Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Vince G, CSN MFT on October 16, 2012, 07:29:54 AM
-
I'm just curious. If Romney by some act of God gets elected, do you truly believe he's going to solve the countries problems???
-
I'm just curious. If Romney by some act of God gets elected, do you truly believe he's going to solve the countries problems???
Here is what I believe and i can't make it any simpler for you -
Obama = 100% disaster and promising exactly 4 more years of the same bullshit we have seen.
R-Money = 75% - 100% chance of being a mess.
Most of us are willing to take that 25% chance on Romney considering Obama is a proven failure beyond anything we have ever seen and is promising 4 more years of the same corrupt failed policies we have seen over the last 4 years.
-
Here is what I believe and i can't make it any simpler for you -
Obama = 100% disaster and promising exactly 4 more years of the same bullshit we have seen.
R-Money = 75% - 100% chance of being a mess.
Most of us are willing to take that 25% chance on Romney considering Obama is a proven failure beyond anything we have ever seen and is promising 4 more years of the same corrupt failed policies we have seen over the last 4 years.
So, you're basically admitting that Romney is going to fuck up this country...just like you said prior to him being nominated. You don't believe he's going to solve any problems do you???
-
So, you're basically admitting that Romney is going to fuck up this country...just like you said prior to him being nominated. You don't believe he's going to solve any problems do you???
I said he is probably going to fuck up. Probable fuck up is better than certain fuck up.
-
I said he is probably going to fuck up. Probable fuck up is better than certain fuck up.
But then you should do like I did in 2008 and vote for someone you actually believe in
-
But then you should do like I did in 2008 and vote for someone you actually believe in
I'm not voting for someone who has ZERO chance of winning. I don't want Obama in office any longer. There is only one possible way of accomplishing that.
I think even if Romney does nothing at all but sit like a plant in the corner we will be far better off than w 4 more years of obama since business will feel more confident in expanding and growing.
-
I don't think it's a matter of believing who is going to fix it, as it is, who is going to fuck it up less. I'd pick Romney at this point.
-
I said he is probably going to fuck up. Probable fuck up is better than certain fuck up.
So you support throwing Ron PAul under a bus for a guy with 25% chance of succes?
You really are full of shit 33.... You believe what FOX and Neocon media tell you nothing more
-
Wow you guys are pretty gloomy about your outlook, either 100% fail or 75-100% fail. Do you see things get better in the long run?
-
Here is what I believe and i can't make it any simpler for you -
Obama = 100% disaster and promising exactly 4 more years of the same bullshit we have seen.
R-Money = 75% - 100% chance of being a mess.
Most of us are willing to take that 25% chance on Romney considering Obama is a proven failure beyond anything we have ever seen and is promising 4 more years of the same corrupt failed policies we have seen over the last 4 years.
That's weird, i thought you said 50% a few months ago.
Will you continue you forum crusade if he does get elected?
-
That's weird, i thought you said 50% a few months ago.
Will you continue you forum crusade if he does get elected?
I'm done at 99,999 most likely
-
I'm done at 99,999 most likely
backpedaling already
-
That's weird, i thought you said 50% a few months ago.
Will you continue you forum crusade if he does get elected?
why is that weird
were you actually expecting a rational, well thought response from this idiot
I always get a laugh whenever some right wing idiot says that Obama has "destroyed" the country or something similar yet they can't name one thing that has negatively effected them or can show how the country is worse off than when Obama took office. People have forgotten what those dark days of complete and total uncertainty were like in late 2008 when we really had no clue if the entire global economy was headed for a meltdown or not
-
why is that weird
were you actually expecting a rational, well thought response from this idiot
I always get a laugh whenever some right wing idiot says that Obama has "destroyed" the country or something similar yet they can't name one thing that has negatively effected them or can show how the country is worse off than when Obama took office. People have forgotten what those dark days of complete and total uncertainty were like in late 2008 when we really had no clue if the entire global economy was headed for a meltdown or not
ObamaCare!
-
ObamaCare!
I have no doubt you'll need it one day as will many of your fellow ghetto dwellers
-
I have no doubt you'll need it one day as will many of your fellow ghetto dwellers
Whatever - like i said you had no idea about the 2010 disaster coming same as three weeks from now.
Enjoy the last few weeks of this disastrous junta, its over soon.
-
Whatever - like i said you had no idea about the 2010 disaster coming same as three weeks from now.
Enjoy the last few weeks of this disastrous junta, its over soon.
what are you a robot
you just repeat the same bullshit over and over again
-
Obama certainly didn't fix it and he will do worse if he is re-elected.
-
Obama certainly didn't fix it and he will do worse if he is re-elected.
what's worse now than when he took office
umemployment
stock market
housing prices
the budget deficit
?
-
what's worse now than when he took office
umemployment
stock market
housing prices
the budget deficit
?
Yes to all of the above
-
Yes to all of the above
false
333 - how can you be this stupid
you think the stock market was higher when Obama took office (go check ANY financial website) ?
the deficit ?
-
false
333 - how can you be this stupid
you think the stock market was higher when Obama took office (go check ANY financial website) ?
the deficit ?
::) ::)
Oh yeah - lets all clap that the deficit is 1.1 trillion vs 1.5 trillion.
-
::) ::)
Oh yeah - lets all clap that the deficit is 1.1 trillion vs 1.5 trillion.
LOL. These clowns are so desperate for ANYTHING to celebrate that they're actually bragging about running deficits in excess of $1 trillion.
-
::) ::)
Oh yeah - lets all clap that the deficit is 1.1 trillion vs 1.5 trillion.
never said it was good
just pointing out that it going DOWN
btw - Romney said in the debate that Obama DOUBLED it
-
never said it was good
just pointing out that it going DOWN
btw - Romney said in the debate that Obama DOUBLED it
Yeah - because some of the stim bill money is ending.
Geez dude - you really are a joke
-
Yeah - because some of the stim bill money is ending.
Geez dude - you really are a joke
really
are you really this stupid
-
really
are you really this stupid
Just stop. I destroyed you on this and you have no response.
For the cult of obama to be cheering this is beyond insane
-
Just stop. I destroyed you on this and you have no response.
For the cult of obama to be cheering this is beyond insane
He's an embarrassingly stupid person.
Look at how desperate they are to find anything they can claim is an "accomplishment".
-
Just stop. I destroyed you on this and you have no response.
For the cult of obama to be cheering this is beyond insane
the only thing that is destroyed is what's left of your addled mind
the CBO issued a projection in January 2009, just days before Obama took office that the budget deficit would reach $1.2 trillion that year, before the cost of any new stimulus plan or other legislation was taken into account. So part of the deficit may be due to the stimulus but most of it was already baked in to the number due to the collapsing economy and it's been going down steadily since the day Obama took office
-
the only thing that is destroyed is what's left of your addled mind
the CBO issued a projection in January 2009, just days before Obama took office that the budget deficit would reach $1.2 trillion that year, before the cost of any new stimulus plan or other legislation was taken into account. So part of the deficit may be due to the stimulus but most of it was already baked in to the number due to the collapsing economy and it's been going down steadily since the day Obama took office
Republicans dont use facts
-
I'm done at 99,999 most likely
Hey, you promised!
-
Sometimes I actually enjoy the passion I see here. I just hope those of you flapping your lips (so to speak) will actually get out and vote. All too often, people have plenty to say or complain about and yet do nothing to change it. You'll notice I am not telling who to vote for.
Me, I am not big on liars in funny underwear who fail to recognize women as equal to men and what's more race is not an issue for me. But you should make your own decision on election day. Just make one.
-
Sometimes I actually enjoy the passion I see here. I just hope those of you flapping your lips (so to speak) will actually get out and vote. All too often, people have plenty to say or complain about and yet do nothing to change it. You'll notice I am not telling who to vote for.
Me, I am not big on liars in funny underwear who fail to recognize women as equal to men and what's more race is not an issue for me. But you should make your own decision on election day. Just make one.
Good contribution
-
Sometimes I actually enjoy the passion I see here. I just hope those of you flapping your lips (so to speak) will actually get out and vote. All too often, people have plenty to say or complain about and yet do nothing to change it. You'll notice I am not telling who to vote for.
Me, I am not big on liars in funny underwear who fail to recognize women as equal to men and what's more race is not an issue for me. But you should make your own decision on election day. Just make one.
Yet you area fan of a liar on foreign policy.
-
Yet you area fan of a liar on foreign policy.
You mean like kneepadding the party that lied to get us into Iraq?
-
What exactly did they lie about. Break it down for me......without cutting and pasting. Hell, the intell on WMD's was better then the stuff on Bin Laden and they still went...so "expert" break it down, what was the lie.
-
What exactly did they lie about. Break it down for me......without cutting and pasting. Hell, the intell on WMD's was better then the stuff on Bin Laden and they still went...so "expert" break it down, what was the lie.
Saddam being connected with 9/11
Using an event that claimed thousand of american lives for political gain
Thats cool with you? I know the answer to that one so dont bother.
Now close your eyes and imagine if a democrat pres did this
-
Bush never said Saddam was connected to 9/11.The main claim was that he had WMD's...as did the Clinton admin. Ties to AQ were way down on the list
-
Bush never said Saddam was connected to 9/11.The main claim was that he had WMD's...as did the Clinton admin. Ties to AQ were way down on the list
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_Hussein_and_al-Qaeda_link_allegations
September 11th aftermathThe Bush Administration sought to link the Iraqi dictator to Islamist radicals early on in the aftermath of the September 11th attacks. President Bush allegedly made the case to Tony Blair as early as September 14, 2001, although Blair urged him not to pursue the claim.[12]
In addition, Bush received on 21 September 2001 a classified President's Daily Brief (PDB), indicating the U.S. intelligence community had no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the September 11th attacks and that "there was scant credible evidence that Iraq had any significant collaborative ties with Al Qaeda."[13]
[edit] Cheney's claimsVice President Dick Cheney had told Meet the Press on December 9, 2001, that Iraq was harboring Abdul Rahman Yasin, a suspect in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing,[14] and repeated the statement in another appearance on September 14, 2003, saying "We learned more and more that there was a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaida that stretched back through most of the decade of the '90s, that it involved training, for example, on BW and CW, that al-Qaida sent personnel to Baghdad to get trained on the systems that are involved. The Iraqis providing bomb-making expertise and advice to the al-Qaida organization. We know, for example, in connection with the original World Trade Center bombing in '93 that one of the bombers was Iraqi, returned to Iraq after the attack of '93. And we’ve learned subsequent to that, since we went into Baghdad and got into the intelligence files, that this individual probably also received financing from the Iraqi government as well as safe haven."[15] and once again in an interview with National Public Radio in January, 2004, stating that there was "overwhelming evidence" of a relationship between Saddam and al-Qaeda based on evidence including Iraq's purported harboring of Yasin.[16]