Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Bam-bam on August 09, 2013, 07:22:15 AM
-
Tuff to call. Depeneds if you give the edge to "condition"or "mass"
-
He was perfect in '75, but just massive in '74 with a little less detail.
-
74.
-
Like him in '75, but got to go with '74 for overall fullness and mass. The physique that he brought that year was absolutely incredible, even by today's standards.
Notice the bruise just above his left ankle. This must of been from some gym machine or something because was there every year since 1970.
-
Like him in '75, but got to go with '74 for overall fullness and mass. The physique that he brought that year was absolutely incredible, even by today's standards.
Notice the bruise just above his left ankle. This must of been from some gym machine or something because was there every year since 1970.
Maybe it was a birthmark?
-
Think this is from 74.
-
For me, shape > mass and detail
74
-
Still the best side chest.
-
there are some 74 shots where he looks equally as detailed but bigger, the 75 had better coverage
-
'73 FTW
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=236120.0;attach=275965;image)
-
Today's pros look smooth and bloated compared to the champs of the past.