Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: shiftedShapes on February 26, 2014, 07:03:33 PM

Title: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: shiftedShapes on February 26, 2014, 07:03:33 PM
Is it worth taking for a natural?

(http://i.imgur.com/7NRUt.jpg)
Title: Re: Creatine
Post by: Icelord on February 26, 2014, 07:06:11 PM
If you want a hell of a placebo effect that gives you an extra 50lbs on your bench
sure
Title: Re: Creatine
Post by: the trainer on February 26, 2014, 07:11:05 PM
These are the supplements that actually work

creatine
multi vitamin
joint supplement
Protein powder

Title: Re: Creatine
Post by: shiftedShapes on February 26, 2014, 07:12:07 PM
If you want a hell of a placebo effect that gives you an extra 50lbs on your bench
sure

Eh I took it when I was starting out maybe 15 years ago and who knows if it helped, gains come so easily as a beginner.  My assumption would be just placebo, but I figured that with all of the know-it-alls on here somebody must have taken the time to do the research and figure out if it does anything but bloat you.
Title: Re: Creatine
Post by: Wolfox on February 26, 2014, 07:14:21 PM
Laugh all you want but if you're natural creatine is a MUST. And yes, its absolutely does work. It's the most proven and effective supplement for strength gains on the market thats NOT an AAS.

I've gotten great gains off of creatine. It usually turns my 8rep max into 10reps for 2 sets in 3 weeks.  I know lots of people say you don't need to cycle it but for strength gains you do. It will give you a boost for the first month then after you're saturated it's back to programming but with increased muscular endurance.

After another month of being off you'll keep your strength gains but lose some endurance.

I can usually do about 3-4 cycles a year where i'm guaranteed strength gains from creatine with very little programming. Just bullrush those 8 reps and try to do more ... and it happens. And funny shit how you think after a 10rep max pr that you can't do another set and get 10 more reps... but with the magic of creatine it happens.
Title: Re: Creatine
Post by: Wolfox on February 26, 2014, 07:23:01 PM
These are the supplements that actually work

creatine
multi vitamin
joint supplement
Protein powder



If someone were broke as shit and they asked which supplements they should buy I would say:


1. Creatine
2. Fish oil


And you know what? Thats all you really need.
Title: Re: Creatine
Post by: shiftedShapes on February 26, 2014, 07:34:25 PM
If someone were broke as shit and they asked which supplements they should buy I would say:


1. Creatine
2. Fish oil


And you know what? Thats all you really need.

Yeah I just might go for both of those...
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: TheShape on February 26, 2014, 08:13:42 PM
Creatine works, but I hate taking it because my stomach gets messed up from it. Glutamine is also a must for a natural.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Karl Kox on February 26, 2014, 08:41:15 PM
Creatine has alway worked really good for me, at first.  Then I retain too much water.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: the trainer on February 26, 2014, 08:43:55 PM
Creatine has alway worked really good for me, at first.  Then I retain too much water.

try kre alkalyn this form of creatine does not bloat you.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: tom joad on February 26, 2014, 08:44:22 PM
make sure you take it with grape juice that's the key.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Karl Kox on February 26, 2014, 08:46:18 PM
try kre alkalyn this form of creatine does not bloat you.

Thanks I'll try it. 
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: shiftedShapes on February 26, 2014, 09:35:42 PM
make sure you take it with grape juice that's the key.

will that take my gains from 1000 to 2000%?

seriously though where's the best place to buy creatine online, i.e. cheapest for a major brand.  Does Costco sell it?
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: jude2 on February 26, 2014, 09:36:51 PM
Yes it is the only one u should spend your money on. The rest should go towards food.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: MichaelScottDM on February 26, 2014, 09:40:31 PM
What have you found best when cycling it? 6 weeks on, 6 off? Ive got a bottle here of pure monohydrate I'd like to start using again.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: jude2 on February 26, 2014, 09:44:35 PM
What have you found best when cycling it? 6 weeks on, 6 off? Ive got a bottle here of pure monohydrate I'd like to start using again.
You can get what u need from it using 5 grams on workout days.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Wolfox on February 26, 2014, 09:48:54 PM
What have you found best when cycling it? 6 weeks on, 6 off? Ive got a bottle here of pure monohydrate I'd like to start using again.

4- 6 weeks on 2-3 months off. .

If you hop on too soon from the last cycle you won't see those true strength gains...only endurance. Your muscle still has a lot of creatine stored in it.

I recommend cycling mainly for strength tho. If muscle gains are your concern just stay on and you should benefit from the increased endurance in training.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: the trainer on February 26, 2014, 09:55:10 PM
make sure you take it with grape juice that's the key.

This is wrong half of the suger in grape juice is low glycemic, you need high glycemic  carbs like dextrose or some mash potato that works best.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: TEMPER on February 26, 2014, 09:56:30 PM
Jesus Christ people read a fucking article once in a while before spouting off your random horseshit make believe fun facts...

try kre alkalyn this form of creatine does not bloat you.

Lol no. Just spouting off random bullshit perpetrated by supplement companies to milk you for $70.

Creatine monohydrate is all you need and it is $20 for 2lbs of the shit...Cheap and effective.

Eh I took it when I was starting out maybe 15 years ago and who knows if it helped, gains come so easily as a beginner.  My assumption would be just placebo, but I figured that with all of the know-it-alls on here somebody must have taken the time to do the research and figure out if it does anything but bloat you.

You say this word "bloat" but I don't think you know what it means.

Bloat: Bloating is any abnormal general swelling, or increase in diameter of the abdominal area.

Some people get gas and such from eating any raw powders like glutamine, creatine, fiber powder, etc...Has nothing to do with the creatine itself it's the fact that it's basically a non easily digestible powder..A 2 minute gas bubble is not "bloating"

Creatine has alway worked really good for me, at first.  Then I retain too much water.

Just plain clueless...Clueless. Creatine has no effect on "water retention" Again I think you have no clue of the meaning.

Water retention: An abnormal accumulation of fluid in the circulatory system or within the tissues or cavities of the body.

Creatine does some very minor things to muscle cells' intracellular fluid...On a microscopic cellular level within the muscle cells...Hello..Fluids are what give muscle any size whatsoever lol...A huge % of muscle tissue is water..

Absolutely creatine is one of the most valuable supplements for overall well being you can get..For the money it is completely undeniable $20 for 2lbs of the stuff which is like a 180 day supply..

If you care to know all the positive benefits to supplementing creatine MONOHYDRATE that go way beyond muscles or strength read this article.
http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/most_recent/new_uses_for_creatine
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: TEMPER on February 26, 2014, 09:59:05 PM
What have you found best when cycling it? 6 weeks on, 6 off? Ive got a bottle here of pure monohydrate I'd like to start using again.

You do not cycle creatine for jesus fucking god's sake man...How are you this clueless..The shit has been around since the fucking 80's.

It's food..Do you cycle fucking chicken? beef? Do you cycle fucking potatoes.

Cycling fucking creatine..You have creatine in your fucking body as we speak...Why would you "load" it or "cycle" it just start fucking taking it and take it forever it's fucking food...
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: TEMPER on February 26, 2014, 10:00:11 PM
4- 6 weeks on 2-3 months off. .

If you hop on too soon from the last cycle you won't see those true strength gains...only endurance. Your muscle still has a lot of creatine stored in it.

I recommend cycling mainly for strength tho. If muscle gains are your concern just stay on and you should benefit from the increased endurance in training.

This idiot has got to be trolling. Lol pure comedy.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: sagittal chest on February 26, 2014, 10:02:05 PM
Lol @ creatine cycles
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Icelord on February 26, 2014, 10:02:57 PM
You do not cycle creatine for jesus fucking god's sake man...How are you this clueless..The shit has been around since the fucking 80's.

It's food..Do you cycle fucking chicken? beef? Do you cycle fucking potatoes.

Cycling fucking creatine..You have creatine in your fucking body as we speak...Why would you "load" it or "cycle" it just start fucking taking it and take it forever it's fucking food...
It's been proven that using creatine long-term as a supplement causes creatinine levels to go above desirable thresholds into the unhealthy range, affecting kidney function
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: sagittal chest on February 26, 2014, 10:04:38 PM
And yes, it does work.
I started using it when I trained natural when Mark Maguire and Sosa were putting the spotlight on it.
Made very significant strength gains. I was pleasantly surprised.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Wolfox on February 26, 2014, 10:08:27 PM
Lol @ creatine cycles

So tell me... Do those strength increases remain constant throughout the duration you're on creatine? The answer is no. Everyone who has taken creatine should know after the first month and ahalf the strength increases slow down. You're not gonna put on 30lbs on your bench every month for the entire year you're on creatine. This first month and half, yes, but not every month the entire year.

This is why you cycle.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: TEMPER on February 26, 2014, 10:09:45 PM
It's been proven that using creatine long-term as a supplement causes creatinine levels to go above desirable thresholds into the unhealthy range, affecting kidney function

Blood creatinine levels are dependant on the amount of muscle mass one carries, diet, exercise, underlying kidney problems and many, many other factors.

I have never heard of 1 serious study proving that 5g of supplemental creatine per day in a healthy individual has ever caused any health problems whatsoever.

Here ya go sport:

 Causes of high creatinine levels

1. Dehydration or inadequate water intake such as high fever, sweating, diuresis can cause blood concentration and reduced blood flow in the kidneys. Creatinine will increase.

2. Over-tiredness, lack of rest can cause elevation of creatinine level.

3. Urine abnormalities such as long term hematuria, proteinuria can be accompanied by high creatinine.

4. Intake of drugs that have renal toxicity can cause high creatinine which can even be irreversible.

5. If renal dysfunction patients have infections such as cold, pneumonia, intestinal infection, urinary tract infections can increase creatinine level in short time.

http://www.kidneyfailureweb.com/creatinine/251.html
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: TEMPER on February 26, 2014, 10:19:37 PM
So tell me... Do those strength increases remain constant throughout the duration you're on creatine? The answer is no. Everyone who has taken creatine should know after the first month and ahalf the strength increases slow down. You're not gonna put on 30lbs on your bench every month for the entire year you're on creatine.

This is why you cycle.

Rofl dude you really do not understand the fucking biology involved in atp, creatine, or even how muscles work for that matter...

When you supplement with creatine it just fills gaps in the cells that are empty it does not add any new tissue.

If you're functioning on 50% ATP levels and all of a sudden start functioning on 100% levels (supplementing with creatine) of course you'll see an initial TINY jump in how you perform..But that's just because you're bringing something up to full...lol

The "strength increase" is a minor side effect of the tiny amount of fluid and size the muscle gains when ATP and the stores are filled up...Wtf 30lbs on your bench..dude rofl you are a fucking beginner man..Lol month and a half? dude creatine is not a fucking drug...It's instant. The minute you drink it your cells are full, whatever strength or size you gain from it is gained right then..Instantly.

Jesus why am I even typing this you have zero knowledge of any reality and this is a waste of time.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Wolfox on February 26, 2014, 10:22:58 PM
Rofl dude you really do not understand the fucking biology involved in atp, creatine, or even how muscles work for that matter...

When you supplement with creatine it just fills gaps in the cells that are empty it does not add any new tissue.

If you're functioning on 50% ATP levels and all of a sudden start functioning on 100% levels (supplementing with creatine) of course you'll see an initial TINY jump in how you perform..But that's just because you're bringing something up to full...lol

Jesus why am I even typing this you have zero knowledge of any reality and this is a waste of time.

Wow bro thanks for sharing your jr college physiology knowledge.


Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: TEMPER on February 26, 2014, 10:24:03 PM
Wow bro thanks for sharing your jr college physiology knowledge.



You are a beginner and completely clueless, I don't even know where to begin.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: sagittal chest on February 26, 2014, 10:24:42 PM
So tell me... Do those strength increases remain constant throughout the duration you're on creatine? The answer is no. Everyone who has taken creatine should know after the first month and ahalf the strength increases slow down. You're not gonna put on 30lbs on your bench every month for the entire year you're on creatine. This first month and half, yes, but not every month the entire year.

This is why you cycle.

Tbh,
I don't really know. I never looked into it in depth, and I didn't stay on it.
All I know is it increased my strength significantly and quickly for the short duration I was using it.
I was training naturally at the time.

Not trying to be an asshole, but 'creatine cycles' just sounds funny.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: shiftedShapes on February 26, 2014, 10:25:14 PM
Jesus Christ people read a fucking article once in a while before spouting off your random horseshit make believe fun facts...

Lol no. Just spouting off random bullshit perpetrated by supplement companies to milk you for $70.

Creatine monohydrate is all you need and it is $20 for 2lbs of the shit...Cheap and effective.

You say this word "bloat" but I don't think you know what it means.

Bloat: Bloating is any abnormal general swelling, or increase in diameter of the abdominal area.

Some people get gas and such from eating any raw powders like glutamine, creatine, fiber powder, etc...Has nothing to do with the creatine itself it's the fact that it's basically a non easily digestible powder..A 2 minute gas bubble is not "bloating"

Just plain clueless...Clueless. Creatine has no effect on "water retention" Again I think you have no clue of the meaning.

Water retention: An abnormal accumulation of fluid in the circulatory system or within the tissues or cavities of the body.

Creatine does some very minor things to muscle cells' intracellular fluid...On a microscopic cellular level within the muscle cells...Hello..Fluids are what give muscle any size whatsoever lol...A huge % of muscle tissue is water..

Absolutely creatine is one of the most valuable supplements for overall well being you can get..For the money it is completely undeniable $20 for 2lbs of the stuff which is like a 180 day supply..

If you care to know all the positive benefits to supplementing creatine MONOHYDRATE that go way beyond muscles or strength read this article.
http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/most_recent/new_uses_for_creatine


I was not using bloat in the clinical sense, what I meant was that I thought I was retaining more water, more likely I was getting fatter as well (likely increased calories were more responsible than creatine).

Just ordered.  19.35 with two day shipping for 2.2lbs.  We'll see if it works, if not I'll just return it.

Read the wiki and it seems legit.

I'll do one rounded teaspon a day, no loading nonsense
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: shiftedShapes on February 26, 2014, 10:27:47 PM
I realize that any gains will be moderate, but after a decade and a half of training with no supplements and only making very modest gains (if any) at this point, I'll take what I can get.

Maybe in another 20 years they'll have a performance enhancing drug with major results and no significant adverse effects.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: sagittal chest on February 26, 2014, 10:31:08 PM
I realize that any gains will be moderate, but after a decade and a half of training with no supplements and only making very modest gains (if any) at this point, I'll take what I can get.

Maybe in another 20 years they'll have a performance enhancing drug with major results and no significant adverse effects.

If you're natural id say the strength gains are more than moderate.
I remember overhead pressing a bar that just one month before was difficult - and easily doing it while sitting.
It was a 'wtf moment'.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Wolfox on February 26, 2014, 10:31:11 PM
You are a beginner and completely clueless, I don't even know where to begin.

Yes obviously with your jr college physiology 101 knowlege, it is I that am the beginner.  


You're just forgetting about the muscular and neural adaptations of the initial strength increases from that increase in creatine and increased resynthesis of ATP  :-\




Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: TEMPER on February 26, 2014, 10:32:32 PM
I was not using bloat in the clinical sense, what I meant was that I thought I was retaining more water, more likely I was getting fatter as well (likely increased calories were more responsible than creatine).

Just ordered.  19.35 with two day shipping for 2.2lbs.  We'll see if it works, if not I'll just return it.

Read the wiki and it seems legit.

I'll do one rounded teaspon a day, no loading nonsense

Lol dude you are using this term "works" like it's fucking Dianabol...When you start taking a multi vitamin do you all of a sudden notice some crazy changes to your body...NO LOL. Creatine is just something that is part of how the cells function..Nothing drastic happens.

If your deficient in the stuff it brings you up to full levels and life goes on...Say Each muscle cell weighs "100 units" , when you take creatine now they all weigh 105 units. So you may gain 1lb of "muscle (intracellular fluid) " With that 1lb gain comes what always comes with 1lb gains...NOt much of anything...Creatine is not some drug or even anything, it's just food..It plays on minute cellular functions in the brain, muscles, tissues, all around bodily functions because it is always there in our bodies, we are just bringing our levels up to 100% to maximize it's effects.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: TEMPER on February 26, 2014, 10:37:55 PM
Yes obviously with your jr college physiology 101 knowlege, it is I that am the beginner.  


You're just forgetting about the muscular and neural adaptations of the initial strength increases from that increase in creatine and increased resynthesis of ATP  :-\






No you're forgetting that you are not strong...So you have never been strong, and never will be strong...Going from fucking benching 135 to benching 185 after having trained for 6 months is not your "creatine cycle" it's called gains...From lifting and eating.

If your "creatine cycle" put 30lbs on your bench you are a total beginner and would have gained that 30lbs on your bench by doing anything...

Actual strong people, powerlifters, and bodybuilders, that bench 315+ for easy reps on any given day will not see anything from creatine...Key word being "SEE" just because you don't see physical changes does not mean your cells etc. are not functioning better on a minute level.

The fact that you think you need to stop taking A FUCKING FOOD...CREATINE IS IN FOOD..For "2-3 months" or whatever horseshit you were spouting proves you're clueless.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Big Chiro Flex on February 26, 2014, 10:45:27 PM
4- 6 weeks on 2-3 months off. .

If you hop on too soon from the last cycle you won't see those true strength gains...only endurance. Your muscle still has a lot of creatine stored in it.

I recommend cycling mainly for strength tho. If muscle gains are your concern just stay on and you should benefit from the increased endurance in training.

Holy fuck this is retarded.

Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Wolfox on February 26, 2014, 10:56:48 PM
No you're forgetting that you are not strong...So you have never been strong, and never will be strong...Going from fucking benching 135 to benching 185 after having trained for 6 months is not your "creatine cycle" it's called gains...From lifting and eating.

If your "creatine cycle" put 30lbs on your bench you are a total beginner and would have gained that 30lbs on your bench by doing anything...

Actual strong people, powerlifters, and bodybuilders, that bench 315+ for easy reps on any given day will not see anything from creatine...Key word being "SEE" just because you don't see physical changes does not mean your cells etc. are not functioning better on a minute level.

The fact that you think you need to stop taking A FUCKING FOOD...CREATINE IS IN FOOD..For "2-3 months" or whatever horseshit you were spouting proves you're clueless.

Funny you say that because my last creatine cycle years ago increased my bench from 305 for 8 to 305 for 10 in a month.

When you're talking about advanced lifers you're talking about people that use steroids or actual advanced dudes who eat so much meat creatine supplementation is less of a benefit.

And of course the more advanced you are the less shit works. Groundbreaking shit Einstein   ::)
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: TEMPER on February 26, 2014, 11:06:21 PM
Well there ya go. In my opinion it's the best supplement out there. It is an actual supplement, although it is in food like you said you'd have to eat 2-3lbs of meat a day and digest it all 100% perfectly to get 5g. Which is why everyone not supplementing is running at 50% or less. Bringing that up to 100% can only be good.

http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/most_recent/new_uses_for_creatine

Really is worth a read.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Wolfox on February 26, 2014, 11:16:46 PM
Well there ya go. In my opinion it's the best supplement out there. It is an actual supplement, although it is in food like you said you'd have to eat 2-3lbs of meat a day and digest it all 100% perfectly to get 5g. Which is why everyone not supplementing is running at 50% or less. Bringing that up to 100% can only be good.

http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/most_recent/new_uses_for_creatine

Really is worth a read.

Thats something we both can agree on.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: SF1900 on February 26, 2014, 11:20:51 PM
From what I know, creatine is the only supplement that has been studied using randomized clinical trials in major universities (Harvard, Yale, Cornell, UCLA, etc). Creatine has been shown to work. This is what the research shows. It doesnt mean youre going to look like Ronnie Coleman, but studies show it does work, unlike muscletech and BSN garbage.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Go F Yourself on February 26, 2014, 11:33:13 PM
creatine is shown to inhibit mysotain, i would definitely be taking it
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on February 27, 2014, 12:52:00 AM
the only supplement i have been taking continuously.. very effective with me.. i thought it made me carry more water but here i have stopped it for about 2 months and still look the exact same!!..
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Teutonic Knight on February 27, 2014, 12:57:23 AM
the only supplement i have been taking continuously.. very effective with me.. i thought it made me carry more water but here i have stopped it for about 2 months and still look the exact same!!..

-modern day staff ( like pro rugby chemicals  ;)), everything else on WADA's lists is easily detectable
 ;D
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: _aj_ on February 27, 2014, 02:44:23 AM
A better question is if it is worth it at all if you are on gear, even a small "enhanced" TRT dose?

Full disclosure: as a natty, I take creatine, fish oil, protein powder and some delusional ZMA. I would like to trade-in all of that for some test e.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: jon cole on February 27, 2014, 03:03:56 AM
creatine works, it increase strengt a bit, but for it increase the volume during my training.

it i can do 3 set like 10/8/6 reps with a weight, with creatine after 2 weeks i can do 12/10/9.

so at the end the volume is bigger, so more volume means more strengt and more muscle.

With certain brand of creatine i can also feel my muscle more full when i woke up.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: _aj_ on February 27, 2014, 03:07:50 AM
creatine works, it increase strengt a bit, but for it increase the volume during my training.

it i can do 3 set like 10/8/6 reps with a weight, with creatine after 2 weeks i can do 12/10/9.

so at the end the volume is bigger, so more volume means more strengt and more muscle.

With certain brand of creatine i can also feel my muscle more full when i woke up.

This is starting to sound like a discussion on bb.com.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Van_Bilderass on February 27, 2014, 03:10:35 AM
try kre alkalyn this form of creatine does not bloat you.

You know why it doesn't bloat you? Because you take less. Alkalyn is 99% monohydrate.
It's a scam.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Wolfox on February 27, 2014, 03:11:48 AM
creatine works, it increase strengt a bit, but for it increase the volume during my training.

it i can do 3 set like 10/8/6 reps with a weight, with creatine after 2 weeks i can do 12/10/9.

so at the end the volume is bigger, so more volume means more strengt and more muscle.

With certain brand of creatine i can also feel my muscle more full when i woke up.

I think celltech is the best bro. It has dextrose to spike insulin levels that will help with the 2 week loading @ 20 grams a day.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: FermiDirac on February 27, 2014, 03:13:38 AM
5lbs extra on the bench for 5lbs extra bloat?  ???

Creatine works fine, but, some recent studies have shown that there might be long term effects connected to usage of creatine. Note, MIGHT.
Some results indicated that long term usage leads to a permanently lower the bodie's own production of creatine. Creatine is gods gift to permabulking nattys.  ;D

Some good info:
http://www.webmd.com/vitamins-supplements/ingredientmono-873-CREATINE.aspx?activeIngredientId=873&activeIngredientName=CREATINE

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12546637

PubMed has many interesting articles for further reading and references, provided you know how to read a scientific article/journal.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: jon cole on February 27, 2014, 03:16:29 AM
This is starting to sound like a discussion on bb.com.


creatine works better with 1 gr of tren ace e.w.

(is it better?)
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: FermiDirac on February 27, 2014, 03:19:11 AM
I think celltech is the best bro. It has dextrose to spike insulin levels that will help with the 2 week loading @ 20 grams a day.
:D

(http://www.funnystuffblog.com/images/cell-tech-boy.jpg)
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: wes on February 27, 2014, 03:21:00 AM
Creatine works great..........try this stack for 8 weeks for serious gains:

Week # 1:
Creatine
Test
Tren

Week # 2:
Creatine
Test
Tren

Week # 3:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Deca

Week # 4:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Deca
Anadrol

Week # 5:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Deca
Anadrol

Week # 6:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Anadrol
Deca

Week # 7:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Anadrol
Deca

Week # 8:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Anadrol
Deca

::)
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: _aj_ on February 27, 2014, 03:28:08 AM
Creatine works great..........try this stack for 8 weeks for serious gains:

Week # 1:
Creatine
Test
Tren

Week # 2:
Creatine
Test
Tren

Week # 3:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Deca

Week # 4:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Deca
Anadrol

Week # 5:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Deca
Anadrol

Week # 6:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Anadrol
Deca

Week # 7:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Anadrol
Deca

Week # 8:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Anadrol
Deca

::)


Aaannnnndddd...were back...thanks Wes.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: wes on February 27, 2014, 03:30:36 AM
My pleasure AJ !  :D
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: bigmc on February 27, 2014, 03:32:39 AM
Creatine works great..........try this stack for 8 weeks for serious gains:

Week # 1:
Creatine
Test
Tren

Week # 2:
Creatine
Test
Tren

Week # 3:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Deca

Week # 4:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Deca
Anadrol

Week # 5:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Deca
Anadrol

Week # 6:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Anadrol
Deca

Week # 7:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Anadrol
Deca

Week # 8:
Creatine
Test
Tren
Anadrol
Deca

::)

great post bro

would you front load the creatine

also do you need to taper off

ive heard the post creatine crash can be brutal

what would you recommend for pct HMB?

also is it safe to stack creatine with NO2 supps?
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: wes on February 27, 2014, 04:41:53 AM
great post bro

would you front load the creatine

also do you need to taper off

ive heard the post creatine crash can be brutal

what would you recommend for pct HMB?

also is it safe to stack creatine with NO2 supps?
Thanks Mac,and YES.........I would definately recommend frontloading when doing Creatine,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,a very effective tactic of the pros.

I increase my dosage as the cycle goes on,then I taper downwards getting closer to the end of my cycle.

HMB is the perfect post cycle therapy when using Creatine.


To avoid the dreaded post "Creatine Crash",just switch the Creatine in your cycle to Glutamine and watch those muscles blow right up from within.......no crashing what so ever and the switch makes the bodys receptors just suck up the new compound that is Glutamine resulting in even further anabolism !!

Never combine Creatine with NO2....very common mistake of "the more is better" generation.....very dangerous and toxic combination.....err on the side of caution and keep your kidneys intact by not trying this unsafe combination of compounds.

One word of caution when using good Pharm Grade Creatine is to take a joint supplement as the muscles become so strong,that the joints can become traumatized due to the fact that their growth cannot keep up with the growth of the skeletal muscle.  

Very potent stuff this Creatine.......don`t take stupidly huge doses as you can and will get too big,too fast!  :)

Train hard and eat good and thank me later!  ;)
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: the trainer on February 27, 2014, 04:51:23 AM
Whats wrong with you wes do you think everybody wants to take steroids, for the natural bodybuilder creatine is the best option, they can also take some zma to make sure the test levels are ok from all the hard training and a joint supplement and eat eat.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: SuperTed on February 27, 2014, 04:55:56 AM
From what I know, creatine is the only supplement that has been studied using randomized clinical trials in major universities (Harvard, Yale, Cornell, UCLA, etc). Creatine has been shown to work. This is what the research shows. It doesnt mean youre going to look like Ronnie Coleman, but studies show it does work, unlike muscletech and BSN garbage.

This.

Independent research has shown creatine is a useful supplement to take and does work.
Obviously the gains made on creatine will not be a fraction of what even a basic steroid cycle will give you, but its still useful regardless. :D
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: bigmc on February 27, 2014, 05:07:04 AM
This.

Independent research has shown creatine is a useful supplement to take and does work.
Obviously the gains made on creatine will not be a fraction of what even a basic steroid cycle will give you, but its still useful regardless. :D

gives me the shits
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: SuperTed on February 27, 2014, 05:12:45 AM
gives me the shits

I know a few people who have that issue with creatine. Luckily I'm not one. ;D
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: SuperTed on February 27, 2014, 05:25:07 AM
i tried creatine but was never sure it worked


then i read it increases DHT


so stopped

I wonder if that is the cause of my baldness. Some of these legal, supposedly harmless supplements seem to have some shitty sides. 
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: _aj_ on February 27, 2014, 05:25:24 AM
i tried creatine but was never sure it worked


then i read it increases DHT


so stopped

LOL, the "hairanoia" is everywhere!
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: _aj_ on February 27, 2014, 05:27:25 AM
I wonder if that is the cause of my baldness. Some of these legal, supposedly harmless supplements seem to have some shitty sides. 

I've been using creatine since the dawn of time and my hair is fine. It efficacy is measured in hundredths of a percentage point. It is the natty's "finishing touch" to put 0.0025" of water-film on your arm over the course of a year.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: wes on February 27, 2014, 08:49:13 AM
Whats wrong with you wes do you think everybody wants to take steroids, for the natural bodybuilder creatine is the best option, they can also take some zma to make sure the test levels are ok from all the hard training and a joint supplement and eat eat.
Calm down Gloria,I was just goofing around.
::)
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: the trainer on February 27, 2014, 09:41:32 AM
Calm down Gloria,I was just goofing around.
::)

Never mess with a black man when he wants fried chicken or when a natural bodybuilder wants his creatine now here you go.

Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: jon cole on February 27, 2014, 09:55:59 AM
Thanks Mac,and YES.........I would definately recommend frontloading when doing Creatine,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,a very effective tactic of the pros.

I increase my dosage as the cycle goes on,then I taper downwards getting closer to the end of my cycle.

HMB is the perfect post cycle therapy when using Creatine.


To avoid the dreaded post "Creatine Crash",just switch the Creatine in your cycle to Glutamine and watch those muscles blow right up from within.......no crashing what so ever and the switch makes the bodys receptors just suck up the new compound that is Glutamine resulting in even further anabolism !!

Never combine Creatine with NO2....very common mistake of "the more is better" generation.....very dangerous and toxic combination.....err on the side of caution and keep your kidneys intact by not trying this unsafe combination of compounds.

One word of caution when using good Pharm Grade Creatine is to take a joint supplement as the muscles become so strong,that the joints can become traumatized due to the fact that their growth cannot keep up with the growth of the skeletal muscle.  

Very potent stuff this Creatine.......don`t take stupidly huge doses as you can and will get too big,too fast!  :)

Train hard and eat good and thank me later!  ;)

"a friend of mine" wants to buy raw creatine and brew it at home, are raw creatine from china safe ?
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: spiro on February 27, 2014, 09:58:37 AM
What a waste of time and energy taking that worthless shit. 10 mg of dbol preworkout if you don't want to be a full time juicer.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: steamboatwillie on February 27, 2014, 10:11:32 AM
http://www.flexonline.com/nutrition/supplements/dosing-dilemma

According to this new article I need 47 grams a day. 
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on February 27, 2014, 02:04:20 PM
This is starting to sound like a discussion on bb.com.

Fucking A.... can't believe we're discussing creatine on getbig.  Wanna increase your muscle's creatine levels?  Use steroids
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: shiftedShapes on February 27, 2014, 05:01:27 PM
Fucking A.... can't believe we're discussing creatine on getbig.  Wanna increase your muscle's creatine levels?  Use steroids

And what if we are not willing to drastically increase our risk of illness and early mortality?  Does that mean we can't seek small marginal improvements?

I basically dismissed all supplements a long time ago and I'm just considering that perhaps some of them have some small value.  Obviously nothing like steroids but maybe not totally insignificant either.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Big Chiro Flex on February 27, 2014, 10:23:51 PM
Dianabol is an excellent supplement.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: cephissus on February 27, 2014, 10:34:04 PM
lmao creatine, what the hell is this, bodybuilding.com?  t-nation?

oh wait, t-nation has actually been linked as a serious source on getbig.com  :D :D :D

i wonder what the thermometer reads down yonder over the styx right about now
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Icelord on February 27, 2014, 10:36:04 PM
And what if we are not willing to drastically increase our risk of illness and early mortality?  Does that mean we can't seek small marginal improvements?

I basically dismissed all supplements a long time ago and I'm just considering that perhaps some of them have some small value.  Obviously nothing like steroids but maybe not totally insignificant either.
Eh.

Can look good natural, dude. No creatine or prohormones. Just sacrificing diet-wise for 6 months and doing a lot of cardio and some weight training. And an endless basin of patience.

If you're going to get on pharmaceuticals, go for the real thing. Don't drive a toy steering wheel in your living room pretending it's a real car because you're scared of getting in the driver's seat of an actual automobile.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Super Natural on February 28, 2014, 02:08:34 AM
.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: CalvinH on February 28, 2014, 06:38:43 AM
I hated creatine, made me feel bloated and fucked with my stomach.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: dr.chimps on February 28, 2014, 06:42:13 AM
I hated creatine, made me feel bloated and fucked with my stomach.
Strong words. Watery. Yes. Hate? No.     ;D
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: CalvinH on February 28, 2014, 06:48:29 AM
Strong words. Watery. Yes. Hate? No.     ;D


If I'm gonna feel bloated I want it to be from to much beer ;D
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: dr.chimps on February 28, 2014, 07:03:07 AM

If I'm gonna feel bloated I want it to be from to much beer ;D
Atta boy! And, hey, only 45 mins work and a call to the Mum in NM - the bloat starts.  Start your engines.   ;D
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Army of One on February 28, 2014, 07:15:33 AM
Lol@ creatine , I remember in the late nineties when it came out and all the media were calling it a steroid, because anyone who gained 30pounds of muscle in 4 months from drugs were using creatine as their excuse for why.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: BigCyp on February 28, 2014, 07:18:56 AM
Lol@ creatine , I remember in the late nineties when it came out and all the media were calling it a steroid, because anyone who gained 30pounds of muscle in 4 months from drugs were using creatine as their excuse for why.

Hahaha exactly. I remember when I first bought some creatine I didn't tell any of my friends in case they lost respect for me  ;D
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Army of One on February 28, 2014, 07:23:49 AM
Hahaha exactly. I remember when I first bought some creatine I didn't tell any of my friends in case they lost respect for me  ;D

Hahaha yes, in the late nineties the drug users were just on creatine, now the drug users are just hard working naturals who eat and lift religiously and have myostatin deficiency
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: BigCyp on February 28, 2014, 07:31:27 AM
Hahaha yes, in the late nineties the drug users were just on creatine, now the drug users are just hard working naturals who eat and lift religiously and have myostatin deficiency

Hahaha yes, the good old myostatin deficiency which seems to become more and more acute the longer these naturals have been training. Hopefully someone will find a cure for this terrible ailment before too many livers and kidneys fail due to the sheer amount of vitamins they need to take
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on February 28, 2014, 07:54:25 AM
And what if we are not willing to drastically increase our risk of illness and early mortality?  Does that mean we can't seek small marginal improvements?

I basically dismissed all supplements a long time ago and I'm just considering that perhaps some of them have some small value.  Obviously nothing like steroids but maybe not totally insignificant either.

Then prepare to look unimpressive
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: wes on February 28, 2014, 07:57:13 AM
"a friend of mine" wants to buy raw creatine and brew it at home, are raw creatine from china safe ?
No China is filt,,,,,,, scam, ,,,,,,,,,,, scambag

not Wes approved
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: gracie bjj on February 28, 2014, 08:31:34 AM
i used PRO LAB  creatine yrs ago n the STUFF WORKS BIGTIME, i got stronger n fuller in about 3 weeks, im not big on supplements but i really liked that
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: shiftedShapes on February 28, 2014, 04:19:32 PM
Then prepare to look unimpressive

My body is ready.

I took my first dose today...should I update you guys on my gains.  This could get realkt freaky, the powder was cheap enough but what if I have to buy a whole new wardrobe to fit my swoled body?  Maybe cover those costs with fitness modeling, might as well put thw beef to work.
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: Nails on February 28, 2014, 04:24:57 PM
Personally as a natty

I load up on a DOUBLE shot of johnny walker black before the gym on heavy days and a sam adams on light days
Title: Re: Creatine - Is it worth taking for a natural?
Post by: cephissus on February 28, 2014, 08:03:48 PM
Hahaha yes, the good old myostatin deficiency which seems to become more and more acute the longer these naturals have been training. Hopefully someone will find a cure for this terrible ailment before too many livers and kidneys fail due to the sheer amount of vitamins they need to take

;D