Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: 240 is Back on June 21, 2014, 01:51:52 PM

Title: Ted Cruz: "We should be open to adopting some level of amnesty for illegal imm
Post by: 240 is Back on June 21, 2014, 01:51:52 PM
Haha, just kidding.  The man has a solid set of beliefs and doesn't just shift positions.  he'd never say such a thing.

Ted Cruz 2016, for being one of the lone remaining GOP voices that stands WITH the voters.  Ask Eric Cantor what people in his district think about letting illegals stay - he lost the primary based on this issue alone. 
Title: Re: Ted Cruz: "We should be open to adopting some level of amnesty for illegal imm
Post by: SCRUBS on June 21, 2014, 05:57:17 PM
Teddy knows the value of keeping them illegal.
Title: Re: Ted Cruz: "We should be open to adopting some level of amnesty for illegal imm
Post by: T-REX007 on June 21, 2014, 08:05:34 PM
Illegal USED to mean something in the past, what happened - ?
Title: Re: Ted Cruz: "We should be open to adopting some level of amnesty for illegal imm
Post by: RagingBull on June 21, 2014, 08:33:43 PM
240...Hillary or Cruz for you in '16?

Haha, just kidding.  The man has a solid set of beliefs and doesn't just shift positions.  he'd never say such a thing.

Ted Cruz 2016, for being one of the lone remaining GOP voices that stands WITH the voters.  Ask Eric Cantor what people in his district think about letting illegals stay - he lost the primary based on this issue alone. 

Title: Re: Ted Cruz: "We should be open to adopting some level of amnesty for illegal imm
Post by: 240 is Back on June 21, 2014, 11:30:13 PM
240...Hillary or Cruz for you in '16?


Cruz all the way.   I think he needs to do some cardio and get a cooler haircut.  But IMO, amnesty is going to be the biggest, or at least one of the biggest, issues of 2016. 

Sure, things change, and we don't know what can happen in the world... spring 2008, iraq is the issue, by fall, it was the economy.  But seeing Cantor get voted out by such a big margin, having way more $$, over the SINGLE issue of amnesty...

I just don't think the repubs that "fell in line" and reversed course about such a HUGE issue that really matters to people, realized it could cost them elections.  So I think they'll REVERSE course again.  They'll call is "clarifying" or "softening stance", but we will all know what it means.