Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Iceman1981 on August 04, 2012, 10:28:41 PM
-
Biggest and Baddest Mr. Olympia Of All-Time!!!
More Pics -----> Ronnie Coleman 2003 Mr Olympia HQ PICS (http://www.legendsofbodybuilding.com/2012/08/ronnie-coleman-2003-mr.html)
-
Biggest and Baddest Mr. Olympia Of All-Time!!!
More Pics -----> Ronnie Coleman 2003 Mr Olympia HQ PICS (http://www.legendsofbodybuilding.com/2012/08/ronnie-coleman-2003-mr.html)
Couple of rare ones there ice, Biggest yip absolutely, the late 90s (1997-99) better Version IMO Lost his Lines and Aesthetics @ that sort of Massive Weight in 03, heres Haney in 1986
-
Looks like shit IMO.
His 98-99 form was his only truly great physique.
-
black men with muscles
-
Looks like shit IMO.
His 98-99 form was his only truly great physique.
defintely, the big waist ruins it all.
-
He looks horrible, he should not be celebrated for bringing this physique to a stage.
-
Ronnie "G.O.A.T" Coleman
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-02zNS4o8kck/UB4CVfMzJpI/AAAAAAAACzQ/Ts6inI18ORk/s1600/05.jpg)
(http://i396.photobucket.com/albums/pp45/adamthebest84/dorianyates93olympia3.jpg)
-
craig titus looks good there
-
yates...........lol ;D
Ronnie!
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v503/robert1986/coleman-yates-side-chest.jpg)
-
Still not matched. The greatest 8)
-
Biggest and Baddest Mr. Olympia Of All-Time!!!
More Pics -----> Ronnie Coleman 2003 Mr Olympia HQ PICS (http://www.legendsofbodybuilding.com/2012/08/ronnie-coleman-2003-mr.html)
:-\
Looks like dogshit.
-
the best physique of all-time right there 8)
-
His biggest, but by far not his best. His proportions had gone to complete shit by then, legs way too big and arms way too small for the torso. He added size in all the wrong spots, hips, gut, ass, waist and thighs, while arms, delts, chest and back stayed the same. Ronnie looked a 1000 times better at a lighter bodyweight.
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2008/1998_olympia_review_c.jpg) (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-02zNS4o8kck/UB4CVfMzJpI/AAAAAAAACzQ/Ts6inI18ORk/s1600/05.jpg)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=319007.0;attach=358369;image) (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-vP6hL7T5VIc/UB4CYgirp8I/AAAAAAAACz4/rr_0YQOoCOI/s1600/10.jpg)
-
in 98,99 ronnie was best bodybuilder on stage,in 03 he was a freek,way beyond anyone else on stage!
-
His biggest, but by far not his best. His proportions had gone to complete shit by then, legs way too big and arms way too small for the torso. He added size in all the wrong spots, hips, gut, ass, waist and thighs, while arms, delts, chest and back stayed the same. Ronnie looked a 1000 times better at a lighter bodyweight.
his proportions were fine in 03. Everything got bigger, not just his thighs and waist
-
(http://learninginmind.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/nubret2.jpg)
-
his proportions were fine in 03. Everything got bigger, not just his thighs and waist
Looks like dogshit compared to 98/99.
-
Looks like dogshit compared to 98/99.
the Mr. Olympia isn't a beauty pageant. Following your logic, Dorian looked like crap every year
-
the Mr. Olympia isn't a beauty pageant. Following your logic, Dorian looked like crap every year
This makes no sense.
Ronnie looked great 98-99, and 01 ASC.
Dorian looked great 92, 93 and 95 and 96GP
Ronnie looks bloated and watery. Conditioning suffered way to much to be the greatest physique ever. Plus his proportions were absolute shit this year.
-
This makes no sense.
Ronnie looked great 98-99, and 01 ASC.
Dorian looked great 92, 93 and 95 and 96GP
Ronnie looks bloated and watery. Conditioning suffered way to much to be the greatest physique ever. Plus his proportions were absolute shit this year.
it makes perfect sense. Bodybuilding isn't a beauty pageant. Ronnie met the criteria in 03 despite not looking aesthetic. His arms, delts, chest, back - everything got bigger. It wasn't just his glutes, thighs, and waist that grew like you say. Dorian is another example of a bodybuilder having good proportions despite not looking "pretty." Also, Ronnie's conditioning in 03 was great. Not sure what you're smoking
-
lots of gorgeous, muscly negros in this thread
-
it makes perfect sense. Bodybuilding isn't a beauty pageant. Ronnie met the criteria in 03 despite not looking aesthetic. His arms, delts, chest, back - everything got bigger. It wasn't just his glutes, thighs, and waist that grew like you say. Dorian is another example of a bodybuilder having good proportions despite not looking "pretty." Also, Ronnie's conditioning in 03 was great. Not sure what you're smoking
Not sure what you're smoking. Not only his proportions have gone to shit, he also lost a ton of detail and cuts playing the size game. He looked a 1000 times better at a lighter bodyweight. Ronnie should have never been more than 250, that was just perfect for his frame.
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_mC1TEdZ4gks/TCuueiWz1sI/AAAAAAAAMFA/-hP3irGwVZI/s1600/Ronnie+Coleman+in+1998+-+01+-+www.Musclebase.Blogspot.com.JPG) (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-02zNS4o8kck/UB4CVfMzJpI/AAAAAAAACzQ/Ts6inI18ORk/s1600/05.jpg)
-
Not sure what you're smoking. Not only his proportions have gone to shit, he also lost a ton of detail and cuts playing the size game. He looked a 1000 times better at a lighter bodyweight. Ronnie should have never been more than 250, that was just perfect for his frame.
his definition and proportions were fine. Here is a comparison between 03 and a lighter version of himself
-
his definition and proportions were fine. Here is a comparison between 03 and a lighter version of himself
Yeah... lighter physique every day and twice on sunday.
Not a good comparison of conditioning either, which is really where 03 Ronnie gets killed by his lighter self.
-
way too bloated, i much rather prefer the aesthetics of a younger Ronnie.
the reference will go over most of yer heads probably ;D
-
which ronnie was best ?? well in terms of best bodybuilding physique.. the early years for sure..
BUT in terms of walking around in clothes.. or being in the gym lifting... shooooot.... 03/04 all the way...
&feature=relmfu
-
which ronnie was best ?? well in terms of best bodybuilding physique.. the early years for sure..
Ronnie in the 02 BFTO was amazing. Probably the best offstage physique of all-time
-
ITS BODYBUILDING!!!! THE GOAL IS TO GET BIGGER!!!
His 2003 physique was one of the best EVER!!!! He was a SHREDDED 287lbs!!!!
-
ITS BODYBUILDING!!!! THE GOAL IS TO GET BIGGER!!!
His 2003 physique was one of the best EVER!!!! He was a SHREDDED 287lbs!!!!
There's also something called asthetics. Getting "BIGGER!!!" forsaking everything else is what has got us the current crop of deformaties called pro bb's
-
I want to see a freak show! PERIOD!!!!
-
To each his own. You want a freak show, Ronnie is the freak of freaks!
-
To each his own. You want a freak show, Ronnie is the freak of freaks!
Agreed! 98-99 his most aesthetic and best look onstage!
-
Agreed! 98-99 his most aesthetic and best look onstage!
Agree.
Freaky size, great conditioning, mostly great balance (obviously excluding calves).
-
Ronnie in the 02 BFTO was amazing. Probably the best offstage physique of all-time
This is the best he ever looked.
He looked diced and balanced here.
-
I said biggest & baddest. I didn't say 2003 was his best. In my opinion 98/99 was his best, but then again I think the judges will have Ronnie 2003 winning against anyone because of the size and conditioning he put together for that year.
-
99, 2003, 2005 doesn't matter, Greatest of all time, period. 2003 was his freakiest, when he won the Arnold, probably his most conditioned, first Olympia win most incredible improvement ever.
Here is a gym shot I took in 2005, 2-3 weeks after he competed.
-
99, 2003, 2005 doesn't matter, Greatest of all time, period. 2003 was his freakiest, when he won the Arnold, probably his most conditioned, first Olympia win most incredible improvement ever.
Here is a gym shot I took in 2005, 2-3 weeks after he competed.
He did have a very narrow shoulder structure as evidenced by that pic
It didnt matter in the end though due to his insane mass
-
look at his veins through the leggings, WTF :o
ron coleman greatest bodybuilder of all time
-
He did have a very narrow shoulder structure as evidenced by that pic
It didnt matter in the end though due to his insane mass
Put him next to Phil Heath, you might change your opinion.
-
look at his veins through the leggings, WTF :o
ron coleman greatest bodybuilder of all time
I saw that. How fucking vascular do you have to be for the veins to pop through your spandex? Spandex leggings are gay by the way
-
He did have a very narrow shoulder structure as evidenced by that pic
he actually has naturally wide clavicles. He tends to pull his shoulders back which makes him look narrow
-
Yeah he was definitely huge in 2003 but he looked like shit.
-
he actually has naturally wide clavicles. He tends to pull his shoulders back which makes him look narrow
Totally agree, I've got screen caps on another computer where he's actually
standing a little behind Jay and still looks as wide. Here's a fair comparison
that is Ronnie from the 1999 Olympia DVD/Jay and Phil 2001 Olympia and I think the scaling is very close
to accurate.
(http://a2.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/155/bfccadf9c67b474eb5f6f8d123372333/l.jpg)
-
man look at that shoulder to waist differential.
ronnie 99 was insane.
-
Totally agree, I've got screen caps on another computer where he's actually
standing a little behind Jay and still looks as wide. Here's a fair comparison
that is Ronnie from the 1999 Olympia DVD/Jay and Phil 2001 Olympia and I think the scaling is very close
to accurate.
(http://a2.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/155/bfccadf9c67b474eb5f6f8d123372333/l.jpg)
haahahahah phil heath should retire after seeing this picture
-
haahahahah phil heath should retire after seeing this picture
Dorian Yates owns all of them.
-
Totally agree, I've got screen caps on another computer where he's actually
standing a little behind Jay and still looks as wide. Here's a fair comparison
that is Ronnie from the 1999 Olympia DVD/Jay and Phil 2001 Olympia and I think the scaling is very close
to accurate.
(http://a2.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/155/bfccadf9c67b474eb5f6f8d123372333/l.jpg)
Hahahhahahhaha Poor Phil, looks like a god damn amateur next to Coleman.
-
99, 2003, 2005 doesn't matter, Greatest of all time, period. 2003 was his freakiest, when he won the Arnold, probably his most conditioned, first Olympia win most incredible improvement ever.
Here is a gym shot I took in 2005, 2-3 weeks after he competed.
I agree ^^^^^^^^
-
His biggest, but by far not his best. His proportions had gone to complete shit by then, legs way too big and arms way too small for the torso. He added size in all the wrong spots, hips, gut, ass, waist and thighs, while arms, delts, chest and back stayed the same. Ronnie looked a 1000 times better at a lighter bodyweight.
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2008/1998_olympia_review_c.jpg) (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-02zNS4o8kck/UB4CVfMzJpI/AAAAAAAACzQ/Ts6inI18ORk/s1600/05.jpg)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=319007.0;attach=358369;image) (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-vP6hL7T5VIc/UB4CYgirp8I/AAAAAAAACz4/rr_0YQOoCOI/s1600/10.jpg)
So 23" arms are too small for a man of that size? Sheesh.