Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: El Diablo Blanco on April 17, 2013, 07:36:50 AM
-
I was thinking about this Boston bombing. It's been three days now. I doubt the person/people involved just headed back to their home/apt in Boston and are hanging out. Chances are if they were smart they'd already be on some beach by now. They are saying there were three bombs made from pressure cookers in duffel bags. You would assume this means more than one person planted them because one dude waking around with three large duffels would be a little suspicious.
If the FBI can't catch someone, you know the public is going to want someone to hang.
Does the FBI just blame it on some Iranian or NK to justify another US invasion? Do they blame some whitey?
It's obvious if a muslim did it the USA would go to war in a heartbeat, but what if some Mexican or Colombian did it, would they invade and attack those countries? Nope.
-
i am surprised no one is claiming responsibility
-
Remember 1996 Olympic bombing? No one ever got caught for that either.
I was thinking about this Boston bombing. It's been three days now. I doubt the person/people involved just headed back to their home/apt in Boston and are hanging out. Chances are if they were smart they'd already be on some beach by now. They are saying there were three bombs made from pressure cookers in duffel bags. You would assume this means more than one person planted them because one dude waking around with three large duffels would be a little suspicious.
If the FBI can't catch someone, you know the public is going to want someone to hang.
Does the FBI just blame it on some Iranian or NK to justify another US invasion? Do they blame some whitey?
It's obvious if a muslim did it the USA would go to war in a heartbeat, but what if some Mexican or Colombian did it, would they invade and attack those countries? Nope.
-
i am surprised no one is claiming responsibility
All the Muslim terrorist groups have denied responsibility for the bombing so far! It is most likely domestic terror! Will take time to peice it together!
-
I think Ronnie's right. Muslims would have bragged about this and they didn't. It's most likely domestic terrorism. Some sources are saying it was black powder or smokeless powder in the pressure cooker. I would think a Muslim extremist would mix their own explosive and not buy it over the counter.
-
They should blame bin laden.
-
Normally when Muslims do it, you'd be hearing from Group_X and Y that they were responsible and more will come.
Strange that nothing is heard, maybe it was an islamic free-agent
-
I was thinking about this Boston bombing. It's been three days now. I doubt the person/people involved just headed back to their home/apt in Boston and are hanging out. Chances are if they were smart they'd already be on some beach by now. They are saying there were three bombs made from pressure cookers in duffel bags. You would assume this means more than one person planted them because one dude waking around with three large duffels would be a little suspicious.
If the FBI can't catch someone, you know the public is going to want someone to hang.
Does the FBI just blame it on some Iranian or NK to justify another US invasion? Do they blame some whitey?
It's obvious if a muslim did it the USA would go to war in a heartbeat, but what if some Mexican or Colombian did it, would they invade and attack those countries? Nope.
We would invade if those countries had huge oil reserves.
-
I think Ronnie's right. Muslims would have bragged about this and they didn't. It's most likely domestic terrorism. Some sources are saying it was black powder or smokeless powder in the pressure cooker. I would think a Muslim extremist would mix their own explosive and not buy it over the counter.
It's all kitchen sink shit. They didn't even use good quality ball bearings. Shit some angry white kid can google and learn.
Basically the gunpowder builds up pressure and the pressure cooker allows it to get up to a high PSI before it explodes and then the shards go flying. The fact a lot of people lost legs but nothing to their upper bodies shows that this just spread out horizontally.
-
Eventually they will have to blame someone. Obama going on TV and proclaiming they will catch someone means that some poor fucker is going to get framed for it if they cannot find the true person.
-
I find it curious, too, that no one has claimed responsibility. That could indicate home grown, or it could indicate a change in Al Qaeda affiliated tactics.
Maybe they have other operatives in the field waiting to strike and want to hold off claiming credit until the operation is complete.
Maybe they got sick of eating drone launched hellfire missiles and want to make it as hard for the FBI to catch them as possible.
-
We would invade if those countries had huge oil reserves.
Mexico is an OPEC member. ::)
-
Mexico is an OPEC member. ::)
That's the irony isn't. The US claims their dependence on Oil from Saudis but in reality the US gets more oil from Canada, Mexico and Nigera than they do Saudi Arabia. The USA produces enough oil on its own that they never need to import from anywhere else but it's more lucrative to sell it off then buy it from others
-
If the FBI can't catch someone, you know the public is going to want someone to hang.
The vast majority will pretty much forget about it and move on with their lives, as long as it doesn't effect them directly.
Does the FBI just blame it on some Iranian or NK to justify another US invasion? Do they blame some whitey?
They are not blaming anybody at the moment. They are investigating. Once they arrest a suspect, they will issue a press release.
It's obvious if a muslim did it the USA would go to war in a heartbeat, but what if some Mexican or Colombian did it, would they invade and attack those countries? Nope.
Quit talking foolish. The USA is not going to war against anybody right now.
-
a lot of these things are government conspiracies
-
If the FBI can't catch someone, you know the public is going to want someone to hang.
The vast majority will pretty much forget about it and move on with their lives, as long as it doesn't effect them directly.
Does the FBI just blame it on some Iranian or NK to justify another US invasion? Do they blame some whitey?
They are not blaming anybody at the moment. They are investigating. Once they arrest a suspect, they will issue a press release.
It's obvious if a muslim did it the USA would go to war in a heartbeat, but what if some Mexican or Colombian did it, would they invade and attack those countries? Nope.
Quit talking foolish. The USA is not going to war against anybody right now.
So you really believe that if the suspect is Syrian or Iranian that the USA wouldn't deploy the military to attack?
-
Could be they're just stumped. Only 17% of crimes are solved, and the more planning a person takes, their chances improve of getting away with it.
There are probably pics of the bomber's face... and they're probably doing everything they can to ID the person... but investigators might be in a tough spot...
If they know who it is, and he's on the run with thousands in cash, he can lay low for months.
If they go public, it creates a panic and makes them look a little pathetic, gives this guy a platform, etc.
It is odd that we don't have an instant party to blame, but that's real life. "Fantasy" is where obama or bush gives us some hollywood tale of what happened - then that story is discredited later. Like with the bin laden lie that obama told, like with FBI recovering a hijackers passport in just a few hours despite all that chaos and the 911 crash itself. Those stories are obvious bullshit, hollywood fluff from minute one. We're not getting that this time.
-
One of my cop buddies told me that whereas most crimes are committed amongst people who know each other - its very very easy to get with almost anything given enough planning and if you can keep it to yourself.
Could be they're just stumped. Only 17% of crimes are solved, and the more planning a person takes, their chances improve of getting away with it.
There are probably pics of the bomber's face... and they're probably doing everything they can to ID the person... but investigators might be in a tough spot...
If they know who it is, and he's on the run with thousands in cash, he can lay low for months.
If they go public, it creates a panic and makes them look a little pathetic, gives this guy a platform, etc.
It is odd that we don't have an instant party to blame, but that's real life. "Fantasy" is where obama or bush gives us some hollywood tale of what happened - then that story is discredited later. Like with the bin laden lie that obama told, like with FBI recovering a hijackers passport in just a few hours despite all that chaos and the 911 crash itself. Those stories are obvious bullshit, hollywood fluff from minute one. We're not getting that this time.
-
One of my cop buddies told me that whereas most crimes are committed amongst people who know each other - its very very easy to get with almost anything given enough planning and if you can keep it to yourself.
That makes a lot of sense actually. If you plan ahead, choose your victim, detail an escape route, and don't do anything conspicious/stupid, I can see most people getting away with crimes.
Most of the time, it seems people tell their friends, post about it, bring their cell along for the crime, or act funny when police ask around.
You should write a letter to Rep Peter King (R) of your state, and ask him if he has any solutions. I bet he can think of some.
-
That makes a lot of sense actually. If you plan ahead, choose your victim, detail an escape route, and don't do anything conspicious/stupid, I can see most people getting away with crimes.
Most of the time, it seems people tell their friends, post about it, bring their cell along for the crime, or act funny when police ask around.
You should write a letter to Rep Peter King (R) of your state, and ask him if he has any solutions. I bet he can think of some.
With repubs like these, who needs dems? LOL
GOP Rep. Peter King On Boston Bombing: "We Need More Cameras"
ANDREA MITCHELL, MSNBC: Congressman, briefly, do you think that this will lead to more cameras? I know it's controversial, there are privacy issues. Boston does have a lot of cameras. European cities, led by London, have the most. Are Americans going to have to get used to more surveillance on a daily basis?
REP. PETER KING (R-NY): I think we do because I think privacy involves being in a private location. Being out in the street is not an expectation of privacy. Anyone can look at you, can see you, can watch what you're doing. A camera just makes it more sophisticated, but it's no different from your neighbor looking out the window at you or a police officer looking at you walking down the street.
So, I do think we need more cameras. We have to stay ahead of the terrorists and I do know in New York, the Lower Manhattan Security Initiative, which is based on cameras, the outstanding work that results from that. So yes, I do favor more cameras. They're a great law enforcement method and device. And again, it keeps us ahead of the terrorists, who are constantly trying to kill us.
-
Term limits
With repubs like these, who needs dems? LOL
GOP Rep. Peter King On Boston Bombing: "We Need More Cameras"
ANDREA MITCHELL, MSNBC: Congressman, briefly, do you think that this will lead to more cameras? I know it's controversial, there are privacy issues. Boston does have a lot of cameras. European cities, led by London, have the most. Are Americans going to have to get used to more surveillance on a daily basis?
REP. PETER KING (R-NY): I think we do because I think privacy involves being in a private location. Being out in the street is not an expectation of privacy. Anyone can look at you, can see you, can watch what you're doing. A camera just makes it more sophisticated, but it's no different from your neighbor looking out the window at you or a police officer looking at you walking down the street.
So, I do think we need more cameras. We have to stay ahead of the terrorists and I do know in New York, the Lower Manhattan Security Initiative, which is based on cameras, the outstanding work that results from that. So yes, I do favor more cameras. They're a great law enforcement method and device. And again, it keeps us ahead of the terrorists, who are constantly trying to kill us.
-
it's probably some Punk just like Timothy Mcveigh
-
Random crimes are the hardest to solve. Investigators will always look at motives and those close to the victim, but if it was some random dude who just disappears, they never know.
-
Could have been some crazy fucker denied entry to the Boston marathon for all we know.
-
Could have been some crazy fucker denied entry to the Boston marathon for all we know.
lol... how does one get denied entry? Don't you just pay the fee and enter? Or does one have to qualify?
-
It's all kitchen sink shit. They didn't even use good quality ball bearings. Shit some angry white kid can google and learn.
Basically the gunpowder builds up pressure and the pressure cooker allows it to get up to a high PSI before it explodes and then the shards go flying. The fact a lot of people lost legs but nothing to their upper bodies shows that this just spread out horizontally.
hm.... how do you know all this ???
-
Remember 1996 Olympic bombing? No one ever got caught for that either.
Since when?it took them 7 years but they caught him
-
lol... how does one get denied entry? Don't you just pay the fee and enter? Or does one have to qualify?
You have to be invited or some shit.
-
lol... how does one get denied entry? Don't you just pay the fee and enter? Or does one have to qualify?
You need to qualify to run in it by running in smaller marathons and having a certain time in it.
With the exclusion of the Olympics and various Championship races, the Boston Marathon is the only marathon in the USA that maintains qualifying times and requirements. While the specific requirements change from year to year, the requirements generally state that a runner must have completed a qualifying marathon within the year and a half before the upcoming Boston Marathon.
All participants must adhere to the guidelines set forth by the B.A.A., USA Track and Field or foreign equivalent, International Paralympic Committee, Wheelchair Sports, USA, Disabled Sports, USA, and the United States Association for Blind Athletes. Qualifying times must be met in competitions observing these same rules. Proof of qualification must accompany the application.
•For the 2014 Boston Marathon, qualifying times must be run on or after September 22, 2012
•The acceptance of official race entrants will be based on qualifying time, with the fastest qualifiers (in relation to their age and gender) being accepted first until the race is full
•All qualifying times are subject to review and verification
•All standards below are based on official submitted net time
•All standards below are equal to the 2013 Boston Marathon qualifying standards
•The qualifying times below are based upon each athlete's age on the date of the Boston Marathon in which they are participating
Age Men Women
18-34 3:05 3:35
35-39 3:10 3:40
40-44 3:15 3:45
45-49 3:25 3:55
50-54 3:30 4:00
55-59 3:40 4:10
60-64 3:55 4:25
65-69 4:10 4:40
70-74 4:25 4:55
75-79 4:40 5:10
80+ 4:55 5:25
-
hm.... how do you know all this ???
Science class.
-
1984
-
Perhaps this whole bombing thing is over the botched Iginla trade to the Bruins last month. ;)
-
So you really believe that if the suspect is Syrian or Iranian that the USA wouldn't deploy the military to attack?
No. Why would they? It's likely the actions of a lone wolf, not a regime. And besides, what good has come from attacking regimes in the past? Where has it gotten the US?
-
Obama must be having a shitty week.
We've been attacked at marathon. Nobody knows shit.
Also your gun legislation is finished, even in the senate with dems.
Oh, and by the way, we're under poison attack via mail.
Tough week to be president. :(
-
Obama must be having a shitty week.
We've been attacked at marathon. Nobody knows shit.
Also your gun legislation is finished, even in the senate with dems.
Oh, and by the way, we're under poison attack via mail.
Tough week to be president. :(
No one respects O-TWINK whatsoever. He dog shit
-
No one respects O-TWINK whatsoever. He dog shit
he is a two term president. he doesn't give a shit. He doesnt care with fox news thinks, he doesn't care what getbiggers think.
he's dog shit who is worth 200 million, 2 years out of office.
i bet he's happy to be dog shit, if that's the case.
-
he is a two term president. he doesn't give a shit. He doesnt care with fox news thinks, he doesn't care what getbiggers think.
he's dog shit who is worth 200 million, 2 years out of office.
i bet he's happy to be dog shit, if that's the case.
While everything crumbles around him and us. He is a piece of shit and you still make excuses for him why?
-
While everything crumbles around him and us. He is a piece of shit and you still make excuses for him why?
I still do that, huh? LInk to that, please? lol...
-
While everything crumbles around him and us. He is a piece of shit and you still make excuses for him why?
bobert just implying that as long as you have money and security, you dont care much about the morons who "vote" for you, and that basically life is a giant free for all.
-
1984
This.
If nobody gets caught the new boogieman is you. cctv trees everywhere, TSA checkpoints on the roads, mobile x-ray scanners all the stuff they've been buying up and wanting the public to accept.
If nobody is caught, that could be on purpose.