Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: garebear on November 01, 2012, 03:59:21 PM
-
London-based magazine, The Economist, endorsed President Barack Obama on Thursday. It is the second time the world’s leading economics-focused magazine has endorsed Obama, this time by a narrow margin over former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney.
The Economist’s choice turned to two questions: how good of a president has Obama been, especially on the main issues of the economy and foreign policy? And can America really trust Mitt Romney to do a better job?
The magazine said in a press release today that while Obama’s shortcomings are many, Republican challenger Romney has changed his position too often on policy matters.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2012/11/01/the-economist-endorses-obama-for-president/
-
so?
the economist is a massively keynesian socialist rag that tries to put on airs of superiority
they always endorse the democrat
they didn't predict 2008 peter schiff did
-
London-based magazine, The Economist, endorsed President Barack Obama on Thursday. It is the second time the world’s leading economics-focused magazine has endorsed Obama, this time by a narrow margin over former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney.
The Economist’s choice turned to two questions: how good of a president has Obama been, especially on the main issues of the economy and foreign policy? And can America really trust Mitt Romney to do a better job?
The magazine said in a press release today that while Obama’s shortcomings are many, Republican challenger Romney has changed his position too often on policy matters.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2012/11/01/the-economist-endorses-obama-for-president/
I've read the reasons they chose Obama over Romney....
It sounded a hell of a lot like damning with faint praise. I think they referred to Obama as the "devil we know" or something similar.
Which makes sense because neither of these two gentlemen are very good candidates.
-
I've read the reasons they chose Obama over Romney....
It sounded a hell of a lot like damning with faint praise. I think they referred to Obama as the "devil we know" or something similar.
Which makes sense because neither of these two gentlemen are very good candidates.
Yes, that's true.