Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: TRIX on April 20, 2013, 07:25:41 PM

Title: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: TRIX on April 20, 2013, 07:25:41 PM
i cant take them serious, 19 inch arms on a girls frame, a lot at expos, i mean, a lot

(http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/p480x480/64494_10152771684155370_1435098611_n.jpg)

i saw phillip le heath, and yes his arms are massive, but he is narrow and thus i am not impressed, even jay cutler is not even that wide.

are you impressed with narrow bodybuilders?

ps: i am a twink, and i look like shit (lets get that out of the way)

your thoughts? are you impressed?


Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: michael arvilla on April 20, 2013, 07:28:17 PM
Jay Cutler= wide!
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: quadzilla456 on April 20, 2013, 07:30:22 PM
i cant take them serious, 19 inch arms on a girls frame, a lot at expos, i mean, a lot

(http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/p480x480/64494_10152771684155370_1435098611_n.jpg)

i saw phillip le heath, and yes his arms are massive, but he is narrow and thus i am not impressed, even jay cutler is not even that wide.

are you impressed with narrow bodybuilders?

ps: i am a twink, and i look like shit (lets get that out of the way)

your thoughts? are you impressed?



Jay may be many things but he is not narrow. Only thing that bugs me with Heath is his pecs and clavicle width. But with his current mass it is less noticeable. he looks much better than guys like Branch Warren who may be wider but have that dwarf look going on.
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: ChristopherA on April 20, 2013, 07:47:28 PM
Def never heard Jay called narrow. It's just his waist is SO big it takes away from his width and kills his taper
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: MCWAY on April 20, 2013, 07:49:19 PM
That "narrow" crap was criticism of Heath from his early years, a problem that he's long since fixed. And, he's got two Sandows to prove it.
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Mr Nobody on April 20, 2013, 07:51:43 PM
Do these guys even lift?
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: bAF1 on April 20, 2013, 08:35:25 PM
wider than heath
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: deadpan on April 20, 2013, 08:45:13 PM
yeah ronnie coleman and kevin levrone and shawn ray and flex wheeler and arnold were totally unimpressive  ::)
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Marine on April 20, 2013, 10:30:45 PM
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mUk55WbN9Y4/T-ikZX8NXGI/AAAAAAAAFwQ/CSHbT6a3NaQ/s1600/Joel+Stubbs+(7).jpg)

WIDE NIIGGA

WIDE CREW APPROVED
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Nomad on April 20, 2013, 11:48:33 PM
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mUk55WbN9Y4/T-ikZX8NXGI/AAAAAAAAFwQ/CSHbT6a3NaQ/s1600/Joel+Stubbs+(7).jpg)

WIDE NIIGGA

WIDE CREW APPROVED

Dont worry once phil get enough of legit kigs gh in him, he will make up in width growth for all those years not bodybuilding.
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Bevo on April 20, 2013, 11:55:51 PM
i cant take them serious, 19 inch arms on a girls frame, a lot at expos, i mean, a lot

(http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/p480x480/64494_10152771684155370_1435098611_n.jpg)

i saw phillip le heath, and yes his arms are massive, but he is narrow and thus i am not impressed, even jay cutler is not even that wide.

are you impressed with narrow bodybuilders?

ps: i am a twink, and i look like shit (lets get that out of the way)

your thoughts? are you impressed?




Nice I assume u r in the middle of these 2 beasts
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Tito24 on April 21, 2013, 12:01:31 AM
jay is not very wide either;
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: anabolichalo on April 21, 2013, 12:54:24 AM


ps: i am a twink, and i look like shit (lets get that out of the way)





brilliant
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: delon on April 21, 2013, 01:12:52 AM
If Jay isn't wide then there is no such thing

(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=44530&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Marine on April 21, 2013, 02:01:30 AM
Jay Cutler iis wiiiiiiide but

wolf is wider;;;;;;;




BUT JOELS STUBBS IS THE WIDEST FOREVER

Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Radical Plato on April 21, 2013, 03:11:05 AM
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3rj7o3GQZ1rpbajeo1_400.jpg)
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Radical Plato on April 21, 2013, 03:13:30 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=326555.0;attach=365939;image)
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: dj181 on April 21, 2013, 03:42:39 AM
 8)

(http://www.sportowiec.org/pub/images/editor/zdjeciawresien2011/Don_Howorth_dobry.jpg)
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Mr Nobody on April 21, 2013, 03:45:28 AM
8)

(http://www.sportowiec.org/pub/images/editor/zdjeciawresien2011/Don_Howorth_dobry.jpg)
Why is wearing a watch on stage?
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: dj181 on April 21, 2013, 03:58:25 AM
Why is wearing a watch on stage?

coz the chicks dig it 8)
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Mr Nobody on April 21, 2013, 04:01:28 AM
coz the chicks dig it 8)
I forgot take the watch off, I did that once myself. I got the pics from the promoter and saw I had a watch on and started laughing at myself. ;D
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: _bruce_ on April 21, 2013, 04:04:16 AM
8)

(http://www.sportowiec.org/pub/images/editor/zdjeciawresien2011/Don_Howorth_dobry.jpg)

Not bad. Normally laugh about the broad shoulder stuff but this one looks impressive.
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: dj181 on April 21, 2013, 04:04:54 AM
Not bad. Normally laugh about the broad shoulder stuff but this one looks impressive.

and he's got a Germanic surname to boot ;D
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: anabolichalo on April 21, 2013, 04:20:56 AM
before stumbling on getbig i wasnt aware i was narrow and thus not impressive, no matter how much muscle i carry



getbig gave me a lot of broken dreams


Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: gracie bjj on April 21, 2013, 04:32:48 AM
i agree, having wide clavicles to begin with gives a bodybuilder an edge
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Mr Nobody on April 21, 2013, 04:35:52 AM
i agree, having wide clavicles to begin with gives a bodybuilder an edge
Exactly = Genes.
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: gracie bjj on April 21, 2013, 04:40:33 AM
working the middle deltoid head can give a person alittle more width but like mr nobody said,its all genes. just like if a person is born with short biceps insertions, no amount of preacher curls will ever give him that full, long bicep look, like francos bi,s would never look full like arnolds no matter how many preacher curls he did
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: dj181 on April 21, 2013, 04:50:12 AM
Exactly = Genes.

that's true, but you'll never really know what your "genes" are until you really try ;)

look at roy callender when he was a young dude, you would never guess that he could be so massive and this only became apparent once he really tried
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Mr Nobody on April 21, 2013, 04:56:15 AM
that's true, but you'll never really know what your "genes" are until you really try ;)

look at roy callender when he was a young dude, you would never guess that he could be so massive and this only became apparent once he really tried
Agreed to a certain extent. Yea you got to try but you see was Larry Scott as wide as Don Howorth? No and he would never be yet both trained under Vince Gironda. I am talking bone structure not muscle  development.
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: gracie bjj on April 21, 2013, 05:01:22 AM
i know some guys who dont do any real trap work cause they believe thick traps make a person look narrow, i disagree, i think thick traps dont hurt a persons appearence of looking wide.
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Parker on April 21, 2013, 05:03:26 AM
i know some guys who dont do any real trap work cause they believe thick traps make a person look narrow, i disagree, i think thick traps dont hurt a persons appearence of looking wide.
Melvin Anthony was a proponent of less or no trap work...Flex didn't do as much trap work after his accident---he had better traps in 93 than at anytime after.
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Marine on April 21, 2013, 09:41:33 AM
(http://muscleshots.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/mystery6.jpg)

GH15  was wide.....,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,fellas.....
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: deadpan on April 21, 2013, 10:07:10 AM
Melvin Anthony was a proponent of less or no trap work...Flex didn't do as much trap work after his accident---he had better traps in 93 than at anytime after.

it's more a matter of narrow guys typically have lower and wider trap insertions so the traps look much more pronounced. i don't think i've ever seen a "wide" guy with huge traps, unlike JoJ.

(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mb2n707vmW1rh2qgwo1_400.jpg)
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: anabolichalo on April 21, 2013, 10:14:43 AM
joj's back is basically shocking to see in real life
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: gracie bjj on April 21, 2013, 10:17:56 AM
it's more a matter of narrow guys typically have lower and wider trap insertions so the traps look much more pronounced. i don't think i've ever seen a "wide" guy with huge traps, unlike JoJ.

(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mb2n707vmW1rh2qgwo1_400.jpg)

damn thats a thick ass back,delts n traps :o
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: Hulkotron on April 21, 2013, 10:36:41 AM
Looks like a series of tumors or reptilian sorcery.
Title: Re: Narrow Bodybuilders = Not impressive, no matter how much muscle they carry
Post by: falco on April 21, 2013, 11:04:03 AM
(http://www.ambal.ru/95240974692.jpg)