Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: Marty Champions on February 19, 2013, 03:04:53 PM
-
you get different elements by different gradients of pressurization . In other words they are all linked , its just one element going into the next one via pressurization
(http://www.meta-synthesis.com/webbook/35_pt/russell_1.gif)
watch this short video by a great English man Wallium B Fallkum the third, does great work in breaking the knowledge down for the average atheist who doesnt beleive we are all one
notice how hydrogen is at the center=the sun
-
the eptymology of hydrogen
drogen=to do work, to perform, to bear suffering
hy= he and skin/complexion
even the root word of hydrogen speaks volumes that the sun=god and it does the suffering of a true christ, it works, it does its duty always giving us heat
the truth is there you just have to accept it
-
The periodic table is both a work of science, and art. That's the real mindfuck.
-
The periodic table is both a work of science, and art. That's the real mindfuck.
the 3d version is the only way to truthfully show it, kids in schools are given the dumbed down version of it. Schools hate to invite a unity,oneness, creator , or god concept to anything
-
.
-
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/d618ab95d52293221fda6c2be1ad6341/tumblr_mgorsnxWsw1rkit9co1_500.jpg)
-
the 3d version is the only way to truthfully show it, kids in schools are given the dumbed down version of it. Schools hate to invite a unity,oneness, creator , or god concept to anything
Ok, I'll play. How does physics imply a creator? Why is it necessarily planned instead of just the nature of shit? And if there is evidence, then of what value is faith? And which creator? Vishnu? The upanishads rock, so.
How about moral and metaphysical implications of scientific pursuits - aren't. Just the facts, ma'am.
-
Ok, I'll play. How does physics imply a creator? Why is it necessarily planned instead of just the nature of shit? And if there is evidence, then of what value is faith? And which creator? Vishnu? The upanishads rock, so.
How about moral and metaphysical implications of scientific pursuits - aren't. Just the facts, ma'am.
+
good question, but when one says its within your nature to talk allot of bullshit, the reality is, its your upbringing (family or friends or getbig) that turned you into the so called natural bullshitter you are
so it can be seen as nature but when thinking it thru there must be a reason for it all
-
+
good question, but when one says its within your nature to talk allot of bullshit, the reality is, its your upbringing (family or friends or getbig) that turned you into the so called natural bullshitter you are
so it can be seen as nature but when thinking it thru there must be a reason for it all
We're using 'nature' in different ways. You're speaking of what I'm inclined to do as a conscious being by virtue of the influence of my surroundings. Falcon is just talking about hydrogen atoms, which is what I mean by nature. Something naturally existing which we observe and note its properties and behaviors. In b4 heisenberg.
We can't point to some things that have an obvious cause and say that all other things must also have a cause even if we can't see it. That's the whole question. Was there an intentional cause of everything? Simply asserting that everything has an intentional cause because I can throw a pot on a wheel is of the same value as asserting that the universe has no intentional cause because no one sat down and made that coastline. Both positions just extend their 'logic' to a universal scale, but there's no physical evidence to support or refute either.
The workings of hydrogen don't imply God. They just inform us about what hydrogen does.
-
Gravity is amazing.
-
Is this the guy from Run DMC ??
-
Ok, I'll play. How does physics imply a creator? Why is it necessarily planned instead of just the nature of shit? And if there is evidence, then of what value is faith? And which creator? Vishnu? The upanishads rock, so.
How about moral and metaphysical implications of scientific pursuits - aren't. Just the facts, ma'am.
whatever thing there is in existance is created
the hydrogen (actually few elements before hydrogen are unamed) created everything down the line to the last element
by a couple of principles
the pressure principle wich leads to the multiplicative principle
the multiplicative principle is easy to understand you can have two humanbeings and turn that into a billion humans. all things can and do eminate from one point, everything that comes after the one point is created
then we ask how did the one point get here well that is the one and only creative force that was ever needed wich is just a dot of light. the behavior of light spawns everything into existance, not instantaneously but over time because of its physics.
physics is a language, this could be called god or you could just call it a language that started everything and kept everything going
anyways one could start up this creative force that was all that was ever needed somewhere else and start another universe if they want to just by knowledge of this 3d periodic table
that could be very well the reason for being of this milkway galaxy, perhaps many galaxys are "artificially created" by someone that knows the 3d periodic table and how to go from element to element and create that in a "factory' if you will