Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The_Hammer on March 07, 2013, 12:27:47 PM
-
LOL, own3d
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/377379_10151369370412911_793111446_n.jpg)
-
LOL. You think this is owning?
Fucking sheep
-
How is this !n pwning? It took a fucking 12hr filibuster to get an answer and Paul FUCKING up Obama crap the entire time. lol
Sheeple
-
Senator Paul did that so he could get a clear answer in writing for the public, we should be thankful for representatives like Paul who hold their feet to the fire and protect our freedoms. They refused to clarify until he held up the nomination. You are a fool if you read this any other way.
-
LOL. You think this is owning?
Fucking sheep
fucking moron
-
Senator Paul did that so he could get a clear answer in writing for the public, we should be thankful for representatives like Paul who hold their feet to the fire and protect our freedoms. They refused to clarify until he held up the nomination. You are a fool if you read this any other way.
This, good post...
Hammer is the biggest dumb fuck on here...
-
This, good post...
Hammer is the biggest dumb fuck on here...
Hammer
Abraham
Enigma
are all Benny B Gimmicks
-
This, good post...
Hammer is the biggest dumb fuck on here...
Holder made it pretty damn clear in prior testimony and written comments about what kind of extraordinary circumstances would be necessary for a strike inside the US against US citizens
http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/05/politics/obama-drones-cia/index.html
-
Hammer
Abraham
Enigma
are all Benny B Gimmicks
haha... well at least that savage traitor in the white house has one ally on getbig. :-X ::)
-
Holder made it pretty damn clear in prior testimony and written comments about what kind of extraordinary circumstances would be necessary for a strike inside the US against US citizens
http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/05/politics/obama-drones-cia/index.html
No he didn't, he used examples of imminent threats that would always be responded to with imminent, deadly force.
He wouldn't say that non combatant American citizens wouldn't be targeted without judicial oversight. The fact that we would even have to ask is insane.
-
No he didn't, he used examples of imminent threats that would always be responded to with imminent, deadly force.
He wouldn't say that non combatant American citizens wouldn't be targeted without judicial oversight. The fact that we would even have to ask is insane.
all the examples he gave were of people engaged in "combat" or terrorism and said it "entirely hypothetical" and "unlikely to occur."
and Rand Paul get's up in public and muses that the POTUS could simply decide to target Jane Fonda or people in cafes
Rand Paul is an idiot or at least he plays one on TV
-
all the examples he gave were of people engaged in "combat" or terrorism and said it "entirely hypothetical" and "unlikely to occur."
and Rand Paul get's up in public and muses that the POTUS could simply decide to target Jane Fonda or people in cafes
Rand Paul is an idiot or at least he plays one on TV
Eric Holder did that, is that what you're saying?
Why wouldn't Holder just answer the real question? Why change the scenario to individuals engaged in combat or terrorism?
Why not just clearly say non combatant Ameircans won't be targeted? ???
-
Eric Holder did that, is that what you're saying?
Why wouldn't Holder just answer the real question? Why change the scenario to individuals engaged in combat or terrorism?
Why not just clearly say non combatant Ameircans won't be targeted? ???
pretty obvious to me what he was talking about in this letter from 3 days ago
-
LOL, own3d
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/377379_10151369370412911_793111446_n.jpg)
Carefully worded and plenty vague.
Define - "Actively"
Define - "Engaged"
Define - "Combat"
-
LOL, own3d
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/377379_10151369370412911_793111446_n.jpg)
On a scale from 9-10 / 10 how stupid are you?