Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Army of One on July 19, 2013, 01:07:35 PM
-
Good thread on bb.com, raises a lot of valid points, long read but very interesting
Cliffs:recent study shows women find 80% of men unattractive,have unrealistic standards,3 and 4/10s won't touch anything but top 20% of men, when hit the wall they settle, marry but looking to trade up,its in their blood
"I meant to also add "and feminism" to the thread title but it wouldn't fit. Alright, just for the few misc white-knights who think the notion of female hypergamy is an imaginative construct by "hateful misogynists", I highly recommend you check out this economics paper published 2 months ago that shows that women are, by nature, hypergamous as it found couples where the woman out-earned the man were more likely to divorce and those divorces were mostly filed by the woman, much to the dismay of feminist dogma. Also, there is overwhelming evidence in modern psychology that female hypergamy does in fact exist and is a reality in most relationships these days.
Alright, first of all. I want you to understand what exactly female hypergamy is. It isn't just securing an attractive mate, no. Rather, it is about securing the best possible mate a woman can ever hope to get. I'm sure you've heard the countless anecdotes of a newly-wed couple and the bride claiming her husband is the best of men? Only to cheat on him a few years down the road when she "gets bored with him" with a more attractive and thus sees him as a "superior genetic specimen"? The reason she got "bored" with her husband, no matter how loyal he is or how much he spoils her (this happens rich guys all the time), is exactly due to female hypergamy. The reason why we haven't seen this behavior manifest it self for the many millennia civilization has been around was simply because it was kept in check. Divorce, in all cultures, brought upon ruin and shame to a woman and her family. Being a sloot would not only promise her a life of abject poverty and prostitution, but it would be total social ruin to her family as well.
Nowadays, thanks to the rise of modern feminism, there is now no stigma attached to being a sloot and women have financial and social incentives to divorce their beta husbands. Invariably, it is these men who constitute 80% of the population (beta males) who end up in these situations the most. The so-called beta provider. Personally, I've heard this story too many times where beta males who were ignored for most of their life end up with some post-wall sloot who's well out of her prime and claiming she grew tired of "bad boys" (the 20% of males that are known as the alpha males) and claims she wants to settle down with a "nice and caring" guy, only really planning to divorce him later on. Feminism essentially unleashed hypergamy that was bottled up for thousands of years, which is why we are seeing sloots getting completely out of control. And when she has a bast*rd child? That will be completely financed by the grand master among all white-knights that is known as the government.
If you think you are an alpha and are still stupid enough to get married, you will eventually become a beta thanks to the feminist laws and your wife is destined to be turned off by you. This paradox is central to why many marriages fail today. We all know women are attracted to dominant personalities or the so called "dark triad" traits. These same traits that causes women to be attracted to you is then punished by feminist laws and these days one can expect to be hauled off by the white-knights in blue over a dispute that wasn't even violent. A modern marriage forces you to become the proverbial beta male, which ensures your wife will become repulsed by you over time and either cheat on you or cheat on you and file for divorce, simultaneously. A man can never really win when it comes to marriage these days.
Refer to post 2 for more.
Cliffs:
There aren't any. If you have the attention span of a fly, you likely won't benefit from this wealth of knowledge that was brought to us at the cost of the sweat, blood, and tears of many good men who initially bought the nonsense pushed by society that women are these "angelic princesses that can never do any harm".
Furthermore, as I showed in another thread, the average woman's standards are completely uncalibrated with reality's. Women find 80% of men to be unattractive/undesirable. So, unless you are apart of that elusive 20% of males who are getting practically all the sex and women, your wife will surely not find you physically attractive and she clearly has other motives. You will serve the role of the typical emasculated husband who provides her with every luxury she would ever dream of while in return as gratitude get to have a go at an overused whole in the dark once every three months, and she can refuse after 3 months have passed if she doesn't "feel like it".
The good news in all of this is that more men are beginning to see the sham that modern marriage really is. According to Pew Research, barely half of U.S adults are married and the marriage rates are declining rapidly, and it's not women who are refusing to get married. Even mangina websites such as Forbes now realize they cannot deny this reality by stating:
"As of 2010, only 22% of Millennials are married and the median age of first marriage for Gen Y women is 26.5 years old. Currently, there are more unmarried women in their early 30s than at any time in the last 60 years".
Young men are refusing to get married as they have seen their fathers, uncles, and family friends brought to total ruin by them. That's why we are seeing so many "man up" and "where have all the good men gone" articles. The feminist establishment realizes this and is getting the propaganda machine in gear. The feminist establishment cannot survive without married men pumping more into the system than necessary, because it is a basic fact of economics that married men go beyond what is necessary in terms of production and contribution to society so that they can provide better lives for their families. Governments need these men to redistribute their extra contributions to keep the "misandry bubble" (a very good but long article, I suggest you read it) from popping. Single motherhood will only continue to increase and celebrated as "female liberation" until these men starve out the government's redistribution by simply not getting married. It's a very simple yet equally effective solution.
If you want to have a relationship and eventually kids, I completely understand and sympathize with that. It is simply human nature. Long term relationships are fine, but given current societal norms, most will fail as most women will naturally start to pressure you into marriage once "baby rabies" starts to kick in. If you can sustain one without a marriage, then more power to you. However, if you are still stupid enough to get married after knowing all of these facts about the nature of women and marriage in our twisted civilization, then you deserve every hardship that comes upon you. Do not say we never warned you.
-
(https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/5185278976/h6A9786F8/)
-
(https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/5185278976/h6A9786F8/)
Included cliffs for the sub 80 iq Getbiggers too
-
Women have ridiculously high standards. You should see someone of the women on dating sites. Their standards are ridiculous.
And most women out there are average at best.
I think the problem is that women think guys are so horny that they will date or go out with anyone, thus they have their pick of the litter and can keep their standards high.
-
Women have ridiculously high standards. You should see someone of the women on dating sites. Their standards are ridiculous.
And most women out there are average at best.
I think the problem is that women think guys are so horny that they will date or go out with anyone, thus they have their pick of the litter and can keep their standards high.
I see hot chicks with loser guys all the time. I know those chicks had high standards but why settle on the loser?
-
I see hot chicks with loser guys all the time. I know those chicks had high standards but why settle on the loser?
He's alpha man, all alpha. Read into that however you want.
-
I see hot chicks with loser guys all the time. I know those chicks had high standards but why settle on the loser?
I dont know. Why do you think they are going out with loser guys? :-\ :-\
-
Hookers don't have standards, they have a set price.
-
Hookers don't have standards, they have a set price.
Tbombz has different prices
-
This is all evolutionary, driven by their sub conscious.
-
Hookers don't have standards, they have a set price.
And they are far cheaper then a divorce :'(
-
Good thread on bb.com, raises a lot of valid points, long read but very interesting
Cliffs:recent study shows women find 80% of men unattractive,have unrealistic standards,3 and 4/10s won't touch anything but top 20% of men, when hit the wall they settle, marry but looking to trade up,its in their blood
"I meant to also add "and feminism" to the thread title but it wouldn't fit. Alright, just for the few misc white-knights who think the notion of female hypergamy is an imaginative construct by "hateful misogynists", I highly recommend you check out this economics paper published 2 months ago that shows that women are, by nature, hypergamous as it found couples where the woman out-earned the man were more likely to divorce and those divorces were mostly filed by the woman, much to the dismay of feminist dogma. Also, there is overwhelming evidence in modern psychology that female hypergamy does in fact exist and is a reality in most relationships these days.
Alright, first of all. I want you to understand what exactly female hypergamy is. It isn't just securing an attractive mate, no. Rather, it is about securing the best possible mate a woman can ever hope to get. I'm sure you've heard the countless anecdotes of a newly-wed couple and the bride claiming her husband is the best of men? Only to cheat on him a few years down the road when she "gets bored with him" with a more attractive and thus sees him as a "superior genetic specimen"? The reason she got "bored" with her husband, no matter how loyal he is or how much he spoils her (this happens rich guys all the time), is exactly due to female hypergamy. The reason why we haven't seen this behavior manifest it self for the many millennia civilization has been around was simply because it was kept in check. Divorce, in all cultures, brought upon ruin and shame to a woman and her family. Being a sloot would not only promise her a life of abject poverty and prostitution, but it would be total social ruin to her family as well.
Nowadays, thanks to the rise of modern feminism, there is now no stigma attached to being a sloot and women have financial and social incentives to divorce their beta husbands. Invariably, it is these men who constitute 80% of the population (beta males) who end up in these situations the most. The so-called beta provider. Personally, I've heard this story too many times where beta males who were ignored for most of their life end up with some post-wall sloot who's well out of her prime and claiming she grew tired of "bad boys" (the 20% of males that are known as the alpha males) and claims she wants to settle down with a "nice and caring" guy, only really planning to divorce him later on. Feminism essentially unleashed hypergamy that was bottled up for thousands of years, which is why we are seeing sloots getting completely out of control. And when she has a bast*rd child? That will be completely financed by the grand master among all white-knights that is known as the government.
If you think you are an alpha and are still stupid enough to get married, you will eventually become a beta thanks to the feminist laws and your wife is destined to be turned off by you. This paradox is central to why many marriages fail today. We all know women are attracted to dominant personalities or the so called "dark triad" traits. These same traits that causes women to be attracted to you is then punished by feminist laws and these days one can expect to be hauled off by the white-knights in blue over a dispute that wasn't even violent. A modern marriage forces you to become the proverbial beta male, which ensures your wife will become repulsed by you over time and either cheat on you or cheat on you and file for divorce, simultaneously. A man can never really win when it comes to marriage these days.
Refer to post 2 for more.
Cliffs:
There aren't any. If you have the attention span of a fly, you likely won't benefit from this wealth of knowledge that was brought to us at the cost of the sweat, blood, and tears of many good men who initially bought the nonsense pushed by society that women are these "angelic princesses that can never do any harm".
Furthermore, as I showed in another thread, the average woman's standards are completely uncalibrated with reality's. Women find 80% of men to be unattractive/undesirable. So, unless you are apart of that elusive 20% of males who are getting practically all the sex and women, your wife will surely not find you physically attractive and she clearly has other motives. You will serve the role of the typical emasculated husband who provides her with every luxury she would ever dream of while in return as gratitude get to have a go at an overused whole in the dark once every three months, and she can refuse after 3 months have passed if she doesn't "feel like it".
The good news in all of this is that more men are beginning to see the sham that modern marriage really is. According to Pew Research, barely half of U.S adults are married and the marriage rates are declining rapidly, and it's not women who are refusing to get married. Even mangina websites such as Forbes now realize they cannot deny this reality by stating:
"As of 2010, only 22% of Millennials are married and the median age of first marriage for Gen Y women is 26.5 years old. Currently, there are more unmarried women in their early 30s than at any time in the last 60 years".
Young men are refusing to get married as they have seen their fathers, uncles, and family friends brought to total ruin by them. That's why we are seeing so many "man up" and "where have all the good men gone" articles. The feminist establishment realizes this and is getting the propaganda machine in gear. The feminist establishment cannot survive without married men pumping more into the system than necessary, because it is a basic fact of economics that married men go beyond what is necessary in terms of production and contribution to society so that they can provide better lives for their families. Governments need these men to redistribute their extra contributions to keep the "misandry bubble" (a very good but long article, I suggest you read it) from popping. Single motherhood will only continue to increase and celebrated as "female liberation" until these men starve out the government's redistribution by simply not getting married. It's a very simple yet equally effective solution.
If you want to have a relationship and eventually kids, I completely understand and sympathize with that. It is simply human nature. Long term relationships are fine, but given current societal norms, most will fail as most women will naturally start to pressure you into marriage once "baby rabies" starts to kick in. If you can sustain one without a marriage, then more power to you. However, if you are still stupid enough to get married after knowing all of these facts about the nature of women and marriage in our twisted civilization, then you deserve every hardship that comes upon you. Do not say we never warned you.
Read it, pretty good and accurate...
I don't care what anyone says, women are satisfied when you keep them in the beta position. They want to be used and abused. If you don't, someone else will.
-
sage advice there from those life-weary 13-20 odd year old's
-
sage advice there from those life-weary 13-20 odd year old's
;D
-
Only 20%? I think that's too low. It's gotta be more closer to 50%.
Single men should completely forget about marriage. It's a legally, financially binding arrangement that mostly benefits women. Don't do it.
-
Women have ridiculously high standards. You should see someone of the women on dating sites. Their standards are ridiculous.
those women are the worst of the worst, that is why they need a dating site to meet men
like it has been already mentioned, many good looking women are with average or worse guys
E
-
Read it, pretty good and accurate...
I don't care what anyone says, women are satisfied when you keep them in the beta position. Today's women who are products of Baby Boomers, want to be used and abused due to the way they have been brought up. If you don't, someone else will.
fixed
-
Women have ridiculously high standards. You should see someone of the women on dating sites. Their standards are ridiculous.
And most women out there are average at best.
I think the problem is that women think guys are so horny that they will date or go out with anyone, thus they have their pick of the litter and can keep their standards high.
Haha, yeah its so true. I just SMH whenever I read their stupid standards. And many of them arnt even hot.
Yes, Ive said it before and I say it again, women are useless scum, so just fuck em and leave em, because they deserve no more no less. If your a 10, your Lucky you`ll end up with a 6-7... If a girl is a 5, she can get with a 9 because most women are ridicolous shallow, that the 10s are pretty much impossible to satisfy.
I hate girls, they are manipulate, shallow, fake, liars and whores. Ive yet to come across a nice girl I would consider being with. Id rather just move to America and fuck easy going sluts all day everyday. In Norway, you have to be the best of the best to get with a decent chick... And its not worth it.... ::)
-
sage advice there from those life-weary 13-20 odd year old's
Haha, you not mirin,bro?
-
Keep the faith "betas" out there...you see that hot Chica at the bar, the one who passed you up?
You can get her, in about 5-10 yrs, after she marries and divorces...a few kids, and a "few extra pounds".
You got her, in the pocket, in the pocket. Work that long frame...
-
Marriage only makes sense for a woman for a man youll eventually lose just like in a casino house always wins in the end. That is how it is setup for now. My advice to young men is to get snipped for your 21st so you dont end up paying for a child you never wanted.
-
fixed
Maybe, the baby boomer generation is the worst thing that ever happened to the United State. :-X
-
Haha, yeah its so true. I just SMH whenever I read their stupid standards. And many of them arnt even hot.
Yes, Ive said it before and I say it again, women are useless scum, so just fuck em and leave em, because they deserve no more no less. If your a 10, your Lucky you`ll end up with a 6-7... If a girl is a 5, she can get with a 9 because most women are ridicolous shallow, that the 10s are pretty much impossible to satisfy.
I hate girls, they are manipulate, shallow, fake, liars and whores. Ive yet to come across a nice girl I would consider being with. Id rather just move to America and fuck easy going sluts all day everyday. In Norway, you have to be the best of the best to get with a decent chick... And its not worth it.... ::)
Damn dude! :o
-
those women are the worst of the worst, that is why they need a dating site to meet men
like it has been already mentioned, many good looking women are with average or worse guys
E
Yeah, its a confusing messing. DAting does suck!
-
Maybe, the baby boomer generation is the worst thing that ever happened to the United State. :-X
It's been said that you have to take the good with the bad, and they had good ideas, but at the heart of it all, many are still hippies/weedheads/me-me at heart. They never thought about how their actions (listed) would affect their kids, and quite frankly, i don't think they gave a damn. This is the same generation that was called the "me" generation. The generation for which the term "yuppie" was coined. The generation of high divorce rates, when the kids were young. The generation of wanting to be a "cool" parent and friends with your kids. A generation that allowed their kids to talk back to them. A genration that sought to rob men of their testicles, and their sons as well...A generation that taught that boys/maleness, is bad...and must be reined in...but at the same time, that irresponsibility of men is rewarded, by women...firstly their mothers, and then the women that said young men date. A generation that believed in giving everybody a medal, because they didn't want to hurt the loser's self esteem...Now all of sudden when shit hits the fan...this is now "something new, but old, but through no fault of anybody"... ??? ::)
You know, I met a man a few yrs ago, he was a baby boomer, and his son at 35 yrs old was cosntantly getting in trouble with the law. the father was trying to go to the casino, and was pissed that his son was putting a damper on his plans...and was moaning about his son. He said, "I don't know what's wrong with these kids nowadays...", I looked at him, and I wanted to tell him, that it was possibly the way he was raised...this man is more concerned about going to the casino than his own son.
-
It's been said that you have to take the good with the bad, and they had good ideas, but at the heart of it all, many are still hippies/weedheads/me-me at heart. They never thought about how their actions (listed) would affect their kids, and quite frankly, i don't think they gave a damn. This is the same generation that was called the "me" generation. The generation for which the term "yuppie" was coined. The generation of high divorce rates, when the kids were young. The generation of wanting to be a "cool" parent and friends with your kids. A generation that allowed their kids to talk back to them. A genration that sought to rob men of their testicles, and their sons as well...A generation that taught that boys/maleness, is bad...and must be reined in...but at the same time, that irresponsibility of men is rewarded, by women...firstly their mothers, and then the women that said young men date. A generation that believed in giving everybody a medal, because they didn't want to hurt the loser's self esteem...Now all of sudden when shit hits the fan...this is now "something new, but old, but through no fault of anybody"... ??? ::)
You know, I met a man a few yrs ago, he was a baby boomer, and his son at 35 yrs old was cosntantly getting in trouble with the law. the father was trying to go to the casino, and was pissed that his son was putting a damper on his plans...and was moaning about his son. He said, "I don't know what's wrong with these kids nowadays...", I looked at him, and I wanted to tell him, that it was possibly the way he was raised...this man is more concerned about going to the casino than his own son.
Parker, you should seriously start a blog, you have really great insight and know something about everything!
-
i was about to say the same. Parkers posts always impress me.lots of insights.
-
What Parker is saying is correct, but what was different before the 60's, and the mass influence of corporations and liberal concepts being pushed in media/schools/universities?
It was conservative Christian values that ruled peoples behaviour and societal norms.
Do you think people nowadays are willing to go back to such a thing, or are they even capable of doing so?
-
Agree most women are whores but I don't agree with the high standards thing. I see so many hot young girls with such losers. And i mean, ugly, scrawny emo guys that dont have a cent to their name. I think it has something to do with women not wanting to be with someone as hot or hotter then them because they are so scared the guy will cheat or get more attention then them.
But this article, it has a lot of truth to it but i cant understand why women would want to be like this. What is the point in being with someone you don't even find attractive? are they so scared of being alone?
-
"The troubles of the world are not in my department."
-
Parker, you should seriously start a blog, you have really great insight and know something about everything!
thank you, but there might be another avenue that i might take.
In America all too few blows are struck into flesh. We kill the spirit here, we are experts at that. We use psychic bullets and kill each other cell by cell.
-
Agree most women are whores but I don't agree with the high standards thing. I see so many hot young girls with such losers. And i mean, ugly, scrawny emo guys that dont have a cent to their name. I think it has something to do with women not wanting to be with someone as hot or hotter then them because they are so scared the guy will cheat or get more attention then them.
But this article, it has a lot of truth to it but i cant understand why women would want to be like this. What is the point in being with someone you don't even find attractive? are they so scared of being alone?
Yes. What has been stated on here before, is that women are just as insecure, if not more so, about being rejected than men are. I've known women who would date chunky dudes, because these men wouldn't run away...these men know that they have got the better deal, and that it would be hard to find another one.
-
I belive old evolutionary programming play its part.
- Naturally women would prefer a fit man, small waist, strong arms and shoulders. As he would be the best hunter.
- In modern society, beeing fit does not necessarily mean you are a good "hunter". But those old insticts are still there.
In todays world a fit, poor man or a unfit rich man will mess with female instincts because its evolutionary wrong.
-
Parker, you should seriously start a blog, you have really great insight and know something about everything!
some love him some hate him but either way I dont think anybody will deny parkers a very bright guy.
-
theres truth to that, i mean when i walk in the city i feel bit bad for the average guys, all the women staring lustfully at me,almost desprately trying to tell me"fuck me please",just without words, i think this is some evolutionary natural process which they cant help to fight.
at the same time i feel bad that i cant exist twice,then id get twice the amount of women.
atleast i have the courtesy to leave the kinda ugly ones in the mating pool.for example last night i was out with my fashionable convertible and at stoplight, 3 women came walking by very closely,maybe 2feet away and they notice my massive arm on the steering wheel(i prefer to waer tank top or no shirt, the weather serves as excuse)and its the usual,predictable jaw dropping reaction coming from them, so i tell them loud enoughly, "hey girls, theres 1 seat still free, but only for the one on the right,the other 2 are too ugly".
see, dont be too selfish, think about the 80% out there 8)
Are u really that much into yourself? ;D
And aren't u old?? :D
-
Haha, yeah its so true. I just SMH whenever I read their stupid standards. And many of them arnt even hot.
Yes, Ive said it before and I say it again, women are useless scum, so just fuck em and leave em, because they deserve no more no less. If your a 10, your Lucky you`ll end up with a 6-7... If a girl is a 5, she can get with a 9 because most women are ridicolous shallow, that the 10s are pretty much impossible to satisfy.
I hate girls, they are manipulate, shallow, fake, liars and whores. Ive yet to come across a nice girl I would consider being with. Id rather just move to America and fuck easy going sluts all day everyday. In Norway, you have to be the best of the best to get with a decent chick... And its not worth it.... ::)
Plus they have cooties! :P
-
Alot of morons in this thread. Nobody gets what they want. Maybe if you weren't a bunch of wants obsessed americano's you'd get this.
It's a bell curve everyone finds the top 10 percent more desirable, however maintaining a position in this percentage is far from realistic. Those that do best in marriage and in life are the ones that have some self control.
-
Alot of morons in this thread. Nobody gets what they want. Maybe if you weren't a bunch of wants obsessed americano's you'd get this.
It's a bell curve everyone finds the top 10 percent more desirable, however maintaining a position in this percentage is far from realistic. Those that do best in marriage and in life are the ones that have some self control.
Divorced peoples' lack of willpower is sickening.
-
Alot of morons in this thread. Nobody gets what they want. however maintaining a position in this percentage is far from realistic.
Actually if you are handsome, built, with a good personality it's suprisingly easy.
Not that YOUR inflicted ass has ever or will ever know anything about that but many males on this site can relate to this fact.
-
I belive old evolutionary programming play its part.
- Naturally women would prefer a fit man, small waist, strong arms and shoulders. As he would be the best hunter.
- In modern society, beeing fit does not necessarily mean you are a good "hunter". But those old insticts are still there.
In todays world a fit, poor man or a unfit rich man will mess with female instincts because its evolutionary wrong.
Yes I totally agree. Its all about those basic natural evolutionary instincts that goes waaay waaay back. We are only intelligent animals after all, and there is nothing that will ever change our primative behaviour, no matter how hard we try to deny it.
Im sure Uberman has a lot to say about this.
-
Included cliffs for the sub 80 iq Getbiggers too
The cliffs are shit and not working. Nothing to do with being intelligent not wanting to waste time
Sum it up in 3-5 bullet points:
- women are shit by nature
- women settle when old and ugly
- majority of women would trade up in split second
- love doesn't exist
-
All women by nature are whores.
They want the same thing men want, but they pretend they're above that.
Most have been dancin' away in clubs, since they could put on a training size bra looking for the next sucker.
Their appetite cannot be simply satiated by buying 6 or 600 pairs of shoes.
They are [all] always looking to be white knighted. As if ... the feminists are above that. The feminists too are all whores [they pretend they're not, but they are in fact "closet whores"]. Albeit, they are misandrous egalitarian whores.
They want equality, yet they want to control the men in the relationships. Soon as you're married, you might as well cut off your testicles or whatever is left of it and hand it over to them along with half your assets, if not more.
P.S. Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?
-
Analysis in this thread applies to western women, women in other cultures are still kept on a leach.
-
The cliffs are shit and not working. Nothing to do with being intelligent not wanting to waste time
Sum it up in 3-5 bullet points:
- women are shit by nature
- women settle when old and ugly
- majority of women would trade up in split second
- love doesn't exist
sadly, what it seems is that today's society has pitted men and women against one another, even if they are married, and also have kids. This cannot be conducive to a productive society. When you are trying to build something, whether it be a family or a community, you can't have the parties going at one another or even absolving themselves of their duties to follow trivial pursuits...
Women have always been the foundations of society. The bedrock, the ones that require the men strong, smart, etc. Men are the pillars (ie pillars of the community), holding up community, making sure that community is stable, and provides security. Now, what if you have a poor foundation? Well, we all know what happens when foundation of a house is poorly done...the support (the pillars) cannot do their job, and fail...the house (community) fails.
-
Haha, yeah its so true. I just SMH whenever I read their stupid standards. And many of them arnt even hot.
Yes, Ive said it before and I say it again, women are useless scum, so just fuck em and leave em, because they deserve no more no less. If your a 10, your Lucky you`ll end up with a 6-7... If a girl is a 5, she can get with a 9 because most women are ridicolous shallow, that the 10s are pretty much impossible to satisfy.
I hate girls, they are manipulate, shallow, fake, liars and whores. Ive yet to come across a nice girl I would consider being with. Id rather just move to America and fuck easy going sluts all day everyday. In Norway, you have to be the best of the best to get with a decent chick... And its not worth it.... ::)
OOooooookkkkaay.... :-\
-
Im sure Uberman has a lot to say about this.
Well i ve written extensively on this subject months (years) ago, browse my post history, but I d add this.
Beauty, strength, money, all fade away, none of these strategies of survival last forever. It s what you do with what you have at the moment you have it that matters, it's how long you maintain your strenghts, it's how you reverse your weaknesses, that matters. There are people who are good looking, rich, powerful, yet are unhappy. I think our society makes it a religion to "find hapiness", not understanding how it works, in fact most people get sick of looking for something that simply doesnt exist; constant hapiness. People were a lot happier on a more consistant basis in the past it is a fact. People in the past were not looking for hapiness, but to please God. And they were happier.
Constant hapiness? This is not what we ve been designed for; hapiness is just an emotion among many others. Life is a rollercoaster of feelings. There are people who have been, felt, miserable all their lives but raised kids who dominate, are happier than others by a wide margin. The me generation has no clue about history, nor can envision the future; they ll never reach the maturity to raise kids properly enough for them to survive.
Fact is hapiness is more easily found for everyone following basic principles more than buying into the last trend that in order to steal money from your pocket will "reveal" you a shortcut to reach it.
There is a bigger picture, experience, at work, and you have to see beyond individuals.
Just consider the fact that once economies collapse, not matter how good looking or rich you are, if you are at the wrong place at the wrong moment, your good looking body and its pockets full of money wont mean shit.
The Bible says only the humble, down to earth, who finds his happiness in the simplest things will be saved, will live long...will be part of tomorrow. Only he will have hopes. We are blades of grass, and some of them are greener than others. We are just toys in the hands of something bigger than us. Our "feelings" are not even ours per se, they re just strategies of survival genetically embedded in ourselves and we didnt choose just like we didnt choose most of our physical attributes. Our only choice is to decide what to do with them.
Life is a challenge, an experience, full of traps and one needs a strong spiritual, mental discipline to go thru it without "failing". Many good looking, strong, rich people have died since the birth of mankind. Many of their genes have been saved and cross mixed generation after generation. Many dumb, ugly people have survived the same way; they were "inferior", still they still exist. The real question is, what is the point of all of this ? Are we just a bunch of randomly mixed, generated, strategies of survival, is the only purpose of our existences to struggle for survival against others individuals , against the weather, other animal species, who are as vain and lost as ourselves and who just want to dominate without having to be someone else slave?
I dont believe that we re designed to be constantly happy or unhappy. Life as a human being is about more than that; it's about surviving whatever the way you survive. Now, a lot of people think that all strategies of survival are equivalent, that being a whore, a murderer, a robber, is justified and just as good as studying, working, etc if it allows you to survive, others aiming at the betterment of mankind until a perfect being is obtained believe that you have to constantly improve your thoughts and/or body it gives a meaning to their existences and to the process of reproduction in humans. When they choose not to fall for a sin, they see the difficulty of that choice as a step in the good direction.
It is also funny how some ugly people give birth to good looking kids and how good looking parents give birth to ugly kids. There are so many things we dont understand.
Ultimately I think preppers have better odds of survival than yuppies from the cities.
On a side note I think that male beauty isnt as fun as it seems to be. Im quite handsome myself and the more I age the more I attract young girls teens and women of all ages, pretty suprising considering i was a very insecure pimple face when a teen. As a result, I have more and more occasions to seduce and be seduced by women of all ages who want the best partner to breed with. It actually makes my life harder, more painful, because most of these women when they figure I am married have a daughters, suddenly realizing they cant "have" me start to hate on me, because I wont be their lover. How many of them also hate on me because I am the one they would have loved to start a family with but "unfortunately" they ve ended with the skinny fat/ fat insecure asshole. So at first glance they all fall in love then quickly turn into w(b)itches as soon as you dont answer to their attempts to flirt with you. Because they re little girls who arent used to not get what they want.
Anyway in most cases it only results in more troubles for me than anything. So, beauty definitely has its pros and...cons.
I am affraid it's all a lot more complicated than that; if only good looking, powerful, rich people were allowed to reign, be happy, most ugly , poor people would just kill themselves right? But life is a gigantic (infinite?) experience where anything can happen, and the result of this struggle for survival is "feelings", emotions that make us feel alive. It is fascinating how we create, fabricate, give, a meaning to things with our brains, when simply put, most of what exists, is "happening", is only struggle for survival by various life forms of all kinds.
There will be major events that will see the world population decrease massively, just like it happened countless times in the past.
The real question is... who is saved, and who isnt, who adapts, who doesnt. Where does all of this go. What do we want for our kids and grandkids.
-
Sum it up in 3-5 bullet points:
- women are shit by nature
- women settle when old and ugly
- majority of women would trade up in split second
- love doesn't exist
Actually Love exists, it's just that people dont know/ignore what it is made of at its core, what defines it, or misunderstand what it is made of, confuse it with something else.
-
Just got back from the beach with a chick and had an amazing time...made out for hours while she fell asleep on my shoulder.
..nothing like laying on the beach gazing at the stars .....
realistically I need a 25 year old girl...not one almost 35...and she knows it,,,... but sometimes you gotta enjoy enjoy the moment and go with the flow....girl was hot so I figured why the fuck not. you dont have to go looking for your "soul mate" to enjoy dating.
-
Actually Love exists, it's just that people dont know/ignore what it is made of at its core, what defines it, or misunderstand what it is made of, confuse it with something else.
My bullets were just examples actually
But yeah. The hollywood concept of love does not exist or do so in rare long term cases
-
women are no worse than men.
they only lied for so long because men raped and beat them so much throughout time that they basically had to start finding secret ways of communicating and strategizing and manipulating so that they could protect their interests.
-
I see hot chicks with loser guys all the time. I know those chicks had high standards but why settle on the loser?
probably money bra
-
It's a sad pathetic world we live in today. Women are dating up, and men are dating down. Look around, you are more likely to see a good looking guy with an ugly chick, then vice versa. The problem you guys just don't see it....men for the most part, underrate other men's looks, overrate women's looks, and their own looks....
-
It's a sad pathetic world we live in today. Women are dating up, and men are dating down. Look around, you are more likely to see a good looking guy with an ugly chick, then vice versa. The problem you guys just don't see it....men for the most part, underrate other men's looks, overrate women's looks, and their own looks....
It's because most of them ain't bodybuilders.
-
women dont cheat on alpha males
they cheat on betas and twinks
if you cant hold on to your woman you are weak
-
I see hot chicks with loser guys all the time. I know those chicks had high standards but why settle on the loser?
no you dont...as i said before men often times underrate other men's looks. That guy she is with is probably in actuality better looking than you are...
-
no you dont...as i said before men often times underrate other men's looks. That guy she is with is probably in actuality better looking than you are...
or rich
-
It's a sad pathetic world we live in today. Women are dating up, and men are dating down. Look around, you are more likely to see a good looking guy with an ugly chick, then vice versa. The problem you guys just don't see it....men for the most part, underrate other men's looks, overrate women's looks, and their own looks....
i don't see this at all, though i regularly see fat guys with good looking women
rarely do i see a couple where the guy is clearly better looking
E
-
i don't see this at all, though i regularly see fat guys with good looking women
rarely do i see a couple where the guy is clearly better looking
E
No, I see it every where as well.. The guy is in almost 99% cases better looking than the chick theyr With. Like Ive said before its much easier for a ugly chick to get With a handsome guy than it is for a ugly guy to get With a cute chick. So if Your a 10, Your Lucky if you get a 7.. and I mean Lucky. Bitches are better off alone With their selfish crap and ridicoulus anticiaptions. Most of them are fake anyway. Sad but true.
-
Let me see if I'm following...
An average woman that wants a good looking guy, and a secure furure...is a useless whore piece of shit.
But an average guy has every right to expect dime pieces to flock to him.
Everybody wants a good life....women too ;)
-
No, I see it every where as well.. The guy is in almost 99% cases better looking than the chick theyr With. Like Ive said before its much easier for a ugly chick to get With a handsome guy than it is for a ugly guy to get With a cute chick. So if Your a 10, Your Lucky if you get a 7.. and I mean Lucky. Bitches are better off alone With their selfish crap and ridicoulus anticiaptions. Most of them are fake anyway. Sad but true.
i don't know must be different where you guys live, i always see good looking women with guys that are out of shape or barely average looking
can we define the rating scale, what each number means?
i'd say 1 - 3 is ugly or gross and helpless, 4 is below average but can improve with losing weight or maybe a new haircut, 5 is average meaning not good looking but not ugly either just a plain jane, 6 is better than average but not somebody you would date, 7 is pretty hot, 8 is beautiful and typically the best looking girl in every room, 9 is out of this world and should be making money off their looks, 10 is perfect and probably doesn't exist
if a person is a 10, they almost have to "settle for less" because how many 10's truly exist? you can't give somebody a 10 unless you see them completely naked
if i give somebody a 7 that means they're pretty hot so nothing wrong with a 10 going for somebody that's "pretty hot"
E
-
:D ;D ;)
-
Well i ve written extensively on this subject months (years) ago, browse my post history, but I d add this.
Beauty, strength, money, all fade away, none of these strategies of survival last forever. It s what you do with what you have at the moment you have it that matters, it's how long you maintain your strenghts, it's how you reverse your weaknesses, that matters. There are people who are good looking, rich, powerful, yet are unhappy. I think our society makes it a religion to "find hapiness", not understanding how it works, in fact most people get sick of looking for something that simply doesnt exist; constant hapiness. People were a lot happier on a more consistant basis in the past it is a fact. People in the past were not looking for hapiness, but to please God. And they were happier.
Constant hapiness? This is not what we ve been designed for; hapiness is just an emotion among many others. Life is a rollercoaster of feelings. There are people who have been, felt, miserable all their lives but raised kids who dominate, are happier than others by a wide margin. The me generation has no clue about history, nor can envision the future; they ll never reach the maturity to raise kids properly enough for them to survive.
Fact is hapiness is more easily found for everyone following basic principles more than buying into the last trend that in order to steal money from your pocket will "reveal" you a shortcut to reach it.
There is a bigger picture, experience, at work, and you have to see beyond individuals.
Just consider the fact that once economies collapse, not matter how good looking or rich you are, if you are at the wrong place at the wrong moment, your good looking body and its pockets full of money wont mean shit.
The Bible says only the humble, down to earth, who finds his happiness in the simplest things will be saved, will live long...will be part of tomorrow. Only he will have hopes. We are blades of grass, and some of them are greener than others. We are just toys in the hands of something bigger than us. Our "feelings" are not even ours per se, they re just strategies of survival genetically embedded in ourselves and we didnt choose just like we didnt choose most of our physical attributes. Our only choice is to decide what to do with them.
Life is a challenge, an experience, full of traps and one needs a strong spiritual, mental discipline to go thru it without "failing". Many good looking, strong, rich people have died since the birth of mankind. Many of their genes have been saved and cross mixed generation after generation. Many dumb, ugly people have survived the same way; they were "inferior", still they still exist. The real question is, what is the point of all of this ? Are we just a bunch of randomly mixed, generated, strategies of survival, is the only purpose of our existences to struggle for survival against others individuals , against the weather, other animal species, who are as vain and lost as ourselves and who just want to dominate without having to be someone else slave?
I dont believe that we re designed to be constantly happy or unhappy. Life as a human being is about more than that; it's about surviving whatever the way you survive. Now, a lot of people think that all strategies of survival are equivalent, that being a whore, a murderer, a robber, is justified and just as good as studying, working, etc if it allows you to survive, others aiming at the betterment of mankind until a perfect being is obtained believe that you have to constantly improve your thoughts and/or body it gives a meaning to their existences and to the process of reproduction in humans. When they choose not to fall for a sin, they see the difficulty of that choice as a step in the good direction.
It is also funny how some ugly people give birth to good looking kids and how good looking parents give birth to ugly kids. There are so many things we dont understand.
Ultimately I think preppers have better odds of survival than yuppies from the cities.
On a side note I think that male beauty isnt as fun as it seems to be. Im quite handsome myself and the more I age the more I attract young girls teens and women of all ages, pretty suprising considering i was a very insecure pimple face when a teen. As a result, I have more and more occasions to seduce and be seduced by women of all ages who want the best partner to breed with. It actually makes my life harder, more painful, because most of these women when they figure I am married have a daughters, suddenly realizing they cant "have" me start to hate on me, because I wont be their lover. How many of them also hate on me because I am the one they would have loved to start a family with but "unfortunately" they ve ended with the skinny fat/ fat insecure asshole. So at first glance they all fall in love then quickly turn into w(b)itches as soon as you dont answer to their attempts to flirt with you. Because they re little girls who arent used to not get what they want.
Anyway in most cases it only results in more troubles for me than anything. So, beauty definitely has its pros and...cons.
I am affraid it's all a lot more complicated than that; if only good looking, powerful, rich people were allowed to reign, be happy, most ugly , poor people would just kill themselves right? But life is a gigantic (infinite?) experience where anything can happen, and the result of this struggle for survival is "feelings", emotions that make us feel alive. It is fascinating how we create, fabricate, give, a meaning to things with our brains, when simply put, most of what exists, is "happening", is only struggle for survival by various life forms of all kinds.
There will be major events that will see the world population decrease massively, just like it happened countless times in the past.
The real question is... who is saved, and who isnt, who adapts, who doesnt. Where does all of this go. What do we want for our kids and grandkids.
that is all flirting you are talking about, not seduction. Once you really get seduced by a good looking woman who wants only a quickie and if there is a good cover to do it, you are in trouble my friend.
Your male instincts will prevail and your rational way of thinking is gone. Mating instinct.
-
(http://blogs.bet.com/entertainment/spotlight/bet-blog/assets/2010/10/tiger-elin1.jpg)
-
i don't know must be different where you guys live, i always see good looking women with guys that are out of shape or barely average looking
can we define the rating scale, what each number means?
i'd say 1 - 3 is ugly or gross and helpless, 4 is below average but can improve with losing weight or maybe a new haircut, 5 is average meaning not good looking but not ugly either just a plain jane, 6 is better than average but not somebody you would date, 7 is pretty hot, 8 is beautiful and typically the best looking girl in every room, 9 is out of this world and should be making money off their looks, 10 is perfect and probably doesn't exist
if a person is a 10, they almost have to "settle for less" because how many 10's truly exist? you can't give somebody a 10 unless you see them completely naked
if i give somebody a 7 that means they're pretty hot so nothing wrong with a 10 going for somebody that's "pretty hot"
E
You know what? Dont sweat it, because the truth is I dont even want a 8, 9 or 10 in real life if shes a stuck up bitch like most of them are anyway. Notice how much nicer the girls are the uglier they are, and how much more evil they are the hotter they are. Its not completely that black and white of course, but I think you know what I mean, and I see this everywhere all the time. That being said, I dont want to end up with a 4 either, despite her having a good personality. Because when it comes down to it, apperance plays a big role wheter we like it or not. The challenge its to find someone in the middle who can fulfill both needs. I need a bitch that is good looking enough, intelligent, have a sense of humour, down to earth, but can still be classy... Its that too much to ask for!? :-\
-
You know what? Dont sweat it, because the truth is I dont even want a 8, 9 or 10 in real life if shes a stuck up bitch like most of them are anyway. Notice how much nicer the girls are the uglier they are, and how much more evil they are the hotter they are. Its not completely that black and white of course, but I think you know what I mean, and I see this everywhere all the time. That being said, I dont want to end up with a 4 either, despite her having a good personality. Because when it comes down to it, apperance plays a big role wheter we like it or not. The challenge its to find someone in the middle who can fulfill both needs. I need a bitch that is good looking enough, intelligent, have a sense of humour, down to earth, but can still be classy... Its that too much to ask for!? :-\
^^^this. The sooner boys realize this, the sooner they're ready to grow up and enter a relationship as a man. Balance in all things.
A ridiculously beautiful woman is bound to have personality flaws - the world she grew up in virtually guarantees it, due to over-coddling, over-praising, a sense of entitlement, etc....what man really wants that as a long term mate? THe same could be said for ridiculously good looking men - over-entitled, over-confident, unsympathetic, etc...
I assume we're still talking about finding long term wives here.
-
^^^this. The sooner boys realize this, the sooner they're ready to grow up and enter a relationship as a man. Balance in all things.
A ridiculously beautiful woman is bound to have personality flaws - the world she grew up in virtually guarantees it, due to over-coddling, over-praising, a sense of entitlement, etc....what man really wants that as a long term mate? THe same could be said for ridiculously good looking men - over-entitled, over-confident, unsympathetic, etc...
I assume we're still talking about finding long term wives here.
7 is the magic number IMHO when it comes to the perfect women, any more sexiness and lust is wasted
-
Most likeable are grades 1,2,3,7,8 -> dismissed/hated by the swamp of average vaginal vermin and more often prone to have somewhat of a worked out personality because of suffering ridicule.
4 - 6 are hell's anus because they are in huge numbers and get kicked from below and above.
I have never seen nor penetrated a 9 or 10.*
*experiences?