Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Marty Champions on November 09, 2013, 06:09:28 PM
-
or are you still trying to figure out if u should do chest twice a week instead of three or if 7 reps is better then 9
-
The discovery in the 1970s that only a tiny percentage of our DNA codes for proteins prompted some prominent biologists at the time to suggest that most of our DNA is functionless junk. Although other biologists predicted that non-protein-coding DNA would turn out to be functional, the idea that most of our DNA is junk became the dominant view among biologists.
-
Ironically, even after evidence for the functionality of non-protein coding DNA began flooding into the scientific literature, some leading apologists for Darwinian evolution ratcheted up claims that “junk DNA” provides evidence for their theory and evidence against intelligent design. Since 2004, biologists Richard Dawkins, Douglas Futuyma, Kenneth Miller, Jerry Coyne and John Avise have published books using this argument. So have philosopher of science Philip Kitcher and historian of science Michael Shermer. So has Francis Collins, former head of the Human Genome Project and present director of the National Institutes of Health, despite the fact that he co-authored some of the scientific articles providing evidence against “junk DNA.”
These authors claim to speak for “science,” but they have actually been promoting an anti-scientific myth that ignores the evidence and relies on theological speculations instead. For the sake of science, it’s time to expose the myth for what it is.
-
Ironically, even after evidence for the functionality of non-protein coding DNA began flooding into the scientific literature, some leading apologists for Darwinian evolution ratcheted up claims that “junk DNA” provides evidence for their theory and evidence against intelligent design. Since 2004, biologists Richard Dawkins, Douglas Futuyma, Kenneth Miller, Jerry Coyne and John Avise have published books using this argument. So have philosopher of science Philip Kitcher and historian of science Michael Shermer. So has Francis Collins, former head of the Human Genome Project and present director of the National Institutes of Health, despite the fact that he co-authored some of the scientific articles providing evidence against “junk DNA.”
These authors claim to speak for “science,” but they have actually been promoting an anti-scientific myth that ignores the evidence and relies on theological speculations instead. For the sake of science, it’s time to expose the myth for what it is.
this is exactly how people argue FOR meat eating. and there best physical reasoning is the bi-cuspid teeth wich is rediculous there were plenty of plant eating dinosaurs with sharp teeth
people are fucking faggets
i am just superior always
-
great reading
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noncoding_DNA
-
Gorrillas are strong as hell and only eat leaves.
-
Ants are strong and they drink sugar water.
-
only 76 veiwed this thread pathetic
this is cutting edge stuff
people here are fucking stupid they dont want to learn probably weak from heme-iron , geez not a single worth while response in this tread either relating to the topic....just more reason why i am superior and less need for me to be "humble", if i was humble id just keep these great ideas to myself
heres something for those that do want to learn
interesting stuff
-
Lol members here know that 90% of all your posts is nonsense thats why they skip your threads and dont participate in them.
-
Ants are strong and they drink sugar water.
The same goes for these guys too. ;D
(http://www.lightandskyphotography.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/PEOPLE-Street-Basketball-Venice-Beach-California.jpg)
(http://www.hipsterwave.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/dsc_6233.jpg)
-
It is amazing what biologist and scientists for that matter are allowed to get away with. Calling something "junk" because they don't have the ability to figure out what something does is amazing to me...Didn't they do this with dark matter in space until recently?
-
It is amazing what biologist and scientists for that matter are allowed to get away with. Calling something "junk" because they don't have the ability to figure out what something does is amazing to me...Didn't they do this with dark matter in space until recently?
Also "Tonsils".
-
Lol members here know that 90% of all your posts is nonsense thats why they skip your threads and dont participate in them.
contradiction? u are here are you not
-
contradiction? u are here are you not
learn to read i said 90% fruitdick
-
learn to read i said 90% fruitdick
participate much?
-
participate much?
you asked me a question you dirty steroid peddler
-
you asked me a question you dirty steroid peddler
what do you know about the non protien coding dna
-
what do you know about the non protien coding dna
never heard of it before to be honest im just trolling here..sorry carry on =/
-
never heard of it before to be honest im just trolling here..sorry carry on =/
ok..