Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Papper on April 30, 2014, 09:40:55 AM
-
In you opinion, what is the most unmanly feature between having
A soft blubbery stomach that vibrates like jelly and the accompanying love handles that escapes the line of your pants
Or
A frail build around the clavicles and a width that makes you think of a small kindergarten girl
?
-
They are both reasons to be deleted from the gene pool.
-
Both pretty bad, id have to pick the overall frail build
-
It is because of these issues that we have such a narrow Mr. O.
-
Frailty. When did Wide World of Sports feature geeks lifting anything?
-
In you opinion, what is the most unmanly feature between having
A soft blubbery stomach that vibrates like jelly and the accompanying love handles that escapes the line of your pants
Or
A frail build around the clavicles and a width that makes you think of a small kindergarten girl
?
People like those should not have kids they are making the human race soft.
-
A frail build around the clavicles is most unmanly
This guy has a rather bloated looking stomach, but I doubt people would consider him unmanly.
(http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/f/f/ffc7a-42.jpg)
-
They are both reasons to be deleted from the gene pool.
Yes they are. The two most unmanly physique features I can think of.
A combination of these should be treated as a hermaphrodite.
-
A frail build around the clavicles is most unmanly
This guy has a rather bloated looking stomach, but I doubt people would consider him unmanly.
(http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/f/f/ffc7a-42.jpg)
CHAOS laying the smack down on some juicer in the backround..
-
A frail build around the clavicles is most unmanly
This guy has a rather bloated looking stomach, but I doubt people would consider him unmanly.
(http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/f/f/ffc7a-42.jpg)
He has more a thick gut, that's rather manly
But a soft stomach with subcutaneous fat is shameful
-
The thing is, though, most of those traits comes in pairs. Skinny fat people usually have that marshmallow lower body/torso paired with narrow front rotated shoulders and girly wrists/shoulders of peace. I see them all day every day since I study physics/math.
To answer the question, girly upper torsos is the most disgusting trait.
-
a very small chin trumps all
-
a very small chin trumps all
Or a recessive jawline.
-
Mudflap labia
-
Must be eliminated from the gene pool.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/c69e5bbd8e6e822891a3308999bbd2af/tumblr_mpf5e2w5lX1s4dff1o1_500.jpg)
(http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/lYsI9Rd6lqQ/hqdefault.jpg)
-
Point, flabby, fat man boobs by far are worse than either of those two traits.
-
Must be eliminated from the gene pool.
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/c69e5bbd8e6e822891a3308999bbd2af/tumblr_mpf5e2w5lX1s4dff1o1_500.jpg)
Wtf...where is his dick...omg
-
Klinefelter syndrome - worst of both worlds.
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/Bodymorphproj_mkg_modA001_20070325_pos03.jpg)
-
Juiced
(http://s4.postimg.org/5jpw4n5od/esfitness_boooom.jpg)
clean
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/Bodymorphproj_mkg_modA001_20070325_pos03.jpg)
-
Juiced
(http://s4.postimg.org/5jpw4n5od/esfitness_boooom.jpg)
clean
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/Bodymorphproj_mkg_modA001_20070325_pos03.jpg)
that you?
-
I said physique traits so I meant to exclude the face.
Man
Boobs are shameful too. But often they are interlinked with flabby stomach
-
Frailty is worst by far! A man should have big, broad shoulders. And not to skinny legs and arms. Well, he should be over all big and muscular...
I could forgive a bit of jiggly belly fat, but never narrow shoulders.
-
I would much rather have a flabby stomach than a frail build.
At least you can do something about the stomach. However, if you have a frail and narrow build, you're fucked no matter what.
-
Frail shoulders are worse. My sister in-laws ex-boyfriend had shoulders almost narrower than his hips. He was also bald and had a pronounced occipital bun. At the time they were dating I was taking an anthropology class and was fascinated by his neanderthal features.
-
In the question of what to choose... Yes you can't overcome narrowness as evident by the most blown up man in the world. So you choose subcutaneous fat
BUT in my opinion, the flabby unshapely belly that make the torso have a pear shape is the most unmanly
Just because it is adjustable shows complete lack of will power and that makes it disgusting
I can't blame a guy that has done the most with a small frame
-
In the question of what to choose... Yes you can't overcome narrowness as evident by the most blown up man in the world. So you choose subcutaneous fat
BUT in my opinion, the flabby unshapely belly that make the torso have a pear shape is the most unmanly
Just because it is adjustable shows complete lack of will power and that makes it disgusting
I can't blame a guy that has done the most with a small frame
Yeah but an overweight, soft man is like that by choice. If he slimmed down and got in shape who knows. A fat guy is usually the product of his environment more so than his genes. (Remember, not too long ago in human history being overweight and soft was considered the pinnacle of attraction. It was a sign that you had wealth and access to resources and were in good health).
The frail, narrow shouldered guy is genetically built that way. Ultimately, it is genetic fitness that attracts women to men (and vice versa). Broad shoulder structure is one physical trait that (most) women find attractive in prospective mates. Other things like facial and structural symmetry are also good indicators of genetic fitness.
I wouldn't exactly call either of these guys unmanly:
(http://www.thefightlounge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Roy-Nelson.png) (http://photos.famouswiki.com/f/fedor-emelianenko-33856/gallery/fedor-emel-287422.jpg)
-
Yeah but an overweight, soft man is like that by choice. If he slimmed down and got in shape who knows. A fat guy is usually the product of his environment more so than his genes. (Remember, not too long ago in human history being overweight and soft was considered the pinnacle of attraction. It was a sign that you had wealth and access to resources and were in good health).
The frail, narrow shouldered guy is genetically built that way. Ultimately, it is genetic fitness that attracts women to men (and vice versa). Broad shoulder structure is one physical trait that (most) women find attractive in prospective mates. Other things like facial and structural symmetry are also good indicators of genetic fitness.
I wouldn't exactly call either of these guys unmanly:
(http://www.thefightlounge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Roy-Nelson.png) (http://photos.famouswiki.com/f/fedor-emelianenko-33856/gallery/fedor-emel-287422.jpg)
In the question of what has the least meaning in attracting females .. i whole heartedly agree. A frail build is worse
-
In the question of what has the least meaning in attracting females .. i whole heartedly agree. A frail build is worse
I had an interesting conversation with a married female friend a few years back. She admitted her disgust for "little men". Basically, her disgust was reserved for small and frail looking men. This was not a preference thing, it was outright disgust, like seeing a cockroach.
I figured she felt comfortable unloading this one me because I am close to a polar opposite of a "little man".