Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: Wiggs on January 30, 2014, 11:50:15 AM
-
As I told you gentlemen last year and you didn't believe it. The original Europeans were black. Europe was ruled by blacks until 1789. There was a "renaissance" or rebirth and whites have ruled since. But we can get into that later. The article below I'm sure many of you have read or heard about.
Between my ramblings and what's coming out. You are beginning to see what we've all been told is a lie. The Afrocentric view that you love to hate is the truth of history. This will certainly butt hurt many of you no doubt. But truth must be known.
The original whites where black ;) Understanding that is the beginning of understanding.
I don't agree with any Neanderthal bullshit. They've found these black Europeans as recent as supposedly 7,000 years old. That fucks up alot of their bs theories now.
http://politicalblindspot.com/scientists-reveal-the-first-european-faces-were-not-white/
Much to the dismay of any would-be “White Supremacists,” scientists have recently revealed that the face of the first Europeans were surprisingly Sub-Saharan African in appearance.
The head of the prototypical “First European” was recreated from bone fragments,
an incomplete skull and jawbone. These pieces were discovered in a cave in the south west region of Romania’s Carpathian Mountains.
Forensic artist Richard Neave is responsible for the reconstruction, based on fragments that are at least 35,000 years old. Radiocarbon dating analysis have determined that the oldest fragments may have been as old as 36,000 years old. Neave is a forensic artist, for a BBC program about the origins of the human race and evolution
At that time, Europe was inhabited by Homo Neanderthalis, or the Neanderthal man, who were quickly replaced by African nomadic peoples. The Neanderthal Genome Project has posited that the Neanderthals were killed off by these migrating groups. The first true homo sapiens (and homo sapien sapiens), in Europe, apparently would not have been recognizable as ethnically “Caucasian” whatsoever. Those traits, often identified as “white,” seem to have emerged much later, after Europe was settled by African peoples who looked like those Neave has recreated for us here.
The primary difference between this skull and later homo sapien sapiens are the unusually large molar teeth, which has led some scientists to speculate that the skull represents some intermixing with the native Homo Neanderthalis.
Whether or not that is the case, what is certain is that the appearance of the first truly “human” European ancestors looked nothing like what many would expect.
Erik Trinkaus, professor of anthropology at Washington University in Missouri, said the jaw in particular is the oldest, modern human fossil that can be directly-dated, saying that, “Taken together, the material is the first that securely documents what modern humans looked like when they spread into Europe.”
That might be a bit of a disappointment to those last remaining doubters that all of humanity originated in Africa and spread out from there.
-
is that the lead singer of hot chocolate great band
i didnt realise he was that old
-
They'll rule again!
-
(http://xaxor.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/crazy-pics-from-russia-part5-17.jpg)
-
How is Africa doing today a long with the Hebrews? ;D
-
Wiggs - rewriting history since 2010.
Unfortunately, wiggs, history is written by the victors... clearly you guys got the shit kicked out of you over and over.
-
Religion is all the same, its race that is to blame.
(http://xaxor.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/crazy-pics-from-russia-part10-16.jpg)
-
Wiggs - rewriting history since 2010.
Unfortunately, wiggs, history is written by the victors... clearly you guys got the shit kicked out of you over and over.
Look around homie. Things are changing...git yer guns
-
can you guys see the images i post?
-
Like I said, many of you will get butthurt and you've proven my prediction correct. I have much more where that came from. I think because we so many people on this board with white European roots, we'll focus on the days when Blacks ruled Europe. As I stated in posts earlier this month or last month. There has already been some sort of great race war in the past. It's just covered up. Things are beginning to be uncovered and shift because the descendants of the victors got fat, content, lazy.
-
am i invinceable
-
Look around homie. Things are changing...git yer guns
What is changing?
-
am i invinceable
(http://guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/WTF-russia-gifs-285x200.jpg)
-
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-25885519
Hunter-gatherer European had blue eyes and dark skin
Scientists have shed light on what ancient Europeans looked like.
Genetic tests reveal that a hunter-gatherer who lived 7,000 years ago had the unusual combination of dark skin and hair and blue eyes.
It has surprised scientists, who thought that the early inhabitants of Europe were fair.
The research, led by the Institute of Evolutionary Biology in Barcelona, Spain, is published in the journal Nature.
The lead author, Dr Carles Lalueza-Fox, said: "One explanation is that the lighter skin colour evolved much later than was previously assumed."
Scandinavian links
Two hunter-gatherer skeletons were discovered in a cave in the mountains of north-west Spain in 2006.
The cool, dark conditions meant the remains (called La Brana 1 and 2) were remarkably well preserved. Scientists were able to extract DNA from a tooth of one of the ancient men and sequence his genome.
The team found that the early European was most closely genetically related to people in Sweden and Finland.
But while his eyes were blue, his genes reveal that his hair was black or brown and his skin was dark.
"This was a result that was unexpected," said Dr Lalueza-Fox.
Scientists had thought the first Europeans became fair soon after they left Africa and moved to the continent about 45,000 years ago.
"It has been assumed that it is something that happens in response to going from Africa to higher latitudes where the UV radiation is very low and you need to synthesise vitamin D in your skin. Your skin becomes lighter quite soon," explained Dr Lalueza-Fox.
"It is obvious that this is not the case, because this guy has been in Europe for 40,000 years and he still has dark skin."
The hunter-gatherer's genome also gave the team an insight into how humans had changed as they moved from foraging to farming.
The early European would have subsisted on a diet of mainly protein, and his DNA reveals that he was lactose-intolerant and unable to digest starch. The ability to ingest dairy projects and starchy foods came after agriculture was adopted and people changed what they ate.
Continue reading the main story
“
Start Quote
It will be very interesting to see how general this result is across ancient pre-agricultural Europe”
David Reich
Harvard Medical School
Commenting on the research, David Reich, from Harvard Medical School in the US, said: "The significance of this paper is that it reports the oldest European genome sequence reported to date - the first European genome sequence that predates the appearance of agriculture.
"The dark skin is a very interesting finding, as light skin is nearly universal across Europe today. These results suggest that the light skin seen across Europe today is a development of the last at least 7,000 years."
He added: "It will be very interesting to see how general this result is across ancient pre-agricultural Europe once additional genome sequences become available."
Early results of research that Prof Reich has been involved with were recently published on the biology preprint website bioRxiv.org and a paper has been submitted to a journal.
He has looked at the genomes of several hunter-gatherers and early farmers in Europe. This work suggests that present-day Europeans derive from three ancient populations of early inhabitants of the continent.
-
(http://img.izismile.com/img/img4/20110803/640/crazy_russian_homebuilt_mercedes_640_06.jpg)
-
Look around homie. Things are changing...git yer guns
I'll pull a pellius and wait to see who wins before claiming my position on the subject.
-
This article proves what I said last year correct. White skin is recent. It's biblical leprosy or what's known today as Albinism. Various forms of it. This is the the truth.
-
They were MattT?
-
This article proves what I said last year correct. White skin is recent. It's biblical leprosy or what's known today as Albinism. Various forms of it. This is the the truth.
And? Isn't it proof that evolution always makes things better? :)
-
I'll pull a pellius and wait to see who wins before claiming my position on the subject.
lolol.
I don't want war. I want the truth to be known and then I want my land of Israel back.
-
They were MattT?
from Dubai India and ugly as hell
-
Wiggs, how old is earth?
-
ok wiggs but the white man has since conquered europe and settled :D
-
And? Isn't it proof that evolution always makes things better? :)
It's actually a mutation. You're traits are all recessive.
Anything else?
-
lolol.
I don't want war. I want the truth to be known and then I want my land of Israel back.
I'd buy you a ticket to Israel if you promise to never come back.
-
lolol.
I don't want war. I want the truth to be known and then I want my land of Israel back.
all youre proving is that youre brethren has literally done nothing but get its ass kicked all across history....
I think yoid be better off letting your brothers keep their dignity
-
ok wiggs but the white man has since conquered europe and settled :D
Yes, we are not talking about the obvious. We are talking about what we've all been lied about. We're talking about your true history. It seems that you fellas are having a hard time facing it. You're very defensive here today. lol
-
(http://video.kylekeeton.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Holy_Bath_Epiphany_Russia.jpg)
-
lolol.
I don't want war. I want the truth to be known and then I want my land of Israel back.
Sucks to want things you'll never have....eh ? ;)
-
(http://cdn4.faniq.com/images/photos/photo_large/92/file-16442592-7/hot-texas-longhorn-girl.jpg)
-
(http://img.izismile.com/img/img5/20120719/640/meanwhile_in_russia_640_14.jpg)
-
all youre proving is that youre brethren has literally done nothing but get its ass kicked all across history....
I think yoid be better off letting your brothers keep their dignity
You're unusually defensive about all this. Take a step back and breath.
I'm loling my ass of right now. Do you not understand these people are actually your ancestors?
My brothers are from Israel. The ancient Hebrews. Yours are the ancient black Europeans. And before that these people came from Africa. Do you understand that?
-
MC Wiggens shutting down the non hebrew in this thread
-
(https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRa7LM9S9igBuQDvp9Z_l8Sh4WOWfhhGvkpY5inOiN2SQeDtiagSw)
(http://englishrussia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/podborka_44.jpg)
-
(http://video.kylekeeton.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Holy_Bath_Epiphany_Russia.jpg)
crazy hebrew
-
MC Wiggens shutting down the non hebrew in this thread
All I'm doing is telling the truth and you guys are going ape. I told you guys this stuff last year and you went either livid or quiet. That's not my intent. My intent is to get the truth out there, we deal with and see that we are more similar than you all think. Different nations and colors but we all started from the same roots. In Africa. Is that so hard for them to accept?
-
Wiggs, how old is the earth?
-
(http://img.izismile.com/img/img5/20120719/640/meanwhile_in_russia_640_14.jpg)
haha
-
All I'm doing is telling the truth and you guys are going ape. I told you guys this stuff last year and you went either livid or quiet. That's not my intent. My intent is to get the truth out there, we deal with and see that we are more similar than you all think. Different nations and colors but we all started from the same roots. In Africa. Is that so hard for them to accept?
bah its not hard for me to accept
-
Wiggs, how old is the earth?
I don't know. And don't think you're smart enough to bait me into saying 6,000 years old. I'll tell you how old earth is not. It's not billions or even millions or tens of thousands of years old. It's young. Will that answer suffice?
-
Sucks to want things you'll never have....eh ? ;)
Yes it does suck. Thank God I have the Bible that tells me how it will end. ;)
-
bah its not hard for me to accept
No not you man. Them. I'm not trolling them. I bringing awareness. I love you guys.
-
He who cares less wins in the game of getting women
-
No not you man. Them. I'm not trolling them. I bringing awareness. I love you guys.
hebrew jesus you got me blushing over here
-
I don't know. And don't think you're smart enough to bait me into saying 6,000 years old. I'll tell you how old earth is not. It's not billions or even millions or tens of thousands of years old. It's young. Will that answer suffice?
You do realise that the first article states that the earth is much older? You cant believe both you inconsistent imbecill.
Do you even read what you post?
-
I'm a pretty smart guy and I'm sure the aura or supremacy some of you are drunk with has clouded your judgement from these truths. The Age is coming to an end and a new one beginning. Lots of evils were done. That up to God to place judgement on us all.
Like it or not, we're going to have to learn to live with each other. Remembering our roots is a great beginning.
-
You do realise that the first article states that the earth is much older? You cant believe both you inconsistent imbecill.
Do you even read what you post?
Yes you moron. People here know that I don't believe in these modern dating systems. It's much younger than what weve been told. Carbon dating systems have proved to be very faulty after 5,000 years. The point of posting it was for the black Euro not the dating system. Which is wrong.
-
All I'm doing is telling the truth and you guys are going ape. I told you guys this stuff last year and you went either livid or quiet. That's not my intent. My intent is to get the truth out there, we deal with and see that we are more similar than you all think. Different nations and colors but we all started from the same roots. In Africa. Is that so hard for them to accept?
It's very obvious that you're a racist, not a true Christian and fundamentalist.
1. You want your people to rule the world and the rest of other races beneath your people feet.
2.No true Christian desires to rule nor cares about who ruled or not, that's how empires, slavery,etc creates.
3. Fundamentalist because no matter what counter-evidence I will present you won't listen or believe.
Now I'm not a believer in Abrahamic religion however I still wait for the response I gave you in the Demon Thread.
I care who ruled this world but I also want true freedom for everybody and this world has been created for the elite. They want to create an Idiocracy state all over the world & I'm against for it.
The Africa theory is to some degree proven however lots of very early bones has been found in China or Oriental Asia.
-
I'd buy you a ticket to Israel if you promise to never come back.
lol. It can't work that way. This will be a divine intervention to make that happen.
-
We will clean our country from these degenerate elements.
-
Yes it does suck. Thank God I have the Bible that tells me how it will end. ;)
spoilers ?
-
Yes you moron. People here know that I don't believe in these modern dating systems. It's much younger than what weve been told. Carbon dating systems have proved to be very faulty after 5,000 years. The point of posting it was for the black Euro not the dating system. Which is wrong.
You cant believe what the article claims and your belief in a young earth you buffon.
Sometimes you believe and science and sometimes you dont. Sometimes the bible is the Word of god, and sometimes it isnt. Inconsistent imbecill.
-
It's very obvious that you're a racist, not a true Christian and fundamentalist.
1. You want your people to rule the world and the rest of other races beneath your people feet.
2.No true Christian desires to rule nor cares about who ruled or not, that's how empires, slavery,etc creates.
3. Fundamentalist because no matter what counter-evidence I will present you won't listen or believe.
Now I'm not a believer in Abrahamic religion however I still wait for the response I gave you in the Demon Thread.
I care who ruled this world but I also want true freedom for everybody and this world has been created for the elite. They want to create an Idiocracy state all over the world & I'm against for it.
The Africa theory is to some degree proven however lots of very early bones has been found in China or Oriental Asia.
Are you white Europe of original black Europe?
I'm not a Christian no. Christians teach a European view of the Bible. White Christ, The name "Jesus", and they crowned the Khazars as the Jews. All this done on purpose for Eurocentric slant on history.
I believe in the Bible. Old and New testament including the Aprocraphal books taken out around the renaissance. (Gee I wonder why)
I won't be doing any ruling. Christ, Yahoshua will be doing the ruling. And BTW, Black ruled EVERYWHERE before people started changing colors. Same goes for Asians. Buddah was black...Laugh now and soon enough I'll be referring to this thread when I prove people wrong for the thousandth time.
-
You cant believe what the article claims and your belief in a young earth you buffon.
I can believe what I want. Why you're so concerned about it is the real question.
-
So the white European man must be an evolved version of the black homos you're referring to...? ???
-
Europe (Ancient Rome) Conquered by Africans
That Accounts for Red Haired People
& The Dark-Skinned People with Nappy Hair
It started with the Moors in Rome--Septimus Severus
Black rulership of the Roman Empire begins in 193 A.D. with African born, Roman Emperor Septimus Severus. There were four other Black emperors after the Severus dynasty.
Hannibal, the father of military strategy, performed the astounding feat of crossing the Alps on elephants in 218 B.C. With only 26,000 of his original force of 82,000 troops remaining, Hannibal defeated Rome, the mightiest military power of the age, who had a million men, in every battle for the next fifteen years. His tactics are still taught in leading military academies of the U.S., Europe & other lands.
Black ruler ship was widespread in Europe during the “Dark” & Middle Ages!
The original “knights” of England were Black! --including the knights of King Arthur’s Round Table! That’s why they were called “knights” after the night or darkness of their skin.
An African king named Gormund ruled Ireland during the Anglo-Saxon period in England reports the medieval historian Geoffrey of Monmouth.
Halfdan the Black was the first Africoid king to unite Norway.
When the British Isles were invaded by the Vikings some of these Norse raiders were Africoid. In fact, different varieties of ‘Viking’ Africans lived in Scandinavia during the middle ages and are frequently mentioned in Viking sagas.
There were Black Huns! The dictionary describes the Huns as “a fierce barbaric race of Asiatic nomads who led by Attila, ravaged Europe I the 4th and 5th centuries A.D.” The Gothic writer Jordannes described their infamous leader, Attila the Hun as having “a flat nose and swarthy complexion.” He describes the types of Huns he had seen as “of dark complexion, almost black... broad shoulder, flat noses and small eyres.”
The African Moors dominated southwest Europe during the Middle Ages for 700 years: 711-1492 A.D. African Moors ruling southwest Europe centuries, darkened whites in this area, especially Portal, which was “the first example of a Negrito (African) republic in Europe?"
Moors ruling Scotland in the 10th century mixed with whites until the black skin color disappeared.
(1744 - 1818)
Charlotte Sophia - Wife
King George III - England
Black Celts (Silures) & Black Vikings vexed with the Scandinavia people. A prominent Viking of the eleventh century was Thorhall, who was aboard the ship that carried the early Vikings to the shores of North America. Thorhall was "the huntsman in summer and in winter the steward of Eric the Red. He was a large man and strong, black, and like a giant, silent, and foul-mouthed in his speech, and always egged on Eric to the worst; he was a bad Christian."
Another Viking, more notable than Thorhall, was Earl Thorfinn, "the most distinguished of all the earls in the Islands." Thorfinn ruled over nine earldoms in Scotland and Ireland, and died at the age of seventy-five. His widow married the king of Scotland. Thorfinn was described as "one of the largest men in point of stature, and ugly, sharp featured, and somewhat tawny, and the most martial looking man. It has been related that he was the foremost of all his men."
The black blood type is common even in Nordic Europe where intermixing has been happening since antiquity.
Black slavery lasted in England for about 400 years (1440-1834), during which time much intermixing occurred.
-
More evidence.
-
Are you white Europe of original black Europe?
I'm not a Christian no. Christians teach a European view of the Bible. White Christ, The name "Jesus", and they crowned the Khazars as the Jews. All this done on purpose for Eurocentric slant on history.
I'm believe in the Bible. Old and New testament including the Aprocraphal books taken out around the renaissance. (Gee I wonder why)
I won't be doing any ruling. Christ, Yahoshua will be doing the ruling. And BTW, Black ruled EVERYWHERE before people started changing colors. Same goes for Asians. Buddah was black...Laugh now and soon enough I'll be referring to this thread when I prove people wrong for the thousandth time.
I'm not a European I migrate here, I'm a Andean/Latin.
The 2nd Testament was heavily manipulated throughout history, If you want some early records or truth about Jesus "Isaah" read the Q'uran. It hasn't been changed since it was first written(mind you I'm not a muslim).
Blacks didn't rule everywhere in that sense you put it, they where probably the earliest primates on places on earth(but not all). Buddah wasn't black he was off Nepalese lineage, and don't tell me Jesus was black.. Chaldeans or Assyrians will tell you who he was, because they where the first on earth to adopt Jesus teachings and he spoke the same language as them Arameic.
I recommend you the Book of Enoch much better than New testament IMO, if you want to be enlightened take the potion of Ayahuasca. It will uncover a whole new world.
-
Looks a bit like shizzo with a tan.
-
Black, white or blue who gives a flying fuck?
-
I'm not a European I migrate here, I'm a Andean/Latin.
The 2nd Testament was heavily manipulated throughout history, If you want some early records or truth about Jesus "Isaah" read the Q'uran. It hasn't been changed since it was first written(mind you I'm not a muslim).
Blacks didn't rule everywhere in that sense you put it, they where probably the earliest primates on places on earth(but not all). Buddah wasn't black he was off Nepalese lineage, and don't tell me Jesus was black.. Chaldeans or Assyrians will tell you who he was, because they where the first on earth to adopt Jesus teachings and he spoke the same language as them Arameic.
I recommend you the Book of Enoch much better than New testament IMO, if you want to be enlightened take the potion of Ayahuasca. It will uncover a whole new world.
a pint please landlord
-
Wiggs - rewriting history since 2010.
Unfortunately, wiggs, history is written by the victors... clearly you guys got the shit kicked out of you over and over.
.....and those scientists a VERY MUCH WHITE ......... ;D
-
Reminder to self...
never talk to Wiggs again.
Good that the beautiful Tito is saving the thread with his genuinely masterful poestry.
-
a pint please landlord
I recommend you save some money and to travel to Peru. They have some good Shamans that will guide and help you through a Ayahuasca session.
-
This article proves what I said last year correct. White skin is recent. It's biblical leprosy or what's known today as Albinism. Various forms of it. This is the the truth.
- Check out about famed Otzi , very much white man
- Check out about Krapina Neanderthals in Croatia, white guys again
- Check out about Vindija cave bone, white man bone
;D
-
lolol.
I don't want war. I want the truth to be known and then I want my land of Israel back.
Your land ::) real Jews don't give a fuck about jerks like you ;D
-
I'm not a European I migrate here, I'm a Andean/Latin.
The 2nd Testament was heavily manipulated throughout history, If you want some early records or truth about Jesus "Isaah" read the Q'uran. It hasn't been changed since it was first written(mind you I'm not a muslim).
Blacks didn't rule everywhere in that sense you put it, they where probably the earliest primates on places on earth(but not all). Buddah wasn't black he was off Nepalese lineage, and don't tell me Jesus was black.. Chaldeans or Assyrians will tell you who he was, because they where the first on earth to adopt Jesus teachings and he spoke the same language as them Arameic.
I recommend you the Book of Enoch much better than New testament IMO, if you want to be enlightened take the potion of Ayahuasca. It will uncover a whole new world.
Your post is wrong. I'm much more well versed in this subject than you. I know all about the book of Enoch and have posted about it here. Go back to sleep, wake up and try again.
-
I don't know. And don't think you're smart enough to bait me into saying 6,000 years old. I'll tell you how old earth is not. It's not billions or even millions or tens of thousands of years old. It's young. Will that answer suffice?
::) ::) ::)
Security Guard Scientist Wiggs
-
You're unusually defensive about all this. Take a step back and breath.
I'm loling my ass of right now. Do you not understand these people are actually your ancestors?
My brothers are from Israel. The ancient Hebrews. Yours are the ancient black Europeans. And before that these people came from Africa. Do you understand that?
broseph... wrong guy to try the 'oh man youre getting so angry, im under your skin' line on... I couldnt care less if I have black ancestors, hell I have 4 black cousins (their mom is into the dark meat)
My point is that your story only means that they have gotten their asses kicked and exterminated even more than history already shows...
hell if anything everyone is laughing at you, not gettinf irritated and upset, because your ideas carry no credibility, people see rhem as the ramblings of a man whos desperate to try and rewrite the history of his people.
And im a big wiggins fan... take it for what its worth brotha.
-
Your post is wrong. I'm much more well versed in this subject than you. I know all about the book of Enoch and have posted about it here. Go back to sleep, wake up and try again.
I have lots of Assyrian friends, as well Arab Muslim they both can recite about Isaah or history on it. The bible is a collection of Books from the land of Sumer, Sumeria was ruled by early Assyrians.
What you should read instead is the Story about the Dogon people, now that's amazing(youtube it). There are connections with creation myths all over the world. What happened long time ago happened not just to Africans it happened around the world. In Bolivia, Indonesia, Bosnia, Sudan, Lebanon you'll find mysterious megalithic structures & similar creation myths.
-
Are you debating which fiction that is the "right" fiction? ???
-
Are you debating which fiction that is the "right" fiction? ???
Lol.
On.the money.
Wiggs shares the same trait as most of the "crusaders" here. I'm right because I say I am....LOLOL
-
I would not be surprised if professor wiggs claims that hockey was invented by black people.
-
(http://video.kylekeeton.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Holy_Bath_Epiphany_Russia.jpg)
two weekends ago.....during Russian orthodox religious holiday of "baptism".......
-
I would not be surprised if professor wiggs claims that hockey was invented by black people.
actually... the 1st hockey stick was black. Fact. Just accept that the first everything tbat matters, ever, was black. So even though blacks as a whole in this day and age are monumental failures, its ok because every person ever is actually a descendant of a black therefore blacks = superior. /wiggs logic
-
Oh I'm with ya wiggs, even when I look at old paintings of people from the Middle Ages I can tell they are def black ::) lol
-
That being said , what about the Irish?
-
Oh I'm with ya wiggs, even when I look at old paintings of people from the Middle Ages I can tell they are def black ::) lol
You've never heard of the term iconoclast?
-
two weekends ago.....during Russian orthodox religious holiday of "baptism".......
ah.. so it's not an act of penance for 'true hebrew denying' ???
-
ah.. so it's not an act of penance for 'true hebrew denying' ???
the horror of that statement sent me into autoprayer mode......
-
As I told you gentlemen last year and you didn't believe it. The original Europeans were black. Europe was ruled by blacks until 1789. There was a "renaissance" or rebirth and whites have ruled since. But we can get into that later. The article below I'm sure many of you have read or heard about.
Between my ramblings and what's coming out. You are beginning to see what we've all been told is a lie. The Afrocentric view that you love to hate is the truth of history. This will certainly butt hurt many of you no doubt. But truth must be known.
The original whites where black ;) Understanding that is the beginning of understanding.
I don't agree with any Neanderthal bullshit. They've found these black Europeans as recent as supposedly 7,000 years old. That fucks up alot of their bs theories now.
http://politicalblindspot.com/scientists-reveal-the-first-european-faces-were-not-white/
Much to the dismay of any would-be “White Supremacists,” scientists have recently revealed that the face of the first Europeans were surprisingly Sub-Saharan African in appearance.
The head of the prototypical “First European” was recreated from bone fragments,
an incomplete skull and jawbone. These pieces were discovered in a cave in the south west region of Romania’s Carpathian Mountains.
Forensic artist Richard Neave is responsible for the reconstruction, based on fragments that are at least 35,000 years old. Radiocarbon dating analysis have determined that the oldest fragments may have been as old as 36,000 years old. Neave is a forensic artist, for a BBC program about the origins of the human race and evolution
At that time, Europe was inhabited by Homo Neanderthalis, or the Neanderthal man, who were quickly replaced by African nomadic peoples. The Neanderthal Genome Project has posited that the Neanderthals were killed off by these migrating groups. The first true homo sapiens (and homo sapien sapiens), in Europe, apparently would not have been recognizable as ethnically “Caucasian” whatsoever. Those traits, often identified as “white,” seem to have emerged much later, after Europe was settled by African peoples who looked like those Neave has recreated for us here.
The primary difference between this skull and later homo sapien sapiens are the unusually large molar teeth, which has led some scientists to speculate that the skull represents some intermixing with the native Homo Neanderthalis.
Whether or not that is the case, what is certain is that the appearance of the first truly “human” European ancestors looked nothing like what many would expect.
Erik Trinkaus, professor of anthropology at Washington University in Missouri, said the jaw in particular is the oldest, modern human fossil that can be directly-dated, saying that, “Taken together, the material is the first that securely documents what modern humans looked like when they spread into Europe.”
That might be a bit of a disappointment to those last remaining doubters that all of humanity originated in Africa and spread out from there.
keep telling yourself that.
BTW, nobody gives a shit.
-
This article proves what I said last year correct. White skin is recent. It's biblical leprosy or what's known today as Albinism. Various forms of it. This is the the truth.
hey retard have you seen a picture of jesus he was white bro.... end of topic
-
recreated from skull fragments. fragments not a full skull found? keep reaching.
oh yeah i forgot to remind you wiggs,
12-12-2012 nothing happened.
the HEAT won the finals last year
Phil Heath won the olympia, again.
nibiru, keep wishing.
you are 0-4, stop while you are ahead
-
As I told you gentlemen last year and you didn't believe it. The original Europeans were black. Europe was ruled by blacks until 1789. There was a "renaissance" or rebirth and whites have ruled since. But we can get into that later. The article below I'm sure many of you have read or heard about.
1789 Wasn't that long ago Wiggs.
Are you insane? ???
"The earliest born person to ever be photographed.
Conrad Heyer was born in 1749, and was 103 when he was photographed in 1852.
Ps this is verified on record too, so it is not hearsay.
This man lived to see the industrial revolution, French revolution, the war of 1812, the Napoleonic wars, a year without summer, the invention of the telegraph, railroad, steamboat, he even saw George Washington with his own eyes when he fought for him during the war!"
(http://unitedcats.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/conrad_heyer.jpg?w=700)
"Now if you think about it, born in the first half of the 1700s, he without doubt met many people who were born in the 1600s (middle aged people/ elderly people over 50 would have been alive and well in 1749).
Can you imagine? this guy actually met, and spoke to in living breathing colour (at the time) people from the 1600s!
Now if you times the amount of time that we are looking back, through the first hand experiences of this man, by just over four times, thats the time when the whole christ story happened no?
My point is, does this not show how when we look back at something happening say 1000 or 2000 years as `myths from the past`.. it really was not that long ago in the tide of times, in fact it was almost like yesturday, with the billions of years that the universe has been around. "
-
1789 Wasn't that long ago Wiggs.
Are you insane? ???
"The earliest born person to ever be photographed.
Conrad Heyer was born in 1749, and was 103 when he was photographed in 1852.
Ps this is verified on record too, so it is not hearsay.
This man lived to see the industrial revolution, French revolution, the war of 1812, the Napoleonic wars, a year without summer, the invention of the telegraph, railroad, steamboat, he even saw George Washington with his own eyes when he fought for him during the war!"
(http://unitedcats.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/conrad_heyer.jpg?w=700)
"Now if you think about it, born in the first half of the 1700s, he without doubt met many people who were born in the 1600s (middle aged people/ elderly people over 50 would have been alive and well in 1749).
Can you imagine? this guy actually met, and spoke to in living breathing colour (at the time) people from the 1600s!
Now if you times the amount of time that we are looking back, through the first hand experiences of this man, by just over four times, thats the time when the whole christ story happened no?
My point is, does this not show how when we look back at something happening say 1000 or 2000 years as `myths from the past`.. it really was not that long ago in the tide of times, in fact it was almost like yesturday, with the billions of years that the universe has been around. "
You are using logic trying to rationalize with an insane person. You are doomed to fail.
Wiggs for your own sake, don't bring this crap up at work.
-
Blacks and whites may have a different great ape ancestor.
Nordic people where white.Skin color is usually related to sun intensity, blacks in africa faced torrid conditions as they haven't been able to develop "shelter".
The inuit, the beothucks. Africa is one continent, north america, mexico etc.
the funny thin is barack is black but really half of each, he is neither. Yet anything not white is apparently black, all shades are black not degrees of white and black.
Why do blacks always do that, like is blake griffen black? cause he has a fat nose?
-
1789 Wasn't that long ago Wiggs.
Are you insane? ???
"The earliest born person to ever be photographed.
Conrad Heyer was born in 1749, and was 103 when he was photographed in 1852.
Ps this is verified on record too, so it is not hearsay.
This man lived to see the industrial revolution, French revolution, the war of 1812, the Napoleonic wars, a year without summer, the invention of the telegraph, railroad, steamboat, he even saw George Washington with his own eyes when he fought for him during the war!"
(http://unitedcats.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/conrad_heyer.jpg?w=700)
"Now if you think about it, born in the first half of the 1700s, he without doubt met many people who were born in the 1600s (middle aged people/ elderly people over 50 would have been alive and well in 1749).
Can you imagine? this guy actually met, and spoke to in living breathing colour (at the time) people from the 1600s!
Now if you times the amount of time that we are looking back, through the first hand experiences of this man, by just over four times, thats the time when the whole christ story happened no?
My point is, does this not show how when we look back at something happening say 1000 or 2000 years as `myths from the past`.. it really was not that long ago in the tide of times, in fact it was almost like yesturday, with the billions of years that the universe has been around. "
wiggs owned. end of thread
-
1789 Wasn't that long ago Wiggs.
Are you insane? ???
"The earliest born person to ever be photographed.
Conrad Heyer was born in 1749, and was 103 when he was photographed in 1852.
Ps this is verified on record too, so it is not hearsay.
This man lived to see the industrial revolution, French revolution, the war of 1812, the Napoleonic wars, a year without summer, the invention of the telegraph, railroad, steamboat, he even saw George Washington with his own eyes when he fought for him during the war!"
(http://unitedcats.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/conrad_heyer.jpg?w=700)
"Now if you think about it, born in the first half of the 1700s, he without doubt met many people who were born in the 1600s (middle aged people/ elderly people over 50 would have been alive and well in 1749).
Can you imagine? this guy actually met, and spoke to in living breathing colour (at the time) people from the 1600s!
Now if you times the amount of time that we are looking back, through the first hand experiences of this man, by just over four times, thats the time when the whole christ story happened no?
My point is, does this not show how when we look back at something happening say 1000 or 2000 years as `myths from the past`.. it really was not that long ago in the tide of times, in fact it was almost like yesturday, with the billions of years that the universe has been around. "
This is a vicious owning. There is no back peddling, another one of the black pot heads fantasies.
-
Wiggs not trying to be an ass but that first article was debuncted quite hard after they came up with the recearched. Not just by one credible sourche but several.
-
Wiggs not trying to be an ass but that first article was debuncted quite hard after they came up with the recearched. Not just by one credible sourche but several.
Of course it was, it's nonsense like everything else in this guys life.
-
Wiggs not trying to be an ass but that first article was debuncted quite hard after they came up with the recearched. Not just by one credible sourche but several.
The people that debunked Wiggs article were white so it doesnt count. Black people is clearly the superior race.
-
The people that debunked Wiggs article were white so it doesnt count. Black people is clearly the superior race.
A U product of WHITE man breeding like Wiggs ;D
-
Mr. Wiggs (from a newbie, so sorry), although I do agree that the "first" Europeans were definitely "Black" (migrated from Africa, that is), Blacks certainly did not "rule Europe until 1789, until there was a renassiance and the Whites took over." White skin is much older than only 200-some years.
Hell, I'll even give you that Adam and Eve were Black, being from Africa and all.
But if you had carefully read the article talking about dark-skinned original Europeans, you'd have found that they are talking about people that lived about 40,000 years ago, not 200! And White skin is NOT biblical leprosy, a form of albinism. And second of all, leprosy is an infectious disease, while White skin is a genetic trait, so it can't be caused by infection. Albinism is a genetic disorder characterized by complete (or almost 100%) lack of melanin, which most whites have in varying amounts, if they have brown hair, brown eyes, will tan in the Summertime, et cetera.
So, the content of what you are saying is correct, you got your timeframe all jacked up.
And what is commonly referred to as the "renassiance" in European history happened at the end of the "Middle Ages," or the "dark ages" - around 1500.
-
Wiggs not trying to be an ass but that first article was debuncted quite hard after they came up with the recearched. Not just by one credible sourche but several.
I don't think so. The research isn't claiming they are black, just that the genetic analysis shows the person probably as having darker skin tone than modern white europeans. I haven't seen any articles debunking this claim, so please post them if you know of any.
-
As I told you gentlemen last year and you didn't believe it. The original Europeans were black. Europe was ruled by blacks until 1789. There was a "renaissance" or rebirth and whites have ruled since. But we can get into that later. The article below I'm sure many of you have read or heard about.
Between my ramblings and what's coming out. You are beginning to see what we've all been told is a lie. The Afrocentric view that you love to hate is the truth of history. This will certainly butt hurt many of you no doubt. But truth must be known.
The original whites where black ;) Understanding that is the beginning of understanding.
I don't agree with any Neanderthal bullshit. They've found these black Europeans as recent as supposedly 7,000 years old. That fucks up alot of their bs theories now.
http://politicalblindspot.com/scientists-reveal-the-first-european-faces-were-not-white/
Much to the dismay of any would-be “White Supremacists,” scientists have recently revealed that the face of the first Europeans were surprisingly Sub-Saharan African in appearance.
The head of the prototypical “First European” was recreated from bone fragments,
an incomplete skull and jawbone. These pieces were discovered in a cave in the south west region of Romania’s Carpathian Mountains.
Forensic artist Richard Neave is responsible for the reconstruction, based on fragments that are at least 35,000 years old. Radiocarbon dating analysis have determined that the oldest fragments may have been as old as 36,000 years old. Neave is a forensic artist, for a BBC program about the origins of the human race and evolution
At that time, Europe was inhabited by Homo Neanderthalis, or the Neanderthal man, who were quickly replaced by African nomadic peoples. The Neanderthal Genome Project has posited that the Neanderthals were killed off by these migrating groups. The first true homo sapiens (and homo sapien sapiens), in Europe, apparently would not have been recognizable as ethnically “Caucasian” whatsoever. Those traits, often identified as “white,” seem to have emerged much later, after Europe was settled by African peoples who looked like those Neave has recreated for us here.
The primary difference between this skull and later homo sapien sapiens are the unusually large molar teeth, which has led some scientists to speculate that the skull represents some intermixing with the native Homo Neanderthalis.
Whether or not that is the case, what is certain is that the appearance of the first truly “human” European ancestors looked nothing like what many would expect.
Erik Trinkaus, professor of anthropology at Washington University in Missouri, said the jaw in particular is the oldest, modern human fossil that can be directly-dated, saying that, “Taken together, the material is the first that securely documents what modern humans looked like when they spread into Europe.”
That might be a bit of a disappointment to those last remaining doubters that all of humanity originated in Africa and spread out from there.
I am european wiggs, portuguese. What you say is completely horseshart.
In 1789 you couldn't see any africans here.
American percepcion of history is in hundreds of years, in Europe is measured in thousands of years.
As a small example, in the beach i usually spend time during the summer there is a military fortification from the year 1670 built by caucasians during the time of monarchy.
In Europe there are (native) basicaly two genetic pools, the Celtic from north countries and the roman/arabic in the south. No africans in the equation. I am talking about since way before Jesus Christ our savior walked this earth.
Why are you so desperate with this balony that everybody was hebrew black at some point?
-
I don't think so. The research isn't claiming they are black, just that the genetic analysis shows the person probably as having darker skin tone than modern white europeans. I haven't seen any articles debunking this claim, so please post them if you know of any.
hmm darker skin tone.... you wouldn't be on that brown agenda would you Haidar?
if you aren\t black as night I considered you white just like if you aren't an albino you are black to me.
Logic win
-
Wait, in your opening post, did you say blacks ruled Europe until 1789? Go on...
-
hmm darker skin tone.... you wouldn't be on that brown agenda would you Haidar?
if you aren\t black as night I considered you white just like if you aren't an albino you are black to me.
Logic win
broski im pretty sure the guy who did this research was a vanilla face like yourself, so don't blame me. don't want to be black or white, I'm comfortable right in the middle like my fellow muslim brother Barack Hussein Obama 8)
-
broski im pretty sure the guy who did this research was a vanilla face like yourself, so don't blame me. don't want to be black or white, I'm comfortable right in the middle like my fellow muslim brother Barack Hussein Obama 8)
I bet you are comfortable in the middle you gay.
What kinda man likes to be lunch meat during a dudesome?
-
hmm darker skin tone.... you wouldn't be on that brown agenda would you Haidar?
if you aren\t black as night I considered you white just like if you aren't an albino you are black to me.
Logic win