Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on August 19, 2012, 07:30:40 PM
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/08/19/niall-ferguson-on-why-barack-obama-needs-to-go.html
OUCH!
-
shit i thought newsweek went under ;D
-
shit i thought newsweek went under ;D
It almost did and was bought out for 1 dollar because it was a leftist toilet paper rag.
-
It almost did and was bought out for 1 dollar because it was a leftist toilet paper rag.
so now is it a right toilet paper rag ??? ;D
-
so now is it a right toilet paper rag ??? ;D
No, they probably are suffering financially from running pro communist Obama bs for so long.
-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/08/19/niall-ferguson-on-why-barack-obama-needs-to-go.html
OUCH!
::)
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/19/unethical-commentary-newsweek-edition/
-
::)
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/19/unethical-commentary-newsweek-edition/
LOL!!!!
Get back to me Krugmans' fake space alien invasion.
His nobel prize is as worthy as Obama's.
-
::)
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/19/unethical-commentary-newsweek-edition/
-
;D
-
;D
But, but...he's the first GAY president.
-
But, but...he's the first GAY president.
He is the first openly communist marxist president and that is all i care about.
I would vote for a gay capitalist who loves this country.
An america hating self aggrandizing divisive malcontent layabout who never worked a day in his life who lectures the rest of us on business matters? FUCK NO!
-
Two journalists are on a plane flying over the US.
One remarks to his colleague, "Man, I don't know of anyone who isn't voting for President Obama this election year. How can Romney possibly even think of winning?"
The other man smiles and points his finger out the window, "Do you see all those masses of huge green squares down there?"
He replies, "Yes?"
"Do you know who lives down there??"
"Who?"
"Republicans, thats who"
-
is this chart accurate?
-
But, but...he's the first GAY president.
only in your dreams
-
only in your dreams
That was Newsweek's cover story, after his flip-flop on gay "marriage", genius......or did you forget about that one?
-
I didn't know supporting gay marriage actually made you gay. When did that occur?
-
That was Newsweek's cover story, after his flip-flop on gay "marriage", genius......or did you forget about that one?
did the article say Obama was gay or is that just in your forbidden personal dreams ?
But, but...he's the first GAY president.
-
did the article say Obama was gay or is that just in your forbidden personal dreams ?
Nice try at projection, but neither the article nor I claimed Obama was gay. The point, which zipped cleared over your head, is that Newsweek gushed over Obama for his flip......ahem......."evolution" on this issue. Now, the cover story is that he needs to kick rocks.
-
Nice try at projection, but neither the article nor I claimed Obama was gay. The point, which zipped cleared over your head, is that Newsweek gushed over Obama for his flip......ahem......."evolution" on this issue. Now, the cover story is that he needs to kick rocks.
you're correct
the article didn't say Obama was gay
you're the one that said that
But, but...he's the first GAY president.
-
you're correct
the article didn't say Obama was gay
you're the one that said that
That's because such was the title of the Newsweek article, genius.
-
That's because such was the title of the Newsweek article, genius.
and also a quote from you
-
and also a quote from you
That quote was based on the Newsweek cover and it's in the context of this latest Newsweek cover, namely that the same magazine that gushed over him for being the "first gay president" now wants him gone.
Are you really this bereft of sense, or is this an act just for our amusement?
-
That quote was based on the Newsweek cover and it's in the context of this latest Newsweek cover, namely that the same magazine that gushed over him for being the "first gay president" now wants him gone.
Are you really this bereft of sense, or is this an act just for our amusement?
haven't you learned anything from Mitt Romney
once you repeat the words of someone else those words are now your words and your quote
go back and look at Romneys first official campaign ad for a reference
that's the new Republican standard so enjoy it
-
haven't you learned anything from Mitt Romney
once you repeat the words of someone else those words are now your words and your quote
go back and look at Romneys first official campaign ad for a reference
that's the new Republican standard so enjoy it
Well, that answers my question: You're bereft of sense.
-
Well, that answers my question: You're bereft of sense.
I'm just following the standard set by the leader of your party
you said Obama is gay
everyone can read your words
-
I'm just following the standard set by the leader of your party
you said Obama is gay
everyone can read your words
What you are following the standard set by the leader of YOUR party (blaming your foolishness on someone else, instead of taking responsibility for it).
-
What you are following the standard set by the leader of YOUR party (blaming your foolishness on someone else, instead of taking responsibility for it).
do you want to go ahead and take this moment to go on the official GB.com record and condemn Romneys first campaign ad (the one he paid for and has defended) ?
-
do you want to go ahead and take this moment to go on the official GB.com record and condemn Romneys first campaign ad (the one he paid for and has defended) ?
What does this Newsweek article have to do with Romney's campaign again? Oh, that's right...basically NOTHING!!!
You're just deflecting again, having displayed your inability to decipher simple tongue-in-cheek humor, in regards to a magazine gushing over Obama, proclaiming him the first gay president three months ago, only to now print a front-page piece saying he must go.
-
What does this Newsweek article have to do with Romney's campaign again? Oh, that's right...basically NOTHING!!!
You're just deflecting again, having displayed your inability to decipher simple tongue-in-cheek humor, in regards to a magazine gushing over Obama, proclaiming him the first gay president three months ago, only to now print a front-page piece saying he must go.
everything
you said Obama is gay and now you're claiming you're just quoting Newsweek
by the standard established by the leader of your party if you say someone elses words those words now belong to you and are your quote
so again, you're the one saying Obama is gay
what's the big deal with admitting these are your own words.
This is a popular idea in your party and 333 can't stop talking about how Obama is gay so you've got company in yoru belief
just own your words and get over it
-
General Election: Romney vs. Obama
Gallup Tracking
Obama 45, Romney 47
Romney +2
General Election: Romney vs. Obama
Rasmussen Tracking
Obama 44, Romney 45
Romney +1
Wisconsin: Romney vs. Obama
PPP (D)
Obama 47, Romney 48
Romney +1
VOTERS TO OBAMA - TIME TO GO
-
everything
you said Obama is gay and now you're claiming you're just quoting Newsweek
No, what I said was, "But, but....he's the first GAY president", which anyone with a clue (which disqualifies you, obviously) would know is a reference to the Newsweek article and cover from three months ago. I further explained that such was the context of that statement. Yet, despite that, you continue your exercise in buffoonery.
by the standard established by the leader of your party if you say someone elses words those words now belong to you and are your quote
so again, you're the one saying Obama is gay
what's the big deal with admitting these are your own words.
This is a popular idea in your party and 333 can't stop talking about how Obama is gay so you've got company in yoru belief
just own your words and get over it
By the standards of the leader of your party, when you say and do something STUPID, to create a certain effect and it backfires (as predicted), rather than own up to it, you whine, make excuses, and blame others for your bungling.
-
No, what I said was, "But, but....he's the first GAY president", which anyone with a clue (which disqualifies you, obviously) would know is a reference to the Newsweek article and cover from three months ago. I further explained that such was the context of that statement. Yet, despite that, you continue your exercise in buffoonery.
By the standards of the leader of your party, when you say and do something STUPID, to create a certain effect and it backfires (as predicted), rather than own up to it, you whine, make excuses, and blame others for your bungling.
yet again
these are your words
I personally don't give a shit that you think Obama is gay
-
t
-
yet again
these are your words
I personally don't give a shit that you think Obama is gay
I don't think Obama's gay, O misinformed one. Get a clue; even in this economy, it's quite cheap to obtain.
-
I don't think Obama's gay, O misinformed one. Get a clue; even in this economy, it's quite cheap to obtain.
well, if you say so
weird how you refuse to hold your own leader to that same simple standard
how am I supposed to know when you quote someone else that it's not really your own words when your leader does the exact same thing and then defends it
-
well, if you say so
weird how you refuse to hold your own leader to that same simple standard
how am I supposed to know when you quote someone else that it's not really your own words when your leader does the exact same thing and then defends it
When a clear explanation has been given, especially in light of the subject matter (i.e. a magazine that gushed over Obama, flipping on gay "marriage" and calling him the first gay president, now printing on its cover that he needs to walk), it only shows your feigned ignorance.
If you want to pretend that you're really that stupid (at this point, you're on your way to an Oscar), that's your business.
Perhaps, you should stop following YOUR leader's example and quit blaming your impotence and futility on other people.
-
When a clear explanation has been given, especially in light of the subject matter (i.e. a magazine that gushed over Obama, flipping on gay "marriage" and calling him the first gay president, now printing on its cover that he needs to walk), it only shows your feigned ignorance.
If you want to pretend that you're really that stupid (at this point, you're on your way to an Oscar), that's your business.
Perhaps, you should stop following YOUR leader's example and quit blaming your impotence and futility on other people.
I'm just holding you to the same standard established by the leader of your party
you haven't condemnend his actions so I have to assume you approve and agree
please feel free to correct me if I've misundestood and you actually don't agree with Romney
-
I'm just holding you to the same standard established by the leader of your party
you haven't condemnend his actions so I have to assume you approve and agree
please feel free to correct me if I've misundestood and you actually don't agree with Romney
And what is Obama's standard for you? LOL!!!!!
-
And what is Obama's standard for you? LOL!!!!!
You mean other than, "when I say/do something stupid and it backfires, it ain't really my fault"?
-
You mean other than, "when I say/do something stupid and it backfires, it ain't really my fault"?
not at all
like I've said
the new standard established by the leader of your party is that if you repeat someones words then they become your words
If you don't agree with this standard that just let me know
-
not at all
like I've said
the new standard established by the leader of your party is that if you repeat someones words then they become your words
If you don't agree with this standard that just let me know
As I've said, the new standard established by the leader of your party is that you aren't actually responsible for the stupid things you do and say. It's really someone else's fault.
-
As I've said, the new standard established by the leader of your party is that you aren't actually responsible for the stupid things you do and say. It's really someone else's fault.
If you said something stupid and ridiculous - you didnt do that - somebody else made that happen.
-
If you said something stupid and ridiculous - you didnt do that - somebody else made that happen.
I've said something in complete consistency with your messiah
-
I've said something in complete consistency with your messiah
Who is my messiah? myth? LOL
-
If you said something stupid and ridiculous - you didnt do that - somebody else made that happen.
Does this apply to you and your bullshit on here every day?