Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Scimowser on January 27, 2006, 11:01:01 AM

Title: Whos claim is more accurate?
Post by: Scimowser on January 27, 2006, 11:01:01 AM
Hulk Hogan saying his arms were 24" or Scott Steiners claim his were 26". Scotts at their biggest were fucking enormous, but Hogans never really looked that big. He had fat arms

Steiner also claims to bench 675! lol
Title: Re: Whos claim is more accurate?
Post by: tommywishbone on January 27, 2006, 11:21:25 AM
In order of probability:

#1 Hogan had 24's.............. He weighed 315-320
#2 Steiner BPed 675............ He could have worn a new style BP shirt
#3 Steiner had 26's.............. I can't even come up with a possible excuse for this claim.

All the claims are silly, but I listed them in order of least silly -to- most silly.
Title: Re: Whos claim is more accurate?
Post by: Man of Steel on January 27, 2006, 11:27:25 AM
I've seen a pic of Ronnie and Steiner at an expo around 2001.....both were in fantastic shape and hit a double bi shot for the camera.....Steiner is taller than Coleman, but Coleman's arm still looked bigger....not much, but bigger......26" is pure ca-ca.



MOS
Title: Re: Whos claim is more accurate?
Post by: jaejonna on January 27, 2006, 11:40:23 AM
Thinking back, Stiener's arm looked like they had Synthol
Title: Re: Whos claim is more accurate?
Post by: The Showstoppa on January 27, 2006, 11:43:42 AM
Hulk Hogan is a terd.
Title: Re: Whos claim is more accurate?
Post by: Hulkster on January 27, 2006, 08:02:19 PM
shut up. Hulk Hogan is God! ;)
Title: Re: Whos claim is more accurate?
Post by: ChristopherA on January 27, 2006, 08:19:06 PM
Whatcha gonna do,when the 24" pythons run wild on you,BROTHER!
Title: Re: Whos claim is more accurate?
Post by: Disgusted on January 27, 2006, 08:38:58 PM
Who cares.
Title: Re: Whos claim is more accurate?
Post by: haider on January 27, 2006, 09:33:28 PM
(http://www.members.shaw.ca/mswerdlyk/bpp.jpg)

MONSTER FOREARMS  lmao! ;D
Title: Re: Whos claim is more accurate?
Post by: haider on January 27, 2006, 09:41:18 PM
yea, but he never used it, just like valentino  ;)
Title: Re: Whos claim is more accurate?
Post by: Earl1972 on January 27, 2006, 09:42:13 PM
hogan's arms weren't fat they had vascularity

E
Title: Re: Whos claim is more accurate?
Post by: SiteJaws on January 27, 2006, 10:03:40 PM
Quote from: haider on January 27, 2006, 09:33:28 PM
(http://www.members.shaw.ca/mswerdlyk/bpp.jpg)

MONSTER FOREARMS  lmao! ;D

(http://www.obsessedwithwrestling.com/pictures/s/scottsteiner/15.jpg)
Title: Re: Whos claim is more accurate?
Post by: Karl Kox on January 27, 2006, 10:28:56 PM
Quote from: haider on January 27, 2006, 09:33:28 PM
(http://www.members.shaw.ca/mswerdlyk/bpp.jpg)

MONSTER FOREARMS  lmao! ;D
looks like oil to me

Hogan was ok he dose not lookk that good to a lot of us because we are used to seeing Pro BB's