Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: anabolichalo on February 03, 2013, 07:38:16 AM

Title: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: anabolichalo on February 03, 2013, 07:38:16 AM: what does getbig say
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: SF1900 on February 03, 2013, 07:39:32 AM: Yes, he took the same cycle as Ronnie Coleman to look like that.
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: Soul Crusher on February 03, 2013, 07:43:51 AM: Possible, not likely.

Dude looks like an ecotomorph. So he would have had to have at least a year and half bulk and then a 6 month diet down? 30 lbs muscle year and a half? Not likely IMHO.
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: anabolichalo on February 03, 2013, 07:45:43 AM: Quote from: 333386 on February 03, 2013, 07:43:51 AM
Possible, not likely.

Dude looks like an ecotomorph. So he would have had to have at least a year and half bulk and then a 6 month diet down? 30 lbs muscle year and a half? Not likely IMHO.
delt look hyper suspect to me
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: Hulkotron on February 03, 2013, 08:15:49 AM: (http://i49.tinypic.com/157t6h.jpg)
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: Papper on February 03, 2013, 12:42:33 PM: the first pic is the limit for a natural
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: Nomad on February 03, 2013, 12:55:01 PM: Quote from: anabolichalo on February 03, 2013, 07:38:16 AM
what does getbig say

One word, delts.

Another Lyin Norton in the making.
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: funk51 on February 03, 2013, 12:57:59 PM: Quote from: anabolichalo on February 03, 2013, 07:38:16 AM
what does getbig say
i'd say natural nothing special going on there in a two year period.this guy pic'd was from 1950
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: mass243 on February 03, 2013, 12:59:14 PM: Quote from: Papyrus on February 03, 2013, 12:42:33 PM
the first pic is the limit for a natural

;D ;D
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: dj181 on February 03, 2013, 01:02:31 PM
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: Parker on February 03, 2013, 01:05:20 PM: Quote from: Hulkotron on February 03, 2013, 08:15:49 AM
(http://i49.tinypic.com/157t6h.jpg)
would hit, any more pics?
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: Hulkotron on February 03, 2013, 02:35:10 PM: Quote from: Parker on February 03, 2013, 01:05:20 PM
would hit, any more pics?

Just that one sorry :(
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: Metabolic on February 03, 2013, 02:36:04 PM: Its easily done "naturally" if you supplemente your lipolysis with some clen or ec and eat shittons of food and a decent routine
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: DroppingPlates on February 03, 2013, 02:38:02 PM: Natural or not, does it matter ???
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: SF1900 on February 03, 2013, 02:57:58 PM: Quote from: DroppingPlates on February 03, 2013, 02:38:02 PM
Natural or not, does it matter ???

yes, internet + bodybuilding is serious business. :D
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: DroppingPlates on February 03, 2013, 03:05:04 PM: Quote from: SF1900 on February 03, 2013, 02:57:58 PM
yes, internet + bodybuilding is serious business. :D

OK, OK, I see... ;D

(http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2237/2497418285_622ddf609f.jpg)
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: thebrink on February 03, 2013, 03:07:40 PM: pee eee deeeeeeeeeeee
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: dj181 on February 03, 2013, 03:09:56 PM: how tall is he?
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: Jovo on February 03, 2013, 03:16:15 PM: used prohrmones like hdrol i think
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: arce1988 on February 03, 2013, 03:24:12 PM: PED
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: the_swami on February 03, 2013, 06:31:57 PM: def steroids
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: C-BuZz on February 03, 2013, 07:35:46 PM: Your typical B2M (boy to man) transformation. EASILY achievable by any adolescent going through puberty. There got to be a million just like this on bb.com.

He would look similar even if he didn't lift & you can tell he's a boy in the before pic. Do this at 30/40yrs old ill be impresses. But not boy to man, not impressed sorry. If he was on PED's he'd be twice that size.
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: MikMaq on February 03, 2013, 07:52:55 PM: Quote from: anabolichalo on February 03, 2013, 07:38:16 AM
what does getbig say
It seems to be our friendly persian from norjway, minus a tatoo and all.
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: NordicNerd on February 04, 2013, 03:18:07 AM: Quote from: anabolichalo on February 03, 2013, 07:38:16 AM
what does getbig say

Clearly attainable as a natural. I should know, because I have done a quite similar transformation without drugs.

NN
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: Kwon_2 on February 04, 2013, 03:27:21 AM: Quote from: Parker on February 03, 2013, 01:05:20 PM
would hit, any more pics?

(http://i49.tinypic.com/157t6h.jpg)

(http://oi50.tinypic.com/wsw5uh.jpg)

(http://i49.tinypic.com/157t6h.jpg)

(http://oi46.tinypic.com/kckxp2.jpg)
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: BigCyp on February 04, 2013, 04:05:04 AM: As natural as a paki in the premier league
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: Kwon_2 on February 04, 2013, 05:41:20 PM: Quote from: BigCyp on February 04, 2013, 04:05:04 AM
As natural as a paki in the premier league

:D
Title: Re: i dont think this "natural transformation" was done without peds
Post by: WOOO on February 05, 2013, 06:10:07 AM: Quote from: Papyrus on February 03, 2013, 12:42:33 PM
the first pic is the limit for a natural

;D