Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: The True Adonis on October 22, 2012, 08:01:55 PM
-
Have fun hating our President for another four years, morons. 8)
-
So Obama won two out of three?
-
Romney agreed with President Obama so much on foreign policy and pretty much co-signed what the president said on most things. In total contrast to many things he's said on the campaign trail. In addition, he's a god-damn lie about letting the car companies operate under controlled bankruptcy. He said nothing like that in the past.
President Obama won this one.
-
Romney was either agreeing or lying the entire time.
The problem is nobody fact checks anything so I guarantee Coach many republicans were tipping their Budweiser and saying "damn straight!".
-
LOL! The same chorus of morons and dolts who thought obama was going to get a bump after the VP debate and 2nd debate are the same idiots who are going to be in shock when mittens got to 55% in gallup after tonight.
Have fun you stupid left wing dolts - obama has a few weeks left in his disastrous presidency.
-
Have fun hating our President for another four years, morons. 8)
On the other hand, you, Benny, Whork/Blacken, and the rest of the TK crew better join Chris Matthews and get all the thrills up your respective legs that you can. Because in about two weeks, you could be crying the blues, should Romney do to Obama on election day what he did to him in debate #1.
-
So Obama won two out of three?
Jury's still out on that one. Even if he did, he won the second debate but didn't get jack out of it, in terms of the polls. And the odds of him, getting a bounce out of this performance don't look that hot.
-
Romney agreed with President Obama so much on foreign policy and pretty much co-signed what the president said on most things. In total contrast to many things he's said on the campaign trail. In addition, he's a god-damn lie about letting the car companies operate under controlled bankruptcy. He said nothing like that in the past.
President Obama won this one.
Romney shifted on afghanistan and drones in a big way - completely agreed with obama on things he had disagreed with in the primaries.
-
Jury's still out on that one. Even if he did, he won the second debate but didn't get jack out of it, in terms of the polls. And the odds of him, getting a bounce out of this performance don't look that hot.
The problem is that for obama to win a debate he has to make himself unpalatable to the indes. He is in a lose lose situation.
The far left thinking obama wins = a typically abrasive combative unappealling performance by obama that turns more off than to his side.
GALLUP!!!!
-
On the other hand, you, Benny, Whork/Blacken, and the rest of the TK crew better join Chris Matthews and get all the thrills up your respective legs that you can. Because in about two weeks, you could be crying the blues, should Romney do to Obama on election day what he did to him in debate #1.
covering your bases mcway ;D
-
covering your bases mcway ;D
Not really!! Unlike some of the lefties here and elsewhere, I've never declare this race to be over, before election day.
The fact that Obama is having to play catch-up, in a race that was supposedly locked up due to (fill-in-the-blank), shows just the degree of trouble in which Obama finds himself.
-
Not really!! Unlike some of the lefties here and elsewhere, I've never declare this race to be over, before election day.
The fact that Obama is having to play catch-up, in a race that was supposedly locked up due to (fill-in-the-blank), shows just the degree of trouble in which Obama finds himself.
I agree with this... Obama basically went from a guaranteed win to a 50/50 chance because the first debate was just embarrassing.
-
I agree with this... Obama basically went from a guaranteed win to a 50/50 chance because the first debate was just embarrassing.
Debate had nothing to do with it. Obama's 4 year record of decay, delay, depression, deficit, despair, decline, and denial hasEVERTYTHING to do with why he is DONE!
-
Debate had nothing to do with it. Obama's 4 year record of decay, delay, depression, deficit, despair, decline, and denial hasEVERTYTHING to do with why he is DONE!
PLEASE!!!
Every Poll had Obama way up and then after the first debate, where he looked like ass... They started going further and further down for him.
You really want to say the debate had NOTHING to do with it?
NOTHING?!?!?!
Why do you continue to make a fool of yourself man?
-
Debate had nothing to do with it. Obama's 4 year record of decay, delay, depression, deficit, despair, decline, and denial hasEVERTYTHING to do with why he is DONE!
I wouldn't go that far. As Krauthammer put it, Romney just slashed hundreds of millions of dollars in Obama attack ads to pieces, in a matter of minutes, in that first debate.
Obama's whole campaign is wrapped up in painting Romney to be an unholy monster. With that image gone, Obama has next to nothing and Romney can got to work on him.
-
PLEASE!!!
Every Poll had Obama way up and then after the first debate, where he looked like ass... They started going further and further down for him.
You really want to say the debate had NOTHING to do with it?
NOTHING?!?!?!
Why do you continue to make a fool of yourself man?
Dear God Bro - this is why some of you are so clueless!
You know nothing about polling, sampling, metrics, turnout models, etc.
Some of us told the truth about those bogus polls at the time and are doing so now.
Those polls showing obama up weeks and months ago were pure crap and we said so!
-
Dear God Bro - this is why some of you are so clueless!
You know nothing about polling, sampling, metrics, turnout models, etc.
Some of us told the truth about those bogus polls at the time and are doing so now.
Those polls showing obama up weeks and months ago were pure crap and we said so!
But they are right now?
This is what I hate about the hypocritical state of the world... It's right when it shows you're right, but when it shows you're wrong, they are crap.
FUCK THAT.
You have putting polls out here every since they have been showing Romney leading and winning, but before... Ohh... They were pure crap.
Bullshit.
I wish they would both fucking die and we could get on with someone who really does have what's best for America in the office, but you fucking assholes who refuse to get off these parties nuts will never let it happen.
Yes... I'm talking about you too.
-
But they are right now?
This is what I hate about the hypocritical state of the world... It's right when it shows you're right, but when it shows you're wrong, they are crap.
FUCK THAT.
You have putting polls out here every since they have been showing Romney leading and winning, but before... Ohh... They were pure crap.
Bullshit.
I wish they would both fucking die and we could get on with someone who really does have what's best for America in the office, but you fucking assholes who refuse to get off these parties nuts will never let it happen.
Yes... I'm talking about you too.
Yes!!!! This is why those of us on the right are usually proven right in the end!
Do you even know what "sampling"means?
All of those D+9 and D+7 polls were for idiots and suckers,
We called it all along here!
-
Yes!!!! This is why those of us on the right are usually proven right in the end!
Do you even know what "sampling"means?
All of those D+9 and D+7 polls were for idiots and suckers,
We called it all along here!
::)
If Obama does win, are you going to come back and take your licks or are you going to do what you said you were and run off?
-
Yes!!!! This is why those of us on the right are usually proven right in the end!
Do you even know what "sampling"means?
All of those D+9 and D+7 polls were for idiots and suckers,
We called it all along here!
Many of those earlier polls were using registered voters. Nearly all of them now are using likely voters. And, as predicted long ago, those polls would break Romney's way as the election approached.
If these pollster say Obama's got it locked and he gets beat (especially if he gets blown out), their reputation is SHOT!!
-
Many of those earlier polls were using registered voters. Nearly all of them now are using likely voters. And, as predicted long ago, those polls would break Romney's way as the election approached.
If these pollster say Obama's got it locked and he gets beat (especially if he gets blown out), their reputation is SHOT!!
The level of ignorance on display as to polling methods by obama voters is comical.
-
The level of ignorance on display as to polling methods by obama voters is comical.
Now I'm an Obama voter.
::)
-
Now I'm an Obama voter.
::)
I have been discussing crap polls forever on this board. Those who thought obama was EVER ahead on this race make me laugh my fucking ass off. Seriously - i laugh and mock anyone who was buying into those bullshit polls.
Obama voters and democrats are probably the dumbest people on this planet. Same as the idiots who thought walker was going to lose and then believed the exit polls over the actual vote tally.
The cult of obama and the stupid worthless parasites and pieces of shit voting for obama are in for a rude rude rude wakening on November 6 2012 when then entire fake and false belief system is sunk like a defensless merchant ship in WW2
-
I have been discussing crap polls forever on this board. Those who thought obama was EVER ahead on this race make me laugh my fucking ass off. Seriously - i laugh and mock anyone who was buying into those bullshit polls.
Obama voters and democrats are probably the dumbest people on this planet. Same as the idiots who thought walker was going to lose and then believed the exit polls over the actual vote tally.
The cult of obama and the stupid worthless parasites and pieces of shit voting for obama are in for a rude rude rude wakening on November 6 2012 when then entire fake and false belief system is sunk like a defensless merchant ship in WW2
Serious question,
If Obama wins (which is likely and almost a certainty) what will you say then though as to how he was able to win?
-
Serious question,
If Obama wins (which is likely and almost a certainty) what will you say then though as to how he was able to win?
He is going to lose by at least 50 ECV at this point.
-
Have fun hating our President for another four years, morons. 8)
I could stroll through the oceans of your intellect and barely get my feet wet.....
-
He is going to lose by at least 50 ECV at this point.
You care to take a bet on this?
-
Serious question,
If Obama wins (which is likely and almost a certainty) what will you say then though as to how he was able to win?
Based on what? Obama isn't even at 50% in Gallup, with two weeks to go. No incumbent under 50% (as of mid-September) has ever been re-elected.
No president, since FDR, has been re-elected with unemployment over 8%. BTW, the 7.8% number as of early October is BOGUS, because California didn't submit its numbers on time.
-
You care to take a bet on this?
Look at Gallup 2008 vs now.
The Cult of Obama and the delusional sycophants who worship at the altar of fake polls, media hype, partisan spin, are in for a rude awkening.
The same flock of idiots who never saw the mid term 2010 landslide coming are the same collection of morons thinking obama has this wrapped up.
-
I could stroll through the oceans of your intellect and barely get my feet wet.....
Exactly. It would take you your entire lifetime times a million to wade through intelligence so therefore it is much easier to lampoon yourself on the shore where the water of stupidity only laps at your feet. In this water, you find the most comfort and it is in that water you shall drown.
(I wish that wasn`t the case)
-
Based on what? Obama isn't even at 50% in Gallup, with two weeks to go. No incumbent under 50% (as of mid-September) has ever been re-elected.
No president, since FDR, has been re-elected with unemployment over 8%. BTW, the 7.8% number as of early October is BOGUS, because California didn't submit its numbers on time.
::)
No President, Since FDR, has been re-elected with unemployment below 2 %.
-
::)
No President, Since FDR, has been re-elected with unemployment below 2 %.
Par the course, as usual. Slap Adonis in the face with the facts and he resorts to spouting nonsense....AGAIN!!
-
Gallup will have Romney ay 55 in a few days and the dolts will still be clueless.
-
Par the course, as usual. Slap Adonis in the face with the facts and he resorts to spouting nonsense....AGAIN!!
The statistic I gave is 100 percent true. Sorry to break it to you.
-
The statistic I gave is 100 percent true. Sorry to break it to you.
And, it's totally irrelevant. When talking about the relevant issues, you melt like butter on a blowtorch, as usual.
-
And, it's totally irrelevant. When talking about the relevant issues, you melt like butter on a blowtorch, as usual.
Irrelevant because perhaps both numbers have not occurred in an election year since FDR perhaps.
You have no context of history and it shows. You melt like Jesus in the face of Evidence.
-
Irrelevant because perhaps both numbers have not occurred in an election year since FDR perhaps.
You have no context of history and it shows. You melt like Jesus in the face of Evidence.
The facts on Jesus have been around for over 2000 years, despite crackpot claims by atheists like you.
Back to the election, the fact remains about sitting presidents and their approval ratings within striking range of the election (1-2 months).
Of course, having failed to refute that, you run your mouth only to sound like a bumbling fool.
We haven't had sitting presidents poll under 50% as of mid-September, end up losing their re-election bids? Do George H.W. Bush, Gerald Ford, and Jimmy Carter ring a bell?
http://freedomslighthouse.net/2012/09/22/cost-historical-analysis-shows-every-president-below-50-in-mid-september-in-the-gallup-poll-has-lost-the-election-obama-at-47-chart/
Perhaps you'd like some Grey Poupon with those toes of yours.
-
Have fun hating our President for another four years, morons. 8)
The only problem with your statement is that we've.been right with every criticism of him. This isn't hyperbole, its fact. He's a disaster.
-
The facts on Jesus have been around for over 2000 years, despite crackpot claims by atheists like you.
Back to the election, the fact remains about sitting presidents and their approval ratings within striking range of the election (1-2 months).
Of course, having failed to refute that, you run your mouth only to sound like a bumbling fool.
We haven't had sitting presidents poll under 50% as of mid-September, end up losing their re-election bids? Do George H.W. Bush, Gerald Ford, and Jimmy Carter ring a bell?
http://freedomslighthouse.net/2012/09/22/cost-historical-analysis-shows-every-president-below-50-in-mid-september-in-the-gallup-poll-has-lost-the-election-obama-at-47-chart/
Perhaps you'd like some Grey Poupon with those toes of yours.
Hahahaha. You're killing me, bro.
-
Hahahaha. You're killing me, bro.
Then, you and Adonis can cackle together like the silly saps you are. That doesn't change the facts regarding Jesus Christ, notwithstanding that it as nothing to do with this thread and is Adonis' simply waffling, when his pitiful quips get chopped to pieces.
-
Then, you and Adonis can cackle together like the silly saps you are. That doesn't change the facts regarding Jesus Christ, notwithstanding that it as nothing to do with this thread and is Adonis' simply waffling, when his pitiful quips get chopped to pieces.
The term "fact" does not belong in the same sentence as Jesus Christ let alone the bible.
-
The term "fact" does not belong in the same sentence as Jesus Christ let alone the bible.
Not in a post by Mcway either.
For him and 33.... facts is leftist talking points
-
Romney agreed with President Obama so much on foreign policy and pretty much co-signed what the president said on most things. In total contrast to many things he's said on the campaign trail. In addition, he's a god-damn lie about letting the car companies operate under controlled bankruptcy. He said nothing like that in the past.
President Obama won this one.
That's fine. That's what Obama did during the FP debate with McCain.
-
Exactly. It would take you your entire lifetime times a million to wade through intelligence so therefore it is much easier to lampoon yourself on the shore where the water of stupidity only laps at your feet. In this water, you find the most comfort and it is in that water you shall drown.
(I wish that wasn`t the case)
When mom told you you were "special"...she didn't mean you were smart
-
Then, you and Adonis can cackle together like the silly saps you are. That doesn't change the facts regarding Jesus Christ, notwithstanding that it as nothing to do with this thread and is Adonis' simply waffling, when his pitiful quips get chopped to pieces.
You dont believe in Jesus Mcway you are the exact opposite in fact
-
So Obama won two out of three?
He lost 2 out of three.
The liberal retards, like the op, gave him the second debate only because he spoke up. But, he still lost that debate on every single economic topic.
-
Romney agreed with President Obama so much on foreign policy and pretty much co-signed what the president said on most things. In total contrast to many things he's said on the campaign trail. In addition, he's a god-damn lie about letting the car companies operate under controlled bankruptcy. He said nothing like that in the past.
President Obama won this one.
Sorry wiggs but the mittt romney comment was just confirmed by yahoo.com..he advised on bankruptcy with gov garantess..this is standard protocol in private equity..this isn't really on your real of intelligence..just let it go..don't be a typical uninformed black man
-
Not really!! Unlike some of the lefties here and elsewhere, I've never declare this race to be over, before election day.
The fact that Obama is having to play catch-up, in a race that was supposedly locked up due to (fill-in-the-blank), shows just the degree of trouble in which Obama finds himself.
Kind of like saying
LANDSLIDE COMING!!
Kind of like that?
-
Not in a post by Mcway either.
For him and 33.... facts is leftist talking points
Try again, ID Crisis boy.
Fact: Romney crushed Obama in the first debate and has been riding high, since then.
Fact: Romney is over 50% in Gallup
Fact: Romney now leads in the RCP electoral college map, when was all but left for dead about three weeks ago.
Fact: Obama's "win" in debate 2 did absolutely NOTHING to change his fortunes in the polls.
You, your non-spelling alter ego, and Adonis can put that in your pipes and smoke them.
-
Kind of like saying
LANDSLIDE COMING!!
Kind of like that?
That's 333386's assertion, not mine (though, I'm hoping he's right on this one).
-
That's 333386's assertion, not mine (though, I'm hoping he's right on this one).
you posted that "The Leftist are calling the election over"
Is 3333 a leftist?
-
you posted that "The Leftist are calling the election over"
Is 3333 a leftist?
Raz and Gallup have Romney plus 5. Landslide coming.
-
you posted that "The Leftist are calling the election over"
Is 3333 a leftist?
No, because you left out THIS PART:
The fact that Obama is having to play catch-up, in a race that was supposedly locked up due to (fill-in-the-blank), shows just the degree of trouble in which Obama finds himself.
Raz and Gallup have Romney plus 5. Landslide coming.
Both polls have Romney at 50% or higher.
It's Maalox time for Team Obama.
Not to mention, the CNN poll that had Obama winning debate #3, also said 50% of voters claimed that debate did NOTHING to change their vote.
25% said the debate made them pull for Romney; 24% said it made them go for Obama.
-
No, because you left out THIS PART:
The fact that Obama is having to play catch-up, in a race that was supposedly locked up due to (fill-in-the-blank), shows just the degree of trouble in which Obama finds himself.
Both polls have Romney at 50% or higher.
It's Maalox time for Team Obama.
Um ok.. You pulled a Romney there.. Nice
-
Um ok.. You pulled a Romney there.. Nice
I didn't pull anything. It's clear from my statement that I was referring to people who were saying that OBAMA (not Romney) had this race locked up.
-
Guys, quit fighting.
-
I didn't pull anything. It's clear from my statement that I was referring to people who were saying that OBAMA (not Romney) had this race locked up.
Landslide coming.
-
Now I'm an Obama voter.
::)
If you dont come on Getbig and start 58 threads per day about how obama sucks, plays golf, etc then youre an Obama Kneepader.
You can go on record as saying "i dont like Obama"...doesnt matter.. If you ask for facts or anything to be backed up, youre a kneepader
-
I am an Obama voter. 8) Seems that a lot of people are afraid to admit that around here.
-
I am an Obama voter. 8) Seems that a lot of people are afraid to admit that around here.
He has a record now TA
-
I am an Obama voter. 8) Seems that a lot of people are afraid to admit that around here.
Im not.
;)
-
Based on what? Obama isn't even at 50% in Gallup, with two weeks to go. No incumbent under 50% (as of mid-September) has ever been re-elected.
No president, since FDR, has been re-elected with unemployment over 8%. BTW, the 7.8% number as of early October is BOGUS, because California didn't submit its numbers on time.
@ 51% as of today
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Approval-Center.aspx
-
@ 51% as of today
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Approval-Center.aspx
That's job approval, not head to head against Romney, which is what I mentioned in my posts.
And it's the head-up against Romney where he's under 50%.
-
That's job approval, not head to head against Romney, which is what I mentioned in my posts.
haven't you cited job approval as a factor in other posts
I could dig through your posts but don't really care that much
from your recent posts it seems like you're suggesting it's game over for Obama
Is that a fair assesment of your opinion ?
-
haven't you cited job approval as a factor in other posts
I could dig through your posts but don't really care that much
from your recent posts it seems like you're suggesting it's game over for Obama
Is that a fair assesment of your opinion ?
Not as of late, if ever.
I'm not saying it's game over for Obama...YET! But, as Chuck Todd put it, Obama is running out of time, out of money (the DNC is $20 million in the hole), and out of excuses.
If he doesn't do something to stop the bleeding....and do it FAST, his ticket to the woodshed will be punched on Nov. 6.
-
Not as of late, if ever.
I'm not saying it's game over for Obama...YET! But, as Chuck Todd put it, Obama is running out of time, out of money (the DNC is $20 million in the hole), and out of excuses.
If he doesn't do something to stop the bleeding....and do it FAST, his ticket to the woodshed will be punched on Nov. 6.
you weren't citing job approval rating in this statement and the follow up statment where you indicate "approval ratings" in reference to your earlier statement?
Based on what? Obama isn't even at 50% in Gallup, with two weeks to go. No incumbent under 50% (as of mid-September) has ever been re-elected. No president, since FDR, has been re-elected with unemployment over 8%. BTW, the 7.8% number as of early October is BOGUS, because California didn't submit its numbers on time.
The facts on Jesus have been around for over 2000 years, despite crackpot claims by atheists like you.
Back to the election, the fact remains about sitting presidents and their approval ratings within striking range of the election (1-2 months).
Of course, having failed to refute that, you run your mouth only to sound like a bumbling fool.
We haven't had sitting presidents poll under 50% as of mid-September, end up losing their re-election bids? Do George H.W. Bush, Gerald Ford, and Jimmy Carter ring a bell?
http://freedomslighthouse.net/2012/09/22/cost-historical-analysis-shows-every-president-below-50-in-mid-september-in-the-gallup-poll-has-lost-the-election-obama-at-47-chart/
Perhaps you'd like some Grey Poupon with those toes of yours.
-
Have fun hating our President for another four years, morons. 8)
It works both ways, tools will be tools.
But, are you certain OB will win?
-
It works both ways, tools will be tools.
But, are you certain OB will win?
if Romney wins I'm fairly certain it will be a disaster for the middle and lower classes
-
you weren't citing job approval rating in this statement and the follow up statment where you indicate "approval ratings" in reference to your earlier statement?
Look at the link I posted with my statement. It clearly compared incumbents vs. challengers, not simply job approval.
That is what I referenced. Basically I goofed up, using up the term, "job approval" in this instance. But the link I cited, coupled with my discussion with 333386 clearly shows that the topic was a head-to-head matchup.
-
if Romney wins I'm fairly certain it will be a disaster for the middle and lower classes
How have the middle and lower classes been faring the past 4 years?
I do know that the top 10% have made more money in the last 4 years than they did during any 4 year stretch of the Bush II admin.
-
Look at the link I posted with my statement. It clearly compared incumbents vs. challengers, not simply job approval.
That is what I referenced. Basically I goofed up, using up the term, "job approval" in this instance. But the link I cited, coupled with my discussion with 333386 clearly shows that the topic was a head-to-head matchup.
Obama was at 50% many times during September according to your favorite poll of likely voters
he was @ 49% in September for job approval rating which is why it seemed to me you were referring to job approval rating
Otherwise the statement doesn't match the #s
just so I'm clear, you don't think a job approval rating above 50% matters?
-
Look at the link I posted with my statement. It clearly compared incumbents vs. challengers, not simply job approval.
That is what I referenced. Basically I goofed up, using up the term, "job approval" in this instance. But the link I cited, coupled with my discussion with 333386 clearly shows that the topic was a head-to-head matchup.
that was a link for registered voters
I thought you only cared about likely voters
BTW - Obama was at 50% among registered voters at times during the month of Sept
Also the chart from your link doesn't show any past race amount registered voter ANY WHERE near as close as this race is other than 1980 when they were 39 to 39
http://www.gallup.com/poll/150743/Obama-Romney.aspx
-
that was a link for registered voters
I thought you only cared about likely voters
BTW - Obama was at 50% among registered voters at times during the month of Sept
Also the chart from your link doesn't show any past race amount registered voter ANY WHERE near as close as this race is other than 1980 when they were 39 to 39
http://www.gallup.com/poll/150743/Obama-Romney.aspx
I'm aware of that. Early and late September Obama hit 50%. As the link stated, he was at 47%, when that comparison was made. And at that point, the previous three incumbents under 50% all lost their re-election bids.
-
I'm aware of that. Early and late September Obama hit 50%. As the link stated, he was at 47%, when that comparison was made. And at that point, the previous three incumbents under 50% all lost their re-election bids.
I didn't notice the chart in the link you posted specified a particular week
as you've confirmed Obama was @ 50% multiple times in September and at Present Obama has an approval rating of 51% and currently within 1% among registered voters with a margin of error of ±3 percentage points
basically a toss up at this point
like I said many times let's just get to the election and see what happens
I think it will be close but I think Obama will win
-
How have the middle and lower classes been faring the past 4 years?
I do know that the top 10% have made more money in the last 4 years than they did during any 4 year stretch of the Bush II admin.
23 million middle and lower class Americans craving jobs says they haven't fared too well.
StrawAnus believes they'd all have jobs if we just handed over a few trillion more to the unions and other Obama cronies in the form of "stimulus" dollars. ::)
-
23 million middle and lower class Americans craving jobs says they haven't fared too well.
StrawAnus believes they'd all have jobs if we just handed over a few trillion more to the unions and other Obama cronies in the form of "stimulus" dollars. ::)
I'm pretty middle class and I've done better today than I have in previous years.
This year will definitely end up much more lucrative than any previous.
-
I'm pretty middle class and I've done better today than I have in previous years.
This year will definitely end up much more lucrative than any previous.
Too bad that isn't the case across the board. Earnings as a whole are lower than they were 4 years ago. U6 is still in the mid-teens and most jobs that were lost have been replaced by low-wage shit jobs in the retail sector and the like. The same sector 240 and Blacken wouldn't shut the fuck up about with regards to Rick Perry's job creation record in Texas. Just another example of the blatant hypocrisy of your average leftist.
Not that I'm accusing you of this but StrawMan has made the same claim. So in reality, a leftist like him who claims to worry about others actually only gives a shit about himself and his own standing in the world. Just another hypocrite.
-
Too bad that isn't the case across the board. Earnings as a whole are lower than they were 4 years ago. U6 is still in the mid-teens and most jobs that were lost have been replaced by low-wage shit jobs in the retail sector and the like. The same sector 240 and Blacken wouldn't shut the fuck up about with regards to Rick Perry's job creation record in Texas. Just another example of the blatant hypocrisy of your average leftist.
I will not deny that I am very fortunate... Many people haven't been so lucky.
Do you really think Mitt will turn things around?
I ask seriously... Right now I'm still a Johnson guy... I want the country to do better... MUCH better, but in the past 12 years, it's just gotten worse.
-
I will not deny that I am very fortunate... Many people haven't been so lucky.
Do you really think Mitt will turn things around?
I ask seriously... Right now I'm still a Johnson guy... I want the country to do better... MUCH better, but in the past 12 years, it's just gotten worse.
I'm most likely voting Gary Johnson. Not that it matters as CT has voted Dem in every election since, I believe, the early 80s. I don't think Mitt will do shit. The only reason I'd consider voting for Mitt is because he would have to run for re-election, which would cause him to be a little refrained. Obama has been a c*nt even while having to run for reelection so can you imagine what he'll be like when he won't have any reason to worry about public opinion? Scary stuff.
-
I'm most likely voting Gary Johnson. Not that it matters as CT has voted Dem in every election since, I believe, the early 80s. I don't think Mitt will do shit. The only reason I'd consider voting for Mitt is because he would have to run for re-election, which would cause him to be a little refrained. Obama has been a c*nt even while having to run for reelection so can you imagine what he'll be like when he won't have any reason to worry about public opinion? Scary stuff.
I guess that's true... What would he not do?