Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Disgusted on April 04, 2013, 04:13:27 PM
-
Another reason to avoid sugar.
-
I've read a lot about abstaining from sugar and all of the numerous health benefits. I try staying on the low GI side if at all possible. I'll eat sugars and white rice for instance, but only when I cook it. So much unnecessary sugars added to so many foods out there. This is why I like intermittent fasting if I can as well. Had some BSL testing strips and when I fast intermittently for a week or so my blood sugar levels tighten right up. It's amazing how you can see your body change and take blood-sugar readings and confirm it that was too.
-
Sugar is a devil
-
So do any of you guys remember Dr Squat? First to squat over 1000.
-
Yeah Dr. Fred is OG
-
Another reason to avoid sugar.
I've read a lot about this over the years. Some great research at www.lef.org. It's just so damn hard to follow, but when it's a matter of life or death, you make it work.
-
We got to get approval from Falcon on this.
-
Awesome to watch this. Thanks for posting!
I'm surprised I haven't read of this earlier. Off to research....
-
700 club is NHS funded, yes?
-
Time to crack out the Mayo..
-
700 club is NHS funded, yes?
NHS?
-
Sugar is poison and everthing with the same effects as sugar is not natural or good. And people not getting it, can might as well die off. Population is too great anyway. But it is poison. Just very hard to avoid altogether in society and hanging out with unaware people.
-
fred hatfeild looks like complete and utter hell
i dont care what he says he looks pathetic and shitty
with meat your always going to get heme-iron, heme-iron with sugar just accelerates the heme-iron
i had my tonsils out at 17 because all i wanted to do was eat meat. your tonsils are lymph nodes they swell up when your body is toxic shit, however at 17 i was pretty ripped and healthy looking on the outside but i had to have a few surgerys on my tonsils
also if you banged any hoes without condoms your mutating your dna especially dirty hoes, now add heme-iron to the mix even more mutations
-
fred hatfeild looks like complete and utter hell
i dont care what he says he looks pathetic and shitty
with meat your always going to get heme-iron, heme-iron with sugar just accelerates the heme-iron
i had my tonsils out at 17 because all i wanted to do was eat meat. your tonsils are lymph nodes they swell up when your body is toxic shit, however at 17 i was pretty ripped and healthy looking on the outside but i had to have a few surgerys on my tonsils
also if you banged any hoes without condoms your mutating your dna especially dirty hoes, now add heme-iron to the mix even more mutations
Go easy on him bro..he just survived a terminal cancer diagnosis by three docs. ;D
-
700 Club is for morons. :-\
-
700 Club is for morons. :-\
Pat Robertson is the first person I turn to for credible, objective commentary on a subject! ;D
-
is it really so much low sugar or just low calories in general which can starve cancer cells and/or provide individuals of normal health with even better health?
-
Pat Robertson is the first person I turn to for credible, objective commentary on a subject! ;D
Well he does Leg Press 2000 lbs.
-
:D
http://www.cbn.com/communitypublic/legpress_explanation.aspx
How Pat Robertson Leg Pressed 2,000 Pounds
Pat Robertson worked out at the gym on an incline leg press machine with weights up to 570 pounds. Working with his physician, who was an amazing strength trainer, he worked up to 800 pounds, then 1,000 pounds. Then one day he was able to leg press 1,500 pounds one time. Then over the succeeding months, he trained with multiple reps of 1,200 pounds, 1,300 pounds, and 1,400 pounds.
One Saturday morning, his physician said, “I’ll get you bragging rights. Let’s go to 2,000 pounds.” Then he worked up multiple reps of 1,400 pounds, 1,500 pounds, 1,600 pounds, 1,700, pounds, 1,800 pounds and 1,900 pounds. When 2,000 pounds was put on the machine two men got on either side and helped push the load up, and then let it down on Mr. Robertson, who pushed it up one rep and let it go back down again.
Mr. Robertson warms up now at 500 pounds, and was shown on television with Kristi Watts doing 1000 pounds.
His doctor, by the way, has leg pressed 2,700 pounds. It is not nearly as hard as the authors of these reports make it out to be. We have multiple witnesses to the 2,000 pound leg press, plus video of the 10 reps of 1,000 pounds.
-
:D
(http://www.blog.joelx.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/patrobertsonlegpressimage.jpg)
(http://www.dvorak.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/patr.jpg)
(http://www.richardcleaver.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/patpress.jpg)
-
Well he does Leg Press 2000 lbs.
Haha I remember when he came back and basically admitted on tv that the poundages he claimed were complete bullshit after being exposed worldwide as a fucking liar. :D
-
If beating Cancer was as easy as just not eating Sugar, we would have many more survivors. My Grandmother beat Cancer the old Fashioned way (today they would have declared it inoperable and terminal as they wouldn`t do the type of procedure they did). They removed one lung when she was in her late 70s and removed a bit from another area and the cancer never returned. She didn`t have to do anything after that and lived to well in her 90s, cancer free. She ate whatever she wanted her whole life and was never above 110 lbs her whole life.
-
Haha I remember when he came back and basically admitted on tv that the poundages he claimed were complete bullshit after being exposed worldwide as a fucking liar. :D
I think he still sticks to the 2000 lb leg press story, but says he only goes up to 1500 lbs nowadays. :-\
-
I think the Mayo Clinic is a better source of info than Pat Robertson and "Dr. Squat".
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/cancer-causes/CA00085/NSECTIONGROUP=2
Cancer causes: Popular myths about the causes of cancer
Myth: People with cancer shouldn't eat sugar, since it can cause cancer to grow faster.
Fact: Sugar doesn't make cancer grow faster. All cells, including cancer cells, depend on blood sugar (glucose) for energy. But giving more sugar to cancer cells doesn't speed their growth. Likewise, depriving cancer cells of sugar doesn't slow their growth.
This misconception may be based in part on a misunderstanding of positron emission tomography (PET) scans, which use a small amount of radioactive tracer — typically a form of glucose. All tissues in your body absorb some of this tracer, but tissues that are using more energy — including cancer cells — absorb greater amounts. For this reason, some people have concluded that cancer cells grow faster on sugar. But this isn't true.
-
(http://samson-power.com/ASL/images/Hatfield/fredsquat.jpg)
-
:-\
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/cancer_cells_feed_on_sugar_free_diet
Cancer Cells Feed on Sugar-Free Diet
Release Date: 01/10/2012
Study highlights role of glutamine in absence of glucose in growth of B cell tumors
Cancer cells have been long known to have a “sweet tooth,” using vast amounts of glucose for energy and for building blocks for cell replication.
Now, a study by a team of researchers at Johns Hopkins and elsewhere shows that lymph gland cancer cells called B cells can use glutamine in the absence of glucose for cell replication and survival, particularly under low-oxygen conditions, which are common in tumors.
Writing in the Jan. 4, 2012, edition of Cell Metabolism, Anne Le, M.D., and a team of investigators collaborating with the Johns Hopkins Brain Science Institute, say the finding is critical for developing innovative cancer therapies because it offers “proof of concept” evidence that curbing the growth of B cell cancers can be accomplished by inhibiting a glutamine enzyme called glutaminase.
Le notes that although little is known about glutamine’s role in the growth of B cell cancer, the amino acid circulates in the blood at the highest level among the 20 amino acids that do so.
The tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA or Krebs cycle) is classically regarded as a pathway for glucose oxidation. However, the experiments by Le and the team show that B cells oxidize glutamine when glucose is absent.
The study also found that when oxygen is scarce, there is enhanced conversion of glutamine to glutathione, an important agent for controlling the accumulation of oxygen-containing chemically reactive molecules that cause damage to normal cells.
When the investigators used a glutaminase inhibitor, cancerous growth of B cells was stopped in petri dishes.
“The flexibility of the TCA cycle in using both glutamine and glucose pathways may be important for cancer cells to proliferate and survive, especially under the low-oxygen and nutrient-deprived conditions often encountered in the tumor microenvironment,” says Le.
Now, perhaps, scientists can exploit that survival strategy to stop cancer, according to former Johns Hopkins scientist Chi Dang, M.D., now at the Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania. “A broader and deeper understanding of cancer cell metabolism and cancer cells’ability to reprogram biochemical pathways under metabolic stress can be a rich ground for therapeutic approaches targeting tumor metabolism,” he says.
In addition to Le, an assistant professor in the Department of Pathology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, other researchers from Johns Hopkins who participated in this study include Sminu Bose, Arvin Gouw, Joseph Barbi, Takashi Tsukamoto, Camilo J. Rojas and Barbara Slusher. The Johns Hopkins Brain Science Institute, where Tsukamoto, Rojas and Slusher are faculty, is pursuing the development of new glutaminase inhibitor drugs.
Media Contact: Christen Brownlee
410-955-7832; cbrownlee@jhmi.edu
-
If beating Cancer was as easy as just not eating Sugar, we would have many more survivors. My Grandmother beat Cancer the old Fashioned way (today they would have declared it inoperable and terminal as they wouldn`t do the type of procedure they did). They removed one lung when she was in her late 70s and removed a bit from another area and the cancer never returned. She didn`t have to do anything after that and lived to well in her 90s, cancer free. She ate whatever she wanted her whole life and was never above 110 lbs her whole life.
Didn't you read your bible? Fellow christian charlatan Kent Hovind claims the cure for cancer is given right there in the sacred text of the bible in this doozy of a video!
-
Didn't you read your bible? Fellow christian charlatan Kent Hovind claims the cure for cancer is given right there in the sacred text of the bible in this doozy of a video!
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Christians should embrace Cancer. Not only is it "god`s Will" and he gives his strongest soldiers the toughest challenges, its wrong for them to murder living organisms in the body.
-
Go easy on him bro..he just survived a terminal cancer diagnosis by three docs.
So much for his fuckin ideas about diet then.
-
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Christians should embrace Cancer. Not only is it "god`s Will" and he gives his strongest soldiers the toughest challenges, its wrong for them to murder living organisms in the body.
:)
Heathens!! The lot of them!!
-
So much for his fuckin ideas about diet then.
are you talking about hatfield?
i remember reading his book "bodybuilding a scientific approach" and he said that both low-fat and low-carb "diets" work, but that a low-fat diet is a better method to follow
-
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Christians should embrace Cancer. Not only is it "god`s Will" and he gives his strongest soldiers the toughest challenges, its wrong for them to murder living organisms in the body.
I agree. Any intervention on the part of doctors is playing god and interfering in his plan. If god wanted someone free of cancer he would spontaneously cure the cancer or not have given it to them in the first place.
-
So do any of you guys remember Dr Squat? First to squat over 1000.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=188738.0;attach=219868;image)
-
"Dr. Squat" oh brother
-
I think this is very misleading. Certain fruits like blackberries and cherries (any dark colored berry for that matter) are loaded with anti-cancer compounds like anthocyanins and vitamin c. It is stupid to avoid these types of foods just because they contain some fructose.
-
If you're after longevity then you should do everything the opposite a bb would want.
For example, you'd want LOW IGF-1. You want to eat very low cal, low protein, low BCAA's etc.
These guys were thrilled when they were able to drop their IGF-1 by 50%.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xvdbtt_eat-fast-live-longer-hd_shortfilms#.UV_jE1fT47q
I remember when Dan Duchaine said Hatfield was the very definition of unhealthiness, a walking heart attack. He liked Three Musketeers candy bars. He said Source of calories didn't matter! :D
-
Great documentary Disgusted. I use a similar diet with yours and the documentary is on the same page.
-
If you're after longevity then you should do everything the opposite a bb would want.
For example, you'd want LOW IGF-1. You want to eat very low cal, low protein, low BCAA's etc.
These guys were thrilled when they were able to drop their IGF-1 by 50%.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xvdbtt_eat-fast-live-longer-hd_shortfilms#.UV_jE1fT47q
I remember when Dan Duchaine said Hatfield was the very definition of unhealthiness, a walking heart attack. He liked Three Musketeers candy bars. He said Source of calories didn't matter! :D
Yep. These life extensionist cats want to slow their metabolisms to a creeping halt and put as little miles on their body as possible. And when they do exhaust it, it's all highway miles and never going past 2400 RPMs.
Bodybuilding is pedal to the metal, skipping oil changes and revving the fuck out of your shit with no regard for anything else. I don't bulk up on massive calories anymore for that reason, because it's completely unnecessary to eat so slothfully only to do cardio and burn those calories too. Way too much metabolic damage and exhaustion. I eat smaller and stay at a lower bodyweight and focus on aesthetics like the guys from the 70's and 80's, no bloofy live fast, die young bullshit.
Not going to go as far as eating like a bird though. I know people who do those very low caloric diets and never run around. They're scared of getting too wound up and harming their body. Conversely, they're living TOO safely and not being realistic. Gotta find that balance.
-
I think this is very misleading. Certain fruits like blackberries and cherries (any dark colored berry for that matter) are loaded with anti-cancer compounds like anthocyanins and vitamin c. It is stupid to avoid these types of foods just because they contain some fructose.
Lustig said these food were acceptable in their whole food form because they contained fiber which aided the digestion process and blunted the deleterious affects of fructose. His main beef is with processed food and refined sugars.
-
Yep. These life extensionist cats want to slow their metabolisms to a creeping halt and put as little miles on their body as possible. And when they do exhaust it, it's all highway miles and never going past 2400 RPMs.
Bodybuilding is pedal to the metal, skipping oil changes and revving the fuck out of your shit with no regard for anything else. I don't bulk up on massive calories anymore for that reason, because it's completely unnecessary to eat so slothfully only to do cardio and burn those calories too. Way too much metabolic damage and exhaustion. I eat smaller and stay at a lower bodyweight and focus on aesthetics like the guys from the 70's and 80's, no bloofy live fast, die young bullshit.
Not going to go as far as eating like a bird though. I know people who do those very low caloric diets and never run around. They're scared of getting too wound up and harming their body. Conversely, they're living TOO safely and not being realistic. Gotta find that balance.
in your opinion, how low is very low cals?
i'm down to about 1800 cals, and i'm thinking to even go down to 1200 cals, but a bud of mine here told me that i shouldn't go under 1500 cals
-
in your opinion, how low is very low cals?
i'm down to about 1800 cals, and i'm thinking to even go down to 1200 cals, but a bud of mine here told me that i shouldn't go under 1500 cals
They do a structured "VLCD" 800 calorie per diem. I think people who do the HCG diet do the same. You can usually get all you need for the day without going over that amount.
I'm usually under 2000 and I think that's pretty low, but it gives me a nice buffer for when I do want to pig out and eat 3-4000 calories in a day. Doesn't phase me at all when I eat double or triple what I normally eat. I wouldn't be happy eating less than a thousand per day though. Seems way too low for life to be enjoyable.
-
They do a structured "VLCD" 800 calorie per diem. I think people who do the HCG diet do the same. You can usually get all you need for the day without going over that amount.
I'm usually under 2000 and I think that's pretty low, but it gives me a nice buffer for when I do want to pig out and eat 3-4000 calories in a day. Doesn't phase me at all when I eat double or triple what I normally eat. I wouldn't be happy eating less than a thousand per day though. Seems way too low for life to be enjoyable.
800 cals ??? fuck :o
i remember when i did that for 2 weeks straight and i near passed the fuck out after being into it for just 3 days
but you think that one can get all they need at 800 cals per day?
-
800 cals ??? fuck :o
i remember when i did that for 2 weeks straight and i near passed the fuck out after being into it for just 3 days
but you think that one can get all they need at 800 cals per day?
Yes. But do I recommend it? No.