Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: the trainer on July 05, 2014, 02:20:18 PM
-
So you now you have enough vitamin d in your body from the sun and you are ready for the next step to increase your test levels, go to a butcher shop that sells meat from grass fed cows and ask them for the bull testicles take it and slice it real thin with onions and red peppers and eat it raw, this is loaded with hormones and after a week you should feel like a beast in the gym and in the bedroom.
An average size bull balls has 135 calories 26 grams of protein and only 1 grams of carbs so you are also getting protein while increasing your test levels.
-
So you now you have enough vitamin d in your body from the sun and you are ready for the next step to increase your test levels, go to a butcher shop that sells meat from grass fed cows and ask them for the bull testicles take it and slice it real thin with onions and red peppers and eat it raw, this is loaded with hormones and after a week you should feel like a beast in the gym and in the bedroom.
An average size bull balls has 135 calories 26 grams of protein and only 1 grams of carbs so you are also getting protein while increasing your test levels.
all cows eat grass.
-
All beef in Ireland is grass fed, lol @ the hormone bloated corn fed shit you get in the USA.
-
Most getbiggers want to know, will sucking on the balls of a juiced bodybuilder give them the same nutritional benefits?
-
Most getbiggers want to know, will sucking on the balls of a juiced bodybuilder give them the same nutritional benefits?
My gf can taste the gear in my cum. Skip the balls and go straight for the cock
-
Most getbiggers want to know, will sucking on the balls of a juiced bodybuilder give them the same nutritional benefits?
Not unless you swallow their jizz.
-
All beef in Ireland is grass fed, lol @ the hormone bloated corn fed shit you get in the USA.
I have no idea why they do that.
A field of grass costs fuck all compared to buying bags of feed.
-
I have no idea why they do that.
A field of grass costs fuck all compared to buying bags of feed.
Half the people there want to eat like the cows, straight from a trough. Makes sense.
-
Corn is cheaper in the US because of government subsidies
-
Corn is cheaper in the US because of government subsidies
Cheaper than a field?
-
My gf can taste the gear in my cum. Skip the balls and go straight for the cock
I'm willing to do whatever it takes to achieve muscle supremacy. But it all stops with another man's cock and balls.
-
I'm willing to do whatever it takes to achieve muscle supremacy. But it all stops with another man's cock and balls.
Would you consider your own? Kinda like recycling
-
Cheaper than a field?
Yes, because of economies of scale.
-
Would you consider your own? Kinda like recycling
I'm listening
-
Yes, because of economies of scale.
Most farmers already have fields, they dont need to buy them.
-
Most farmers already have fields, they dont need to buy them.
Farmers that grow food have fields. Cattle farmers typically do not. It is much cheaper and easier to raise cattle in a confined area and feed them corn than it is to buy and maintain huge tracts of grasslands. Grass-fed beef is available to the consumer at a higher cost than corn-fed beef because of the extra expense in producing it.
Before World War II, most Americans had never eaten corn-fed beef. Raised on pasture, cattle reared before the 1950s usually took two or three years to be ready for the slaughterhouse. Steers were fed grain only occasionally and in small quantities, and farmers tended to use corn as a supplement—not a staple—of their livestock’s diets.
A close-up of two cows confined with several other cows, each with a red numbered tag hanging from one ear
But as American corn production skyrocketed in the post-War era, and as the economic boom of the 1950s prompted higher consumer demand for meat, farmers and ranchers turned to a new practice: fattening their cattle on corn. Cheaper and more efficient than grass, corn enabled cattle to be brought to market in as few as 15 months. Moreover, it allowed farmers to feed cattle in confined pens or lots, reducing ranchers’ land costs and limiting their risk of losing livestock to predators and bad weather. With cheaper feed in the equation, beef prices fell, and Americans began to purchase more and more beef, most of it corn-fed. By 1960, Americans ate a yearly average of more than 66 pounds of beef each. By 1975, that number had grown to 88.5 pounds of beef per person, per year.
In 2008, corn-fed cattle are the norm. While most cattle still begin their lives grazing on grass, the vast majority—an estimated three-quarters of them, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture—are “finished,” or fattened for market, in feedlots. There, they spend three to six months eating a diet composed of 70 to 90 percent corn.
http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/kingcorn/cows.html (http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/kingcorn/cows.html)
-
are you man enough to post a pic?
-
Farmers that grow food have fields. Cattle farmers typically do not. It is much cheaper and easier to raise cattle in a confined area and feed them corn than it is to buy and maintain huge tracts of grasslands. Grass-fed beef is available to the consumer at a higher cost than corn-fed beef because of the extra expense in producing it.
Lol, you guys have got it all about face.
All farmers in the UK graze their cattle.
-
are you man enough to post a pic?
(http://thearmchairblogger.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/bodybuilder.jpg)
-
Lol, you guys have got it all about face.
All farmers in the UK graze their cattle.
The UK is a MUCH smaller country and a much smaller beef market. In addition, the UK government does not subsidize corn so there is no economic advantage for farmers to choose corn over grass.
-
The UK is a MUCH smaller country and a much smaller cattle market. In addition, the UK government does not subsidize corn so there is no economic advantage for farmers to use corn.
Hence you have more field space?
Way to fuck up your own point.
-
Hence you have more field space?
Way to fuck up your own point.
You do not seem very intelligent so this will be my last post on this. If you want more information it is freely available online. Grass-feeding in the US is more expensive and less efficient than corn-feeding. If you wish to compare the US beef market to the UK beef market you must factor in the economic effects of subsidies, land prices, and market size.
-
Most getbiggers want to know, will sucking on the balls of a juiced bodybuilder give them the same nutritional benefits?
arnold said he would drink horse piss straight from the source if it would give him greater muscle gains.
-
You do not seem very intelligent so this will be my last post on this. If you want more information it is freely available online. Grass-feeding in the US is more expensive and less efficient than corn-feeding. If you wish to compare the US beef market to the UK beef market you must factor in the economic effects of subsidies, land prices, and market size.
I take it they grow corn in the fields to feed to the cattle in the barns?
Wheres agenda21NWO when hes needed, you guys are having the piss taken out of you.
-
Cheaper than a field?
Yup, here we feed our cows corn and trenbolone.
The tren makes them able to eat a high carb diet and still stay lean, which is why it works great for cutting cycles. I learned this from a fat bald guy with a youtube channel.