Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: Uncle Joon on September 11, 2014, 03:50:34 PM

Title: ....
Post by: Uncle Joon on September 11, 2014, 03:50:34 PM
...
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on September 11, 2014, 03:52:33 PM
Ron , just like RX muscle, MD etc.. can claim to have 10,000 plus members when in reality it's about 20 guys with a few hundred gimmicks each
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: The True Adonis on September 11, 2014, 03:54:53 PM
Excellent point.

So actually in effect by having gimmicks we are helping up traffic anyway.

So what exactly is the issue with it?
Drowns out any interesting or meaningful discussion for the most part unless the gimmick is creative and witty.  Sadly, most are not.  :-\
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: el numero uno on September 11, 2014, 04:25:01 PM
And how is that any different from the current situation we have now?

I mean if peoples real identities were know say like on Facebook etc that would make sense not to have gimmicks

But since 90% of peoples real identities aren't known on here, aren't we all in effect just one giant gimmick anyway?

As for meaningful discussion that is not necessarily true, I have had fucking epic 20 page + threads here talking to myself 
 


 ;D
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: booty on September 11, 2014, 04:34:36 PM
What about a member using someone's real name and pic? That's a gimmick... So the no gimmick rule doesn't apply here.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: booty on September 11, 2014, 04:42:50 PM
Yeah that's just wrong and identity theft.

Not talking about pretending to be some real life person you are not like Wesgaspatto did and bringing other persons real name into disrepute that's just wrong and should be an insta ban.

But say like you have your booty account and now you want to do a gimmick account called fruity for example.

Don't see a problem there.
xx
They don't want to stop gimmicks or they would ban members who steal others identities.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: booty on September 11, 2014, 04:50:09 PM

Like I actually got accused of being that D Comerford gimmick cos she was a woman.

As if I would fucking write so retarded  ::)


chadwick the beta is a moron.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: NightTrain on September 11, 2014, 04:55:03 PM
I will like set 50 gimmicks on his ass if he shows up and bothers you again.
Someone's got to take a stand with that shit.
I am white knighting you now cos your coming to my party...hahaha.
xx


 ::)
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: booty on September 11, 2014, 04:56:08 PM

 ::)
Hi Chad
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: Frank Clairmonte on September 11, 2014, 04:59:09 PM
I never had any, so I cant tell.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: _bruce_ on September 11, 2014, 05:06:00 PM
Junior itself is a gimmick - probably an disembodied spirit who bought an old pig for 9.99 from the a voodoo butcher and entered it via option D(rectal passage).
Watch out Frankenstein.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: TheShape. on September 11, 2014, 05:10:21 PM
Who actually has time for any of this gimmick nonsense?
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: Grape Ape on September 11, 2014, 05:11:48 PM
I got 700 hundred bro....actually I lie....I have 694 now....haha.
I like you so much Frank that if I was down to my last gimmick i'd give it to you.
Just like I would give booty my last Rolo  :D

How did you acquire them?  Tell us.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: OneMoreRep on September 11, 2014, 05:23:09 PM
Drowns out any interesting or meaningful discussion for the most part unless the gimmick is creative and witty.  Sadly, most are not.  :-\

This. We don't want "fluff" clogging up the forum and we also don't want one person simply talking to himself. That shit looks crazy when you realize what they are up to.

Other reasons as to why we don't condone gimmick use are:

When some people employ the use of a gimmick account, it's because they want a deeper layer of anonymity that would allow them to say the things that they wouldn't like their main account to be associated with. For instance, you're on the fence with regards to how you feel about a certain member, but have never had any direct confrontation with said member, in turn, you ramp up the old gimmick account and attack him/her a bit to see where their breaking point is. Conversely, you use the gimmick to befriend said individual, but keep the allegiance limited to that of gimmick use.

You can also create gimmicks to imitate real people (Wes Gasporotto comes to mind) and that is not allowed, for as it can bring about problems for the real individual.

You can also create gimmicks to bring about havoc to the site. You use the gimmick to flood the forum or destroy threads, knowing very well that only that gimmick account will be banned/deleted, while you can always go home to your main account.

These are all things we are trying to avoid. There have been some members that are highly talented when it comes to working with their own gimmick accounts, but the vast majority of members don't have that level of tact when it comes to that kind of thing (most personalities and/or writing styles/grammatical mistakes tend to seep right through sooner or later).

Happy posting!

"1"
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: Grape Ape on September 11, 2014, 05:35:13 PM
Lot's of dedication hard work and graft.

 

Please explain the hard work.  The forum would like to know.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: booty on September 11, 2014, 05:41:16 PM
This. We don't want "fluff" clogging up the forum and we also don't want one person simply talking to himself. That shit looks crazy when you realize what they are up to.

Other reasons as to why we don't condone gimmick use are:

When some people employ the use of a gimmick account, it's because they want a deeper layer of anonymity that would allow them to say the things that they wouldn't like their main account to be associated with. For instance, you're on the fence with regards to how you feel about a certain member, but have never had any direct confrontation with said member, in turn, you ramp up the old gimmick account and attack him/her a bit to see where their breaking point is. Conversely, you use the gimmick to befriend said individual, but keep the allegiance limited to that of gimmick use.

You can also create gimmicks to imitate real people (Wes Gasporotto comes to mind) and that is not allowed, for as it can bring about problems for the real individual.

You can also create gimmicks to bring about havoc to the site. You use the gimmick to flood the forum or destroy threads, knowing very well that only that gimmick account will be banned/deleted, while you can always go home to your main account.

These are all things we are trying to avoid. There have been some members that are highly talented when it comes to working with their own gimmick accounts, but the vast majority of members don't have that level of tact when it comes to that kind of thing (most personalities and/or writing styles/grammatical mistakes tend to seep right through sooner or later).

Happy posting!

"1"
Its Chadwick the beta behind the D Comerford account and I googled her and she is the mayor of my town. So why have you allowed this account to continue? You stated above that members can't impersonate others ?
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: Grape Ape on September 11, 2014, 05:54:11 PM
Lots of tissue, lube, porn and cocaine.

Now that's hard work.

Hope that helps
Mwah
x0x0

Nah, that's not it.  How did you really do it?

I'm sure it's nothing our board founder would frown upon.

Just tell everyone.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: King Shizzo on September 11, 2014, 06:05:56 PM

Also I want to add you seem to have excellent knowledge of gimmick psychology clearly you are a man experienced and familiar with the subject.
Did you get better over time spotting gimmicks, who is for real or who is fake? Or did you just naturally have that intuitive 6th sense like I do?
Sometimes I honestly think its a gift I was blessed with from God.
Or maybe it was cos I played poker for over 18 years 12-16 hours a day with every degen imaginable and could spot a bullshiter or a nark a mile away.
Sometime I wonder if people are just genuinely that dumb or just don't know when they telegraph that shit.

How can i put it in mma terms? Hmmmmm....It's almost like a guy who tries load a massive overhand right and throws himself off balance telegraphing that shit and falls on his face on the floor comically while step aside stare and laugh thinking to yourself WTF?

noiamsayin? ;)
 


 
Takes one to know one. I honestly think you bring the quality of this board down with all of your gimmicks.

I have told you that since day one.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: TrueGrit on September 11, 2014, 06:11:21 PM
Its Chadwick the beta behind the D Comerford account and I googled her and she is the mayor of my town. So why have you allowed this account to continue? You stated above that members can't impersonate others ?


Isn't your town like 30 people, Karen? Brutal lack of awareness of local micro-personalities.

Also, and I mean this affectionately, can you please shut up about this D Cornholerford a little.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: che on September 11, 2014, 06:12:47 PM
Its Chadwick the beta behind the D Comerford account and I googled her and she is the mayor of my town. So why have you allowed this account to continue? You stated above that members can't impersonate others ?
Holy shit STFU already , no one gives a fuck , the Mayor doesn't give a fuck  ,the people in your town don't give a fuck , OMR doesn't  give a fuck , Getbig don't give a fuck , holy fuck you are annoying .
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: NightTrain on September 11, 2014, 11:29:16 PM
yawn.


I see booty got her way and got the name changed on that one member.

Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: Shakespeare on September 12, 2014, 12:28:34 AM
This. We don't want "fluff" clogging up the forum and we also don't want one person simply talking to himself. That shit looks crazy when you realize what they are up to.

Other reasons as to why we don't condone gimmick use are:

When some people employ the use of a gimmick account, it's because they want a deeper layer of anonymity that would allow them to say the things that they wouldn't like their main account to be associated with. For instance, you're on the fence with regards to how you feel about a certain member, but have never had any direct confrontation with said member, in turn, you ramp up the old gimmick account and attack him/her a bit to see where their breaking point is. Conversely, you use the gimmick to befriend said individual, but keep the allegiance limited to that of gimmick use.

You can also create gimmicks to imitate real people (Wes Gasporotto comes to mind) and that is not allowed, for as it can bring about problems for the real individual.

You can also create gimmicks to bring about havoc to the site. You use the gimmick to flood the forum or destroy threads, knowing very well that only that gimmick account will be banned/deleted, while you can always go home to your main account.

These are all things we are trying to avoid. There have been some members that are highly talented when it comes to working with their own gimmick accounts, but the vast majority of members don't have that level of tact when it comes to that kind of thing (most personalities and/or writing styles/grammatical mistakes tend to seep right through sooner or later).

Happy posting!

"1"

One must have the most exquisite view from way up there on his high horse.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: Grape Ape on September 12, 2014, 03:43:59 AM
With use of an old school telegraph  ;)

Was not a telegraph either.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: Grape Ape on September 12, 2014, 04:14:20 AM

What you think it was? A typewriter maybe? ;)

Well, I don't think it was a typewriter either.  And since I don't think you've been registering these gimmicks I have to think you did something else.

But, you claim to care about traffic and the forum.  If you were to do something shady, that might cause forumers here think if you could do that, you could get THEIR passwords too.   Then their PMs aren't safe.  If you could get passowrds, maybe you could also get IPs.  Then their personal info isn't safe.  That would cause them not to post here and limit traffic.

Since you care about these things, you wouldn't do something like that, right?

Under those assumptions, the options are getting limited.

So how did you do it.  Share with the forum you love so much.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: Shockwave on September 12, 2014, 08:36:10 AM
Its Chadwick the beta behind the D Comerford account and I googled her and she is the mayor of my town. So why have you allowed this account to continue? You stated above that members can't impersonate others ?
Jesus Christ shut up. Youre not going to whine your way into getting him banned, so quit trying already.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: Grape Ape on September 12, 2014, 09:07:35 AM
I will addressing this in epic video I will be posting over weekend when I have some time.
Your concerns will be addressed then and I don't want to miss a marketing opportunity
Hope this helps.
Mwah
x0x0

I will not be watching the video.  Please post cliffs notes underneath.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: Grape Ape on September 12, 2014, 09:34:16 AM
Do you want me to out your gimmick bro? ;D

Which one?

I actually prefer you just answer the question.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: Shockwave on September 12, 2014, 09:47:34 AM

His name got changed already to D-Ford though
So? She doesnt give a shit about the name, that was just her leverage to try and get him banned. Shes been whining about how he needs to be banned because of that name any chance she gets.

She doenst give a flying fuck about the mayor, hell she didnt even who it was until she googled it. It never works though, theyre not going to ban him just because he upset her, but dammit she tries.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: Shockwave on September 12, 2014, 10:00:52 AM
Hold up a minute my friend, lets be fair about this.

So if tomorrow I created an account called Phil Heath and put a picture of him up as my avatar and started incessantly harassing and stalking a female competitor on here accusing them of "ratting people out to the police" "being responsible for peoples deaths" "drug dealing"....you think that is acceptable?

OneMoreRep even gave the person in question the opportunity to supply evidence of the allegations, it was never provided.

So if you agree that is not acceptable why should it be acceptable for a mayor of her province me impersonated and used to stalk and harass booty exactly?

Would love to hear your explanation.



 
Omr told him to eother put up or shut up - he promptly shut up. That was the deal. Then after that she tried to leverage thenfact that he changed to a different account to get him banned, even though he stopped harrassing her pretty much altogether when told to.

And shes still whining about it trying to get him banned, even though hes completely ceased saying anything to her at all.

At this point she needs to get over it, OMR did what he needed to do and stopped the harrassment from happening. Its over, but she wont let it go because she felt she had some leverage to try and get back at someone that got under her skin.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: Grape Ape on September 12, 2014, 10:24:11 AM

The are "major issues" that need correcting here. I know what the problems are, but also know what the solutions are. I am always prepared to help and Ron knows this.

This site needs a major upgrade. That is all I am prepared to say.
[/color]

Yes, I'm aware of SMF expoits.

Now to answer your question.

You didn't, but really didn't expect you too either.
Title: Re: Why Exactly is Having Gimmicks Not Allowed or Against the Rules?
Post by: NightTrain on September 12, 2014, 02:27:18 PM
So? She doesnt give a shit about the name, that was just her leverage to try and get him banned. Shes been whining about how he needs to be banned because of that name any chance she gets.

She doenst give a flying fuck about the mayor, hell she didnt even who it was until she googled it. It never works though, theyre not going to ban him just because he upset her, but dammit she tries.

This. She is a fucking c unt. There is a reason why she has been banned or has left every bodybuilding board except this one. This board is the only one who puts up with her whining and crying around.