written by Ronnie Coleman where he uses words that could only be attributed to a literature major, it starts to smell like shit.
Both magazines went crazy with their photoshopped covers, not to mention their pricing scheme.
Pure garbage..
"1"
MD got rid of the muscular cartoons now.....they're focusing on what real bodybuilding is about
-
'Wasp' waist!
-
Seems to me they are trying to regain some mainstream attention and they know Arnold's physique will always be accepted rather than the current mass monsters out there.
-
Because its a pain taking the computer into the bathroom to jerk off its a lot easier to take the magazine.
LOL!
-
Why people still buy bodybuilding magazines is beyond me.
I remember buying a pair of Muscular Development & Flex magazines back in 2000 and found them both to be utter garbage.
Muscular development was composed of 15 pages of muscle cartoons, followed by 10 pages of ghost written articles and then 200 pages of useless advertising, which would then culminating with a 3 page ramble from Valentino. The worst part is that they would always tout on their covers how their present issue was the biggest one up to date; when in reality their useless magazine was 90% advertisements and 10% garbage anyway.
Flex tried to have a little more integrity, but when you have an article supposedly written by Ronnie Coleman where he uses words that could only be attributed to a literature major, it starts to smell like shit.
Both magazines went crazy with their photoshopped covers, not to mention their pricing scheme.
Pure garbage..
"1"
haha, i remember reading articles 'written' by Sergio Oliva where he talked about the theoretical implications of certain training styles.
-
haha yes when i red these articles of pros i thought they were all so in the know and smart. ha ha!
-
I haven't seen an Ironmag here for ages. Used to be a great mag but it went down hill.
-
haha, i remember reading articles 'written' by Sergio Oliva where he talked about the theoretical implications of certain training styles.
As a kid I really thought they wrote those articles themselves, until I realized most of them were (close to) illiterate... ;D
-
I buy MD cuz of women in these mags with their DD's mmm. Til they removed them.. I stopped buying.
-
if i want to see women i buy a porn magazine. oh wait fuck that i dont even buy magazines for porno