Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Roger Bacon on February 16, 2013, 09:58:16 PM

Title: Real Per Capita Federal Expenditures 1792 - 2004
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 16, 2013, 09:58:16 PM

.

Title: Re: Real Per Capita Federal Expenditures 1800-1990
Post by: tbombz on February 16, 2013, 10:35:17 PM

first graph is not adjusted for inflation

second graph looks like obama is finally getting things turned around and back under control

Title: Re: Real Per Capita Federal Expenditures 1800-1990
Post by: Roger Bacon on February 16, 2013, 10:48:14 PM

Quote from: tbombz on February 16, 2013, 10:35:17 PM

first graph is not adjusted for inflation

Real
1. Describing a variable that takes inflation into account. For example, when considering GDP growth, if GDP has grown 10% in dollar terms, and the inflation rate is 3%, real GDP growth is only 7%. See also: Nominal.

Title: Re: Real Per Capita Federal Expenditures 1792 - 2004
Post by: whork on February 17, 2013, 04:58:57 AM

Quote from: P.I.P on February 16, 2013, 09:58:16 PM

.

Wow Bush fucked up even more than we thought.

Title: Re: Real Per Capita Federal Expenditures 1792 - 2004
Post by: tonymctones on February 17, 2013, 07:51:45 AM

Quote from: tbombz on February 16, 2013, 10:35:17 PM

first graph is not adjusted for inflation

second graph looks like obama is finally getting things turned around and back under control

cumdrizzle showing his economic prowess once again.

Title: Re: Real Per Capita Federal Expenditures 1792 - 2004
Post by: GigantorX on February 17, 2013, 08:11:23 AM

Second graph is federal, state and local.  The latter 2 skew the graph.