Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Fury on June 26, 2013, 06:53:51 PM
-
Cheers DOMA being struck down because they say people should be treated equally.
Viciously defends affirmative action.
-
Yeah, pretty much.
Not a lot of logic in the liberal mind.
Hell, just witness Blacken and 240 as good examples.
-
quite different, one is to aide people who are oppressed or treated unequally, you know that thing called discrimination.
Both look to end discrimination. I agree with affirmative action when the system is rigged to ensure fairness I don't support handouts nor an equally adept person missing a job because he is white etc.
They are totally different but both actually have the same ideal at the core. One is much harder to execute because the world is unfair.
-
quite different, one is to aide people who are oppressed or treated unequally, you know that thing called discrimination.
Both look to end discrimination. I agree with affirmative action when the system is rigged to ensure fairness I don't support handouts nor an equally adept person missing a job because he is white etc.
They are totally different but both actually have the same ideal at the core. One is much harder to execute because the world is unfair.
Yet the left has failed in all the way around and made things significantly worse. Great job. Theleft isn't about helping anyone, its all about political power. This nation is failing solely due to liberalism.
-
Even funnier is the mindset of John Roberts who readily admits the VRA was successful in preventing disenfranchisement of minority voters so now let's get rid of it
btw - activist judge much?
VRA was renewed in 2006 with a Republican POTUS and received a 98-0 Vote in the Senate
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/21/washington/21vote.html
I guess since 2006 we've completely eliminated racism in this country and there is not chance that Republicans would ever try to suppress the minority vote to win an election.
The 5 to 4 Voting Rights Act ruling, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by the usual gang of conservative justices, pronounced voting discrimination over, noting that “things have changed dramatically” in the South since the Voting Rights Act was signed in 1965, and because African-Americans and other minorities voted in historic numbers in the last election, clearly the country has become post-racial. “Our country has changed, and while any racial discrimination in voting is too much, Congress must ensure that the legislation it passes to remedy that problem speaks to current conditions,” Roberts wrote.
“There is no doubt that these improvements are in large part because of the Voting Rights Act,” Roberts continued. “The Act has proved immensely successful at redressing racial discrimination and integrating the voting process.”