Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Roger Bacon on June 08, 2014, 05:30:25 PM

Title: Twin Peaks
Post by: Roger Bacon on June 08, 2014, 05:30:25 PM
Anyone seen this? Mini Series from 1990

It's on Netflix  :o


Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: SF1900 on June 08, 2014, 05:52:57 PM
Anything by David Lynch is odd. Overall, good director. Ever seen, "Blue Velvet?"
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Roger Bacon on June 08, 2014, 06:22:26 PM
Anything by David Lynch is odd. Overall, good director. Ever seen, "Blue Velvet?"

No, I haven't seen Lost Highway either. He's my new favorite.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Irongrip400 on June 08, 2014, 08:12:55 PM
It was more than a miniseries, if I recall correctly. I thought it ran a few seasons.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: SF1900 on June 08, 2014, 08:16:03 PM
No, I haven't seen Lost Highway either. He's my new favorite.

Watch Mulholland Drive and The Elephant Man.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Van_Bilderass on June 08, 2014, 08:24:11 PM
(http://media.giphy.com/media/nkPBQMDcJF5pm/giphy.gif)
(http://media.giphy.com/media/GecTCwrXzHiiA/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Tee_rex65 on June 08, 2014, 09:33:05 PM
Anyone seen this? Mini Series from 1990

It's on Netflix  :o




Twin Peaks was the inspiration for many games such as Alan Wake on the Xbox 360 and Deadly Premonition on the PS3. Be sure to checkout Eraserhead and if you really want to bake your noodle, Inland Empire. I'm a huge Lynch fan and have seen all his movies, but even Inland Empire was a little much for me.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Dr Kincaid on June 09, 2014, 02:26:46 AM
Awesome.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: DroppingPlates on June 09, 2014, 03:27:02 AM
Watch Mulholland Drive and The Elephant Man.

Great pick, esp that cowboy was brilliant

Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: _bruce_ on June 09, 2014, 04:51:18 AM
Interesting dude and his movies are great - subconscious horror.
Eraserhead has dystopia written all over it.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Parker on June 09, 2014, 04:55:26 AM
Anything by David Lynch is odd. Overall, good director. Ever seen, "Blue Velvet?"
If you want to talk about odd, American Gothic was right up there.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: the trainer on June 09, 2014, 06:43:27 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=430697.0;attach=475670;image)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: PJim on June 09, 2014, 06:46:57 AM
Lynch is one of the greatest
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Mrdibbs on June 09, 2014, 07:15:14 AM
Watch Mulholland Drive and The Elephant Man.

Don't think i''ll ever be able to process seeing this movie.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: bigmikecox on June 09, 2014, 07:17:33 AM
Anyone seen this? Mini Series from 1990

It's on Netflix  :o




Old skool right there
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Thick Nick on June 09, 2014, 09:44:49 AM
Anyone seen this? Mini Series from 1990

It's on Netflix  :o




Your vagina called... It says it's less of a pussy then whoever watches this shit.  ;D
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: DroppingPlates on June 09, 2014, 10:02:13 AM
Your vagina called... It says it's less of a pussy then whoever watches this shit.  ;D

Even Chuck Norris movies are beyond your level of intelligence..
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Roger Bacon on June 15, 2014, 11:53:16 PM
Your vagina called... It says it's less of a pussy then whoever watches this shit.  ;D

True  ;D
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: MORTALCOIL on June 15, 2014, 11:58:14 PM
Masterpiece. First eleven episodes (if I recall correctly) were just incredible. Thanks to him, some realize you could have intelligent shows on TV. Don't think you would have had Six Feet Under, The Wire, OZ, etc...;if that show ad't changed the rules for what could be shown on TV. Lost Highway is one of my favorite movies of the 90s; Mulholland Drive is great but walks in the same footsteps. Eraserhead: pure genius as Elephant Man was. The Straight Story showed Lynch was not just about the oddity. A true genius, Tod Browning's heir and a great one.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: The Ugly on June 16, 2014, 12:03:40 AM
No, I haven't seen Lost Highway either. He's my new favorite.

I'd have to say that's his Opus, though MD is incredible, too.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: The Ugly on June 16, 2014, 12:05:38 AM
Masterpiece. First eleven episodes (if I recall correctly) were just incredible. Thanks to him, some realize you could have intelligent shows on TV. Don't think you would have had Six Feet Under, The Wire, OZ, etc...;if that show ad't changed the rules for what could be shown on TV. Lost Highway is one of my favorite movies of the 90s; Mulholland Drive is great but walks in the same footsteps. Eraserhead: pure genius as Elephant Man was. The Straight Story showed Lynch was not just about the oddity. A true genius, Tod Browning's heir and a great one.

You really need a primer to make sense of Eraserhead, though. Nothing literal in that film at all, totally symbolic.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Roger Bacon on June 16, 2014, 12:07:03 AM
Looks like Stanley Kubrick might get bumped out of first place...  :o
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: MORTALCOIL on June 16, 2014, 12:09:11 AM
You really need a primer to make sense of Eraserhead, though. Nothing literal in that film at all, totally symbolic.

So? Same could be told about a good number of Fellini's movies, Bunuel's, Bergman's, etc....Movies are not necessarily about narrative process (which I don't disregard; love Howard Hawks for example). Eraserhead is a very evocative movie. Pretty much what makes me categorize it as "Art" (no pompous).
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: The Ugly on June 16, 2014, 12:12:10 AM
So? Same could be told about a good number of Fellini's movies, Bunuel's, Bergman's, etc....Movies are not necessarily about narrative process (which I don't disregard; love Howard Hawks for example). Eraserhead is a very evocative movie. Pretty much what makes me categorize it as "Art" (no pompous).

So?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: MORTALCOIL on June 16, 2014, 12:14:42 AM
So?

So we agree I guess.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: The Ugly on June 16, 2014, 12:32:35 AM
I guess. Not sure why you seemed peeved at the primer thing is all.

Just saying a large percentage of viewers (me included) will have no idea what the hell they're watching without a little heads up.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: MORTALCOIL on June 16, 2014, 12:39:54 AM
Not peeved. Just my personal experience. You said it yourself, pretty hard to give the "plot" of such a movie. A lot of great movies are difficult by nature; you just have to watch them with an open mind and enjoy it or not.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: The Ugly on June 16, 2014, 12:53:13 AM
Not peeved. Just my personal experience. You said it yourself, pretty hard to give the "plot" of such a movie. A lot of great movies are difficult by nature; you just have to watch them with an open mind and enjoy it or not.

Ok, fair enough. Unfortunately, I'm way too unsophisticated to enjoy something so puzzling, unless I have some means to decode it. Absolutely hated Eraserhead when I first saw it. Total jibberish, it seemed, until someone clued me in. Only then could I appreciate it as art.

Again, I'm probably just not the intended audience, though it was fun once I knew.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: MORTALCOIL on June 16, 2014, 01:03:03 AM
Ok, fair enough. Unfortunately, I'm way too unsophisticated to enjoy something so puzzling, unless I have some means to decode it. Absolutely hated Eraserhead when I first saw it. Total jibberish, it seemed, until someone clued me in. Only then could I appreciate it as art.

Again, I'm probably just not the intended audience, though it was fun once I knew.

My guess (it's worth what it's worth, so not much probably) is that you didn't only enjoy it the second time because someone gave you a hint but also because of the first experience. Both had an equal importance on how your second viewing went. There's a popular view about how art should be about spontaneity and emotional reactions to a piece of work. I don't think it works this way. You teach yourself about those things if that makes any sense. Some things you will grow into.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: The Ugly on June 16, 2014, 01:10:26 AM
My guess (it's worth what it's worth, so not much probably) is that you didn't only enjoy it the second time because someone gave you a hint but also because of the first experience. Both had an equal importance on how your second viewing went. There's a popular view about how art should be about spontaneity and emotional reactions to a piece of work. I don't think it works this way. You teach yourself about those things if that makes any sense. Some things you will grow into.

Have you seen Inland Empire by Lynch?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: MORTALCOIL on June 16, 2014, 01:20:23 AM
Have you seen Inland Empire by Lynch?

Not yet. What I heard about it was not really engaging. I'll surely see it one day.

Another example: Gus Van Sant's (which I'm not a fan of) movie "Last Days". Went to see it. Hated it, thought it was complete BS. Slow paced, zero narrative, nothing aesthetically pleasing, etc.....Bit the weird thing is that for the next weeks, I couldn't stop thinking about the movie and it's vibe. I went and saw it a month after. Still a very unpleasant experience and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone. Still, there's something in that movie, something morbid for sure but which doesn't lack depth.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: The Ugly on June 16, 2014, 01:38:50 AM
Not yet. What I heard about it was not really engaging. I'll surely see it one day.

Another example: Gus Van Sant's (which I'm not a fan of) movie "Last Days". Went to see it. Hated it, thought it was complete BS. Slow paced, zero narrative, nothing aesthetically pleasing, etc.....Bit the weird thing is that for the next weeks, I couldn't stop thinking about the movie and it's vibe. I went and saw it a month after. Still a very unpleasant experience and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone. Still, there's something in that movie, something morbid for sure but which doesn't lack depth.

About Cobain? Haven't seen it.

I'll tell you another I just couldn't wrap my brain around. Dead Man by Jim Jarmusch, Depp starring. WTF was happening there?

Actually most of Lynch's films are like that (Elephant Man and The Straight Story being exceptions), filled with metaphor and the bizarre. But I still enjoy them, especially after I figure out what he's suggesting. Inland Empire was just too much, though. A thematic continuation of Mullholland Drive, perhaps, but SO slow, and SO long, I couldn't even finish it.

Funny, too, because in interviews, Lynch himself doesn't come off as an overly eclectic dude.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Roger Bacon on June 16, 2014, 04:00:00 AM
On the first episode of Twin Peaks when Pete Martell called Sheriff Truman after finding Laura's body, why did he simply say "She's here" like they knew she was dead or something and expected it?

???
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: MORTALCOIL on June 16, 2014, 04:04:11 AM
On the first episode of Twin Peaks when Pete Martell called Sheriff Truman after finding Laura's body, why did he simply say "She's here" like they knew she was dead or something and expected it?

???

There's a prequel to "Twin Peaks".
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Roger Bacon on June 16, 2014, 04:05:08 AM
There's a prequel to "Twin Peaks".

Thanks, I need to check it out... Is this question answered?  ???
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Gregzs on October 06, 2014, 05:44:37 PM
http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/entertainment-eonline/20141006/b585758/?cid=hero_media

Twin Peaks Coming Back to Life on Showtime

Twin Peaks is coming back! The hit drama is returning to life 25 years later thanks to Showtime. David Lynch, one of the creators of the acclaimed drama, took to Twitter to share the news. Last week Lynch and co-creator Mark Frost ignited speculation with simultaneous tweets hinting at something more.

"The mysterious and special world of Twin Peaks is pulling us back. We're very excited. May the forest be with you," Lynch and Frost said in a statement.

Check out the teaser.

"What more can I say— Twin Peaks with David Lynch and Mark Frost on Showtime in 2016!" Showtime's David Nevins said in a statement. "To quote Agent Cooper, 'I have no idea where this will lead us, but I have a definite feeling it will be a place both wonderful and strange.'"

The series ran for two seasons on ABC and starred Kyle MacLachlan. The first season focused on the murder of Laura Palmer ( Sheryl Lee). The large cast also included Michael Ontkean, Madchen Amick, Sherilyn Fenn, Peggy Lipton, Ray Wise and more. There's been no casting revealed for the revival.

E! News has confirmed the new season will be nine episodes and will be a continuation of the story started with the original series and not a remake or reboot of the classic series that ran from 1990-1991. A film, Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me, followed in 1992. Lynch and Frost will write all nine episodes with Lynch directing the entire limited series.

Twin Peaks is just the latest show to receive a comeback following cancellation. In November, HBO's The Comeback will return nearly 10 years after it was canceled. NBC is prepping a new series, Heroes Reborn, based on their hit superhero series Heroes. Meanwhile, Veronica Mars recently returned to life on the big screen seven years after it was canceled and 10 years after it originally premiered.

In the final episode of Twin Peaks, Laura Palmer says , "I will see you again in 25 years." Looks like she's making good on that promise.

Showtime will re-air the series prior to the 2016 debut of the new episodes.

So, 2016 on Showtime. Start counting down!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: orion on October 06, 2014, 06:03:50 PM
What I remember about Twin Peaks was the eerie atmosphere, that there was always something lurking around the corner.  I honestly can't recall how it ended, only that it was unsatisfactory.

Lost Highway was the ultimate mind fuck ever put on film.  A chance to see Robert Blake before he became an assassin
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: The Ugly on October 07, 2014, 12:02:16 AM
What I remember about Twin Peaks was the eerie atmosphere, that there was always something lurking around the corner.  I honestly can't recall how it ended, only that it was unsatisfactory.

Lost Highway was the ultimate mind fuck ever put on film.  A chance to see Robert Blake before he became an assassin

Fantastic film. Blake's scene especially.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks
Post by: Gregzs on January 17, 2015, 02:19:10 PM
Kyle MacLachlan Officially Back For Twin Peaks

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=43130

There was much genuine excitement when David Lynch, co-creator Mark Frost and US cable network Showtime put rumours to rest by confirming that mystery series Twin Peaks would be back on our screens in 2016. One element that was still not set in stone was the return of the show’s anchor, leading man Kyle MacLachlan, as FBI Agent Dale Cooper. Now we know for sure that he’s back.

With Showtime boss David Nevins attending the Television Critics Association’s winter press tour, he was briefly joined on stage by MacLachlan, who emerged from backstage wearing a natty suit and bearing a mug, which contained Cooper’s now-trademark beverage request of “damn fine coffee. And hot.” Lynch also tweeted an image of MacLachlan in his suit.

"I'm very excited to return to the strange and wonderful world of Twin Peaks," MacLachlan told the TV critics. "We look forward to seeing all of you there. May the forest be with you.” Nevins admitted that he had to convince Lynch and Frost to bring the town back to Showtime and that he’d largely be leaving them alone to make the show they want, with Lynch on directing duty for all nine episodes of a planned miniseries that should help to wrap up more of the plot. At least, as far as anything gets wrapped up in the world of Twin Peaks. Now all we have to do is be patient and wait until next year...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B7LvMXYCcAEaiCO.jpg:large)