Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: Marty Champions on August 27, 2014, 06:15:45 AM
-
oh boy what a crock of shit, how can you have a negative charge?
the word "charge" implies an energy or force. you cant have a negative charge , you can have energy going in different directions, vacuums , repulsion but not 'negative 'charge'
its an ambiguous term
-
oh boy what a crock of shit, how can you have a negative charge?
the word "charge" implies an energy or force. you cant have a negative charge , you can have energy going in different directions, vacuums , repulsion but not 'negative 'charge'
its an ambiguous term
Your just not smart enough to understand.
-
what does modern science says about negatives in weightlifting
-
Stick to discussing heme iron ::)
Leave the scientific taxonomy to the professionals.
-
oh boy what a crock of shit, how can you have a negative charge?
the word "charge" implies an energy or force. you cant have a negative charge , you can have energy going in different directions, vacuums , repulsion but not 'negative 'charge'
its an ambiguous term
Ok there "nick tesla", the terms positive ( + ) and negative (- )denote, the flow of electrons on a conducting material.
-
Ok there "nick tesla", the terms positive ( + ) and negative (- )denote, the flow of electrons on a conducting material.
Exactly!! What a total dumbass!! Questions like this just show that you can't ride a "copy and paste" degree very far!
-
Ok there "nick tesla", the terms positive ( + ) and negative (- )denote, the flow of electrons on a conducting material.
youre actially wrong "modern science" says
Electrons are ALWAYS negatively charged.
Protons are ALWAYS positively charged.
look what i said above , i was talking about direction of flow
there is still no existing "negative charge" just flow in different directions
it shouldnt be called a negative charge if the electrons are flowing directionally
the terminology is screwed up and misleading
-
Exactly!! What a total dumbass!! Questions like this just show that you can't ride a "copy and paste" degree very far!
wow so wait are you disagreeing with modern science too?
modern science says
Electrons are ALWAYS negatively charged.
Protons are ALWAYS positively charged.
-
there is no such thing as a positive electron in "modern science" textbooks
again i seem to be the enemy when i bring the truth and point to the fallacies
-
Yes it's screwed up and misleading, but only for simpletons who aren't physicists. Those who have a background in physics have no problems or qualms dealing with "negative" charges.
It's an unfortunate result of the last turn of century, when they decided the electrons to "carry" the negative charge. Our current society is so strongly integrated with this result of negative charges that we cannot change this in any pleasant manner.
I suggest you actually take up a few courses in plasma physics and electro dynamics. Once you've mastered the four fundamental equations of electrodynamics, Maxwell's equations, then at long last you will grasp this concept.
-
there is no such thing as a positive electron in "modern science" textbooks
again i seem to be the enemy when i bring the truth and point to the fallacies
They are called positrons and they do exist. >:(
-
They are called positrons and they do exist. >:(
a positron is not an electron. you cant call two same things two different things , this is just a silly argument of semantics
its like saying an electron 'is' a proton because its in an atom but 'different'
-
a positron is not an electron. you cant call two same things two different things , this is just a silly argument of semantics
its like saying an electron 'is' a proton because its in an atom but 'different'
Call it whatever you want, it fulfils every characteristic of the particle called electron except its opposite charge.
As a matter of fact, the positron is an electron, it's just that it is the antimatter equivalent.
Dirac wrote a follow-up paper in December 1929[3] that attempted to explain the unavoidable negative-energy solution for the relativistic electron. He argued that "... an electron with negative energy moves in an external [electromagnetic] field as though it carries a positive charge." He further asserted that all of space could be regarded as a "sea" of negative energy states that were filled, so as to prevent electrons jumping between positive energy states (negative electric charge) and negative energy states (positive charge).
-
Yes it's screwed up and misleading, but only for simpletons who aren't physicists. Those who have a background in physics have no problems or qualms dealing with "negative" charges.
It's an unfortunate result of the last turn of century, when they decided the electrons to "carry" the negative charge. Our current society is so strongly integrated with this result of negative charges that we cannot change this in any pleasant manner.
I suggest you actually take up a few courses in plasma physics and electro dynamics. Once you've mastered the four fundamental equations of electrodynamics, Maxwell's equations, then at long last you will grasp this concept.
Bingo ;)
But let's keep our posts positive ::)
-
Call it whatever you want, it fulfils every characteristic of the particle called electron except its opposite charge.
As a matter of fact, the positron is an electron, it's just that it is the antimatter equivalent.
antimatter/dark matter= ambiguous terminology
lets explain antimatter in a way thats less ambiguous
any "expert" will tell you they cant explain dark matter/antimatter, im sure it is explainable though, but they are never certain with authority when giving a synopsis of antimatter/dark matter
you see if they give names to things like "positrons" with ambiguous undefined words like antimatter and dark matter it makes it all useless...useless untill we give clear explanations of things to wich every critical thinker can comprehend it
-
I prefer Dark Energon
(http://www.toymania.com/sites/default/files/images/TRANSFORMERS_Dark%20Energon_Megatron.preview.jpg)
-
again people claiming to know more than the falcon yet mysteriously vanish from discussion when put in there place ???
-
Marty is an uneducated drunk that has a degree from CPU - "Copy / Paste University"
When confronted by those with actual degrees he looks like a total buffoon..
-
Marty is an uneducated drunk that has a degree from CPU - "Copy / Paste University"
When confronted by those with actual degrees he looks like a total buffoon..
well where am i wrong?
-
oh boy what a crock of shit, how can you have a negative charge?
the word "charge" implies an energy or force. you cant have a negative charge , you can have energy going in different directions, vacuums , repulsion but not 'negative 'charge'
its an ambiguous term
How can you have a negative charge? In the same way you can have an ignoramus like you.
Hope that helps.
-
Johnny Falcon, drop the electricity studies. Start to study Chaos theory.
-
Johnny Falcon, drop the electricity studies. Start to study Chaos theory.
Who wants to study tire flipping and deadlifts?
-
Who wants to study tire flipping and deadlifts?
How can we incorporate electricity and chaos theory into the study of tire flipping and deadlifts.
-
How can we incorporate electricity and chaos theory into the study of tire flipping and deadlifts.
Hook a car battery up to chaos' nuts and have him flip a tire.