Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: GRACIE JIU-JITSU on May 12, 2014, 06:57:49 PM

Title: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: GRACIE JIU-JITSU on May 12, 2014, 06:57:49 PM

 (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BnZlv7eCEAATQ1c.jpg:large)


Ann Coulter's bullshit conservative troll game is slipping. In her zeal to land a jab against... Twitter? Michelle Obama? Nigerian schoolgirls?... she opened a door for her detractors, and they jumped through it with a two-leg flying kick of Photoshop fury.

The way Coulter's game is supposed to work is 1) she says something bigoted or just plain dumb and trollish, 2) outraged critics say something she can twist as sexist, 3) she positions herself as the victim, 4) she wins. But if she looks like a fucking tone-deaf joke of a demagogue instead of a victim, it doesn't really work.

That's where Twitter comes in. Here's the backstory: Michelle Obama, among others, made the hashtag #bringbackourgirls trend, a viral if superficial way to draw mainstream attention to the plight of the 234 Nigerian teen girls kidnapped by an Islamist militant group called Boko Haram. Never mind that anti-Islam conservatives were the first folks to scream for media attention to this story; the nascent right-wing meme is now that Michelle Obama trivialized the story by hashtagging it. So Ann Coulter responded thusly on Twitter yesterday:


One could read a bunch of racial shit into a tweet like that, but why bother? It's just stupid "Oh my team isn't winning so fuck this fake version of America" sunshine patriotism. It's poor form and poor discourse.

More to the point, it's indicative of how a conservative doesn't get social media. Here is how social media responds.


 http://gawker.com/here-is-a-collection-of-twitter-trolls-teaching-photosh-1575074274


(http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--cGjlffqv--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/wjkgjhm6wjiurdsw1ngx.png)

(http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--xPs002Kd--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_320/hgpxpydzstgrwcaalgek.jpg)


(http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--ok-9aFhQ--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_320/mnppkecnxhvldcszktin.jpg)
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Icelord on May 12, 2014, 06:59:20 PM
Those two enormous pink things under that turd are the pig's balls. Little know fact, pigs ejaculate about 300x the volume of semen that a human male does. Dogs are at about 50x.
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: wolfrittner on May 12, 2014, 07:02:06 PM
Those two enormous pink things under that turd are the pig's balls. Little know fact, pigs ejaculate about 300x the volume of semen that a human male does. Dogs are at about 50x.
Hahahahahaha! Icelord really knows everything! I mean that in a positive way.
Even me growing up on a farm did not know that fact about pigs or dogs. :D :D :D
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: wolfrittner on May 12, 2014, 07:03:15 PM
Those two enormous pink things under that turd are the pig's balls. Little know fact, pigs ejaculate about 300x the volume of semen that a human male does. Dogs are at about 50x.
You google all of this or just know?
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Icelord on May 12, 2014, 07:23:59 PM
Hahahahahaha! Icelord really knows everything! I mean that in a positive way.
Even me growing up on a farm did not know that fact about pigs or dogs. :D :D :D

Semen Ejaculation & Collection
Sexual stimulation (5-10 min restraint) of
the boar prior to ejaculation has been shown
to dramatically increase the concentration
and volume of the boar ejaculate. Sexual
stimulation initiates smooth muscle
contractions in the tail of the epididymis and
the vas deferens. The boar usually takes 7-
15 minutes to ejaculate the 150-500 ml
volume.


Imagine that. A 7-15 minute orgasm that can unload as much as half a litre of semen. Holy fuck, dude. That's every woman's wet dream, isn't it?

http://www.livestocktrail.illinois.edu/swinerepronet/publications/extension/boara&p.pdf (http://www.livestocktrail.illinois.edu/swinerepronet/publications/extension/boara&p.pdf)

When a man ejaculates he generally produces between 2 and 5 millilitres of sperm (about the same volume as a large teaspoon would hold). A pig routinely manages one litre which is 200 times as much.

http://www.open.edu/openlearn/body-mind/health/health-sciences/the-science-sperm (http://www.open.edu/openlearn/body-mind/health/health-sciences/the-science-sperm)

Dogs are superior to humans too that way.

Dog semen is ejaculated in three fractions. The first, pre-sperm fraction is small in volume (less than 5 mls) and contains few to no spermatozoa. The pre-sperm fraction is believed to cleanse the urethra of contaminants (urine, bacteria and cellular debris) prior to ejaculation. The pre-sperm is not usually collected. The second, sperm-rich fraction comes from the epididymes and testes. The sperm rich fraction is cloudy white in color and usually 0.5 – 4 ml in volume. The third fraction consists solely of prostatic fluid and contains few to no spermatozoa. Prostatic secretions lend volume to the ejaculate, assist in pushing the sperm out of the vagina and into the cervix/uterus, and provide nutrients for the sperm during their transit to the oviducts. The volumes of the first and third fractions are variable. In particular, the volume of the third fraction is controlled by the person collecting the sample, as they can choose to collect more or less of the cell-free prostatic fluid. Prostatic fluid is normally clear in color and may range in volume from 3 – 80 ml. Volume is not an indicator of semen quality in dogs. However, the measurement of semen volume is important in the calculation of total number of spermatozoa in the sample.

http://veterinarycalendar.dvm360.com/avhc/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=727382&sk=&pageID=3 (http://veterinarycalendar.dvm360.com/avhc/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=727382&sk=&pageID=3)
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Kwon_2 on May 12, 2014, 07:29:03 PM
Ann Coulter's bullshit conservative troll game is slipping. In her zeal to land a jab against... Twitter? Michelle Obama? Nigerian schoolgirls?... she opened a door for her detractors, and they jumped through it with a two-leg flying kick of Photoshop fury.

The way Coulter's game is supposed to work is 1) she says something bigoted or just plain dumb and trollish, 2) outraged critics say something she can twist as sexist, 3) she positions herself as the victim, 4) she wins. But if she looks like a fucking tone-deaf joke of a demagogue instead of a victim, it doesn't really work.

That's where Twitter comes in. Here's the backstory: Michelle Obama, among others, made the hashtag #bringbackourgirls trend, a viral if superficial way to draw mainstream attention to the plight of the 234 Nigerian teen girls kidnapped by an Islamist militant group called Boko Haram. Never mind that anti-Islam conservatives were the first folks to scream for media attention to this story; the nascent right-wing meme is now that Michelle Obama trivialized the story by hashtagging it. So Ann Coulter responded thusly on Twitter yesterday:


One could read a bunch of racial shit into a tweet like that, but why bother? It's just stupid "Oh my team isn't winning so fuck this fake version of America" sunshine patriotism. It's poor form and poor discourse.

Those two enormous pink things under that turd are the pig's balls. Little know fact, pigs ejaculate about 300x the volume of semen that a human male does. Dogs are at about 50x.
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Roger Bacon on May 12, 2014, 07:32:14 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BnZlv7eCEAATQ1c.jpg:large)

Awesome  8)
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Roger Bacon on May 12, 2014, 07:33:37 PM
Those two enormous pink things under that turd are the pig's balls. Little know fact, pigs ejaculate about 300x the volume of semen that a human male does. Dogs are at about 50x.

Hahahahahaha! Kwon really knows everything! I mean that in a positive way.
Even me growing up on a farm did not know that fact about pigs or dogs.  :D :D :D
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Icelord on May 12, 2014, 07:34:42 PM
Hahahahahaha! Kwon really knows everything! I mean that in a positive way.
Even me growing up on a farm did not know that fact about pigs or dogs. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Hahahahahaha! Kwon really knows everything! I mean that in a positive way.
Even me growing up on a farm did not know that fact about pigs or dogs.   :D :D :D
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Roger Bacon on May 12, 2014, 07:36:42 PM
Hahahahahaha! Kwon really knows everything! I mean that in a positive way.
Even me growing up on a farm did not know that fact about pigs or dogs.   :D :D :D

roflmao!!! I must be immature as all hell... this kind of shit cracks me up!!  ;D
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: wolfrittner on May 12, 2014, 08:44:00 PM
roflmao!!! I must be immature as all hell... this kind of shit cracks me up!!  ;D
outta control! :D :D :D
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: 240 is Back on May 12, 2014, 08:54:13 PM
Ann Coulter Quote:
(talking to a disabled Vietnam vet) "People like you caused us to lose that war."
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Kwon_2 on May 14, 2014, 01:12:06 PM
Hahahahahaha! Kwon really knows everything! I mean that in a positive way.
Even me growing up on a farm did not know that fact about pigs or dogs.  :D :D :D

Ann Coulter's bullshit conservative troll game is slipping. In her zeal to land a jab against... Twitter? Michelle Obama? Nigerian schoolgirls?... she opened a door for her detractors, and they jumped through it with a two-leg flying kick of Photoshop fury.

The way Coulter's game is supposed to work is 1) she says something bigoted or just plain dumb and trollish, 2) outraged critics say something she can twist as sexist, 3) she positions herself as the victim, 4) she wins. But if she looks like a fucking tone-deaf joke of a demagogue instead of a victim, it doesn't really work.

That's where Twitter comes in. Here's the backstory: Michelle Obama, among others, made the hashtag #bringbackourgirls trend, a viral if superficial way to draw mainstream attention to the plight of the 234 Nigerian teen girls kidnapped by an Islamist militant group called Boko Haram. Never mind that anti-Islam conservatives were the first folks to scream for media attention to this story; the nascent right-wing meme is now that Michelle Obama trivialized the story by hashtagging it. So Ann Coulter responded thusly on Twitter yesterday:


One could read a bunch of racial shit into a tweet like that, but why bother? It's just stupid "Oh my team isn't winning so fuck this fake version of America" sunshine patriotism. It's poor form and poor discourse.
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Nails on May 14, 2014, 01:14:15 PM
(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3sp0zR_wwvE/0.jpg)
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Roger Bacon on May 14, 2014, 03:13:21 PM
Ann Coulter's bullshit conservative troll game is slipping. In her zeal to land a jab against... Twitter? Michelle Obama? Nigerian schoolgirls?... she opened a door for her detractors, and they jumped through it with a two-leg flying kick of Photoshop fury.

The way Coulter's game is supposed to work is 1) she says something bigoted or just plain dumb and trollish, 2) outraged critics say something she can twist as sexist, 3) she positions herself as the victim, 4) she wins. But if she looks like a fucking tone-deaf joke of a demagogue instead of a victim, it doesn't really work.

That's where Twitter comes in. Here's the backstory: Michelle Obama, among others, made the hashtag #bringbackourgirls trend, a viral if superficial way to draw mainstream attention to the plight of the 234 Nigerian teen girls kidnapped by an Islamist militant group called Boko Haram. Never mind that anti-Islam conservatives were the first folks to scream for media attention to this story; the nascent right-wing meme is now that Michelle Obama trivialized the story by hashtagging it. So Ann Coulter responded thusly on Twitter yesterday:


One could read a bunch of racial shit into a tweet like that, but why bother? It's just stupid "Oh my team isn't winning so fuck this fake version of America" sunshine patriotism. It's poor form and poor discourse.

you're not equipped for this, sasquatch. business is not something you're versed in, just tap out.

I've owned businesses, managed businesses, and invested in businesses. Clippers ain't a public company, I assume sterling owns a controlling share, if not 100%. you can't force a man to sell his business. if he were CEO, the board of directors could vote on terminating him, but he's not elected (hired). it's like forcing Sergey and the other guy to sell Google.com..... you can't do it. Sure, you can fire Eric Schmidt (although I believe he's stepped down already... beside the point), but you can't force Sergey and other guy (the owners) to sell.... the same way you can't force zuckerberg to sell his interest in Facebook..... the same way Annaly Capital can't force me to sell my shares because of something other shareholders see me posting on Getbig. that's not how it works kid.
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Icelord on May 14, 2014, 03:14:46 PM
you're not equipped for this, sasquatch. business is not something you're versed in, just tap out.

I've owned businesses, managed businesses, and invested in businesses. Clippers ain't a public company, I assume sterling owns a controlling share, if not 100%. you can't force a man to sell his business. if he were CEO, the board of directors could vote on terminating him, but he's not elected (hired). it's like forcing Sergey and the other guy to sell Google.com..... you can't do it. Sure, you can fire Eric Schmidt (although I believe he's stepped down already... beside the point), but you can't force Sergey and other guy (the owners) to sell.... the same way you can't force zuckerberg to sell his interest in Facebook..... the same way Annaly Capital can't force me to sell my shares because of something other shareholders see me posting on Getbig. that's not how it works kid.

Why did Marvel ever sell Spider-Man to Sony in the first place though?

Was it an Economical Offer of Peace that they just couldn't refuse?
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Nails on May 14, 2014, 03:24:59 PM


#Bring Back My Upper Lip




(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BnZlv7eCEAATQ1c.jpg:large)   
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Papper on May 14, 2014, 04:07:03 PM
Am I just used to watching young and cute spunk girls all day or is she very tired and unattractive looking ???
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: Lustral on May 14, 2014, 04:24:28 PM
Try reading this thread blind drunk, seeing first 5 -8 replies and not wondering wtf is happening. Think you all copy pastaed you girls.
Title: Re: Ouch!! 2. well more like lol.
Post by: wes on May 14, 2014, 04:27:45 PM
Swine Semen Of Peace