Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on September 24, 2012, 08:10:03 AM
-
Elizabeth Warren’s law license problem
Legal Insurrection ^ | 9/24/12 | William Jacobson
Posted on Monday, September 24, 2012 11:00:35 AM
Warren attempted to deny her role, and referred to a Boston Globe article, but the Globe article supports Brown’s account. The Globe article indicated the representation was for a period of three years and Warren was paid $212,000. The case resulted in a Supreme Court victory for Travelers arising out of a bankruptcy case in New York.
Whatever the political implications of the exchange, Warren’s representation of Travelers raises another big potential problem for Warren.
Warren represented not just Travelers, but numerous other companies starting in the late 1990s working out of and using her Harvard Law School office in Cambridge, which she listed as her office of record on briefs filed with various courts. Warren, however, never has been licensed to practice law in Massachusetts.
As detailed below, there are at least two provisions of Massachusetts law Warren may have violated. First, on a regular and continuing basis she used her Cambridge office for the practice of law without being licensed in Massachusetts. Second, in addition to operating an office for the practice of law without being licensed in Massachusetts, Warren actually practiced law in Massachusetts without being licensed.
Warren refused to disclose the full extent of her private law practice when asked by The Boston Globe. If Warren denies that she has practiced law in Massachusetts without a license, Warren should disclose the full extent of her private law practice. The public has a right to assess whether Warren has failed to comply with the most basic requirement imposed on others, the need to become a member of the Bar of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in order to practice law in and from Massachusetts.
1. Warren Is Not Licensed To Practice Law In Massachusetts
2. Warren Used Her Cambridge Office as Her Law Office
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
-
Fauxcahontas = the most hilarious political nickname of the year!! bwahahaha Bravo!
-
http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/elizabeth-warrens-law-license-problem
LOL - BUSTED
-
Elizabeth Warren Admits She Is Not Licensed to Practice Law in Massachusetts
breitbart.com ^
Posted on Monday, September 24, 2012 11:16:36 AM by Sub-Driver
Elizabeth Warren Admits She Is Not Licensed to Practice Law in Massachusetts
by Michael Patrick Leahy 24 Sep 2012, 7:43 AM PDT
Speaking to Boston's 96.9 FM radio program "Jim and Margery" on Monday, Democratic Senate challenger Elizabeth Warren admitted that she is not licensed to practice law in Massachusetts.
According to reports from listeners, she claimed that she does not maintain a law practice. She also "said that she gave up her New Jersey license because she could not keep up with the Continuing Education requirements," according to one listener who commented on Breitbart's Monday story, "Does Elizabeth Warren Have a Law License Problem?".
Ms. Warren's statement comes as a surprise to the many clients she's provided legal services to over the past decade.....
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
-
Elizabeth Warren Defrauded Asbestos Victims While Practicing Law Without a License
Front Page Mag ^ | 9/24/12 | Daniel Greenfield
Posted on Tuesday, September 25, 2012 8:35:27 PM by Libloather
Elizabeth Warren Defrauded Asbestos Victims While Practicing Law Without a License
Posted by Daniel Greenfield
Sep 24th, 2012
Laws? They’re for little people. Laws don’t apply to Harvard professors. They apply to Harvard janitors.
Compassion? Liberals are great at that. Just ask Elizabeth Warren who was paid nearly a quarter of a million dollars to help Travelers Insurance deny asbestos compensation to asbestos victims… and she did it while practicing law without a license. And wearing a fake Cherokee headdress.
After this latest story, I have a feeling that Elizabeth Warren wishes she had run for the Senate in Oklahoma, instead of in Professor Jacobson’s backyard.
Warren represented not just Travelers, but numerous other companies starting in the late 1990s working out of and using her Harvard Law School office in Cambridge, which she listed as her office of record on briefs filed with various courts. Warren, however, never has been licensed to practice law in Massachusetts.
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
-
Elizabeth Warren's Law License Issues Have Gotten Even Worse Before Tonight's Big Debate
Business Insider ^ | 10/01/12 | Erin Fuchs
Posted on Monday, October 01, 2012 6:28:37 PM by Libloather
Elizabeth Warren's Law License Issues Have Gotten Even Worse Before Tonight's Big Debate
Erin Fuchs | Oct. 1, 2012, 1:09 PM
U.S. Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren is facing new scrutiny over whether she illegally practiced law in Massachusetts without a license.
Massachusetts Lawyer Weekly recently polled attorneys in the state about whether Warren should be investigated for "possibly" practicing law without a license from the state.
Eighty-seven percent of the 1,134 lawyers polled want the Harvard law professor investigated.
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
-
Warren just won - Scott Brown 41 - what's next for him?
-
Damn...that's a huge upset. :P
-
that's a man who should get a job working for - not FOX news - but MSNBC.
Good looking, appeals to moderates, relatively goofy and easy-going...
I don't think FOX would want him... CNN maybe... but he's PERFECT for the mess known as msnbc.
-
Damn...that's a huge upset. :P
How is that a huge upset? Massachusetts is, and has been, one of the bluest states in the country. ::)
-
How is that a huge upset? Massachusetts is, and has been, one of the bluest states in the country. ::)
Because Elizabeth Warren was a horrible contender....no law license, caught lying about having a Native American Heritage...etc.
Regardless of the type of state, people still look at the candidates....
-
Because Elizabeth Warren was a horrible contender....no law license, caught lying about having a Native American Heritage...etc.
Regardless of the type of state, people still look at the candidates....
Not really. She was a Harvard professor in one of the bluest states in the country. Scott Brown winning there was an anomaly and the definition of a huge upset. A Democrat winning in a democrat state? Shocker!
-
Not really. She was a Harvard professor in one of the bluest states in the country. Scott Brown winning there was an anomaly and the definition of a huge upset. A Democrat winning in a democrat state? Shocker!
Romney won in Massachusetts....its always possible
-
scott brown was very popular. she was a bold faced liar.
-
Elizabeth Warren’s law license problem
Legal Insurrection ^ | 9/24/12 | William Jacobson
Posted on Monday, September 24, 2012 11:00:35 AM
Warren attempted to deny her role, and referred to a Boston Globe article, but the Globe article supports Brown’s account. The Globe article indicated the representation was for a period of three years and Warren was paid $212,000. The case resulted in a Supreme Court victory for Travelers arising out of a bankruptcy case in New York.
Whatever the political implications of the exchange, Warren’s representation of Travelers raises another big potential problem for Warren.
Warren represented not just Travelers, but numerous other companies starting in the late 1990s working out of and using her Harvard Law School office in Cambridge, which she listed as her office of record on briefs filed with various courts. Warren, however, never has been licensed to practice law in Massachusetts.
As detailed below, there are at least two provisions of Massachusetts law Warren may have violated. First, on a regular and continuing basis she used her Cambridge office for the practice of law without being licensed in Massachusetts. Second, in addition to operating an office for the practice of law without being licensed in Massachusetts, Warren actually practiced law in Massachusetts without being licensed.
Warren refused to disclose the full extent of her private law practice when asked by The Boston Globe. If Warren denies that she has practiced law in Massachusetts without a license, Warren should disclose the full extent of her private law practice. The public has a right to assess whether Warren has failed to comply with the most basic requirement imposed on others, the need to become a member of the Bar of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in order to practice law in and from Massachusetts.
1. Warren Is Not Licensed To Practice Law In Massachusetts
2. Warren Used Her Cambridge Office as Her Law Office
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
How them election results workin' out for ya' champ? :-\
-
How bad is it when the certified liar wins big time?
The problem is with the republican platform. Period. Leave the tea party alone and get back to what I used to vote for you with.
I voted Gary J. Why wouldn't they entertain people like me.
-
She is hot.